This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, David Wohlferd <dw at LimeGreenSocks dot com>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: rth at redhat dot com, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at foss dot arm dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Paul_Koning at Dell dot com, jakub at redhat dot com, rth at gcc dot gnu dot org, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org, Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>, bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 07:03:25 -0700
Subject: Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <56552209 dot 1020306 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <56592801 dot 9010606 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <565DC5F4 dot 6080804 at foss dot arm dot com> <565E1E37 dot 9080609 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1512012323160 dot 12604 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <565E6862 dot 7070401 at redhat dot com> <566B4BA1 dot 8000509 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <566BEE35 dot 6070804 at redhat dot com> <566D0CE6 dot 6090905 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <566E9191 dot 9030106 at redhat dot com> <567092B9 dot 6020703 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1512152238290 dot 10678 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <567212B0 dot 3060402 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <567290E5 dot 4020400 at redhat dot com>

On 12/17/2015 03:39 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:

On 17/12/15 01:41, David Wohlferd wrote:

On the contrary, I would be surprised to learn that there are ANY
compilers (other than clang) that support gcc's extended asm format.


Prepare to be surprised: Sun Studio compilers seem to support it
just fine.

And Intel's ICC.

jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: David Wohlferd

References:
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: David Wohlferd
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: David Wohlferd
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: David Wohlferd
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: David Wohlferd
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: David Wohlferd
- Re: basic asm and memory clobbers - Proposed solution
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]