This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 12/01/2015 03:29 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
I understand Richard's position and while I think it has some merit, I think it's probably taking things too far at this time.On 11/30/2015 4:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> There is a way for people to be clear about what they want to clobber, >> and that's to use extended asm. The way to clear up the ambiguity is to >> start deprecating basic asm, not to add to the confusion by changing its >> behavior after all these years. > > Well, I disagree. The warning is good, but so is the memory clobber. > They're not exclusive. As Richard Henderson put it: "I'd be perfectly happy to deprecate and later completely remove basic asm within functions."
Jeff
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |