Re: [RFC] Cse reducing performance of register allocation with -O2

[Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>]

On 10/22/2015 06:05 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:03:36PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> [snip]
> > I checked my article
> >
> > ftp://ftp.uvsq.fr/pub/gcc/summit/2004/Fighting%20Register%20Pressure.pdf
> >
> > and GVN gave mostly 0.2% on eon only.  The current environment is
> > quite different (IRA, LRA) so the results might be different too.
> >
> > Also as I remember I implemented GVN only for pseudos.
> >
> > LRA also checks values too but again only for reload and original pseudos.
> Do you still have the branches you've tested back then?  I'd
> really like to try how this patch affects other targets (big
> endian?).  Gcc seems to do a better job optimising code for x86 in
> some complicated situations, so the extra logic might pay off more
> on other targets.
No, sorry.  I can not find the code after 12 years since it was done.  
As I remember that time we even used cvs and there was no branch for the 
code.  That time the the development practice was different.  Even these 
days results of most modern research articles in CS can not be 
reproduced.  If I did such research today, I'd definitely put these code 
somewhere on github with detail instructions how to reproduce the results.

But even if I found the code, I guess it would be easier to write it 
from the scratch than make it working in the current environment.