gcc archive
date index for September, 2015

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2015
22:42 Re: Debugger support for __float128 type? Mark Kettenis
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150930 is now available gccadmin
20:12 Re: Debugger support for __float128 type? Joseph Myers
17:33 Debugger support for __float128 type? Ulrich Weigand
09:59 Re: how well does gcc support type-specific pointer formats? Mikael Pettersson
09:33 Re: how well does gcc support type-specific pointer formats? Richard Biener
09:24 how well does gcc support type-specific pointer formats? Mikael Pettersson

September 29, 2015
23:26 Re: gcc-5-20150929 is now available ISHIKAWA Masaru
22:36 gcc-5-20150929 is now available gccadmin
20:20 Re: missed optimization Richard Biener
19:27 Re: missed optimization fxcoudert
19:26 Re: missed optimization Thomas Koenig
18:36 missed optimization Steve Kargl
09:31 Re: Clarifying attribute-const Szabolcs Nagy

September 28, 2015
21:27 Re: different results from objdump for Ubuntu and Windows H.J. Lu
21:23 different results from objdump for Ubuntu and Windows Helen Tang
16:21 Re: [optimization missed] Why do x86 gcc need extension here? Jeff Law
15:09 [optimization missed] Why do x86 gcc need extension here? Konstantin Vladimirov
10:21 Re: September 2015 GNU Toolchain Update Nick Clifton
00:06 Re: September 2015 GNU Toolchain Update Alan Modra

September 27, 2015
22:35 gcc-6-20150927 is now available gccadmin

September 26, 2015
13:41 Re: C++ Dynamic Arrays Jonathan Wakely

September 25, 2015
22:14 C++ Dynamic Arrays David Kunsman
20:17 Re: Clarifying attribute-const Eric Botcazou
17:19 Clarifying attribute-const Alexander Monakov
12:33 September 2015 GNU Toolchain Update Nick Clifton
09:15 Re: Predictive commoning leads to register to register moves through memory. Richard Biener

September 24, 2015
09:07 RE: Predictive commoning leads to register to register moves through memory. Simon Dardis
01:09 Re: ppc eabi float arguments Alan Modra
00:53 Re: ppc eabi float arguments Michael Meissner

September 23, 2015
23:35 Re: does "assign_stack_local" from "function.h" automatically Do The Right Thing with debug information? [relates to the RTL-level if-conversion improvement project] Abe
23:33 Re: Why use "assign_stack_local" instead of using "assign_stack_temp", both from "function.h"? [relates to the RTL-level if-conversion improvement project] Abe
23:26 Re: [c++std-parallel-2008] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
23:22 Re: ppc eabi float arguments Gabriel Paubert
23:09 Re: ppc eabi float arguments Michael Meissner
22:36 gcc-4.9-20150923 is now available gccadmin
22:35 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
21:12 Re: does "assign_stack_local" from "function.h" automatically Do The Right Thing with debug information? [relates to the RTL-level if-conversion improvement project] Jeff Law
21:11 Re: Why use "assign_stack_local" instead of using "assign_stack_temp", both from "function.h"? [relates to the RTL-level if-conversion improvement project] Jeff Law
20:56 does "assign_stack_local" from "function.h" automatically Do The Right Thing with debug information? [relates to the RTL-level if-conversion improvement project] Abe
20:50 Why use "assign_stack_local" instead of using "assign_stack_temp", both from "function.h"? [relates to the RTL-level if-conversion improvement project] Abe
15:23 Re: Powerpc atomic_load Peter Bergner
14:16 Re: Powerpc atomic_load Sebastian Huber
04:50 Re: ppc eabi float arguments Alan Modra
00:22 Re: ppc eabi float arguments Joseph Myers

September 22, 2015
22:35 gcc-5-20150922 is now available gccadmin
19:21 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H. Peter Anvin
19:19 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H. Peter Anvin
19:13 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H. Peter Anvin
18:13 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers Richard Henderson
18:12 Re: ppc eabi float arguments Bernhard Schommer
17:43 Re: ppc eabi float arguments David Edelsohn
17:39 ppc eabi float arguments Bernhard Schommer
17:00 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
11:52 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers David Chisnall
11:52 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
11:47 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
11:44 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers David Chisnall
11:39 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
11:11 Re: Predictive commoning leads to register to register moves through memory. Richard Biener
10:46 RE: Predictive commoning leads to register to register moves through memory. Simon Dardis
08:41 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers David Chisnall
08:16 Re: avoiding recursive calls of calloc due to optimization Richard Biener
08:11 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers Hal Finkel
00:17 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu

September 21, 2015
23:03 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers Hal Finkel
22:57 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
22:41 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers Hal Finkel
22:19 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
21:23 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers John Criswell
20:45 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
19:00 Product Co.
18:52 Re: [cfe-dev] RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers John Criswell
18:39 Re: avoiding recursive calls of calloc due to optimization Daniel Gutson
18:33 Re: avoiding recursive calls of calloc due to optimization Daniel Gutson
18:18 Re: avoiding recursive calls of calloc due to optimization Marc Glisse
17:32 Re: avoiding recursive calls of calloc due to optimization Jakub Jelinek
17:26 Re: avoiding recursive calls of calloc due to optimization Andrew Pinski
17:20 avoiding recursive calls of calloc due to optimization Daniel Gutson
16:27 Re: RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
14:43 [commit, spu] Re: [BUILDROBOT] spu: left shift of negative value Ulrich Weigand
12:50 Re: Multiprecision Arithmetic Builtins Oleg Endo
12:48 Re: Multiprecision Arithmetic Builtins Marc Glisse
12:42 Re: Multiprecision Arithmetic Builtins Florian Weimer
08:33 Re: Predictive commoning leads to register to register moves through memory. Richard Biener
08:26 Re: Optimization bug? Richard Biener
06:09 Multiprecision Arithmetic Builtins Oleg Endo
05:52 Re: Deprecate SH5/SH64 Oleg Endo

September 20, 2015
22:36 gcc-6-20150920 is now available gccadmin
16:21 Re: Optimization bug? Martin Sebor
16:18 Re: Optimization bug? SÃren Brinkmann
14:37 Re: About loop unrolling and optimize for size Simon Schubert
06:38 Re: Optimization bug? Richard Biener

September 19, 2015
23:40 Re: Optimization bug? Martin Sebor
21:32 Re: Optimization bug? SÃren Brinkmann
18:35 Re: Optimization bug? pinskia
18:01 Optimization bug? SÃren Brinkmann
00:41 [BUILDROBOT] spu: left shift of negative value Jan-Benedict Glaw

September 18, 2015
15:37 Re: Predictive commoning leads to register to register moves through memory. Jeff Law
09:49 Re: ARM Linux EABI: unwinding through a segfault handler Matthijs van Duin
09:13 Re: Predictive commoning leads to register to register moves through memory. Richard Biener

September 17, 2015
20:38 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery DJ Delorie
19:26 Re: RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
19:08 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list, again Gerald Pfeifer
17:39 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Eric S. Raymond
17:38 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Eric S. Raymond
16:28 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Jeff Law
16:24 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Richard Earnshaw
16:08 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Michael Matz
15:59 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Richard Earnshaw
15:58 RE: Predictive commoning leads to register to register moves through memory. Simon Dardis
15:15 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Michael Matz
13:51 Re: dejagnu version update? Richard Earnshaw
13:43 Re: reload question about unmet constraints Ulrich Weigand
11:15 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Eric S. Raymond
10:44 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Richard Biener
10:41 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Eric S. Raymond
09:18 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Richard Biener
02:57 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery DJ Delorie
02:28 Re: reload question about unmet constraints DJ Delorie
00:00 Re: dejagnu version update? Segher Boessenkool

September 16, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150916 is now available gccadmin
20:22 GNU Cauldron short survey Jeremy Bennett
19:43 Re: dejagnu version update? Mike Stump
19:35 Re: dejagnu version update? Ramana Radhakrishnan
19:02 Re: dejagnu version update? Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
18:50 Re: dejagnu version update? Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
18:22 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Jeff Law
18:13 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Jeff Law
17:57 Re: dejagnu version update? Mike Stump
17:39 Re: dejagnu version update? David Malcolm
17:38 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Jeff Law
17:25 Re: dejagnu version update? Trevor Saunders
17:21 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Ramana Radhakrishnan
17:19 Re: reload question about unmet constraints Ulrich Weigand
17:16 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Trevor Saunders
17:06 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Frank Ch. Eigler
17:04 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
16:54 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
16:48 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Jeff Law
16:36 Re: dejagnu version update? Jeff Law
16:32 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Jonathan Wakely
16:25 Re: dejagnu version update? Ramana Radhakrishnan
16:20 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
16:14 Re: dejagnu version update? Mike Stump
16:03 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Joseph Myers
15:50 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Paul_Koning
15:47 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Jeff Law
15:26 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Andrew Cagney
13:45 Re: Split Stack performance, signals Ian Lance Taylor
13:08 Re: RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
08:38 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Richard Biener
08:37 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Richard Biener
08:18 Re: Split Stack performance, signals Anders Oleson
07:29 Re: dejagnu version update? Andreas Schwab
07:07 RE: RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers Matthew Fortune
04:24 from: Bruce Adams Bruce Adams
02:02 Re: Help with gcc-plugin (Traverse all loops inside function) Mikhail Maltsev
01:37 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Frank Ch. Eigler

September 15, 2015
23:28 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Andrew Cagney
23:08 Re: dejagnu version update? Mike Stump
22:36 gcc-5-20150915 is now available gccadmin
22:17 Re: RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
21:45 RE: RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers Matthew Fortune
20:51 Re: Offer of help with move to git Andrew Cagney
20:50 Re: dejagnu version update? Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
20:11 Re: RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
20:05 Re: dejagnu version update? Jeff Law
20:04 Re: dejagnu version update? Jeff Law
19:25 Re: Live range Analysis based on tree representations Aaron Sawdey
19:23 Re: dejagnu version update? Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
19:21 Re: dejagnu version update? David Malcolm
17:39 dejagnu version update? Mike Stump
17:09 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Florian Weimer
17:04 Re: Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Joseph Myers
16:44 Git conversion: disposition of old branches and tags Jason Merrill
16:17 Re: reload question about unmet constraints DJ Delorie
16:16 Re: reload question about unmet constraints Jim Wilson
15:53 Re: reload question about unmet constraints Ulrich Weigand
15:48 RE: [AArch64] A question about Cortex-A57 pipeline description Evandro Menezes
15:43 Re: reload question about unmet constraints Jim Wilson
14:42 Re: reload question about unmet constraints Ulrich Weigand
14:02 Re: Cost and Benefit Allocation for moving the expression above the conditional. Richard Biener
12:38 Help with gcc-plugin (Traverse all loops inside function) Aditya K
11:50 Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list, again niXman
06:58 Re: reload question about unmet constraints Jim Wilson
06:05 Re: reload question about unmet constraints DJ Delorie

September 14, 2015
16:39 Re: Replacing malloc with alloca. Jeff Law
11:14 Re: Replacing malloc with alloca. Marc Glisse
08:15 Re: Replacing malloc with alloca. Richard Earnshaw
07:27 Re: [AArch64] A question about Cortex-A57 pipeline description Nikolai Bozhenov

September 13, 2015
22:35 gcc-6-20150913 is now available gccadmin
22:14 Re: Split Stack performance, signals Anders Oleson
21:17 Re: Split Stack performance, signals Anders Oleson
19:43 Be Jimmy Ginn
19:20 Re: Replacing malloc with alloca. Florian Weimer
18:56 Re: Replacing malloc with alloca. Jeff Law
18:49 Re: Split Stack performance, signals Ian Lance Taylor
18:29 Re: Replacing malloc with alloca. Florian Weimer
13:29 Re: pie in the sky: multi threaded linker Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
12:12 Replacing malloc with alloca. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
07:17 Re: Split Stack performance, signals Keith Randall
06:38 Split Stack performance, signals Anders Oleson
03:32 Re: pie in the sky: multi threaded linker Ian Lance Taylor

September 12, 2015
21:11 pie in the sky: multi threaded linker David Kunsman
18:46 RE: Live range Analysis based on tree representations Ajit Kumar Agarwal
13:17 Re: Inlining Decision Priority Function. David Edelsohn
08:36 Selective criteria and Heuristics for Loop Unrolling. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
08:36 Inlining Decision Priority Function. Ajit Kumar Agarwal

September 11, 2015
21:40 Planned work on loop unrolling frequencies Kelvin Nilsen
16:21 Re: [AArch64] A question about Cortex-A57 pipeline description James Greenhalgh
15:31 [AArch64] A question about Cortex-A57 pipeline description Nikolai Bozhenov

September 10, 2015
18:30 Re: How to allocate memory safely in RTL, preferably on the stack? (relating to the RTL-level if-converter) Jeff Law
18:28 Re: How to allocate memory safely in RTL, preferably on the stack? (relating to the RTL-level if-converter) Abe
18:04 Re: Powerpc atomic_load Bernhard Schommer
17:52 Re: Powerpc atomic_load David Edelsohn
17:40 Powerpc atomic_load Bernhard Schommer
15:40 Build problem with libgomp on ToT? Steve Ellcey

September 09, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150909 is now available gccadmin
21:27 Re: Using the asm suffix Jeff Law
20:26 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Szabolcs Nagy
20:05 Re: [musl] Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Rich Felker
19:27 Re: Ubsan build of GCC 6.0 fails with: cp/search.c:1011:41: error: 'otype' may be used uninitialized in this function Jeff Law
19:17 Re: Ubsan build of GCC 6.0 fails with: cp/search.c:1011:41: error: 'otype' may be used uninitialized in this function Martin Sebor
19:03 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Zack Weinberg
18:48 Re: [musl] Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Zack Weinberg
18:36 Ubsan build of GCC 6.0 fails with: cp/search.c:1011:41: error: 'otype' may be used uninitialized in this function Toon Moene
18:11 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data David Edelsohn
18:02 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Paul_Koning
17:54 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data David Edelsohn
17:25 Re: [musl] Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Rich Felker
17:13 Re: [musl] Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Rich Felker
17:00 Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH forRe: Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list Dan Derebenskiy
17:00 Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH forRe: Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list Dan Derebenskiy
16:58 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Zack Weinberg
16:58 [wwwdocs] PATCH forRe: Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list Gerald Pfeifer
16:52 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Paul_Koning
16:47 Re: [musl] Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Zack Weinberg
16:44 Re: Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list Jeff Law
16:42 Re: [musl] Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Rich Felker
16:41 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Zack Weinberg
16:41 Re: Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list Jonathan Wakely
16:39 Fwd: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Zack Weinberg
16:36 Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Zack Weinberg
16:28 Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list niXman
15:44 Fwd: Successful GCC 5.2 installation Anirudh Attri
08:50 Re: compiling gcc 5.x from the scratch: issues Markus Trippelsdorf
08:36 compiling gcc 5.x from the scratch: issues Michael Mishourovsky
02:19 GCC branches/st (was Re: Offer of help with move to git) Jason Merrill

September 08, 2015
22:35 gcc-5-20150908 is now available gccadmin
21:28 Re: Combined top-down and bottom-up instruction scheduler Jeff Law
21:12 RE: Combined top-down and bottom-up instruction scheduler Evandro Menezes
20:39 Re: Combined top-down and bottom-up instruction scheduler Jeff Law
20:38 Re: Combined top-down and bottom-up instruction scheduler Jeff Law
19:40 Re: Combined top-down and bottom-up instruction scheduler Vladimir Makarov
19:24 Re: Combined top-down and bottom-up instruction scheduler Sebastian Pop
19:24 RE: Combined top-down and bottom-up instruction scheduler Aditya K
19:10 Re: Why scheduler do not re-emit REG_DEAD notes? Jeff Law
18:51 Re: Combined top-down and bottom-up instruction scheduler Jeff Law
18:48 Re: Combined top-down and bottom-up instruction scheduler Segher Boessenkool
18:39 Combined top-down and bottom-up instruction scheduler Aditya K
18:12 Re: How to allocate memory safely in RTL, preferably on the stack? (relating to the RTL-level if-converter) Jeff Law
18:05 How to allocate memory safely in RTL, preferably on the stack? (relating to the RTL-level if-converter) Abe
15:16 Re: incremental compiler project Diego Novillo
00:56 Re: Using the asm suffix David Wohlferd

September 07, 2015
21:27 Re: Why scheduler do not re-emit REG_DEAD notes? Eric Botcazou
16:05 Why scheduler do not re-emit REG_DEAD notes? Konstantin Vladimirov

September 06, 2015
22:35 gcc-6-20150906 is now available gccadmin
18:35 Re: 30_threads/timed_mutex/try_lock_until/57641.cc Jonathan Wakely
12:46 Cost and Benefit Allocation for moving the expression above the conditional. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
06:46 Re: Awareness of register pressure on strength reduction of induction variables. Bin.Cheng

September 05, 2015
03:45 Re: LRA reloads of subregs Vladimir Makarov
01:02 Re: LRA reloads of subregs David Miller

September 04, 2015
19:16 Re: LRA reloads of subregs David Miller
18:30 Re: LRA reloads of subregs David Miller
18:27 Re: LRA reloads of subregs David Miller
18:21 Re: Live range Analysis based on tree representations Aaron Sawdey
16:51 Updating @gcc.gnu.org email forwarding Henderson, Stuart
16:51 Re: incremental compiler project David Malcolm
16:51 Fwd: incremental compiler project David Kunsman
16:32 Re: incremental compiler project Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
16:18 Re: incremental compiler project Jeff Law
16:17 Re: Offer of help with move to git Joseph Myers
16:14 Re: incremental compiler project Jonathan Wakely
15:58 Re: incremental compiler project Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
15:44 Re: incremental compiler project Jeff Law
15:40 Re: incremental compiler project David Kunsman
15:12 Re: incremental compiler project Tom Tromey
14:01 Re: LRA reloads of subregs Vladimir Makarov
11:46 Re: LRA reloads of subregs Segher Boessenkool
06:19 Re: LRA reloads of subregs David Miller
01:27 Re: LRA reloads of subregs Segher Boessenkool

September 03, 2015
22:34 LRA reloads of subregs David Miller
17:37 RFC: Support x86 interrupt and exception handlers H.J. Lu
17:02 Re: incremental compiler project Jeff Law
16:36 Re: incremental compiler project Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
15:51 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Jason Merrill
15:22 RE: Live range Analysis based on tree representations Ajit Kumar Agarwal
11:37 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Joseph Myers
08:20 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Andreas Schwab
08:13 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Andreas Schwab
08:12 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Eric S. Raymond
07:21 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion shmeel gutl
06:59 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Trevor Saunders
06:52 Re: Action stamps Trevor Saunders

September 02, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150902 is now available gccadmin
20:44 incremental compiler project David Kunsman
14:53 Re: Live range Analysis based on tree representations Aaron Sawdey
14:08 Re: RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Andy Lutomirski
13:57 Re: RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Brian Gerst
12:52 Re: Awareness of register pressure on strength reduction of induction variables. Richard Biener
12:50 Re: Live range Analysis based on tree representations Richard Biener
12:49 Re: [musl] RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Austin S Hemmelgarn
10:14 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Joseph Myers
10:05 Re: vectorization cost macro TARGET_VECTORIZE_ADD_STMT_COST Richard Biener
08:52 RE: vectorization cost macro TARGET_VECTORIZE_ADD_STMT_COST Ajit Kumar Agarwal
05:22 Re: [musl] RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Rich Felker
05:03 Re: [musl] RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Andy Lutomirski
04:55 Re: [musl] RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Rich Felker
04:32 Re: [musl] RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Andy Lutomirski
04:18 Re: [musl] RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Rich Felker
03:39 Re: [musl] RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Andy Lutomirski
02:55 Re: [musl] RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Rich Felker
02:24 Re: RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Andy Lutomirski
02:21 Re: RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Andy Lutomirski
01:53 Re: RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Brian Gerst
01:46 Re: reload question about unmet constraints Jim Wilson
01:20 Re: reload question about unmet constraints DJ Delorie
01:12 Re: RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Ian Lance Taylor
01:01 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Eric S. Raymond
00:52 RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers? Andy Lutomirski
00:32 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion David Malcolm

September 01, 2015
23:49 Re: reload question about unmet constraints Jim Wilson
22:37 Re: reload question about unmet constraints Jeff Law
22:35 gcc-5-20150901 is now available gccadmin
22:05 RE: GTY / gengtype question - adding a new header file Matthew Fortune
19:57 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Joseph Myers
18:39 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Mikhail Maltsev
18:03 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Joseph Myers
17:58 Commoning the control and Data Dependence Ajit Kumar Agarwal
17:57 Awareness of register pressure on strength reduction of induction variables. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
17:56 Live range Analysis based on tree representations Ajit Kumar Agarwal
17:33 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Eric S. Raymond
17:11 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Joseph Myers
16:50 Re: GTY / gengtype question - adding a new header file Steve Ellcey
16:22 Re: Action stamps Jason Merrill
16:07 Re: GTY / gengtype question - adding a new header file Steve Ellcey
16:06 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Andreas Schwab
15:59 Re: Action stamps Eric S. Raymond
15:43 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Eric S. Raymond
15:31 Re: Action stamps Jason Merrill
15:30 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Eric S. Raymond
15:00 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion David Edelsohn
14:43 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Julian Brown
14:42 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Richard Earnshaw
14:31 Re: Action stamps Jonathan Wakely
14:26 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Mikhail Maltsev
14:07 Re: [libstdc++] dg-require-atomic-builtins on ARM Andreas Schwab
13:45 Re: [libstdc++] dg-require-atomic-builtins on ARM Sebastian Huber
13:32 Re: getrlimit compatibility issues Richard Biener
13:28 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion David Malcolm
13:07 Re: getrlimit compatibility issues Jan Hubicka
12:56 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Rainer Orth
12:50 Re: Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Joseph Myers
12:22 Re: [libstdc++] dg-require-atomic-builtins on ARM Andreas Schwab
12:04 Re: getrlimit compatibility issues Richard Biener
11:41 [libstdc++] dg-require-atomic-builtins on ARM Sebastian Huber
11:23 Re: getrlimit compatibility issues Jan Hubicka
10:54 Acceptance criteria for the git conversion Eric S. Raymond
09:21 Re: Action stamps Eric S. Raymond
09:12 30_threads/timed_mutex/try_lock_until/57641.cc Sebastian Huber
08:15 Re: GTY / gengtype question - adding a new header file Georg-Johann Lay
08:08 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Eric S. Raymond
07:45 reload question about unmet constraints DJ Delorie
07:11 Re: GTY / gengtype question - adding a new header file Richard Sandiford
06:27 Re: Action stamps Jason Merrill
06:13 Re: Repository for the conversion machinery Rainer Orth
06:08 RE: Repository for the conversion machinery Thomas Preud'homme
05:47 Re: Problem with tree pass pre shmeel gutl


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc