gcc archive
date index for July, 2015

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

July 31, 2015
21:04 Bin Cheng as Loop Induction Variable Optimizations maintainer Jeff Law
17:43 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Abe
17:41 Re: Nathan Sidwell appointed nvptx maintainer Nathan Sidwell
17:37 Nathan Sidwell appointed nvptx maintainer David Edelsohn
11:04 Re: ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression Alex Velenko
10:15 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Richard Biener
09:26 Re: Function attribute((optimize(...))) ignored on inline functions? Richard Biener
04:55 Controlling instruction alternative selection Paul Shortis
03:46 Re: match_scratch causing pattern mismatch Paul Shortis

July 30, 2015
22:39 match_scratch causing pattern mismatch Paul Shortis
16:41 Function attribute((optimize(...))) ignored on inline functions? Matt Turner

July 29, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150729 is now available gccadmin
22:14 Re: ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression Jeff Law
18:35 Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? Uday Khedker
18:00 Re: Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE Uday Khedker
16:15 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Abe
09:37 RE: Expectations for 0/0 Paulo Matos
09:12 Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? Richard Biener
09:12 RE: Expectations for 0/0 Paulo Matos
07:59 Could some ARM maintainer please look at PR66917? Mikael Pettersson

July 28, 2015
22:36 gcc-5-20150728 is now available gccadmin
18:18 Re: Re: ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression Alex Velenko
17:37 Re: Expectations for 0/0 Andrew Haley
17:12 Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? Uday Khedker
15:41 Expectations for 0/0 Paulo Matos
14:40 Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? Richard Biener
14:32 Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? Uday P. Khedker
13:57 Re: Debug assertion and constexpr Jonathan Wakely
10:39 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Richard Biener
08:55 [C++ Patch, preapproved] Prefer DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION to "+D" and "+#D" (2/n) Paolo Carlini
07:42 Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? Richard Biener
07:36 Re: Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE Richard Biener

July 27, 2015
19:16 Debug assertion and constexpr FranÃois Dumont
17:14 Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? Uday Khedker
14:39 Re: Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE Uday P. Khedker
11:04 Re: Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE Richard Biener
10:20 Re: Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE Jakub Jelinek
10:05 Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE Uday Khedker

July 26, 2015
22:36 gcc-6-20150726 is now available gccadmin

July 24, 2015
18:39 Re: cannot find crti.o error, while building gcc cross compiler sindhu selvam
18:09 Re: RETURN_ADDRESS_POINTER_REGNUM Macro Jim Wilson
17:55 Re: cannot find crti.o error, while building gcc cross compiler Jonathan Wakely
17:46 cannot find crti.o error, while building gcc cross compiler sindhu selvam
13:46 Cauldron Accelerator BoF call for agenda proposals Martin Jambor
13:41 OpenMP 4.1 public draft released Jakub Jelinek
12:49 Ann: MELT plugin 1.2.0 for GCC 4.9 & 5. Basile Starynkevitch
06:09 RETURN_ADDRESS_POINTER_REGNUM Macro Ajit Kumar Agarwal
04:44 RE: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Thomas Preud'homme

July 23, 2015
20:24 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Abe

July 22, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150722 is now available gccadmin
16:03 Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables Nikolai Bozhenov

July 21, 2015
22:36 gcc-5-20150721 is now available gccadmin
20:20 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Abe
10:20 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Alan Lawrence

July 20, 2015
19:37 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Abe
18:41 Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables Michael Eager
17:20 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Alan Lawrence
17:11 Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables Jakub Jelinek
16:55 Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables Nikolai Bozhenov
09:20 magic 8 constant (bits / byte maybe?) in GCC JIT memento_of_new_rvalue_from_const <long>::get_wide_int Basile Starynkevitch

July 19, 2015
22:36 gcc-6-20150719 is now available gccadmin

July 17, 2015
17:31 Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables Michael Eager
15:38 Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables Nikolai Bozhenov
14:08 Re: [gomp] Reuse futex barrier implementation for RTEMS Sebastian Huber
13:36 Re: [gomp] Reuse futex barrier implementation for RTEMS Torvald Riegel
11:55 Re: [gomp] Reuse futex barrier implementation for RTEMS Sebastian Huber
11:43 Re: [gomp] Reuse futex barrier implementation for RTEMS Jakub Jelinek
11:33 Re: [gomp] Reuse futex barrier implementation for RTEMS Sebastian Huber
11:26 Re: [gomp] Reuse futex barrier implementation for RTEMS Jakub Jelinek
11:17 Re: [gomp] Reuse futex barrier implementation for RTEMS Sebastian Huber
11:16 Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables Kyrill Tkachov
10:43 [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables Nikolai Bozhenov
06:40 [gomp] Reuse futex barrier implementation for RTEMS Sebastian Huber
00:58 Re: configure.{in -> ac} rename (commit 35eafcc71b) broke in-tree binutils building of gcc Michael Darling
00:56 Re: PATCH: Also check configure.ac in binutils source tree Michael Darling

July 16, 2015
22:08 Re: How to express this complicated constraint in md file Jim Wilson
20:32 How to express this complicated constraint in md file Dmitry Grinberg
18:45 Re: Reduction Pattern ( Vectorization or Parallelization) Richard Biener
18:03 Re: Reduction Pattern ( Vectorization or Parallelization) Toon Moene
13:12 GCC 5.2 Released Richard Biener
11:50 GCC 5.3 Status Report (2015-07-16) Richard Biener
10:53 Re: Reduction Pattern ( Vectorization or Parallelization) Richard Biener
09:33 GCC 4.9.3 build on i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 Andras Salamon
08:51 Re: Partition and subpartition Analysis that helps in further vectorization and parallelization Richard Biener

July 15, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150715 is now available gccadmin
19:02 Re: Spurious parallel make failures in libgcc. Andrew MacLeod
18:58 Re: Spurious parallel make failures in libgcc. Jeff Law
16:00 Re: PATCH: Also check configure.ac in binutils source tree Jan Beulich
15:18 PATCH: Also check configure.ac in binutils source tree H.J. Lu
14:33 Re: Spurious parallel make failures in libgcc. Andrew MacLeod
14:07 Spurious parallel make failures in libgcc. Andrew MacLeod
08:30 Re: Traces on Data Dependency graph. Richard Biener
06:32 Re: configure.{in -> ac} rename (commit 35eafcc71b) broke in-tree binutils building of gcc Jan Beulich
05:39 Re: GCC 5.2 Second Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener
02:06 Re: configure.{in -> ac} rename (commit 35eafcc71b) broke in-tree binutils building of gcc H.J. Lu
02:01 Re: configure.{in -> ac} rename (commit 35eafcc71b) broke in-tree binutils building of gcc pinskia
01:20 Re: configure.{in -> ac} rename (commit 35eafcc71b) broke in-tree binutils building of gcc Alan Modra

July 14, 2015
20:36 Re: GCC 5.2 Second Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Janne Blomqvist
17:30 Re: configure.{in -> ac} rename (commit 35eafcc71b) broke in-tree binutils building of gcc Jim Wilson
17:08 Re: configure.{in -> ac} rename (commit 35eafcc71b) broke in-tree binutils building of gcc H.J. Lu
17:03 Re: configure.{in -> ac} rename (commit 35eafcc71b) broke in-tree binutils building of gcc Jim Wilson
15:29 RE: Traces on Data Dependency graph. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
15:11 Re: C++ coding style inconsistencies Trevor Saunders
14:31 Re: C++ coding style inconsistencies Martin Liška
13:04 Re: Traces on Data Dependency graph. Richard Biener
12:12 Traces on Data Dependency graph. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
11:33 Partition and subpartition Analysis that helps in further vectorization and parallelization Ajit Kumar Agarwal
11:12 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly [from Abe Fri. 2015-July-10 ~4:25pm US Central time, same date ~9:25pm UTC: responses to Richard, comments on: vectorization, if conversion, and optimization in general] Richard Biener
09:13 configure.{in -> ac} rename (commit 35eafcc71b) broke in-tree binutils building of gcc Jan Beulich
00:45 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney

July 13, 2015
09:09 Re: %fs and %gs segments on x86/x86-64 Bin.Cheng
07:31 GCC 5.2 Second Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener
02:16 times(2) used in timevars.c introduces significant measurement error Mikhail Maltsev

July 12, 2015
22:36 gcc-6-20150712 is now available gccadmin
20:26 Re: Understanding uses of a statement and def-use chains rohit bhatia
20:16 Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? Trevor Saunders

July 11, 2015
18:19 Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? Andrew Haley
12:24 Re: Basic GCC testing question Segher Boessenkool

July 10, 2015
21:39 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly [from Abe Fri. 2015-July-10 ~4:25pm US Central time, same date ~9:25pm UTC: responses to Richard, comments on: vectorization, if conversion, and optimization in general] Abe
21:14 Re: Basic GCC testing question Steve Ellcey
19:27 Re: Basic GCC testing question Segher Boessenkool
18:34 Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? Jeff Law
17:43 Basic GCC testing question Steve Ellcey
15:17 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Richard Earnshaw
15:16 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Richard Earnshaw
15:05 Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? Armin Rigo
15:00 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? pinskia
14:19 Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? David Malcolm
14:13 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Richard Earnshaw
14:02 Re: Elementary question about complete_type vs tsubst_flags_t Jason Merrill
13:53 Re: Elementary question about complete_type vs tsubst_flags_t Paolo Carlini
13:42 Re: Elementary question about complete_type vs tsubst_flags_t Jason Merrill
13:20 Re: Proposal to postpone release of 5.2 for a week [Was: Re: patch to fix PR66782] Vladimir Makarov
12:18 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Segher Boessenkool
11:26 Elementary question about complete_type vs tsubst_flags_t Paolo Carlini
10:28 Re: Testing and dynamic linking on remote target Szabolcs Nagy
10:06 RE: [RFC] Design and Implementation for Path Splitting for Loop with Conditional IF-THEN-ELSE Ajit Kumar Agarwal
09:14 Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? Armin Rigo
09:02 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Richard Earnshaw
08:41 Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? Andrew Haley
08:19 RE: [RFC] Design and Implementation for Path Splitting for Loop with Conditional IF-THEN-ELSE Ajit Kumar Agarwal
08:09 Re: Proposal to postpone release of 5.2 for a week [Was: Re: patch to fix PR66782] Richard Biener
07:17 RE: Allocation of hotness of data structure with respect to the top of stack. Matthew Fortune
02:01 Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? David Malcolm
01:02 Re: Allocation of hotness of data structure with respect to the top of stack. Vladimir Makarov

July 09, 2015
22:33 Re: [RFC] Design and Implementation for Path Splitting for Loop with Conditional IF-THEN-ELSE Jeff Law
22:17 GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? Basile Starynkevitch
22:00 Understanding uses of a statement and def-use chains rohit bhatia
20:20 Proposal to postpone release of 5.2 for a week [Was: Re: patch to fix PR66782] Uros Bizjak
16:50 Re: Question about DRAP register and reserving hard registers H.J. Lu
16:31 Re: Question about DRAP register and reserving hard registers Steve Ellcey
15:56 Testing and dynamic linking on remote target David Talmage
12:03 Re: %fs and %gs segments on x86/x86-64 Armin Rigo
09:58 Re: [AArch64] Missed vectorization opportunity in cactusADM Ramana Radhakrishnan
09:57 Re: [AArch64] Missed vectorization opportunity in cactusADM Richard Biener
08:35 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Richard Biener
08:23 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Richard Biener
08:14 Re: CFG transformation of loops with continue statement inside the loops. Richard Biener
03:26 Re: s390: larl for Simode on 64-bit DJ Delorie
03:15 Re: s390: larl for Simode on 64-bit Jeff Law

July 08, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150708 is now available gccadmin
21:38 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Segher Boessenkool
21:35 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Josh Poimboeuf
21:14 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Jeff Law
21:14 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Segher Boessenkool
21:05 Re: s390: larl for Simode on 64-bit DJ Delorie
20:52 Re: s390: larl for Simode on 64-bit Jeff Law
20:51 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Josh Poimboeuf
20:34 s390: larl for Simode on 64-bit DJ Delorie
20:05 Re: libgomp: gomp_ptrlock*() specification Jakub Jelinek
19:36 libgomp: gomp_ptrlock*() specification Sebastian Huber
18:59 Re: X18 on AArch64 pinskia
18:39 Re: X18 on AArch64 Andrà Hentschel
17:18 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Josh Poimboeuf
16:49 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Abe
16:37 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Segher Boessenkool
16:22 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Josh Poimboeuf
14:48 Re: [AD] UltraGDB, an alternative tool to debug GCC, GDB, LLDB, etc. on Windows and Linux Xu,Chiheng
14:46 CFG transformation of loops with continue statement inside the loops. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
12:12 Re: Question about always executed info computed in tree-ssa-loop-im.c Richard Biener
10:36 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Segher Boessenkool
10:01 Re: Question about always executed info computed in tree-ssa-loop-im.c Bin.Cheng
09:58 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Alan Lawrence
09:58 Re: Question about always executed info computed in tree-ssa-loop-im.c Bin.Cheng
09:51 Re: Question about always executed info computed in tree-ssa-loop-im.c Richard Biener
09:26 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Martin Jambor
09:23 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Martin Jambor
06:52 Question about always executed info computed in tree-ssa-loop-im.c Bin.Cheng

July 07, 2015
23:41 Re: [lldb-dev] [AD] UltraGDB, an alternative tool to debug GCC, GDB, LLDB, etc. on Windows and Linux Greg Clayton
22:47 Re: Question about DRAP register and reserving hard registers Steve Ellcey
21:01 Re: X18 on AArch64 pinskia
20:56 Re: [AD] UltraGDB, an alternative tool to debug GCC, GDB, LLDB, etc. on Windows and Linux Sergio Durigan Junior
20:55 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Abe
20:30 X18 on AArch64 Andrà Hentschel
20:25 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Jeff Law
19:46 Re: [AD] UltraGDB, an alternative tool to debug GCC, GDB, LLDB, etc. on Windows and Linux Xu,Chiheng
19:18 Re: [AD] UltraGDB, an alternative tool to debug GCC, GDB, LLDB, etc. on Windows and Linux Sergio Durigan Junior
18:44 Re: Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Segher Boessenkool
17:53 Can shrink-wrapping ever move prologue past an ASM statement? Martin Jambor
17:11 Re: rl78 vs cse vs memory_address_addr_space Segher Boessenkool
16:07 Re: Uninitialized registers handling in the REE pass Pierre-Marie de Rodat
15:02 Re: Uninitialized registers handling in the REE pass Jeff Law
12:58 Re: Does GCC generate LDRD/STRD (Register) forms? Oleg Endo
11:37 Re: Allocation of hotness of data structure with respect to the top of stack. Oleg Endo
10:14 GCC 5.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener
08:35 [AD] UltraGDB, an alternative tool to debug GCC, GDB, LLDB, etc. on Windows and Linux Xu,Chiheng
07:35 GCC 5.2.0 Status Report (2015-07-07), branch frozen Richard Biener
04:55 Re: rl78 vs cse vs memory_address_addr_space DJ Delorie
04:55 Re: Does GCC generate LDRD/STRD (Register) forms? Bin.Cheng
02:05 Does GCC generate LDRD/STRD (Register) forms? Anmol Paralkar (anmparal)

July 06, 2015
21:58 Re: rl78 vs cse vs memory_address_addr_space Segher Boessenkool
20:45 Re: rl78 vs cse vs memory_address_addr_space DJ Delorie
20:25 Re: rl78 vs cse vs memory_address_addr_space Jeff Law
19:48 Re: Allocation of hotness of data structure with respect to the top of stack. Jeff Law
15:42 Uninitialized registers handling in the REE pass Pierre-Marie de Rodat
14:09 Re: Making __builtin_signbit type-generic FX
09:59 Re: Making __builtin_signbit type-generic Uros Bizjak
09:49 Making __builtin_signbit type-generic FX
07:03 Re: Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 Vineet Gupta
06:33 Re: Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 Richard Biener
05:47 Re: Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 Marc Glisse
05:31 Re: Live on Exit renaming. Bin.Cheng
05:30 Re: Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 Vineet Gupta
05:16 RE: Live on Exit renaming. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
04:56 Re: Live on Exit renaming. Bin.Cheng
04:02 RE: Live on Exit renaming. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
01:34 Re: Live on Exit renaming. Bin.Cheng

July 05, 2015
22:35 gcc-6-20150705 is now available gccadmin
22:03 Re: Live on Exit renaming. Steven Bosscher
11:58 Reduction Pattern ( Vectorization or Parallelization) Ajit Kumar Agarwal
11:11 Allocation of hotness of data structure with respect to the top of stack. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
09:07 Re: pa indirect_jump instruction Trevor Saunders
08:11 Re: pa indirect_jump instruction Richard Sandiford

July 04, 2015
13:58 RE: Live on Exit renaming. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
13:45 Live on Exit renaming. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
07:05 Re: %fs and %gs segments on x86/x86-64 Armin Rigo

July 03, 2015
18:34 Re: %fs and %gs segments on x86/x86-64 Jay
14:37 Proposed AAPCS update - parameter passing types with modified alignments Richard Earnshaw
13:45 Re: Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 Richard Biener
13:10 Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 Vineet Gupta
09:37 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Alan Lawrence
08:29 Re: %fs and %gs segments on x86/x86-64 Richard Biener

July 02, 2015
21:23 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Abe
20:22 Re: libgomp: Purpose of gomp_thread_pool::last_team? Jakub Jelinek
19:57 libgomp: Purpose of gomp_thread_pool::last_team? Sebastian Huber
16:27 Re: GCC 5.1.1 Status Report (2015-06-22) Matthew Wahab
15:58 %fs and %gs segments on x86/x86-64 Armin Rigo
15:39 Re: Consideration of Cost associated with SEME regions. Vladimir Makarov
12:40 Re: GCC 5.1.1 Status Report (2015-06-22) Ramana Radhakrishnan
11:07 Re: GCC 5.1.1 Status Report (2015-06-22) Richard Biener
11:06 RE: Consideration of Cost associated with SEME regions. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
11:03 Re: GCC 5.1.1 Status Report (2015-06-22) Matthew Wahab
10:02 Consideration of Cost associated with SEME regions. Ajit Kumar Agarwal
09:30 Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Alan Lawrence
09:18 Transformation from SEME(Single Entry Multiple Exit) to SESE(Single Entry Single Exit) Ajit Kumar Agarwal
07:32 configure --program-suffix could change gccjit library path? Basile Starynkevitch
06:16 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs H. Peter Anvin
04:14 rl78 vs cse vs memory_address_addr_space DJ Delorie

July 01, 2015
22:59 RFC: Add R_X86_64_INDBR_GOTPCREL and R_386_INDBR_GOT32 H.J. Lu
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150701 is now available gccadmin
22:16 making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly Abe
20:09 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs Andy Lutomirski
18:12 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs Vladimir Makarov
17:57 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs Vladimir Makarov
17:43 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs Jakub Jelinek
17:38 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs Andy Lutomirski
17:35 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs Vladimir Makarov
16:15 Re: Code size issues on FP-emulation on libgcc compared to LLVM's compiler_rt Joseph Myers
16:03 CFCs Mark Grange
15:47 Re: Code size issues on FP-emulation on libgcc compared to LLVM's compiler_rt Szabolcs Nagy
15:35 Re: Code size issues on FP-emulation on libgcc compared to LLVM's compiler_rt Zinovy Nis
15:31 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs Jakub Jelinek
15:27 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs Andy Lutomirski
15:23 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs Vladimir Makarov
14:00 Re: Code size issues on FP-emulation on libgcc compared to LLVM's compiler_rt Zinovy Nis
09:32 Re: pa indirect_jump instruction Trevor Saunders
07:20 Re: GCC 5.1.1 Status Report (2015-06-22) Richard Biener
04:20 Re: gcc feature request / RFC: extra clobbered regs Jeff Law


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc