This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
July 31, 2015
21:04 | Bin Cheng as Loop Induction Variable Optimizations maintainer | Jeff Law |
17:43 | Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly | Abe |
17:41 | Re: Nathan Sidwell appointed nvptx maintainer | Nathan Sidwell |
17:37 | Nathan Sidwell appointed nvptx maintainer | David Edelsohn |
11:04 | Re: ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression | Alex Velenko |
10:15 | Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly | Richard Biener |
09:26 | Re: Function attribute((optimize(...))) ignored on inline functions? | Richard Biener |
04:55 | Controlling instruction alternative selection | Paul Shortis |
03:46 | Re: match_scratch causing pattern mismatch | Paul Shortis |
July 30, 2015
22:39 | match_scratch causing pattern mismatch | Paul Shortis |
16:41 | Function attribute((optimize(...))) ignored on inline functions? | Matt Turner |
July 29, 2015
22:35 | gcc-4.9-20150729 is now available | gccadmin |
22:14 | Re: ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression | Jeff Law |
18:35 | Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? | Uday Khedker |
18:00 | Re: Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE | Uday Khedker |
16:15 | Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly | Abe |
09:37 | RE: Expectations for 0/0 | Paulo Matos |
09:12 | Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? | Richard Biener |
09:12 | RE: Expectations for 0/0 | Paulo Matos |
07:59 | Could some ARM maintainer please look at PR66917? | Mikael Pettersson |
July 28, 2015
22:36 | gcc-5-20150728 is now available | gccadmin |
18:18 | Re: Re: ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression | Alex Velenko |
17:37 | Re: Expectations for 0/0 | Andrew Haley |
17:12 | Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? | Uday Khedker |
15:41 | Expectations for 0/0 | Paulo Matos |
14:40 | Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? | Richard Biener |
14:32 | Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? | Uday P. Khedker |
13:57 | Re: Debug assertion and constexpr | Jonathan Wakely |
10:39 | Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly | Richard Biener |
08:55 | [C++ Patch, preapproved] Prefer DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION to "+D" and "+#D" (2/n) | Paolo Carlini |
07:42 | Re: Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? | Richard Biener |
07:36 | Re: Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE | Richard Biener |
July 27, 2015
19:16 | Debug assertion and constexpr | FranÃois Dumont |
17:14 | Preserving tree node fields for access in LTO? | Uday Khedker |
14:39 | Re: Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE | Uday P. Khedker |
11:04 | Re: Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE | Richard Biener |
10:20 | Re: Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE | Jakub Jelinek |
10:05 | Typecasting information in MEM[...] GIMPLE | Uday Khedker |
July 26, 2015
22:36 | gcc-6-20150726 is now available | gccadmin |
July 24, 2015
18:39 | Re: cannot find crti.o error, while building gcc cross compiler | sindhu selvam |
18:09 | Re: RETURN_ADDRESS_POINTER_REGNUM Macro | Jim Wilson |
17:55 | Re: cannot find crti.o error, while building gcc cross compiler | Jonathan Wakely |
17:46 | cannot find crti.o error, while building gcc cross compiler | sindhu selvam |
13:46 | Cauldron Accelerator BoF call for agenda proposals | Martin Jambor |
13:41 | OpenMP 4.1 public draft released | Jakub Jelinek |
12:49 | Ann: MELT plugin 1.2.0 for GCC 4.9 & 5. | Basile Starynkevitch |
06:09 | RETURN_ADDRESS_POINTER_REGNUM Macro | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
04:44 | RE: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly | Thomas Preud'homme |
July 23, 2015
20:24 | Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly | Abe |
July 22, 2015
22:35 | gcc-4.9-20150722 is now available | gccadmin |
16:03 | Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables | Nikolai Bozhenov |
July 21, 2015
July 20, 2015
19:37 | Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly | Abe |
18:41 | Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables | Michael Eager |
17:20 | Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly | Alan Lawrence |
17:11 | Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables | Jakub Jelinek |
16:55 | Re: [DWARF] Tracking uninitialized variables | Nikolai Bozhenov |
09:20 | magic 8 constant (bits / byte maybe?) in GCC JIT memento_of_new_rvalue_from_const <long>::get_wide_int | Basile Starynkevitch |
July 19, 2015
22:36 | gcc-6-20150719 is now available | gccadmin |
July 17, 2015
July 16, 2015
22:08 | Re: How to express this complicated constraint in md file | Jim Wilson |
20:32 | How to express this complicated constraint in md file | Dmitry Grinberg |
18:45 | Re: Reduction Pattern ( Vectorization or Parallelization) | Richard Biener |
18:03 | Re: Reduction Pattern ( Vectorization or Parallelization) | Toon Moene |
13:12 | GCC 5.2 Released | Richard Biener |
11:50 | GCC 5.3 Status Report (2015-07-16) | Richard Biener |
10:53 | Re: Reduction Pattern ( Vectorization or Parallelization) | Richard Biener |
09:33 | GCC 4.9.3 build on i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 | Andras Salamon |
08:51 | Re: Partition and subpartition Analysis that helps in further vectorization and parallelization | Richard Biener |
July 15, 2015
July 14, 2015
July 13, 2015
09:09 | Re: %fs and %gs segments on x86/x86-64 | Bin.Cheng |
07:31 | GCC 5.2 Second Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | Richard Biener |
02:16 | times(2) used in timevars.c introduces significant measurement error | Mikhail Maltsev |
July 12, 2015
22:36 | gcc-6-20150712 is now available | gccadmin |
20:26 | Re: Understanding uses of a statement and def-use chains | rohit bhatia |
20:16 | Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? | Trevor Saunders |
July 11, 2015
18:19 | Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? | Andrew Haley |
12:24 | Re: Basic GCC testing question | Segher Boessenkool |
July 10, 2015
July 09, 2015
July 08, 2015
July 07, 2015
July 06, 2015
21:58 | Re: rl78 vs cse vs memory_address_addr_space | Segher Boessenkool |
20:45 | Re: rl78 vs cse vs memory_address_addr_space | DJ Delorie |
20:25 | Re: rl78 vs cse vs memory_address_addr_space | Jeff Law |
19:48 | Re: Allocation of hotness of data structure with respect to the top of stack. | Jeff Law |
15:42 | Uninitialized registers handling in the REE pass | Pierre-Marie de Rodat |
14:09 | Re: Making __builtin_signbit type-generic | FX |
09:59 | Re: Making __builtin_signbit type-generic | Uros Bizjak |
09:49 | Making __builtin_signbit type-generic | FX |
07:03 | Re: Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 | Vineet Gupta |
06:33 | Re: Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 | Richard Biener |
05:47 | Re: Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 | Marc Glisse |
05:31 | Re: Live on Exit renaming. | Bin.Cheng |
05:30 | Re: Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 | Vineet Gupta |
05:16 | RE: Live on Exit renaming. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
04:56 | Re: Live on Exit renaming. | Bin.Cheng |
04:02 | RE: Live on Exit renaming. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
01:34 | Re: Live on Exit renaming. | Bin.Cheng |
July 05, 2015
22:35 | gcc-6-20150705 is now available | gccadmin |
22:03 | Re: Live on Exit renaming. | Steven Bosscher |
11:58 | Reduction Pattern ( Vectorization or Parallelization) | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
11:11 | Allocation of hotness of data structure with respect to the top of stack. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
09:07 | Re: pa indirect_jump instruction | Trevor Saunders |
08:11 | Re: pa indirect_jump instruction | Richard Sandiford |
July 04, 2015
13:58 | RE: Live on Exit renaming. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
13:45 | Live on Exit renaming. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
07:05 | Re: %fs and %gs segments on x86/x86-64 | Armin Rigo |
July 03, 2015
18:34 | Re: %fs and %gs segments on x86/x86-64 | Jay |
14:37 | Proposed AAPCS update - parameter passing types with modified alignments | Richard Earnshaw |
13:45 | Re: Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 | Richard Biener |
13:10 | Possible issue with ARC gcc 4.8 | Vineet Gupta |
09:37 | Re: making the new if-converter not mangle IR that is already vectorizer-friendly | Alan Lawrence |
08:29 | Re: %fs and %gs segments on x86/x86-64 | Richard Biener |
July 02, 2015
July 01, 2015
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]