This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch, build] Restore bootstrap in building libcc1 on darwin
- From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, fxcoudert at gmail dot com, iain at codesourcery dot com, jakub at redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:46:17 +0000
- Subject: Re: [patch, build] Restore bootstrap in building libcc1 on darwin
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20141205223429 dot 1058D105 at mailhost dot lps dot ens dot fr> <54823479 dot 7040905 at redhat dot com>
On 05/12/14 22:40, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 12/05/14 15:34, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
>>> As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though.
>>> If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps:
>>> ...
>>
>> Sorry but it does not work:
> BTW, thanks for working with Jakub on this. We're going to be getting a Darwin box for Jakub and other folks in the Red Hat team to use when the need arises to dig into these kind of issues.
>
> However, until that box arrives and is setup, this kind of iteration is the only way he can test Darwin stuff.
>
> Jeff
>
Indeed I feel especially bad in these scenarios where patches are
suggested for a patch I submitted and are causing you folks problems.
I really do not want to do that. So many architectures for GCC, so
very few resources. Hopefully as Jeff indicates, this will be sorted
soon. Again from a libcc1 point of view, as long as we have the .so
built on all configurations, that is what matters. I have not chipped
into these threads as I have nothing to say/recommend about darwin
architectures :( I do read them all, though.
Cheers,
Phil