Re: GCC 5.0 Status Report (2014-11-03), Stage 1 ends Nov 15th

[Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrumyan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Status
>> ======
>>
>> The trunk is scheduled to transition from Stage 1 to Stage 3 at the end of Saturday, November 15th (use your timezone to your advantage).
>>
>> We have been in Stage 1 for almost 7 months now with a fortnight
>> still to go.  Still now is a good time to look into bugzilla and pick one or two regressions in your area of expertise and fix them (you may want to prioritize regressions against both 4.9 and 5).
>>
>> What larger merges are still planned for GCC 5?
>> I'm aware of pending merges from match-and-simplify branch, there are the JIT changes partially? approved, MPX also partially? approved, Intel offloading patches partially approved, PTX support partially reviewed.  Thomas, do you plan to post OpenACC changes for review still during stage1?  Do you have any dependencies there (PTX and/or Intel offloading being merged first?)?  What else have been people working on and can get posted for review before stage1 closes?
>> As before, when new features are posted for review during stage 1 and only acked early during stage 3, they can still be accepted for GCC 5.
>>
>> Somewhat misleading quality data below, P3 bugs have not been re-prioritized for quite some time now.  We promise to do this shortly after entering Stage 3.
>>
>> Quality Data
>> ============
>>
>> Priority          #   Change from last report
>> --------        ---   -----------------------
>> P1               10    +  10
>> P2               82    +   6
>> P3               92    +  86
>> --------        ---   -----------------------
>> Total           184    + 102
>>
>> Previous Report
>> ===============
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-04/msg00090.html
>>
>> The next report will be sent by Richard, announcing transition to stage 3.
>
> Hi All,
>
> I sent 3 patches for extended if-conversion which were sent today (two
> of them were sent for review earlier).
> Do we have a chance to be in GCC 5? Note that almost all changes are
> essential only for loop marked with pragma simd. For all changes
> stress testing was done using spec2000 and spec2006, i.e. all loops
> are considered as marked with pragma simd and it did not show any
> failures.

I will get to it soon, possibly not before stage1 officially ends.  But
you are definitely in the camp of people who posted their patch early
enough to be allowed in in stage3.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Thanks.
> Yuri.