This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Update ISL under gcc/infrastructure/ ? // Remove CLooG?

On 04.11.2014 16:17, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi all,

currently, contrib/download_prerequisites downloads isl-0.12.2 from$ISL.tar.bz2

However, that version has a bug which causes an ICE (PR 62289).
End of October, ISL 0.14 was released, which should contain a fix for
that issue. Hence, one should consider using 0.14 instead of /infrastructure/
and download_prerequisites.

Thanks Tobias for bringing this one up.

Disclaimer: I haven't tested that version, yet.

  * * *

The page lists 0.12.2 as
version to be used (without "(or later)").

The configure script does some version checks, but seeminly only to rule
out early version of ISL as it is only the check for an include file.

According to!topic/isl-development/CQGVfj60SQM
"0.14 was kept backward compatible with 0.13." [But 0.15 will break it.]

Thus, assuming 0.13 works, 0.14 also should work. Release notes:

Right. 0.13 should work from svn revision 213816.

As Richard pointed out, isl introduce a backward incompatible change in 0.13 that unfortunately made it impossible to compile 4.8 with isl 0.13.

Judging from Richards comments, this seems to continue to cause issues.

@Sven, we need to be very careful with such changes in the future. If it is low cost, we may even consider to make isl_int again available for
a couple of releases (from 0.14.1 on).

Comments? Especially from Richard and Tobias?

* * *

Finally, is CLooG still needed or will GCC also work with only ISL? Looking
at , it seems as if
it is about the right time to remove it.

CLooG is not necessarily needed. You can run graphite just with ISL. The main reason that ISL code generation is not enabled by default is that we did not yet get extensive testing and it was unclear who will have the time to fix possible bugs.

@Mircae, Roman: Would you have time to help with bug-fixing if we do the switch now? (I am happy to review patches and give advice, but can not do the full move myself)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]