Re: PR63633: May middle-end come up width hard regs for insn expanders?

[Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>]

On 10/24/14 10:29, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> But I'd say, if you can't handle hard regs in the operands (either general,
> or some specific ones), you should
> force the hard regs into pseudos (all hard regs, or just the problematic
> ones) in the expander.
> So in this case, check if they overlap with those 2 regs, and force the
> input operands into pseudos if they do; the output will be harder, guess
> you'd need to emit the pattern into a pseudo and emit_move_insn it
> afterwards to the hard reg.
I'm pretty sure that's what Georg is going to do, my comment was that 
the existence of the hard register operand _may_ point to something else 
that we would want to fix.

jeff