This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD
- From: Ian Grant <ian dot a dot n dot grant at googlemail dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:10:12 -0400
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAKFjmdzLbwLhYoNA3vg3LfWE_jbeq8npheNX6nGtOh--Tp-14g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKFjmdxKZBXXLXVqVR7pE6hmOfmF=8HdCV2gqJC6GxJ3822MMw at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 11 dot 1409171933230 dot 1577 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <CAKFjmdzGtxnYZzWsEKzsuU_BX_qBVu1kL_-v0o0aQUkgVWDQqw at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 11 dot 1409172059360 dot 1931 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> wrote:
>>> Please don't call it "the Intel library", that doesn't mean anything.
>> Doesn't it? How did you know what 'it' was then? Or is that a stupid
>> question? This identity concept is much slipperier than it seems at
>> first, isn't it?
> You included error messages...
Context. And this is what gave that noun meaning. Context is important
in semantics. You can't tell what anything, a C compiler binary, for
example, means in isolation.
>> How about my question about the size of the binaries? Is that 60+MB
>> what other systems show?
>
> I still see <20M here, but I don't know if there are reasons for what you
> are seeing. Are you maybe using different options? (debug information,
> optimization, lto, etc)
That is very useful to know. Thanks.
Ian