This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: VandeVondele Joost <joost dot vandevondele at mat dot ethz dot ch>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:49:37 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F4103 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140905143740 dot GL17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F414C at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140905145304 dot GM17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F7F45 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F816B at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140910132614 dot GF17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F8688 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <CAH6eHdQbx7tkc-8=1MfqyUxwwnTPXSZDjJfzupDJ2gEOeR52Zw at mail dot gmail dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F8731 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch>
On 11 September 2014 15:45, VandeVondele Joost
<joost.vandevondele@mat.ethz.ch> wrote:
>
>>> could it be that the pattern in normal1 should have been '[ab]*/ de*/ [ep]*/*' ?
>>
>>Yes, we are running these tests multiple times:
>>
>>PASS: 23_containers/map/modifiers/erase/abi_tag.cc (test for excess errors)
>>PASS: 23_containers/multimap/modifiers/erase/abi_tag.cc (test for excess errors)
>>PASS: 23_containers/multiset/modifiers/erase/abi_tag.cc (test for excess errors)
>>PASS: 23_containers/set/modifiers/erase/abi_tag.cc (test for excess errors)
>>PASS: 26_numerics/complex/abi_tag.cc (test for excess errors)
>>
>>I'll fix that.
>
> Actually, the proper pattern should presumably be '[ab]*/* de*/* [ep]*/*' even though it seems to make no difference in testing.
Yes, that's what I'm testing.
> I'll have this included in yet another version of the parallel make check patch (plus some further reschuffling as requested by Jakub), so I think there is no need for you to fix this now.
This can (and should) be fixed now, without waiting for some other change.