This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Yury Gribov <y dot gribov at samsung dot com>
- Cc: VandeVondele Joost <joost dot vandevondele at mat dot ethz dot ch>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 16:33:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140905143740 dot GL17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F414C at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140905145304 dot GM17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F7F45 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <540ED02A dot 9080002 at samsung dot com> <20140909101043 dot GQ17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F8014 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140909132414 dot GT17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F80BA at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <540F0E3E dot 3090101 at samsung dot com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:27:10PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 06:14 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
> >I certainly don't want to claim that the patch I have now is perfect,
> >it is rather an incremental improvement on the current setup.
>
> I'd second this. Writing patterns manually seems rather inefficient and
> error-prone
> (not undoable of course but unnecessarily complicated). And with current
> (crippled)
> version Joost already got 100% test time improvement.
But if there are jobs that just take 1s to complete, then clearly it doesn't
make sense to split them off as separate job. I think we don't need 100%
even split, but at least roughly is highly desirable.
Jakub