gcc archive
date index for September, 2014

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2014
20:38 ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.13 David Malcolm
17:09 Re: Testing Leak Sanitizer? Konstantin Serebryany
16:47 Re: Testing Leak Sanitizer? Yury Gribov
15:15 Testing Leak Sanitizer? Christophe Lyon
13:37 Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support Tom de Vries
09:28 Re: Problems with the gcc-bugs mailing list. Jonathan Wakely
09:20 Re: Problems with gcc-bugs Jonathan Wakely
00:26 Re: Problems with gcc-bugs Paul_Koning
00:08 Problems with the gcc-bugs mailing list. George R Goffe

September 29, 2014
23:59 Re: Problems with gcc-bugs George R Goffe
18:55 Re: Is "optimize" attribute on fndecl handled differently? FX
18:08 Re: Dijkstra's Methodology for Secure Systems Development Ian Grant
15:43 Re: Is "optimize" attribute on fndecl handled differently? Joseph S. Myers
13:14 Re: Problems with gcc-bugs Jonathan Wakely
13:10 RE: MIPS Maintainers Moore, Catherine
11:25 Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? Thomas Schwinge
11:09 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Jakub Jelinek
11:00 Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? Jakub Jelinek
10:56 RE: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? Thomas Schwinge
09:45 Re: Issue with __builtin_remainder expansion on i386 FX
09:06 Re: Issue with __builtin_remainder expansion on i386 Uros Bizjak
08:19 Re: GCC 4.9 internal compiler error Marek Polacek
08:17 Re: [Patch, Fortran] Add CO_BROADCAST Tobias Burnus
07:44 GCC 4.9 internal compiler error ÐÐÐÑÑ ÐÐÑÐÐ
07:11 Re: Is "optimize" attribute on fndecl handled differently? Steven Bosscher

September 28, 2014
22:40 gcc-5-20140928 is now available gccadmin
22:09 Re: Is "optimize" attribute on fndecl handled differently? FX
22:02 Re: Is "optimize" attribute on fndecl handled differently? FX
21:05 Re: Is "optimize" attribute on fndecl handled differently? Steven Bosscher
20:29 Re: Is "optimize" attribute on fndecl handled differently? FX
19:02 Re: Autotuning parameters/heuristics within gcc - best place to start? Gary Funck
16:04 Re: Is "optimize" attribute on fndecl handled differently? Steven Bosscher
15:24 Is "optimize" attribute on fndecl handled differently? FX
09:05 RE: MIPS Maintainers Matthew Fortune

September 27, 2014
21:13 Problems with gcc-bugs George R Goffe

September 26, 2014
23:37 Issue with __builtin_remainder expansion on i386 FX
21:02 Re: Problem with accessing built-ins from Fortran front-end Joseph S. Myers
20:07 Re: MIPS Maintainers Eric Christopher
20:01 MIPS Maintainers Jeff Law
14:47 Re: Autotuning parameters/heuristics within gcc - best place to start? Andi Kleen
10:50 Re: [RFD] Using the 'memory constraint' trick to avoid memory clobber doesn't work Richard Biener
10:37 Re: [RFD] Using the 'memory constraint' trick to avoid memory clobber doesn't work David Wohlferd
09:14 Re: cgraph_node::verify - quite strong condition that was met by IPA-ICF Martin Jambor
09:11 Re: Problem with accessing built-ins from Fortran front-end Jakub Jelinek
09:07 Re: Problem with accessing built-ins from Fortran front-end FX
08:56 Re: Problem with accessing built-ins from Fortran front-end Jakub Jelinek
08:49 Re: Problem with accessing built-ins from Fortran front-end Richard Biener
08:34 Re: cgraph_node::verify - quite strong condition that was met by IPA-ICF Richard Biener
08:30 Problem with accessing built-ins from Fortran front-end FX

September 25, 2014
22:42 gcc-4.8-20140925 is now available gccadmin
22:00 Re: cgraph_node::verify - quite strong condition that was met by IPA-ICF Jan Hubicka
21:26 Autotuning parameters/heuristics within gcc - best place to start? Robert Stevenson
20:48 cgraph_node::verify - quite strong condition that was met by IPA-ICF Martin LiÅka
07:36 Re: [RFD] Using the 'memory constraint' trick to avoid memory clobber doesn't work Yury Gribov
05:53 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Janne Blomqvist
01:35 Re: Problems building the latest gcc George R Goffe
00:49 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Jan Hubicka

September 24, 2014
23:36 Re: Problems building the latest gcc Jonathan Wakely
22:44 gcc-4.9-20140924 is now available gccadmin
22:35 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Steven Bosscher
21:51 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Jan Hubicka
21:49 Problems building the latest gcc George R Goffe
21:47 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Ian Lance Taylor
21:21 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Jeff Law
20:32 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Ilya Enkovich
19:56 insert global variable declaration with gcc plugin Pedro Paredes
18:20 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Jan Hubicka
17:05 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Steven Bosscher
16:32 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Jan Hubicka
16:19 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Jan Hubicka
15:27 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Jeff Law
15:02 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Ian Lance Taylor
14:47 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Andi Kleen
14:38 Re: [RFC] Dealing with ODR violations in GCC Jonathan Wakely
14:10 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Jan Hubicka
12:48 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Richard Biener
12:40 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Ian Lance Taylor
09:02 Re: Denormals and underflow control (gradual vs. aburpt) in soft-fp library Uros Bizjak
08:48 Re: [GSoC] Status - 20140901 FINAL Roman Gareev
08:31 Re: [RFD] Using the 'memory constraint' trick to avoid memory clobber doesn't work Richard Biener
08:11 Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Richard Biener
07:43 [RFD] Using the 'memory constraint' trick to avoid memory clobber doesn't work David Wohlferd
06:56 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Ilya Enkovich
05:47 Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files Jan Hubicka

September 23, 2014
17:13 Re: Denormals and underflow control (gradual vs. aburpt) in soft-fp library Joseph S. Myers
16:54 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Jeff Law
16:10 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Jeff Law
16:08 Denormals and underflow control (gradual vs. aburpt) in soft-fp library Uros Bizjak
16:03 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Jakub Jelinek
15:59 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Petr Machata
15:59 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Jeff Law
14:34 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Jakub Jelinek
14:23 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Uros Bizjak
13:55 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Ilya Enkovich
11:20 Re: x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Bin Meng
11:18 Re: x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Bin Meng
11:02 RE: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? Zamyatin, Igor
10:49 Re: x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Richard Biener
10:48 Re: x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Richard Biener
10:41 Re: x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Andrew Haley
09:39 Re: x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Bin Meng
09:11 Re: x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Bin Meng
08:32 Re: x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Jakub Jelinek
08:20 Re: x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Bin Meng
08:10 Re: x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Richard Biener
07:51 x86: combined usage of "-Os -mregparm=3" leads to broken codes Bin Meng

September 22, 2014
17:39 Re: -Wstack-usage and alloca in loops Eric Botcazou
17:08 Re: -Wstack-usage and alloca in loops Jeff Law
16:59 Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? Jeff Law
16:42 Re: Is this a compiler bug? David Malcolm
16:27 Re: Make name+email address cut'n'paste-able Jeff Law
16:24 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
16:21 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jason Merrill
16:20 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Segher Boessenkool
15:58 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
15:56 -Wstack-usage and alloca in loops Dmitry Antipov
15:49 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
15:49 Inserting global variable daclaration Andres Tiraboschi
15:44 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Segher Boessenkool
15:43 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jason Merrill
15:38 Re: Implementing OpenACC's Fortran module Tobias Burnus
15:32 Re: Implementing OpenACC's Fortran module Tobias Burnus
15:26 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
15:21 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jason Merrill
15:17 Re: Implementing OpenACC's Fortran module Thomas Schwinge
14:35 Make name+email address cut'n'paste-able (was: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?) Jan-Benedict Glaw
14:33 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Joseph S. Myers
14:32 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Jakub Jelinek
14:31 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Steve Kargl
14:26 Re: Is this a compiler bug? David Malcolm
14:06 Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? Thomas Schwinge
09:02 Re: LTO testsuite - single test execution Richard Biener
08:32 Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support Richard Biener
06:11 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Andrew Pinski
05:15 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Andrew Pinski
03:08 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Steve Kargl
03:01 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Steve Kargl
02:57 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Andrew Pinski
02:50 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Ed Smith-Rowland
01:56 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Steve Kargl
01:50 Re: Is this a compiler bug? Andrew Pinski
01:23 Is this a compiler bug? Steve Kargl

September 21, 2014
22:43 gcc-5-20140921 is now available gccadmin

September 20, 2014
15:05 Failue when trying to build native mingw32 4.9.1 gcc (c, c++, ada) avy st
14:21 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Jonathan Wakely
11:52 Re: Implementing OpenACC's Fortran module Tobias Burnus
07:41 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Jakub Jelinek
07:33 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Andrew Haley
01:45 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
00:05 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Andrew Pinski

September 19, 2014
23:53 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
23:15 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Jonathan Wakely
23:01 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Jonathan Wakely
18:50 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Dmitry Vyukov
17:32 Re: gcc 4.7.4 lto build failure Rogelio Serrano
16:15 Global Value Numbering on SSA representation based on Redundancy Class Ajit Kumar Agarwal
15:29 Dijkstra's Methodology for Secure Systems Development Ian Grant
15:21 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
13:03 Re: gcc 4.7.4 lto build failure Markus Trippelsdorf
12:55 Re: gcc 4.7.4 lto build failure Markus Trippelsdorf
12:15 gcc 4.7.4 lto build failure Rogelio Serrano
09:04 Re: Implementing OpenACC's Fortran module Thomas Schwinge
05:42 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Yury Gribov
02:38 RE: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Thomas Preud'homme
02:22 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
01:37 RE: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Joe Buck
01:06 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
00:45 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
00:32 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Jonathan Wakely

September 18, 2014
23:07 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
23:03 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
22:55 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Jonathan Wakely
22:46 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
22:42 gcc-4.8-20140918 is now available gccadmin
21:38 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
21:22 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Tobias Ulmer
21:14 LTO testsuite - single test execution Martin LiÅka
18:17 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Jeff Law
18:15 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Jeff Law
17:33 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Dmitry Vyukov
14:37 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Yury Gribov
14:32 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Richard Biener
13:36 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Jeff Law
11:19 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Yury Gribov
11:16 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Yury Gribov
11:16 Re: [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Jakub Jelinek
11:09 [RFC] Add asm constraint modifier to mark strict memory accesses Yury Gribov
10:13 Re: Backporting KAsan patches to 4.9 branch Yury Gribov
09:58 Re: Backporting KAsan patches to 4.9 branch Jakub Jelinek
09:46 Backporting KAsan patches to 4.9 branch Yury Gribov

September 17, 2014
23:15 LTO detects violations of one-definition-rule ? Toon Moene
22:37 gcc-4.9-20140917 is now available gccadmin
21:41 Re: LLVM collaboration? Hal Finkel
19:10 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
19:00 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Marc Glisse
18:35 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
17:36 Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Marc Glisse
17:26 Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
17:26 Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD Ian Grant
16:43 Re: Offloading not relocatable Bernd Schmidt
16:43 Re: Offloading not relocatable Jakub Jelinek
16:39 Re: Offloading not relocatable Ilya Verbin
16:32 Re: Offloading not relocatable Bernd Schmidt
16:22 Re: Offloading not relocatable Jakub Jelinek
16:11 Re: Offloading not relocatable Jakub Jelinek
15:04 Re: Offloading not relocatable Bernd Schmidt
14:42 Re: Offloading not relocatable Jakub Jelinek
14:21 Offloading not relocatable Jakub Jelinek
13:37 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Ulrich Weigand

September 16, 2014
20:23 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Jason Merrill
19:01 Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support Richard Biener
16:04 RE: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
15:34 Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support Tom de Vries
13:02 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Ulrich Weigand
12:28 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Jason Merrill
12:01 Re: Designated Initializers in C++ David Brown
11:20 Re: Designated Initializers in C++ Jakub Jelinek
11:15 Designated Initializers in C++ David Brown
10:23 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Ulrich Weigand
09:48 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Richard Biener
09:28 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
09:20 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Richard Biener
04:12 PowerPC rs6000 multilib combinations Patrick Oppenlander
02:22 Re: GCC 5 snapshots produce broken kernel for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe? Arseny Solokha
02:08 Re: plugins header file Joey Ye

September 15, 2014
18:44 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Jason Merrill
18:18 plugins header file Andrew MacLeod
17:45 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Mike Stump
16:06 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
15:56 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Ulrich Weigand
15:47 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Jason Merrill
15:32 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Jakub Jelinek
15:22 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Ulrich Weigand
10:11 How to access the function body of a constructor? Swati Rathi
09:11 Re: Definition of the Host, Target and Build fields in Bugzilla Jonathan Wakely

September 14, 2014
22:37 gcc-5-20140914 is now available gccadmin
19:53 Re: [GSoC] Status - 20140901 FINAL Prathamesh Kulkarni
19:03 Re: Definition of the Host, Target and Build fields in Bugzilla Andreas Schwab
18:59 Definition of the Host, Target and Build fields in Bugzilla FrÃdÃric Buclin

September 13, 2014
11:21 Re: Lots of C++ failures FX
11:13 Re: Lots of C++ failures FX
11:08 Lots of C++ failures FX
10:58 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
09:53 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
07:34 Re: [GSoC] Status - 20140901 FINAL Tobias Burnus
00:04 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek

September 12, 2014
23:42 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Mike Stump
22:53 Re: [RFC] Dealing with ODR violations in GCC Trevor Saunders
19:08 RE: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
17:46 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Mike Stump
17:03 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
16:36 RE: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
16:34 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
16:33 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
16:10 Re: [GSoC] Status - 20140901 FINAL Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:58 Re: How to access the virtual table? Swati Rathi
10:17 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jonathan Wakely
09:47 RE: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
08:16 Re: [RFC] Dealing with ODR violations in GCC Richard Biener
08:08 Re: Does -flto give gcc access to data addresses? Richard Biener
06:45 Re: How to access the virtual table? Jan Hubicka
05:44 RE: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
05:40 [RFC] Dealing with ODR violations in GCC Jan Hubicka
05:00 How to access the virtual table? Swati Rathi

September 11, 2014
23:08 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Mike Stump
22:44 gcc-4.8-20140911 is now available gccadmin
22:15 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
21:24 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
20:17 Does -flto give gcc access to data addresses? Jeff Prothero
19:23 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Tobias Burnus
19:03 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
18:33 RE: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
18:19 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
17:26 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
17:05 RE: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
16:44 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Tom Tromey
14:53 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
14:49 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Jonathan Wakely
14:45 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
12:07 Using modes on parallel in vec_select Matthew Fortune
11:18 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Jonathan Wakely
10:12 Re: Frame pointer optimization issues Jiong Wang
08:43 RESERVATION REQUEST Shawn lee
08:39 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
08:06 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
07:51 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
06:23 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost

September 10, 2014
22:42 gcc-4.9-20140910 is now available gccadmin
21:39 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Mike Stump
21:23 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
21:08 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
21:07 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Joseph S. Myers
20:58 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Mike Stump
20:43 Re: printf format warning when sizeof(float) == sizeof(double) Joel Sherrill
20:42 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check David Malcolm
20:40 Re: printf format warning when sizeof(float) == sizeof(double) Joseph S. Myers
20:34 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
18:21 printf format warning when sizeof(float) == sizeof(double) Joel Sherrill
18:21 Re: [PATCH] gcc parallel make check Mike Stump
18:00 Increase the size of allocated memory space for basic blocks Yue Chen
15:37 Re: -Wmissing-field-initializers says Âmissing initializer for member when it obviously isn't. Paolo Carlini
14:39 -Wmissing-field-initializers says Âmissing initializer for member when it obviously isn't. Hi-Angel
13:57 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
13:26 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
00:51 Re: Some questions about pass web Carrot Wei
00:31 Re: Some questions about pass web Jan Hubicka

September 09, 2014
21:53 Re: Trouble trying to test GCC on a simulator Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:02 Re: Possible violation of the gcc GPL license Paolo Inaudi
16:46 Re: Possible violation of the gcc GPL license Jeff Law
16:10 Re: GCC 5 snapshots produce broken kernel for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe? Arseny Solokha
15:46 Possible violation of the gcc GPL license Paolo Inaudi
15:14 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
15:01 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
14:46 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Yury Gribov
14:33 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
14:27 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Yury Gribov
14:14 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
13:24 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
13:21 Re: ASAN test failures make compare_tests useless Thomas Schwinge
11:00 Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support Richard Biener
10:57 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
10:34 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
10:29 Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support Tom de Vries
10:10 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
10:05 Re: GCC 5 snapshots produce broken kernel for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe? pinskia
10:02 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Yury Gribov
09:57 Re: GCC 5 snapshots produce broken kernel for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe? Markus Trippelsdorf
09:35 GCC 5 snapshots produce broken kernel for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe? Arseny Solokha
06:51 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost

September 08, 2014
15:13 RE: ICE in bitmap routines with LRA and inline assembly language Robert Suchanek
15:04 Re: Trouble trying to test GCC on a simulator Tristan Gingold
14:51 Re: Trouble trying to test GCC on a simulator Pierre-Marie de Rodat
12:04 Re: How to identify object of a class defined in library file Swati Rathi
11:42 Re: How to identify object of a class defined in library file Jonathan Wakely
10:53 How to identify object of a class defined in library file Swati Rathi
10:26 Re: Trouble trying to test GCC on a simulator Tristan Gingold
10:01 Trouble trying to test GCC on a simulator Pierre-Marie de Rodat

September 07, 2014
22:36 gcc-5-20140907 is now available gccadmin

September 05, 2014
18:01 dejagnu testsuite bug? Steve Ellcey
17:18 Re: libstdc++ testsuite "misbehaving" Mike Stump
16:09 RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
14:53 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
14:37 Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
14:26 [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
13:37 Re: libstdc++ testsuite "misbehaving" Jonathan Wakely
13:08 GNU Tools Cauldron 2014 - Videos for presentations Diego Novillo
11:05 libstdc++ testsuite "misbehaving" Thomas Schwinge
08:19 Re: non-reproducible g++.dg/ubsan/align-2.C -Os execution failure Yury Gribov
01:53 Modifying generic tree with a plugin Andres Tiraboschi

September 04, 2014
23:44 Re: Compare Elimination problems Paul Shortis
23:32 Re: Compare Elimination problems Paul Shortis
22:37 gcc-4.8-20140904 is now available gccadmin
18:37 RE: Register allocation: caller-save vs spilling Wilco Dijkstra
18:04 ICE in bitmap routines with LRA and inline assembly language Steve Ellcey
16:33 Re: Compare Elimination problems Richard Henderson
13:54 Re: [BUILDROBOT] rs6000-ibm-aix4.3 / rs6000-ibm-aix5.3.0: error: 'ASM_WEAKEN_DECL' was not declared in this scope David Edelsohn
08:41 Re: non-reproducible g++.dg/ubsan/align-2.C -Os execution failure Uros Bizjak
08:39 [BUILDROBOT] rs6000-ibm-aix4.3 / rs6000-ibm-aix5.3.0: error: âASM_WEAKEN_DECLâ was not declared in this scope Jan-Benedict Glaw
07:12 non-reproducible g++.dg/ubsan/align-2.C -Os execution failure Tom de Vries
06:44 Re: Compare Elimination problems Uros Bizjak

September 03, 2014
22:46 PATCH for Re: New GCC mirror Gerald Pfeifer
22:44 gcc-4.9-20140903 is now available gccadmin
22:14 Compare Elimination problems Paul Shortis
20:49 Re: stack_pointer_delta related ICE in libgcc on 4.9.1 Andreas Schwab
20:19 Re: Enable EBX for x86 in 32bits PIC code Vladimir Makarov
20:04 Re: selective linking of floating point support for *printf / *scanf Joseph S. Myers
19:27 Re: selective linking of floating point support for *printf / *scanf Joern Rennecke
18:51 Re: stack_pointer_delta related ICE in libgcc on 4.9.1 Joel Sherrill
18:24 Re: stack_pointer_delta related ICE in libgcc on 4.9.1 Jeff Law
17:21 Re: [RFC] Don't inline builtin memory functions when ASan is enabled. Konstantin Serebryany
17:10 Re: Some questions about pass web Carrot Wei
16:23 Re: Bounded array type? Joseph S. Myers
16:08 Re: Bounded array type? Florian Weimer
15:56 stack_pointer_delta related ICE in libgcc on 4.9.1 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
15:35 Re: optimization for simd intrinsics vld2_dup_* on aarch64-none-elf Kyrill Tkachov
15:22 Re: Some questions about pass web Jeff Law
15:22 Re: Bounded array type? Joseph S. Myers
15:09 optimization for simd intrinsics vld2_dup_* on aarch64-none-elf shanyao chen
10:45 Re: gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
10:35 RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
10:33 RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
10:04 Re: gcc parallel make check Tobias Burnus
09:59 Re: gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
09:39 RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
09:37 RE: gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
09:30 Re: gcc parallel make check Jakub Jelinek
09:27 Re: gcc parallel make check Marc Glisse
09:16 gcc parallel make check VandeVondele Joost
08:36 Re: Some questions about pass web Steven Bosscher
08:30 Re: Some questions about pass web Steven Bosscher
07:52 Re: Bounded array type? Florian Weimer
07:47 Re: GCC ARM: aligned access Bin.Cheng
07:44 Employment Opening Notification Within Your Locality. David Wright
07:17 Re: Some questions about pass web Bin.Cheng
06:58 RE: selective linking of floating point support for *printf / *scanf Thomas Preud'homme
01:24 Re: Some questions about pass web Carrot Wei
00:50 Re: GCC ARM: aligned access Peng Fan

September 02, 2014
23:35 Some questions about pass web Carrot Wei
21:22 Bounded array type? James Nelson
18:08 Fwd: Spam again Uros Bizjak
17:46 Re: Spam again Andreas Schwab
17:13 Re: Spam again FrÃdÃric Buclin
15:28 Re: selective linking of floating point support for *printf / *scanf Joseph S. Myers
14:32 [RFC] Don't inline builtin memory functions when ASan is enabled. Maxim Ostapenko
13:26 Re: GCC ARM: aligned access Julian Brown
10:28 Re: Account creation disabled on GCC Bugzilla Joern Rennecke
10:01 Re: Account creation disabled on GCC Bugzilla Jakub Jelinek
09:49 Re: Account creation disabled on GCC Bugzilla Andreas Schwab
08:40 Re: Account creation disabled on GCC Bugzilla Richard Biener
08:40 Re: selective linking of floating point support for *printf / *scanf Andrew Haley
08:05 Re: New anti-spam extension enabled on GCC Bugzilla Richard Biener
07:48 Visualizing Call Hierarchy In Chromium Browser lin zuojian
07:33 Re: selective linking of floating point support for *printf / *scanf Joey Ye
07:05 Re: Spam again Andrew Pinski
07:01 Spam again Uros Bizjak
06:16 Re: Account creation disabled on GCC Bugzilla Uros Bizjak

September 01, 2014
12:55 Re: Account creation disabled on GCC Bugzilla Joel Sherrill
11:10 Re: Account creation disabled on GCC Bugzilla Jakub Jelinek
11:02 Re: Account creation disabled on GCC Bugzilla Florian Weimer
10:36 Account creation disabled on GCC Bugzilla FrÃdÃric Buclin
07:59 [GSoC] Status - 20140901 FINAL Maxim Kuvyrkov
06:56 Re: GCC ARM: aligned access Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
01:15 Re: GCC ARM: aligned access Peng Fan
00:09 Re: GCC ARM: aligned access Matt Thomas


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc