gcc archive
date index for June, 2014

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2014
19:20 Re: combine_simplify_rtx (doesn't) commute XOR and ASHIFTRT ??? Alan Lawrence
16:42 Re: Question about GCC's standard dependent optimization Jeff Law
12:35 LTO and version scripts Ulrich Drepper
08:39 RE: broken links? Gerald Pfeifer
06:18 Re: broken links? Andrey Belevantsev
04:25 Re: broken links? Ingwie Phoenix
03:22 RE: broken links? Hebenstreit, Michael
02:59 RE: Folding a bitfield in a union Thomas Preud'homme
02:07 RE: broken links? Hebenstreit, Michael
01:52 Re: broken links? Ingwie Phoenix

June 29, 2014
23:43 RE: broken links? Hebenstreit, Michael
23:14 Re: broken links? Ingwie Phoenix
23:12 RE: broken links? Gerald Pfeifer
23:05 gcc-4.10-20140629 is now available gccadmin

June 28, 2014
15:12 [fortran, committed] IEEE modules added to gfortran and libgfortran FX
11:06 __attribute__((aligned())) address of (&) arithmetic Hal Ashburner

June 27, 2014
16:47 clang 3.4.1 (and 3.3) compilation failed with gcc 4.7.4 Alexander Pyhalov
14:14 How to duplicate a loop including basic_blocks and edges? Benedikt Huber
10:23 Re: Folding a bitfield in a union Richard Biener
10:02 RE: Folding a bitfield in a union Thomas Preud'homme
09:32 Re: Folding a bitfield in a union Richard Biener
08:48 Re: Question about GCC's standard dependent optimization Richard Biener
08:40 Re: GCC 4.7.4 Released Richard Biener
08:22 Re: [GSoC] Question about unit tests Oleg Endo
06:51 Folding a bitfield in a union Thomas Preud'homme
05:39 Re: [GSoC] generation of GCC expression trees from isl ast expressions Tobias Grosser
05:31 Re: [GSoC] generation of GCC expression trees from isl ast expressions Roman Gareev
01:32 Re: Question about GCC's standard dependent optimization Bin.Cheng

June 26, 2014
22:49 gcc-4.8-20140626 is now available gccadmin
20:13 Re: Question about GCC's standard dependent optimization Jeff Law
16:50 Re: GCC 4.7.4 Released Ãscar Fuentes
16:24 Re: GCC 4.7.4 Released Sergey Boldyrev
09:36 Re: Question about GCC's standard dependent optimization Bin.Cheng
09:19 Re: Question about GCC's standard dependent optimization Richard Biener
08:44 Question about GCC's standard dependent optimization Bin.Cheng
08:25 Re: C++ name mangling not tracking extern "C"-ness of function types? Jakub Jelinek
08:21 C++ name mangling not tracking extern "C"-ness of function types? Stephan Bergmann

June 25, 2014
22:51 gcc-4.9-20140625 is now available gccadmin
20:43 Re: [GSoC] generation of GCC expression trees from isl ast expressions Tobias Grosser
15:27 Re: stdatomic.h and atomic_load_explicit() Joseph S. Myers
15:15 Re: stdatomic.h and atomic_load_explicit() Sebastian Huber
14:50 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Vladimir Makarov
14:43 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Vladimir Makarov
14:37 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Marc Glisse
14:28 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Vladimir Makarov
14:25 Re: [GSoC] generation of GCC expression trees from isl ast expressions Roman Gareev
14:25 [GSoC] Question about unit tests Roman Gareev
14:06 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Jakub Jelinek
14:02 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Richard Biener
14:02 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Vladimir Makarov
14:01 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Vladimir Makarov
13:25 Re: stdatomic.h and atomic_load_explicit() Joseph S. Myers
11:00 stdatomic.h and atomic_load_explicit() Sebastian Huber
10:33 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Richard Biener
09:53 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Bin.Cheng
09:47 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Bin.Cheng
09:32 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Renato Golin
09:26 RE: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Bingfeng Mei

June 24, 2014
21:26 Re: combine_simplify_rtx (doesn't) commute XOR and ASHIFTRT ??? Richard Kenner
18:11 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Renato Golin
17:28 Re: combine_simplify_rtx (doesn't) commute XOR and ASHIFTRT ??? Jeff Law
17:16 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Eric Christopher
15:07 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Vladimir Makarov
14:58 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Ramana Radhakrishnan
14:57 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Ramana Radhakrishnan
14:52 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Vladimir Makarov
14:45 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Vladimir Makarov
14:43 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Renato Golin
14:36 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Ramana Radhakrishnan
14:11 Comparison of GCC-4.9 and LLVM-3.4 performance on SPECInt2000 for x86-64 and ARM Vladimir Makarov
13:42 combine_simplify_rtx (doesn't) commute XOR and ASHIFTRT ??? Alan Lawrence
08:22 Re: Offload Library Kirill Yukhin
06:59 Mirroring GCC Steven Robertson

June 23, 2014
13:12 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
13:01 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
12:43 Re: [GSoC] generation of GCC expression trees from isl ast expressions Roman Gareev
12:28 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
11:51 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
10:08 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
09:41 Re: [GSoC] commutative patterns Richard Biener
08:26 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
07:30 Re: [GSoC] generation of GCC expression trees from isl ast expressions Tobias Grosser
06:34 [GSoC] generation of GCC expression trees from isl ast expressions Roman Gareev

June 22, 2014
22:47 gcc-4.10-20140622 is now available gccadmin
19:52 Re: [GSoC] commutative patterns Prathamesh Kulkarni

June 21, 2014
21:39 Re: [GSoC] commutative patterns Prathamesh Kulkarni

June 20, 2014
18:49 Re: Offload Library Joel Sherrill
18:46 Re: Offload Library David Edelsohn
14:25 Re: regs_used estimation in IVOPTS seriously flawed David Edelsohn
09:36 RE: regs_used estimation in IVOPTS seriously flawed Bingfeng Mei
09:19 Re: regs_used estimation in IVOPTS seriously flawed Bin.Cheng
09:01 RE: regs_used estimation in IVOPTS seriously flawed Bingfeng Mei
05:25 Re: regs_used estimation in IVOPTS seriously flawed Bin.Cheng

June 19, 2014
22:43 gcc-4.8-20140619 is now available gccadmin
21:32 Re: [GSoC] commutative patterns Prathamesh Kulkarni
21:24 [GSoC] commutative patterns Prathamesh Kulkarni
14:23 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
10:42 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
09:07 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni

June 18, 2014
22:37 gcc-4.9-20140618 is now available gccadmin
18:04 Re: ICE with atomic_store Andrew MacLeod
16:59 ICE with atomic_store Basile Starynkevitch
16:24 Re: [GSoC] How to get started with the isl code generation Tobias Grosser
16:03 Re: [GSoC] How to get started with the isl code generation Roman Gareev
15:51 gfortran option -fno-automatic and -finit-local-zero Chase, Jeffrey G. (IS) (Contr)
15:04 Re: [GSoC] How to get started with the isl code generation Tobias Grosser
13:47 [GSoC] question about regular expressions Roman Gareev
13:22 Re: [GSoC] How to get started with the isl code generation Roman Gareev
12:27 RE: regs_used estimation in IVOPTS seriously flawed Bingfeng Mei
11:36 Re: regs_used estimation in IVOPTS seriously flawed Richard Biener
10:57 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
09:21 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
07:28 Re: C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Florian Weimer
07:24 Re: C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Jakub Jelinek
07:18 Re: C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Florian Weimer

June 17, 2014
22:43 Ada and CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET Joel Sherrill
19:58 Cross-compiler GCC 4.8.3 for AArch64 port (aarch64-linux-gnu) - successfully built and installed Raghu L
19:43 Re: Stamping Inquiry/Land Rover/Changdong Co., Ltd. Lin Shelton
16:39 Issue with attribute ((aligned)) ? Ulrich Weigand
15:00 Re: C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Jakub Jelinek
14:59 regs_used estimation in IVOPTS seriously flawed Bingfeng Mei
14:52 Re: C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Florian Weimer
14:39 Re: C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Jakub Jelinek
14:34 Re: C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Florian Weimer
14:25 Re: C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Trevor Saunders
12:41 Re: C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Florian Weimer
09:45 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
09:07 RE: Register Pressure guided Unroll and Jam in GCC !! Bingfeng Mei
07:58 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Jiri Kosina

June 16, 2014
23:05 [GSoC] Status - 20140616 Maxim Kuvyrkov
22:21 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
18:50 Re: Register Pressure guided Unroll and Jam in GCC !! Aaron Sawdey
18:42 Re: Register Pressure guided Unroll and Jam in GCC !! Vladimir Makarov
18:37 Re: Register Pressure guided Unroll and Jam in GCC !! Vladimir Makarov
18:26 Re: Register Pressure guided Unroll and Jam in GCC !! Aaron Sawdey
18:07 RE: Register Pressure guided Unroll and Jam in GCC !! Richard Biener
16:40 RE: Register Pressure guided Unroll and Jam in GCC !! Ajit Kumar Agarwal
14:37 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Mark Brown
14:25 Re: Register Pressure guided Unroll and Jam in GCC !! Richard Biener
14:22 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Michael Matz
14:15 Register Pressure guided Unroll and Jam in GCC !! Ajit Kumar Agarwal
13:03 vector load Rematerialization!! Ajit Kumar Agarwal
11:20 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Jiri Kosina
11:15 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
10:52 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Andreas Schwab
10:29 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Dan Carpenter
08:48 Re: Help understand the may_be_zero field in loop niter information Bin.Cheng
04:10 Regarding concrete inlined and out-of-line inlined instances Ramana
01:51 Re: [PATCH] gcc/dwarf2asm.c: Add static_output_delta() with var_list for dw2_asm_output_delta() Chen Gang
01:36 Re: [PATCH] gcc/dwarf2asm.c: Add static_output_delta() with var_list for dw2_asm_output_delta() Bin.Cheng

June 15, 2014
23:08 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
22:42 gcc-4.10-20140615 is now available gccadmin
17:02 Repost of Gcc plugin for modification of source code ? Mohsin Khan
16:54 Re: Gcc plugin for modification of source code ? Mohsin Khan
14:50 i386.md missing a mode Joel Sherrill
13:06 assigning hard regs to pseudo regs shmuel gutl

June 14, 2014
22:10 Re: Gcc plugin for modification of source code ? Basile Starynkevitch
21:10 Gcc plugin for modification of source code ? Mohsin Khan
17:47 Re: [RFC] Fortran: How to handle allocatable polymorphic components with OpenMPv5/OpenACCv3 Paul Richard Thomas
13:38 Forward declaration style Oleg Endo
12:03 Re: gnat_rm.texi and makeinfo 5.1 Jonathan Wakely
09:50 Re: [PATCH] gcc/dwarf2asm.c: Add static_output_delta() with var_list for dw2_asm_output_delta() Chen Gang
09:45 [PATCH] gcc/dwarf2asm.c: Add static_output_delta() with var_list for dw2_asm_output_delta() Chen Gang
07:13 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
06:50 Re: gnat_rm.texi and makeinfo 5.1 Arnaud Charlet
06:19 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener

June 13, 2014
21:48 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
21:41 Re: gnat_rm.texi and makeinfo 5.1 Dominique Dhumieres
21:30 gnat_rm.texi and makeinfo 5.1 Joel Sherrill
20:58 [RFC] Fortran: How to handle allocatable polymorphic components with OpenMPv5/OpenACCv3 Tobias Burnus
15:23 Re: Should we be updating copyright years on branches? Richard Kenner
15:15 Re: Should we be updating copyright years on branches? Jeff Law
10:33 RFC: New map kind for GOMP_target{,_data} Jakub Jelinek
09:57 Should we be updating copyright years on branches? Jonathan Wakely
09:32 Re: Help understand the may_be_zero field in loop niter information Richard Biener
07:43 Re: Help understand the may_be_zero field in loop niter information Bin.Cheng
07:29 GCC 4.7.4 Released Richard Biener

June 12, 2014
22:47 gcc-4.8-20140612 is now available gccadmin
16:28 Re: ACM SIGPLAN Programming Languages Software Award Jeff Law
14:24 Attributes for var_decl and fun_decl. Umesh Kalappa
12:41 GCC 4.7 branch is now closed Richard Biener
12:00 Re: Help understand the may_be_zero field in loop niter information Zdenek Dvorak
11:46 Re: Help understand the may_be_zero field in loop niter information Richard Biener
11:41 Help understand the may_be_zero field in loop niter information Bin.Cheng
10:56 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
10:04 Re: C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Jonathan Wakely
09:40 C++ interop issue due to non-null pointers Florian Weimer
08:32 Re: ACM SIGPLAN Programming Languages Software Award Mark Wielaard
08:16 Re: ACM SIGPLAN Programming Languages Software Award Richard Biener

June 11, 2014
22:46 gcc-4.9-20140611 is now available gccadmin
14:52 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
14:09 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
12:58 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
12:18 ACM SIGPLAN Programming Languages Software Award David Edelsohn
11:41 RE: implicit gnat_malloc seen as vararg function BELBACHIR Selim
11:35 Re: broken links? Martin Liška
10:53 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
09:08 Re: Best way to compute cost of a sequence of gimple stmt Richard Biener
08:51 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
08:27 RE: Best way to compute cost of a sequence of gimple stmt Thomas Preud'homme
08:09 Re: Best way to compute cost of a sequence of gimple stmt Richard Biener
05:46 RE: Best way to compute cost of a sequence of gimple stmt Thomas Preud'homme

June 10, 2014
18:54 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Richard Biener
18:11 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Jiri Kosina
18:04 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Steven Noonan
17:50 Re: Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Jakub Jelinek
17:46 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Linus Torvalds
17:37 Issue with sub-object __builtin_object_size Ulrich Weigand
16:58 RE: broken links? Hebenstreit, Michael
16:43 Re: broken links? Jonathan Wakely
16:41 Re: broken links? Jonathan Wakely
16:20 broken links? Hebenstreit, Michael
16:20 Re: Weird startup issue with -fsplit-stack Ian Lance Taylor
15:55 Re: How can I get started as a GCC developer Jonathan Wakely
15:38 Re: How can I get started as a GCC developer Jonathan Wakely
15:17 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Jakub Jelinek
15:13 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Peter Zijlstra
15:05 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Marek Polacek
14:54 Re: Weird startup issue with -fsplit-stack Dmitry Antipov
14:53 Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Peter Zijlstra
14:01 Re: How can I get started as a GCC developer Basile Starynkevitch
13:41 Re: How can I get started as a GCC developer Ian Lance Taylor
13:23 [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races Jiri Kosina
11:57 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
11:32 implicit gnat_malloc seen as vararg function BELBACHIR Selim
11:06 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
10:36 How can I get started as a GCC developer Anonymous User
09:15 Re: Best way to compute cost of a sequence of gimple stmt Richard Biener
08:32 Best way to compute cost of a sequence of gimple stmt Thomas Preud'homme

June 09, 2014
19:09 RFH: DWARF representation of mixed-mode registers Richard Sandiford
09:32 Re: Write test case for libstdc++ with C source Sebastian Huber

June 08, 2014
22:51 gcc-4.10-20140608 is now available gccadmin
18:44 Re: [GSoC] How to get started with the isl code generation Tobias Grosser
17:43 Re: [GSoC] How to get started with the isl code generation Roman Gareev

June 07, 2014
23:45 Using cgraph_add_new_function at an arbitrary point PÃricles Alves
22:46 gcc-4.7-20140607 is now available gccadmin
11:24 Top-level configury FX
11:18 Question about LRA in aarch64_be-none-elf Kugan

June 06, 2014
20:24 Re: What is "fnspec function type attribute"? Marc Glisse
20:20 Re: What is "fnspec function type attribute"? Steve Kargl
20:07 What is "fnspec function type attribute"? FX
16:07 Re: Reducing Register Pressure based on Instruction Scheduling and Register Allocator!! Vladimir Makarov
14:48 Reducing Register Pressure based on Instruction Scheduling and Register Allocator!! Ajit Kumar Agarwal
13:57 RE: gnat.dg test: div_no_warning.adb BELBACHIR Selim
13:48 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
10:02 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
09:26 RE: Gimplilfy ICE in gnat.dg/array18.adb BELBACHIR Selim
09:02 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
08:21 Re: Gimplilfy ICE in gnat.dg/array18.adb Eric Botcazou
08:13 RE: Gimplilfy ICE in gnat.dg/array18.adb BELBACHIR Selim

June 05, 2014
23:17 Re: [RFC] PR61300 K&R incoming args Alan Modra
22:37 gcc-4.8-20140605 is now available gccadmin
22:01 Re: Gimplilfy ICE in gnat.dg/array18.adb Eric Botcazou
20:47 Re: RTL representation of i386 shrdl instruction is incorrect? Marc Glisse
19:19 Re: [RFC] PR61300 K&R incoming args Jeff Law
17:57 Re: RTL representation of i386 shrdl instruction is incorrect? Niranjan Hasabnis
12:36 Re: Cross-testing libsanitizer Christophe Lyon
11:04 Gimplilfy ICE in gnat.dg/array18.adb BELBACHIR Selim
07:51 Re: RTL representation of i386 shrdl instruction is incorrect? Richard Biener

June 04, 2014
22:48 gcc-4.9-20140604 is now available gccadmin
22:03 RTL representation of i386 shrdl instruction is incorrect? Niranjan Hasabnis
16:44 Debugging var-tracking problem Michael Collison

June 03, 2014
20:18 Just one suggestion judyhomini
17:30 Re: RFA: [VAX] SUBREG of MEM with a mode dependent address Matt Thomas
15:47 Re: PowerPC IEEE 128-bit floating point: Internal GCC types Joseph S. Myers
14:57 GNU Tools Cauldron 2014 - Presentation abstracts Diego Novillo
14:19 Re: How can I generate a new function at compile time? Benedikt Huber
14:10 Re: How can I generate a new function at compile time? Richard Biener
13:59 Re: How can I generate a new function at compile time? Benedikt Huber
13:14 Re: How can I generate a new function at compile time? Richard Biener
13:04 Re: How can I generate a new function at compile time? Benedikt Huber
12:46 Re: Cross-testing libsanitizer Christophe Lyon
12:20 Re: Cross-testing libsanitizer Florian Weimer
12:18 Re: lib{atomic, itm}/configure.tgt uses -mcpu=v9 as default for sparc Carlos SÃnchez de La Lama
10:16 Re: Cross-testing libsanitizer Yury Gribov
10:11 Re: lib{atomic, itm}/configure.tgt uses -mcpu=v9 as default for sparc Eric Botcazou
10:06 Re: Cross-testing libsanitizer Christophe Lyon
09:38 Re: lib{atomic, itm}/configure.tgt uses -mcpu=v9 as default for sparc Matthias Klose
08:53 Re: FloatingPointMath and transformations Jonathan Wakely
08:44 Re: [GSoC] How to get started with the isl code generation Tobias Grosser
07:57 Re: [RFC] PR61300 K&R incoming args Richard Biener
06:39 Re: Cross-testing libsanitizer Yury Gribov
00:47 Re: FloatingPointMath and transformations Vincent Lefevre
00:15 Re: PowerPC IEEE 128-bit floating point: Internal GCC types Vincent Lefevre
00:11 Re: Zero/Sign extension elimination using value ranges Kugan

June 02, 2014
23:59 Re: question about -ffast-math implementation Andi Kleen
22:19 Re: question about -ffast-math implementation Mike Izbicki
22:16 Re: FloatingPointMath and transformations Vincent Lefevre
21:53 Re: PowerPC IEEE 128-bit floating point: Language standards Joseph S. Myers
21:30 Re: [RFC] PR61300 K&R incoming args Joseph S. Myers
21:21 Re: PowerPC IEEE 128-bit floating point: Internal GCC types Joseph S. Myers
20:32 Re: lib{atomic, itm}/configure.tgt uses -mcpu=v9 as default for sparc Eric Botcazou
19:04 GNU Tools Cauldron 2014 - Presentation schedule Diego Novillo
18:24 Re: PowerPC IEEE 128-bit floating point: Two 128-bit floating point types Joseph S. Myers
18:20 Re: question about -ffast-math implementation Ian Lance Taylor
17:57 Re: [RFC]Better support for big-endian targets in GCC vectorizer Joseph S. Myers
16:13 Re: PowerPC IEEE 128-bit floating point: Language standards Jonathan Wakely
16:06 Re: PowerPC IEEE 128-bit floating point: Language standards Jason Merrill
15:45 Re: PowerPC IEEE 128-bit floating point: Language standards Michael Meissner
15:34 Re: FloatingPointMath and transformations Andreas Schwab
15:25 Cross-testing libsanitizer Christophe Lyon
14:52 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Ludovic CourtÃs
14:48 Re: [RFC] PR61300 K&R incoming args Alan Modra
14:39 Re: FloatingPointMath and transformations Jakub Jelinek
14:33 Re: FloatingPointMath and transformations Geert Bosch
14:06 FloatingPointMath and transformations Vincent Lefevre
13:44 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
12:48 Re: lib{atomic, itm}/configure.tgt uses -mcpu=v9 as default for sparc Carlos SÃnchez de La Lama
12:44 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Richard Biener
12:12 Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps Ludovic CourtÃs
12:09 Re: lib{atomic, itm}/configure.tgt uses -mcpu=v9 as default for sparc Jonathan Wakely
11:38 Re: lib{atomic, itm}/configure.tgt uses -mcpu=v9 as default for sparc Carlos SÃnchez de La Lama
11:23 Re: question about -ffast-math implementation Tim Prince
11:16 [GSoC] decision tree first steps Prathamesh Kulkarni
11:01 Re: lib{atomic, itm}/configure.tgt uses -mcpu=v9 as default for sparc Eric Botcazou
10:00 Re: [RFC] PR61300 K&R incoming args Florian Weimer
09:38 GCC 4.7.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener
09:25 lib{atomic, itm}/configure.tgt uses -mcpu=v9 as default for sparc Carlos SÃnchez de La Lama
07:48 GCC 4.7.4 Status Report, branch frozen for release (candidate) Richard Biener
07:18 Re: question about -ffast-math implementation Mike Izbicki
07:00 Re: question about -ffast-math implementation Andrew Pinski
06:10 Re: question about -ffast-math implementation Janne Blomqvist

June 01, 2014
22:55 gcc-4.10-20140601 is now available gccadmin
06:52 question about -ffast-math implementation Mike Izbicki


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc