gcc archive
date index for March, 2014

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2014
20:32 Re: RL78 sim? DJ Delorie
20:20 Re: VREGS fails to handle subreg of mem Eric Botcazou
15:51 [Question, IRA] Different IRA behaviour with the same RTL input but trivially different CFG Felix Yang
12:03 VREGS fails to handle subreg of mem Claudiu Zissulescu
11:53 Re: Anyone used Graphite of Gentoo recently? Tobias Grosser
08:41 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Andrew Haley
08:10 Re: Anyone used Graphite of Gentoo recently? Richard Biener
06:24 Re: Anyone used Graphite of Gentoo recently? Tobias Grosser
04:44 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw

March 30, 2014
22:36 gcc-4.9-20140330 is now available gccadmin

March 29, 2014
23:49 Re: Could we harden GCC's stack smashing? (Re: Adam Zabrocki's Adventure with stack smashing protection) Steven Stewart-Gallus
22:42 gcc-4.7-20140329 is now available gccadmin
20:03 Re: Could we harden GCC's stack smashing? (Re: Adam Zabrocki's Adventure with stack smashing protection) Ian Lance Taylor
18:59 RL78 sim? Richard Hulme
17:52 Could we harden GCC's stack smashing? (Re: Adam Zabrocki's Adventure with stack smashing protection) Steven Stewart-Gallus
15:33 slides of talk on "GCC plugins thru the MELT example" (Linux F. Collab. S) Basile Starynkevitch
09:52 [patch] Fix texinfo warnings for doc/gcc.texi [was: Re: doc bugs] Tobias Burnus
07:32 Re: Some Tests in gcc.dg/graphite/ are failing for AVR target Tobias Grosser

March 28, 2014
21:32 Re: C Code in GCC Machine Descriptions Ian Lance Taylor
19:50 Re: doc bugs H.J. Lu
19:42 doc bugs Mike Stump
16:46 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Hannes Frederic Sowa
15:49 C Code in GCC Machine Descriptions Saswat Padhi
15:03 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Andrew Haley
14:52 Some Tests in gcc.dg/graphite/ are failing for AVR target K_s, Vishnu
14:48 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Hannes Frederic Sowa
14:17 Re: Testing machine descriptions Niranjan Hasabnis
13:15 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Andrew Haley
11:16 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs shmeel gutl
10:46 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Hannes Frederic Sowa
10:15 Re: question regarding new warning Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:41 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Andrew Haley
09:30 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Hannes Frederic Sowa
09:10 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Andrew Haley
07:56 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Richard Sandiford
06:21 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw
04:13 Re: Testing machine descriptions DJ Delorie
04:07 Re: Testing machine descriptions Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
01:54 Re: Testing machine descriptions Niranjan Hasabnis

March 27, 2014
23:57 Re: Testing machine descriptions DJ Delorie
23:51 Re: Testing machine descriptions Niranjan Hasabnis
23:23 Re: Testing machine descriptions DJ Delorie
22:44 gcc-4.8-20140327 is now available gccadmin
22:37 Re: question regarding new warning Daniel Gutson
22:09 Testing machine descriptions Niranjan Hasabnis
21:05 periodise Aeschliman Declercq
17:57 Re: [Question, C6X] Under what situations should we disable DCE in sched2? Bernd Schmidt
16:51 Re: question regarding new warning mveksler
16:04 Re: [Question, C6X] Under what situations should we disable DCE in sched2? Julian Brown
16:03 Re: [Question, C6X] Under what situations should we disable DCE in sched2? Julian Brown
15:41 Re: [Question, C6X] Under what situations should we disable DCE in sched2? Jeff Law
15:09 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Renato Golin
15:06 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Paul_Koning
14:58 Re: [llvmlinux] Builtin: stack pointer Renato Golin
14:44 Re: [llvmlinux] Builtin: stack pointer Behan Webster
14:34 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Behan Webster
13:51 [Question, C6X] Under what situations should we disable DCE in sched2? Felix Yang
13:18 Re: Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite Mircea Namolaru
11:50 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Renato Golin
11:33 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Jakub Jelinek
11:27 Re: [llvmlinux] Builtin: stack pointer Tim Northover
11:20 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Renato Golin
10:56 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Jakub Jelinek
10:53 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Jakub Jelinek
10:48 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Renato Golin
10:47 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Andrew Pinski
10:44 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Andrew Pinski
10:44 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Jakub Jelinek
10:40 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Jonathan Wakely
10:38 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Renato Golin
10:29 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Andreas Schwab
10:25 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Renato Golin
10:24 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Svante Signell
10:24 Re: question regarding new warning Andrew Haley
10:15 Re: question regarding new warning Jonathan Wakely
10:12 Re: Builtin: stack pointer Andreas Schwab
10:10 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Jonathan Wakely
09:49 Re: question regarding new warning Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:48 Re: WPA stream_out form & memory consumption Martin Liška
09:38 Builtin: stack pointer Renato Golin
09:34 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Svante Signell
08:52 Re: question regarding new warning Florian Weimer
08:52 Re: WPA stream_out form & memory consumption Martin Liška
08:22 RE: question regarding new warning Thomas Preud'homme
08:15 Re: question regarding new warning Andrew Haley
08:05 RE: question regarding new warning Thomas Preud'homme
07:59 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Richard Sandiford
07:45 Re: question regarding new warning Andrew Haley
06:21 Re: RTL Optimisations Umesh Kalappa
05:40 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Chung-Ju Wu
05:36 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Chung-Ju Wu
03:55 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw

March 26, 2014
17:06 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Andris Pavenis
15:39 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Svante Signell
15:37 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Yury Gribov
15:32 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Andreas Schwab
15:30 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Svante Signell
15:27 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Yury Gribov
15:22 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Jonathan Wakely
15:20 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Andreas Schwab
15:15 Re: gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Svante Signell
15:07 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Matthew Fortune
15:05 question regarding new warning Daniel Gutson
14:12 Re: RTL Optimisations Georg-Johann Lay
12:06 Include Bug 53001 in GCC 4.9 Changes Joshua J Cogliati
10:23 gcc-4.9: How to generate Makefile.in from a modified Makefile.am? Svante Signell
07:53 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Richard Sandiford
07:31 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw
03:52 Re: Register at the GSoC website to rate projects Maxim Kuvyrkov

March 25, 2014
23:01 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Joseph S. Myers
22:23 Re: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Richard Sandiford
22:04 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Matthew Fortune
21:50 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Joseph S. Myers
20:50 Re: WPA stream_out form & memory consumption Jan Hubicka
20:02 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Rich Fuhler
17:18 Re: [Question] How to deliver loop-related pragma information from TREE to RTL? Eric Botcazou
13:27 Re: LTO & top-level ASM Ian Lance Taylor
12:43 [ANN] CppCon 2014 Call for Submissions Boris Kolpackov
12:28 Re: RTL Optimisations Jeff Law
12:24 RTL Optimisations Umesh Kalappa
11:21 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Richard Sandiford
10:26 Re: LTO & top-level ASM Martin LiÅka
10:15 Re: [Question] How to deliver loop-related pragma information from TREE to RTL? Richard Biener
09:02 Re: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Richard Sandiford
08:28 Re: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Richard Sandiford
03:01 Re: [Question] How to deliver loop-related pragma information from TREE to RTL? Yangfei (Felix)

March 24, 2014
23:27 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Maciej W. Rozycki
22:12 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Matthew Fortune
21:13 Re: [Question] How to deliver loop-related pragma information from TREE to RTL? Eric Botcazou
21:11 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Richard Hulme
17:35 Re: LTO & top-level ASM Ian Lance Taylor
16:38 Dynamic loading and unloading of functions in gcc-4. adi.bhandari
13:26 LTO & top-level ASM Martin Liška
13:12 Re: Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite Tobias Grosser
13:09 Re: Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite Mircea Namolaru
12:52 Re: [Question] How to deliver loop-related pragma information from TREE to RTL? Richard Biener
12:46 [Question] How to deliver loop-related pragma information from TREE to RTL? Yangfei (Felix)
07:37 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw
03:50 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Jeff Law
03:44 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Jeff Law
02:56 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Thomas Preud'homme

March 23, 2014
22:43 gcc-4.9-20140323 is now available gccadmin
13:21 Re: GCC 4.9.0 Status Report (2014-03-13) Jonathan Wakely
11:25 Re: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Richard Sandiford
08:43 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Matthew Fortune

March 22, 2014
22:43 gcc-4.7-20140322 is now available gccadmin
12:35 Re: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Maciej W. Rozycki
12:13 Re: GCC 4.9.0 Status Report (2014-03-13) Klaus Rudolph
11:39 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Richard Hulme
11:29 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Richard Hulme
10:56 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Richard Sandiford
10:07 Re: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Richard Sandiford
08:36 Re: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Richard Sandiford
07:11 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw
00:48 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Jeff Law
00:36 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation DJ Delorie

March 21, 2014
23:40 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Rich Fuhler
23:22 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Maciej W. Rozycki
22:55 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Joseph S. Myers
22:38 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Rich Fuhler
22:36 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Richard Hulme
16:30 GIMPLE tree dumping of, for example, GIMPLE_OMP_PARALLEL's CHILD_FN Thomas Schwinge
11:51 Re: Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite Tobias Grosser
11:04 Re: Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite Roman Gareev
09:57 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs James Greenhalgh
09:49 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Richard Biener
06:38 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Thomas Preud'homme

March 20, 2014
22:45 gcc-4.8-20140320 is now available gccadmin
20:52 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Prathamesh Kulkarni
17:23 Re: GSoC Concepts - separate checking Braden Obrzut
12:41 Re: libgcc/config.host pattern question Rainer Orth
12:05 Re: libgcc/config.host pattern question Rainer Orth

March 19, 2014
22:54 Spill registers not available David Guillen
22:43 Re: Legitimize address after reload David Guillen
21:03 Re: Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite Tobias Grosser
20:31 Re: [GSoC 2014] Proposal: OpenCL Code Generator Thomas Schwinge
20:24 Re: [GSoC 2014] Proposal: OpenCL Code Generator Maxim Kuvyrkov
19:53 libgcc/config.host pattern question Joel Sherrill
16:03 RE: returning short-enum and truncate doesn't trigger conversion warning Paulo Matos
15:47 Re: returning short-enum and truncate doesn't trigger conversion warning David Brown
15:02 [GSoC 2014] Proposal: OpenCL Code Generator Ilmir Usmanov
14:56 RE: returning short-enum and truncate doesn't trigger conversion warning Paulo Matos
14:43 Re: returning short-enum and truncate doesn't trigger conversion warning David Brown
14:33 returning short-enum and truncate doesn't trigger conversion warning Paulo Matos
13:09 Re: GCC internal re-architecture proposal Andrew MacLeod
09:43 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Richard Biener
09:08 Re: GCC internal re-architecture proposal Richard Biener
03:43 Re: Google Summer of Code Maxim Kuvyrkov
03:02 Re: About gsoc 2014 OpenMP 4.0 Projects Maxim Kuvyrkov
02:59 Re: GSoC 2014 C++ Concepts project Maxim Kuvyrkov
02:54 Re: GSoC Concepts - separate checking Maxim Kuvyrkov
00:27 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Maxim Kuvyrkov

March 18, 2014
20:52 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
20:16 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
19:13 Re: Legitimize address after reload Richard Sandiford
19:10 Re: New .rodata section. Richard Sandiford
19:06 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
18:53 Re: Legitimize address after reload Richard Sandiford
18:41 Re: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Richard Sandiford
18:05 Re: ARM64 va_list Andrew Pinski
17:50 ARM64 va_list Nicholas Robert Kemp
17:38 Re: help me Jonathan Wakely
17:36 help me Ali Abdul Ghani
16:34 Re: GCC internal re-architecture proposal Diego Novillo
15:27 [ANN] Registration for CppCon 2014 is Open Boris Kolpackov
15:18 Re: WPA stream_out form & memory consumption Richard Biener
15:13 Re: WPA stream_out form & memory consumption Richard Biener
15:09 WPA stream_out form & memory consumption Martin Liška
15:06 RE: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Matthew Fortune
14:24 Re: [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Joseph S. Myers
14:19 Re: GCC internal re-architecture proposal Richard Biener
14:16 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Joseph S. Myers
11:28 [RFC, MIPS] Relax NaN rules Matthew Fortune
09:35 Re: RedHat patch not found in mainline gcc Stefan Ring
09:30 Re: RedHat patch not found in mainline gcc Stefan Ring
09:17 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Thomas Preud'homme
09:04 Re: debug strings output order is arbitrary Richard Biener
08:49 Re: RedHat patch not found in mainline gcc Jakub Jelinek
08:13 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Prathamesh Kulkarni
08:08 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Thomas Preud'homme
08:04 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
07:44 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford

March 17, 2014
21:33 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
21:04 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
21:01 Re: debug strings output order is arbitrary Martin Uecker
18:26 Re: Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite Roman Gareev
17:12 RedHat patch not found in mainline gcc Stefan Ring
15:47 Re: Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite Mircea Namolaru
11:51 jump_table_data and active_insn_p Paulo Matos
09:59 RE: builtin function - novops Bingfeng Mei
09:11 Re: builtin function - novops Richard Biener
08:52 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Richard Biener
08:44 Re: debug strings output order is arbitrary Richard Biener

March 16, 2014
22:42 gcc-4.9-20140316 is now available gccadmin
21:34 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation DJ Delorie
21:29 Re: Completing GCC Go escape analysis in GSoC 2014 Ian Lance Taylor
21:28 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Oleg Endo
21:24 Re: [GSoC 2014]Is this proposal suitable? Ray Li
21:23 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation DJ Delorie
21:02 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Oleg Endo
20:57 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
19:16 [GSoC 2014]Is this proposal suitable? Ray Li
18:48 Re: Incorrect generated code for conditional Jonathan Wakely
18:48 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Richard Hulme
16:59 Re: Completing GCC Go escape analysis in GSoC 2014 Ray Li
16:29 Re: Incorrect generated code for conditional Markus Trippelsdorf
16:23 Incorrect generated code for conditional Arthur Schwarz
13:39 Google Summer of Code Mihai Mandrescu
12:21 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Prathamesh Kulkarni
02:58 debug strings output order is arbitrary Martin Uecker

March 15, 2014
22:37 gcc-4.7-20140315 is now available gccadmin
19:39 Re: Legitimize address after reload David Guillen
13:13 Re: Inquireries Basile Starynkevitch
12:30 Inquireries Alangi Derick
00:47 PLEASE RE-ADD MIRRORS (small correction) Dan D .

March 14, 2014
23:53 PLEASE RE-ADD MIRRORS Dan D .
23:28 Re: Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite Tobias Grosser
20:21 Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite Roman Gareev
17:57 Re: Legitimize address after reload DJ Delorie
17:54 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Marc Glisse
17:16 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Richard Biener
16:37 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Prathamesh Kulkarni
15:58 Re: Legitimize address after reload Jeff Law
15:55 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Marc Glisse
15:35 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Prathamesh Kulkarni
15:31 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Prathamesh Kulkarni
15:00 Re: Reg Alloc Problem. Umesh Kalappa
14:20 Re: Legitimize address after reload David Guillen
12:11 Re: Legitimize address after reload Julian Brown
12:11 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
11:52 Legitimize address after reload David Guillen
10:01 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
10:01 Re: SET_EXPR_LOCATION usage for unused tree? Richard Biener
08:50 RE: dom requires PROP_loops Paulo Matos
08:06 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford

March 13, 2014
22:39 gcc-4.8-20140313 is now available gccadmin
22:11 Re: Completing GCC Go escape analysis in GSoC 2014 Ian Lance Taylor
22:07 Ian Lance Taylor and Ramana Radhakrishnan join GCC Steering Committee David Edelsohn
21:45 SET_EXPR_LOCATION usage for unused tree? Thomas Schwinge
18:46 RE: dom requires PROP_loops Richard Biener
16:36 #51253 seriously limits the use of G++ for C++11 Akim Demaille
16:00 RE: dom requires PROP_loops Paulo Matos
15:56 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
15:26 GCC 4.9.0 Status Report (2014-03-13) Jakub Jelinek
13:24 Re: dom requires PROP_loops Richard Biener
12:58 RE: dom requires PROP_loops Paulo Matos
11:30 Re: dom requires PROP_loops Richard Biener
11:21 RE: dom requires PROP_loops Paulo Matos
11:14 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Richard Biener
03:31 Completing GCC Go escape analysis in GSoC 2014 Ray Li

March 12, 2014
22:19 BUG: Bad line number in a message Bruce Korb
20:34 Re: unwinding through signal frame on ARM Ian Lance Taylor
15:33 unwinding through signal frame on ARM Peng Yuan
14:04 New .rodata section. Umesh Kalappa
14:00 Reg Alloc Problem. Umesh Kalappa
09:24 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Richard Biener
09:16 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Marc Glisse
09:05 Re: Scheduler:LLVM vs gcc, which is better Renato Golin
09:03 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Richard Biener
07:13 Re: Scheduler:LLVM vs gcc, which is better lin zuojian

March 11, 2014
23:19 GSoC Concepts - separate checking Braden Obrzut
22:42 GSoC 2014 C++ Concepts project Thomas Wynn
21:36 Re: Issues installing GCC libraries Jonathan Wakely
21:33 Issues installing GCC libraries Falk, Katerina
21:28 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Marc Glisse
13:13 Re: GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success Shahbaz Youssefi
12:26 Re: GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success David Brown
11:20 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Richard Biener
10:55 Re: status of current_pass (notably in gates) .... [possible bug in 4.9] Richard Biener
10:52 Re: dom requires PROP_loops Richard Biener
07:57 Re: [RFC, LRA] Incorrect subreg resolution? Richard Sandiford
03:30 Re: Scheduler:LLVM vs gcc, which is better lin zuojian
03:03 Re: Scheduler:LLVM vs gcc, which is better Chandler Carruth
02:33 Re: Scheduler:LLVM vs gcc, which is better lin zuojian
02:11 Re: Scheduler:LLVM vs gcc, which is better Chandler Carruth
01:59 Scheduler:LLVM vs gcc, which is better lin zuojian
00:40 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation DJ Delorie
00:30 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Oleg Endo
00:17 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation DJ Delorie

March 10, 2014
23:25 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Richard Hulme
21:37 Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation DJ Delorie
18:29 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Prathamesh Kulkarni
17:35 Re: GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success Andrew Haley
17:26 Re: GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success Shahbaz Youssefi
17:18 Re: GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success Andrew Haley
16:35 Re: GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success Igor Pashev
16:30 Re: GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success Shahbaz Youssefi
15:30 [RL78] Questions about code-generation peper03
15:26 Re: GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success Basile Starynkevitch
15:09 Re: GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success Shahbaz Youssefi
14:51 Re: GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success Julian Brown
14:27 GNU C extension: Function Error vs. Success Shahbaz Youssefi
12:30 status of current_pass (notably in gates) .... [possible bug in 4.9] Basile Starynkevitch
12:13 Re: [AVR] remove two maintainers David Brown
11:57 dom requires PROP_loops Paulo Matos
11:17 Re: linux says it is a bug lin zuojian
10:29 Re: [AVR] remove two maintainers Jeremy Bennett

March 09, 2014
22:47 gcc-4.9-20140309 is now available gccadmin

March 08, 2014
22:37 gcc-4.7-20140308 is now available gccadmin
21:00 Re: [buildrobot] Ada/VMS code won't build Douglas B Rupp
12:35 Ah HAH - this SANITY stuff is finally going to show its value for GCC development itself. Toon Moene

March 07, 2014
19:11 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
19:02 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:33 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
17:46 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
16:29 RE: Shouldn't unsafe-math-optimizations (re-)enable fp-contract=fast? Ian Bolton
16:25 Re: [buildrobot] Ada/VMS code won't build Douglas B Rupp
15:04 RE: Shouldn't unsafe-math-optimizations (re-)enable fp-contract=fast? Ian Bolton
10:36 ira marks conflict with hard register, can't explain it. Paulo Matos
10:10 Re: Please have a look at PR60438 lin zuojian
10:05 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Richard Biener
09:33 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Kai Tietz
09:08 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Richard Biener

March 06, 2014
23:45 Re: ira-loop-pressure not marked as optimization? Paulo J. Matos
22:38 gcc-4.8-20140306 is now available gccadmin
22:35 [buildrobot] Ada/VMS code won't build Jan-Benedict Glaw
21:08 Re: ira-loop-pressure not marked as optimization? Paulo Matos
21:03 Re: ira-loop-pressure not marked as optimization? Vladimir Makarov
20:15 Re: ira-loop-pressure not marked as optimization? Paulo J. Matos
18:39 Re: Shouldn't unsafe-math-optimizations (re-)enable fp-contract=fast? Tim Prince
18:17 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Prathamesh Kulkarni
18:01 Re: Shouldn't unsafe-math-optimizations (re-)enable fp-contract=fast? Joseph S. Myers
16:45 Shouldn't unsafe-math-optimizations (re-)enable fp-contract=fast? Ian Bolton
15:16 Re: ira-loop-pressure not marked as optimization? Vladimir Makarov
13:55 ira-loop-pressure not marked as optimization? Paulo Matos
13:31 Please have a look at PR60438 lin zuojian
13:28 Re: asking your advice about bug Tobias Grosser
13:21 Re: asking your advice about bug Tobias Grosser
12:43 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Richard Biener
12:11 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Prathamesh Kulkarni
10:05 Re: Can Some one please help me on this gcc plugin.. Mohsin Khan
07:12 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw
06:06 exposed pipeline shmeel gutl

March 05, 2014
23:39 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
20:55 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
19:53 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
18:55 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
18:37 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
18:19 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
18:15 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:11 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Joseph S. Myers
18:01 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:15 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
16:55 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
16:46 Re: Can Some one please help me on this gcc plugin.. David Malcolm
16:28 Can Some one please help me on this gcc plugin.. Mohsin Khan
16:27 Re: Help Required on Missing GOTO statements in Gimple/SSA/CFG Pass ... Mohsin Khan
16:26 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
15:23 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Thomas Preud'homme
15:23 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Thomas Preud'homme
15:13 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Thomas Preud'homme
15:09 Re: linux says it is a bug Paul_Koning
15:07 Re: linux says it is a bug Richard Henderson
08:48 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Richard Biener
06:39 Re: linux says it is a bug Yury Gribov
06:12 Re: linux says it is a bug Yury Gribov

March 04, 2014
22:40 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
22:11 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
21:35 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
20:52 Re: linux says it is a bug Paul_Koning
20:45 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
19:44 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
19:30 Re: linux says it is a bug Richard Henderson
19:00 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:43 Re: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Richard Sandiford
18:42 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
18:12 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Joseph S. Myers
17:39 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Marc Glisse
17:37 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Thomas Preudhomme
13:51 Re: linux says it is a bug lin zuojian
13:15 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Richard Biener
13:12 Re: GSoC question Andrew Sutton
12:16 Re: linux says it is a bug Richard Biener
12:01 Re: linux says it is a bug Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:55 Re: linux says it is a bug Yury Gribov
11:34 Re: linux says it is a bug Hannes Frederic Sowa
11:14 RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Matthew Fortune
11:08 Re: linux says it is a bug Richard Biener
09:33 Re: linux says it is a bug Hannes Frederic Sowa
09:26 Re: linux says it is a bug Andrew Haley
09:24 Re: linux says it is a bug Hannes Frederic Sowa
09:23 Re: linux says it is a bug Richard Biener
09:19 Re: linux says it is a bug Jonathan Wakely
09:17 Re: linux says it is a bug Hannes Frederic Sowa
09:10 Re: linux says it is a bug Richard Biener
07:02 [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat Thomas Preudhomme
06:40 linux says it is a bug lin zuojian

March 03, 2014
23:17 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
22:51 Re: [AVR] remove two maintainers David Brown
20:46 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
20:44 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:29 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:20 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
19:08 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:01 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
18:59 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
17:23 Re: [AVR] remove two maintainers Denis Chertykov
17:01 Re: [AVR] remove two maintainers David Edelsohn
15:36 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
15:01 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM David Brown
14:05 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Kai Tietz
13:55 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Richard Biener
12:53 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM David Brown
12:04 Re: [AVR] remove two maintainers Denis Chertykov
11:36 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Richard Sandiford
11:35 Re: [AVR] remove two maintainers David Brown
11:34 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Richard Biener
11:26 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Richard Biener
11:15 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Richard Biener
10:49 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Richard Biener
10:41 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM David Brown
10:41 Re: [AVR] remove two maintainers Joern Rennecke
10:22 Re: X86_64 insns combination is not working well Richard Biener
10:19 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Georg-Johann Lay
10:02 Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Richard Biener
09:38 Re: Vim format in gcc source? lin zuojian
09:37 Re: Vim format in gcc source? Jonathan Wakely
09:32 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw
08:40 Re: X86_64 insns combination is not working well Jakub Jelinek
07:01 Vim format in gcc source? lin zuojian
04:25 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
03:02 X86_64 insns combination is not working well lin zuojian

March 02, 2014
23:44 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
23:21 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
22:46 gcc-4.9-20140302 is now available gccadmin
20:13 [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple Prathamesh Kulkarni
18:24 [AVR] remove two maintainers Denis Chertykov
10:05 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell

March 01, 2014
22:41 gcc-4.7-20140301 is now available gccadmin
14:42 GSoC question Andrew Sutton
14:04 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
10:06 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
08:02 Comparing with SSE, NEON instructions seems hard to be generated in some cases 勝余傅
00:50 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc