gcc archive
date index for February, 2014

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 28, 2014
22:51 Re: Handling error conditions in libgomp Joseph S. Myers
17:18 Re: Handling error conditions in libgomp Torvald Riegel
16:19 Re: Changing the MIPS ISA for the Loongson 3A from MIPS64 to MIPS64r2 Richard Sandiford
16:16 Re: Handling error conditions in libgomp Nathan Sidwell
16:06 Re: Handling error conditions in libgomp Richard Henderson
15:21 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Kai Tietz
14:58 Changing the MIPS ISA for the Loongson 3A from MIPS64 to MIPS64r2 Andrew Bennett
14:38 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Diego Novillo
14:34 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Marc Glisse
12:36 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Eric Botcazou
12:19 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Richard Sandiford
12:04 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Richard Sandiford
11:38 Handling error conditions in libgomp Thomas Schwinge
09:50 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Richard Biener
09:24 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Eric Botcazou
09:18 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Georg-Johann Lay
09:13 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Richard Biener
08:52 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Eric Botcazou
08:45 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Eric Botcazou
08:19 Re: [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Basile Starynkevitch
07:32 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Richard Sandiford
05:50 RE: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Pavel Fedin
04:41 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Yuri Gribov
04:12 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Andi Kleen
01:34 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw
01:34 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw
01:31 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs dw
01:02 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney

February 27, 2014
22:42 gcc-4.8-20140227 is now available gccadmin
20:53 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
20:25 Re: About gsoc 2014 OpenMP 4.0 Projects Thomas Schwinge
20:11 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Georg-Johann Lay
19:47 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:22 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
19:06 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:50 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:35 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Andi Kleen
17:25 Re: About gsoc 2014 OpenMP 4.0 Projects guray ozen
17:22 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Michael Matz
17:03 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Richard Sandiford
17:02 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM David Brown
17:01 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
15:37 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
15:36 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Yury Gribov
15:07 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Richard Biener
15:03 Re: Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Eric Botcazou
14:35 [RFC] Meta-description for tree and gimple folding Richard Biener
14:35 Asm volatile causing performance regressions on ARM Yury Gribov
12:49 Re: proposal to turn on some warnings by default Basile Starynkevitch
12:22 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Kyrill Tkachov
12:11 Re: Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Richard Sandiford
11:07 Request for discussion: Rewrite of inline assembler docs Andrew Haley
09:20 Re: proposal to turn on some warnings by default Sylvestre Ledru
09:14 Re: proposal to turn on some warnings by default David Brown
06:50 proposal to turn on some warnings by default Mingjie Xing
00:53 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel

February 26, 2014
18:43 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Joseph S. Myers
18:27 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:40 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
17:34 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
16:51 Re: Memory outputs in inline asm Andrew Haley
16:43 Re: Memory outputs in inline asm Segher Boessenkool
14:33 Re: Memory outputs in inline asm Richard Sandiford
14:00 Re: Memory outputs in inline asm Michael Matz
13:09 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
13:04 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
12:44 Re: Memory outputs in inline asm Andrew Haley
12:24 Re: Memory outputs in inline asm Richard Biener
12:04 Re: Memory outputs in inline asm Andrew Haley
11:53 Re: [LM-32] Code generation for address loading FX MOREL
10:51 Re: Memory outputs in inline asm Richard Biener
10:33 Memory outputs in inline asm Andrew Haley
07:20 RE: About gsoc 2014 OpenMP 4.0 Projects Evgeny Gavrin
05:23 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
05:22 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
05:12 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
03:32 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Jeff Law
03:06 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework George Spelvin
01:47 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
00:16 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney

February 25, 2014
22:24 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
19:19 [GSoC] GCC has been accepted to GSoC 2014 Maxim Kuvyrkov
18:57 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
18:44 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
11:27 About gsoc 2014 OpenMP 4.0 Projects guray ozen
10:54 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
08:20 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
06:05 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
06:00 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
00:09 Re: [LM-32] Code generation for address loading Anthony Green

February 24, 2014
23:51 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
23:35 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
22:37 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
22:04 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Doug Gilmore
21:28 build breakage in libsanitizer Oleg Smolsky
21:13 [GSoc 2014] OpenMP runtime improvements Pranith Kumar
19:54 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
18:53 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:42 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
18:14 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
18:12 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:57 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:40 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:38 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
17:29 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:21 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
16:55 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Michael Matz
16:40 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
16:37 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
16:27 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Richard Biener
15:57 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
14:14 RE: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune
14:12 Non-temporal move Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
13:55 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Michael Matz
09:17 Re: asking your advice about bug Tobias Grosser
05:26 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
05:00 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
01:35 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
01:17 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney

February 23, 2014
22:42 gcc-4.9-20140223 is now available gccadmin
22:09 help with define_peephole2 condition Paul S
19:31 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
15:02 Re: [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Richard Sandiford
09:22 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
03:50 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
00:39 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney

February 22, 2014
22:43 gcc-4.7-20140222 is now available gccadmin
21:53 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
20:27 Re: gcc generated long read out of bounds segfault Andreas Schwab
20:18 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:53 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
18:31 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
18:25 Re: gcc generated long read out of bounds segfault David Fries
08:46 Re: gcc generated long read out of bounds segfault Eric Botcazou
07:49 Re: gcc generated long read out of bounds segfault Andreas Schwab
06:57 gcc generated long read out of bounds segfault David Fries

February 21, 2014
22:37 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
22:11 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Joseph S. Myers
21:00 Accelerator BoF at GNU Tools Cauldron 2014 (was: [gomp4] gomp-4_0-branch) Thomas Schwinge
20:22 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:48 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
19:41 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:24 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
19:16 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:13 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:35 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Michael Matz
17:24 GNU Tools Cauldron 2014 - We have reached capacity Diego Novillo
16:55 [RFC] Introducing MIPS O32 ABI Extension for FR0 and FR1 Interlinking Matthew Fortune

February 20, 2014
22:52 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
22:35 gcc-4.8-20140220 is now available gccadmin
22:10 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
20:57 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Jason Merrill
20:49 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Jason Merrill
19:45 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:09 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:06 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:02 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
18:56 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:56 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:53 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
18:44 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
18:32 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
18:26 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:25 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
18:23 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
18:21 Re: Building GCC with -Wmissing-declarations and addressing its warnings Jonathan Wakely
18:18 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:16 Re: Building GCC with -Wmissing-declarations and addressing its warnings Patrick Palka
18:14 Re: Building GCC with -Wmissing-declarations and addressing its warnings Jonathan Wakely
18:12 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
18:12 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:12 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:55 Re: Building GCC with -Wmissing-declarations and addressing its warnings Richard Sandiford
17:54 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
17:49 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
17:35 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
17:26 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
17:16 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
17:01 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
15:47 Re: gnattools cannot be built for freestanding/bare metal environment without hacking up the build machinery Luke A. Guest
15:37 Re: Building GCC with -Wmissing-declarations and addressing its warnings Patrick Palka
13:17 Re: ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Renato Golin
12:59 Re: ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Ramana Radhakrishnan
12:48 Re: How to include <algorithm> header of stl in gcc? Pritam Gharat
12:42 Re: Building GCC with -Wmissing-declarations and addressing its warnings Jonathan Wakely
12:33 Re: How to include <algorithm> header of stl in gcc? Marc Glisse
12:16 How to include <algorithm> header of stl in gcc? Pritam Gharat
12:09 Re: ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Richard Earnshaw
11:28 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Richard Biener
10:21 Re: ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Renato Golin
10:11 Re: ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Ramana Radhakrishnan
10:02 Re: Building GCC with -Wmissing-declarations and addressing its warnings Patrick Palka
09:20 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
08:30 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
07:17 Re: Building GCC with -Wmissing-declarations and addressing its warnings Jonathan Wakely
04:43 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
04:01 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
00:53 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds

February 19, 2014
23:26 Re: ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Renato Golin
23:20 Re: ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Andrew Pinski
23:17 Re: ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Renato Golin
22:12 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
19:51 Re: Update x86-64 PLT for MPX H.J. Lu
19:49 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:19 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Jan Hubicka
18:11 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
17:56 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
15:41 Re: Stack layout change during lra Vladimir Makarov
15:32 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
15:23 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework David Lang
14:41 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
12:16 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Richard Biener
11:58 Re: ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Richard Sandiford
11:54 Stack layout change during lra Joey Ye
11:42 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
11:07 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
10:59 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
09:52 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
09:46 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
03:02 Re: ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Andrew Pinski
02:56 ARM inline assembly usage in Linux kernel Saleem Abdulrasool

February 18, 2014
23:48 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
22:58 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
22:14 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
21:53 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
21:47 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
21:47 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
21:40 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
21:40 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
21:30 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
21:27 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
20:46 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
20:43 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:57 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:48 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:47 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
19:42 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
19:40 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
19:02 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Jan Hubicka
19:00 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
18:49 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
18:23 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
18:21 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
17:44 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
17:38 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
17:17 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:16 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
16:55 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
16:51 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
16:49 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
16:47 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
16:39 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
16:17 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
16:09 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
15:57 Deadline for DWARF Version 5 comments -- March 31, 2014 Michael Eager
15:56 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
15:39 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
15:33 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
15:31 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
15:17 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Mark Batty
14:57 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
14:05 [LM-32] Code generation for address loading FX MOREL
12:54 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
12:27 [AVX-512] Vectorization when tripcount is less than VF. Kirill Yukhin
12:12 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Sewell
10:42 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Richard Biener
08:51 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Richard Biener
08:01 Re: MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts? David Brown
06:17 Re: Help Required on Missing GOTO statements in Gimple/SSA/CFG Pass ... Basile Starynkevitch
05:47 Help Required on Missing GOTO statements in Gimple/SSA/CFG Pass ... Mohsin Khan
05:22 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
05:02 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
03:42 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
03:25 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
03:00 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
01:36 RE: Vectorizer Pragmas Geva, Robert
01:26 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
00:18 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
00:09 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
00:05 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds

February 17, 2014
23:42 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
23:17 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
23:13 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Joseph S. Myers
23:12 Re: MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts? DJ Delorie
23:10 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Alec Teal
22:48 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
22:32 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
22:27 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
22:25 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
22:14 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
22:10 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
22:02 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
21:21 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
21:06 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
20:55 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Jan Hubicka
20:44 FreeBSD users of gcc Loren James Rittle
20:38 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Richard Biener
20:23 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
20:18 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:55 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:41 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:19 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Will Deacon
18:59 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Joseph S. Myers
18:18 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:33 Re: Need help: Is a VAR_DECL type builtin or not? Ian Lance Taylor
16:03 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
15:59 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Ilya Verbin
15:14 Re: Vectorizer Pragmas Renato Golin
14:47 Re: Vectorizer Pragmas Tim Prince
13:28 Re: Need help: Is a VAR_DECL type builtin or not? Richard Biener
12:15 Re: Need help: Is a VAR_DECL type builtin or not? Dominik Vogt
11:36 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Richard Biener
09:42 Re: Vectorizer Pragmas Renato Golin
02:49 GSoC project ideas Maxim Kuvyrkov

February 16, 2014
23:55 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Jan Hubicka
23:44 Re: Vectorizer Pragmas Tim Prince
22:44 gcc-4.9-20140216 is now available gccadmin
19:05 Re: Vectorizer Pragmas Renato Golin
17:24 Re: Vectorizer Pragmas Tobias Burnus
14:26 Re: MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts? David Brown
06:51 Cheap Software jpiche
01:44 Re: Vectorizer Pragmas Renato Golin

February 15, 2014
22:49 Re: Vectorizer Pragmas Tim Prince
22:43 gcc-4.7-20140215 is now available gccadmin
20:36 Re: Vectorizer Pragmas Renato Golin
19:26 Re: Vectorizer Pragmas Jakub Jelinek
19:16 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
18:56 Vectorizer Pragmas Renato Golin
18:49 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
18:07 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
17:45 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
17:30 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
15:53 Re: [MIPS] Avoiding FP operations/register usage Richard Sandiford
10:10 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Richard Biener
10:03 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Richard Biener
08:17 RE: [RFC] Rationale for passing vectors by value in SIMD registers Matthew Fortune
06:58 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
06:35 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
02:48 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
02:44 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
02:16 Re: asking your advice about bug Tobias Grosser
02:08 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney

February 14, 2014
23:22 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Jan Hubicka
20:53 Re: MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts? Brian Drummond
20:02 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:50 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
19:22 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:19 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:17 Re: MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts? DJ Delorie
18:54 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Richard Henderson
17:29 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
16:52 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Jan Hubicka
16:50 Re: Issue with CRTP generation under 4.8.1 Jonathan Wakely
15:46 Issue with CRTP generation under 4.8.1 Andrew Stern
15:43 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
15:42 Re: gnattools cannot be built for freestanding/bare metal environment without hacking up the build machinery Luke A. Guest
15:24 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Ilya Verbin
14:01 Re: gnattools cannot be built for freestanding/bare metal environment without hacking up the build machinery Luke A. Guest
13:46 Re: Optimizing bit extract Richard Biener
13:40 Re: Need help: Is a VAR_DECL type builtin or not? Richard Biener
13:23 Optimizing bit extract Allan Sandfeld Jensen
12:20 Re: gnattools cannot be built for freestanding/bare metal environment without hacking up the build machinery Brian Drummond
10:27 Re: [RFC] Rationale for passing vectors by value in SIMD registers Andrew Pinski
10:17 [RFC] Rationale for passing vectors by value in SIMD registers Matthew Fortune
10:12 MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts? Brian Drummond
09:50 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
08:59 Need help: Is a VAR_DECL type builtin or not? Dominik Vogt
08:42 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Richard Biener
08:06 Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Jason Merrill
05:08 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
04:43 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
02:01 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
00:48 TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO Jan Hubicka

February 13, 2014
22:40 gcc-4.8-20140213 is now available gccadmin
20:47 Building GCC with -Wmissing-declarations and addressing its warnings Patrick Palka
20:04 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
15:37 Re: Aarch64 implementation for dwarf exception handling Shiva Chen
14:32 Re: Aarch64 implementation for dwarf exception handling Renlin Li
13:58 Re: [GCC 4.8.1] Which section to emit, .eh_frame or .debug_section? Ramana
13:53 GNU Tools Cauldron 2014 - Venue and Hotel information Diego Novillo
13:41 Re: gcc.gnu.org/infrastructure - newer versions of GMP/mpfr/mpc/isl/cloog? Tobias Grosser
13:37 Re: gcc.gnu.org/infrastructure - newer versions of GMP/mpfr/mpc/isl/cloog? Richard Biener
13:21 Re: gcc.gnu.org/infrastructure - newer versions of GMP/mpfr/mpc/isl/cloog? Tobias Grosser
13:19 Re: gcc.gnu.org/infrastructure - newer versions of GMP/mpfr/mpc/isl/cloog? Richard Biener
11:59 Re: [GCC 4.8.1] Which section to emit, .eh_frame or .debug_section? Jakub Jelinek
11:54 [GCC 4.8.1] Which section to emit, .eh_frame or .debug_section? Ramana
11:41 Re: Aarch64 implementation for dwarf exception handling Yufeng Zhang åçå
09:06 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Richard Biener
08:16 Re: Dead code elimination PROBLEM Richard Biener
07:07 Dead code elimination PROBLEM chronicle
04:23 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
02:15 Aarch64 implementation for dwarf exception handling Shiva Chen
00:24 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney

February 12, 2014
20:22 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
18:31 Re: [LLVMdev] Zero-cost toolchain "standardization" process Chris Lattner
18:26 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:19 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:12 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
17:52 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:50 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
16:23 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Jan Hubicka
16:19 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Joseph S. Myers
14:48 Re: m68k optimisation for beginners? Jeff Law
13:15 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Rafael EspÃndola
11:14 Re: sparse overlapping structs for vectorization Richard Biener
11:10 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Richard Biener
09:37 m68k optimisation for beginners? Fredrik Olsson
09:25 gnat.dg test: div_no_warning.adb PARAT Didier
09:19 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
06:21 sparse overlapping structs for vectorization Albert Cahalan
06:06 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
05:39 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
05:13 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel

February 11, 2014
22:36 Re: LLVM collaboration? Hal Finkel
21:38 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Rafael EspÃndola
21:20 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Jan Hubicka
21:04 Re: Conditional execution over emit_move_insn Wojciech Migda
20:52 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Jan Hubicka
20:08 Re: [buildrobot] spu / avr: Fallout from r207335 Jan-Benedict Glaw
18:59 Zero-cost toolchain "standardization" process Renato Golin
18:51 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Markus Trippelsdorf
18:02 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Rafael EspÃndola
17:29 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Renato Golin
17:01 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
16:18 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Renato Golin
16:07 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Uday Khedker
16:00 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Jan Hubicka
15:59 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
10:03 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Uday Khedker
10:03 RE: [MIPS] Avoiding FP operations/register usage Matthew Fortune
09:55 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Renato Golin
09:02 Re: [MIPS] Avoiding FP operations/register usage Richard Sandiford
04:14 Re: Google Summer of Code -- Admin needed Ian Lance Taylor
02:51 Re: Google Summer of Code -- Admin needed Maxim Kuvyrkov
02:29 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Jan Hubicka
00:04 Conditional execution over emit_move_insn Wojciech Migda

February 10, 2014
19:09 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
16:23 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Will Deacon
15:06 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
14:48 Re: LLVM collaboration? Diego Novillo
12:05 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
11:49 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Will Deacon
11:48 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
11:46 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
03:52 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
03:45 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
03:21 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
02:04 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
01:46 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
01:24 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
01:16 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
00:56 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Linus Torvalds
00:28 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
00:07 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel

February 09, 2014
22:35 gcc-4.9-20140209 is now available gccadmin
12:27 Re: type promotion Richard Sandiford

February 08, 2014
22:43 gcc-4.7-20140208 is now available gccadmin
14:45 Re: -O3 and -ftree-vectorize Tim Prince
08:04 Re: FRE may run out of memory Andrew Pinski

February 07, 2014
23:59 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Renato Golin
23:30 Re: Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Joseph S. Myers
23:12 Re: LLVM collaboration? Renato Golin
22:42 Re: LLVM collaboration? Jonathan Wakely
22:35 Re: LLVM collaboration? Renato Golin
22:33 Re: LLVM collaboration? Andrew Pinski
22:28 Re: LLVM collaboration? Andrew Pinski
22:23 Re: LLVM collaboration? Andrew Pinski
22:07 Re: LLVM collaboration? Renato Golin
21:53 Re: LLVM collaboration? Diego Novillo
21:34 Fwd: LLVM collaboration? Renato Golin
20:55 RE: [MIPS] Avoiding FP operations/register usage Matthew Fortune
18:45 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
18:43 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
18:03 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
18:02 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
17:46 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Joseph S. Myers
17:39 Re: [MIPS] Avoiding FP operations/register usage Joseph S. Myers
17:20 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
17:13 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Will Deacon
17:07 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
16:55 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Will Deacon
16:50 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
16:48 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
16:44 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
16:09 Re: -O3 and -ftree-vectorize Tim Prince
15:22 Re: -O3 and -ftree-vectorize Jakub Jelinek
14:45 [MIPS] Avoiding FP operations/register usage Matthew Fortune
12:01 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Will Deacon
10:27 Simplify using context in loop-iv Paulo Matos
09:13 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
07:44 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
04:21 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
04:06 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney

February 06, 2014
23:45 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
23:33 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Joseph S. Myers
23:25 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
22:58 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
22:36 gcc-4.8-20140206 is now available gccadmin
22:29 Re: -O3 and -ftree-vectorize Xinliang David Li
22:21 Re: -O3 and -ftree-vectorize Tim Prince
22:13 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Joseph S. Myers
22:11 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
21:55 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
21:17 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
21:09 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Torvald Riegel
19:27 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Paul E. McKenney
19:23 Re: -O3 and -ftree-vectorize Xinliang David Li
19:20 Re: -O3 and -ftree-vectorize Uros Bizjak
19:01 Re: -O3 and -ftree-vectorize Xinliang David Li
18:59 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Will Deacon
18:55 Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework Ramana Radhakrishnan
18:51 -O3 and -ftree-vectorize Uros Bizjak
17:51 Re: Test gcc.dg/uninit-13.c failure Andreas Krebbel
13:55 Test gcc.dg/uninit-13.c failure Sebastian Huber

February 05, 2014
18:46 Google Summer of Code -- Admin needed Moore, Catherine
14:41 Re: GCC Wiki, struggling to make a new user Jonathan Wakely
14:39 Re: GCC Wiki, struggling to make a new user Jonathan Wakely
14:26 Re: GCC Wiki, struggling to make a new user Frank Ch. Eigler
12:53 Re: asking your advice about bug Tobias Grosser
10:39 RE: Merge epilog loop & loop version due to alias/alignment in vectorization? Bingfeng Mei
09:39 Extended Asm Rewrite Andrew Haley
09:10 Re: Merge epilog loop & loop version due to alias/alignment in vectorization? Richard Biener
05:45 Re: question about gtype-desc.c Basile Starynkevitch
03:36 Re: git mirror hasn't been updated for 8 hours Frank Ch. Eigler

February 04, 2014
23:07 RE: question about gtype-desc.c Iyer, Balaji V
22:36 Re: question about gtype-desc.c Jakub Jelinek
22:26 RE: question about gtype-desc.c Iyer, Balaji V
22:23 Re: question about gtype-desc.c Jakub Jelinek
22:12 question about gtype-desc.c Iyer, Balaji V
21:25 Re: Draft C bindings for IEEE 754-2008 part 4 now available Joseph S. Myers
21:17 Re: FW: Git repo lagging behing Marek Polacek
18:56 Re: Merge epilog loop & loop version due to alias/alignment in vectorization? Xinliang David Li
16:28 Merge epilog loop & loop version due to alias/alignment in vectorization? Bingfeng Mei
15:59 FW: Git repo lagging behing Paulo Matos
09:39 Re: proposal to add -Wheader-guard option Prathamesh Kulkarni
07:21 Re: [committed] Fix simd reference reductions (PR middle-end/59150) Sebastian Huber
07:15 Re: proposal to add -Wheader-guard option Markus Trippelsdorf
07:06 Re: proposal to add -Wheader-guard option Prathamesh Kulkarni

February 03, 2014
21:08 RE: Still fails with strict-volatile-bitfields Bernd Edlinger
14:45 RE: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Richard Biener
14:43 RE: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Bingfeng Mei
13:17 RE: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Richard Biener
12:42 Re: asking your advice about bug Tobias Grosser
11:58 RE: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Bingfeng Mei
11:49 RE: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Bingfeng Mei
10:36 Re: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Richard Biener
10:19 Re: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Richard Biener
10:15 Re: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Richard Biener
10:14 Re: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Florian Weimer
10:00 GCC 4.9.0 Status Report (2014-02-03), Stage 3 ends Richard Biener
09:59 Re: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Jakub Jelinek
09:51 RE: No TBAA before ptr_derefs_may_alias_p? Bingfeng Mei

February 02, 2014
22:59 [buildrobot] spu / avr: Fallout from r207335 Jan-Benedict Glaw
22:48 gcc-4.9-20140202 is now available gccadmin
21:12 Re: g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/catch_exc.cc -O1 times out Paolo Carlini
16:20 RE: g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/catch_exc.cc -O1 times out Iyer, Balaji V
16:08 g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/catch_exc.cc -O1 times out Paolo Carlini
08:05 Re: Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9? Ryan Hill

February 01, 2014
22:43 gcc-4.7-20140201 is now available gccadmin
18:00 Re: -Wformat-security warnings generated in gcc build Prathamesh Kulkarni
11:52 Re: MIPS GCC test failure: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c Richard Sandiford
00:32 MIPS GCC test failure: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c Steve Ellcey
00:01 patch to fix PR59985 Vladimir Makarov


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc