gcc archive
date index for August, 2013

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

August 31, 2013
22:40 gcc-4.7-20130831 is now available gccadmin
13:34 Re: [PATCH 0/6] Convert gimple to a C++ class hierarchy Basile Starynkevitch
06:29 NO TITLE usedmachinery

August 30, 2013
15:01 Re: DX register is not a return value for i386? H.J. Lu
10:09 Re: this code in fold-const.c:fold_single_bit_test looks wrong to me Richard Biener
08:54 Re: DX register is not a return value for i386? Ilya Enkovich

August 29, 2013
22:40 gcc-4.8-20130829 is now available gccadmin
21:21 Re: __mips16_xxx and .globl Reed Kotler
21:09 __mips16_xxx and .globl Reed Kotler
15:40 Re: DX register is not a return value for i386? H.J. Lu
14:33 DX register is not a return value for i386? Ilya Enkovich
13:02 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Jan-Benedict Glaw
11:21 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Diego Novillo
10:44 Prototypes for builtin functions Paulo Matos
10:23 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Richard Biener
10:11 Re: all_ones_mask_p clarification Richard Biener
10:02 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Jan-Benedict Glaw
08:34 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Rainer Orth
08:10 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Jan-Benedict Glaw
07:23 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Michael V. Zolotukhin
01:18 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Paul_Koning
01:15 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Dan Kegel
00:52 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Samuel Mi

August 28, 2013
21:26 Re: Question about local register variable DJ Delorie
20:16 Question about local register variable Jing Yu
18:54 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Jan-Benedict Glaw
18:43 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Samuel Mi
17:15 Re: all_ones_mask_p clarification Mike Stump
17:03 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Jan-Benedict Glaw
15:26 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Samuel Mi
12:56 Re: dynamic plugin in c++ avantikagupta
12:12 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Torvald Riegel
11:40 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Torvald Riegel
11:38 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
11:21 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Richard Biener
11:06 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
10:39 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Richard Biener
10:03 Re: dynamic plugin in c++ Jakub Jelinek
09:59 Re: dynamic plugin in c++ Richard Biener
09:40 Re: all_ones_mask_p clarification Richard Biener
09:34 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
09:07 dynamic plugin in c++ avantikagupta
07:05 Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Sebastian Huber

August 27, 2013
19:54 Automated Toolchain Building and Testing Jan-Benedict Glaw
16:22 Re: Questions about LTO infrastructure and pragma omp target Basile Starynkevitch
15:47 Re: all_ones_mask_p clarification Mike Stump
15:34 Re: dejagnu multilib options and dg-{add|additional-}options Janis Johnson
13:52 Re: dejagnu multilib options and dg-{add|additional-}options Marcus Shawcroft
13:33 Re: MPX ABI extension Ilya Enkovich
11:56 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Michael V. Zolotukhin
11:40 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
11:26 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Michael V. Zolotukhin
11:20 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Richard Biener
10:23 Re: all_ones_mask_p clarification Richard Biener
08:47 Re: haifa-scheduler marks instructions having TRUE dependencies as an ANTI dependencies. Richard Biener
08:06 Re: 4.8.2 -Og vs. -O1 Richard Biener
06:16 Re: MPX ABI extension Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
00:38 peliculas series de tv musica recitales juegos Yanina
00:36 best meds an@ healthcare#products o%l at ne JUANA

August 26, 2013
16:19 Re: --with-dwarf2 and default DWARF version Michael Eager
15:12 MPX ABI extension Ilya Enkovich
14:11 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
13:30 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Michael V. Zolotukhin
12:51 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
11:59 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Michael V. Zolotukhin
10:51 [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: âOPTION_BIONICâ was not declared in this scope Jan-Benedict Glaw
08:46 s e c r e t s l i n e (dot) b i z - Cool VPN secretsline at ymail dot com
08:40 Re: --with-dwarf2 and default DWARF version Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
08:23 Re: --with-dwarf2 and default DWARF version Jakub Jelinek
08:12 --with-dwarf2 and default DWARF version Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
07:41 Re: Vandalised wiki page Joel Sherrill
07:32 Re: Vandalised wiki page Dodji Seketeli

August 25, 2013
22:36 gcc-4.9-20130825 is now available gccadmin
16:24 Re: Vandalised wiki page David Brown

August 24, 2013
22:39 gcc-4.7-20130824 is now available gccadmin
06:17 Re: Why out-of-ssa does var coalescing based on name? Richard Biener

August 23, 2013
20:15 Re: Why out-of-ssa does var coalescing based on name? Wei Mi
17:24 Re: Questions about LTO infrastructure and pragma omp target Jakub Jelinek
17:15 Re: Questions about LTO infrastructure and pragma omp target Ilya Verbin
16:16 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
15:59 Re: Vandalised wiki page Jonathan Wakely
15:31 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Michael V. Zolotukhin
15:25 Re: Vandalised wiki page Frank Ch. Eigler
15:06 Re: Vandalised wiki page Jonathan Wakely
15:05 Re: Vandalised wiki page Jonathan Wakely
14:45 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Xinliang David Li
14:44 Re: Vandalised wiki page Frank Ch. Eigler
14:38 Re: Vandalised wiki page Janus Weil
13:15 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. OndÅej BÃlka
12:37 Re: Questions about LTO infrastructure and pragma omp target Jakub Jelinek
12:24 Re: Questions about LTO infrastructure and pragma omp target Richard Biener
12:16 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Richard Biener
12:10 Re: Why out-of-ssa does var coalescing based on name? Richard Biener
11:19 Re: Questions about LTO infrastructure and pragma omp target Jakub Jelinek
10:55 Re: Questions about LTO infrastructure and pragma omp target Ilya Verbin
09:52 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
09:29 Re: Vandalised wiki page Jonathan Wakely
09:28 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Michael V. Zolotukhin
09:27 mips16 LRA vs reload - Excess reload registers Matthew Fortune
07:02 Re: Vandalised wiki page Václav Zeman
00:22 Special pick may lie ahead... stay tuned! mailout

August 22, 2013
23:58 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Xinliang David Li
23:26 Why out-of-ssa does var coalescing based on name? Wei Mi
22:37 gcc-4.8-20130822 is now available gccadmin
22:13 Vandalised wiki page Alec Teal
16:21 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Xinliang David Li
14:28 Re: [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Jakub Jelinek
14:26 Re: XNEW and consorts Gabriel Dos Reis
14:22 Re: XNEW and consorts Gabriel Dos Reis
14:08 [RFC] Offloading Support in libgomp Michael V. Zolotukhin
13:51 Re: XNEW and consorts Dodji Seketeli
13:37 Problems with LRA for KNF/KNC in GCC 4.9 Andrey Turetskiy
12:23 Re: XNEW and consorts Jakub Jelinek
12:19 Re: XNEW and consorts Richard Biener
10:07 Re: PoC: Function Pointer Protection in C Programs Stephen RÃttger
09:43 Re: [oss-security] PoC: Function Pointer Protection in C Programs Stephen RÃttger
08:32 Re: PoC: Function Pointer Protection in C Programs OndÅej BÃlka
08:24 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. OndÅej BÃlka
07:11 Re: How to specify multiple OSDIRNAME suffixes for multilib (Multilib usage with MPX)? Ilya Enkovich
06:50 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Xinliang David Li
01:20 ÐÐÐÑÐÐÐÑÐÑÑ - ÐÐÐ ÑÐÐÐÐÐÐÑÑÑÑ ÐÐÑ? ÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ!

August 21, 2013
21:20 Re: [oss-security] PoC: Function Pointer Protection in C Programs Hannes Frederic Sowa
19:42 XNEW and consorts Gabriel Dos Reis
19:13 RE: How to specify multiple OSDIRNAME suffixes for multilib (Multilib usage with MPX)? Joseph S. Myers
17:55 Re: New file extension Steinar Bang
17:05 Re: PoC: Function Pointer Protection in C Programs Stephen RÃttger
16:53 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Andi Kleen
16:26 Re: PoC: Function Pointer Protection in C Programs OndÅej BÃlka
16:05 Re: PoC: Function Pointer Protection in C Programs Alessandro Cresto Miseroglio
15:39 Re: PoC: Function Pointer Protection in C Programs Stephen RÃttger
15:28 Re: PoC: Function Pointer Protection in C Programs Alessandro Cresto Miseroglio
15:22 Re: WARNING: profopt.exp does not support dg-do Chung-Ju Wu
15:07 Re: WARNING: profopt.exp does not support dg-do Paolo Carlini
15:00 Re: WARNING: profopt.exp does not support dg-do Paolo Carlini
14:54 Re: WARNING: profopt.exp does not support dg-do Paolo Carlini
14:49 Re: WARNING: profopt.exp does not support dg-do Chung-Ju Wu
14:43 PoC: Function Pointer Protection in C Programs Stephen RÃttger
13:28 [buildrobot] .../gcc/gcc/config/linux.h:105:34: error: âlinux_android_libc_has_functionâ was not declared in this scope Jan-Benedict Glaw
13:16 WARNING: profopt.exp does not support dg-do Paolo Carlini
09:58 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Richard Biener
04:07 Re: Steven Bosscher appointed RTL optimizers reviewer Chung-Ju Wu
01:33 Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?) David Malcolm
01:26 Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?) David Malcolm

August 20, 2013
19:38 Re: Steven Bosscher appointed RTL optimizers reviewer Xinliang David Li
19:25 Re: Steven Bosscher appointed RTL optimizers reviewer Steven Bosscher
16:38 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Xinliang David Li
15:53 Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?) David Malcolm
15:49 Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Andrew MacLeod
15:02 Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?) Paolo Carlini
14:41 Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?) David Malcolm
13:36 Re: Toolchain Build Robot Gerald Pfeifer
13:35 Re: Toolchain Build Robot Gerald Pfeifer
12:13 Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?) Rainer Orth
12:03 Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?) Paolo Carlini
10:57 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Richard Biener
08:11 Re: Build problem msg: xgcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory George R Goffe
07:24 Re: [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope Alexander Ivchenko
05:55 Re: Build problem msg: xgcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory Florian Weimer
03:22 Build problem msg: xgcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory George R Goffe

August 19, 2013
18:58 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Xinliang David Li
18:52 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Richard Biener
17:43 Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2. Xinliang David Li
17:31 Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 PLT entry to support MPX H.J. Lu
15:13 [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: âOPTION_BIONICâ was not declared in this scope Jan-Benedict Glaw
11:53 Re: Toolchain Build Robot Jan-Benedict Glaw
11:45 Re: Toolchain Build Robot Jan-Benedict Glaw
09:44 Fwd: failure notice Uday Khedker
07:56 Re: New testsuite warnings: mkdir: plugin: File exists Andreas Schwab
07:38 New testsuite warnings: mkdir: plugin: File exists Gerald Pfeifer
01:33 Re: Inefficiencies in large integers Asm Twiddler

August 18, 2013
22:39 gcc-4.9-20130818 is now available gccadmin
16:29 Goodbye from our Newsletter SCIKNOW
14:31 Call for Papers and Peer Reviewers- Sciknow Journals SCIKNOW
10:52 Re: Toolchain Build Robot Gerald Pfeifer
10:36 Re: Inefficiencies in large integers Oleg Endo
10:14 Re: Should -Wmaybe-uninitialized be included in -Wall? Gerald Pfeifer
04:55 Inefficiencies in large integers Asm Twiddler

August 17, 2013
22:41 gcc-4.7-20130817 is now available gccadmin

August 16, 2013
10:39 2ååæäèççäæç-åéåæä! Pauline

August 15, 2013
22:39 gcc-4.8-20130815 is now available gccadmin
19:19 ORDER INFORMATION EQUINOX IMPEX
18:58 Re: Questions about LTO infrastructure and pragma omp target Richard Biener
18:06 Re: What does the RTX_FLAG volitil mean? sculptor
15:00 Re: ssa-pre-21.c / PRE for truncated indices Richard Biener
13:44 Re: Questions about LTO infrastructure and pragma omp target Jakub Jelinek
13:37 Questions about LTO infrastructure and pragma omp target Ilya Verbin
11:56 Re: converting rtx object to the assembly instruction. David Given
11:36 ssa-pre-21.c / PRE for truncated indices Joern Rennecke
08:18 assign_parm_find_data_types question Konstantin Vladimirov
04:51 Re: What does the RTX_FLAG volitil mean? pinskia
04:01 What does the RTX_FLAG volitil mean? sculptor

August 14, 2013
20:29 Re: gfortran-dg-runtest, torture options Mikael Morin
20:14 Re: HAVE_ATTR_enabled mishandling? Chung-Ju Wu
19:01 Hello Sergey Karaulnykh
16:39 Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file Gabriel Dos Reis
16:23 Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file Andreas Schwab
15:50 Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 PLT entry to support MPX Jakub Jelinek
15:24 Re: converting rtx object to the assembly instruction. David Malcolm
12:29 Re: Combine pass with reused sources amylaar
08:53 Re: converting rtx object to the assembly instruction. Viktor Pobedin
02:50 Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file Alexandre Oliva
02:49 We can`t wait for the market to open tvovc

August 13, 2013
22:44 Re: GCC for Android Shell Jonathan Wakely
19:51 Our Members Continue to Make Huge Profits! karasev
19:37 Re: converting rtx object to the assembly instruction. Richard Sandiford
18:22 Re: gfortran-dg-runtest, torture options Janis Johnson
17:27 GCC for Android Shell Piotr Miłek
16:47 Re: HAVE_ATTR_enabled mishandling? Vladimir Makarov
15:18 converting rtx object to the assembly instruction. Viktor Pobedin
14:52 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
14:47 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
11:07 gfortran-dg-runtest, torture options Thomas Schwinge
07:50 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Peter Zijlstra

August 12, 2013
20:03 Combine pass with reused sources Lu, John
17:47 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
16:11 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Peter Zijlstra
16:09 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Peter Zijlstra
16:02 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Andi Kleen
15:13 Re: HAVE_ATTR_enabled mishandling? Chung-Ju Wu
15:02 ÐÐÐÐÑÑÑÐÐ ÐÐÑÐÐÐÑ ÑÐÐÐÐÐÑ
14:56 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
12:32 Re: i686 elf return values Nathan Sidwell
12:07 Re: i686 elf return values Maciej W. Rozycki
11:50 Re: [RFC] vector subscripts/BIT_FIELD_REF in Big Endian. Bill Schmidt
10:54 Re: [RFC] vector subscripts/BIT_FIELD_REF in Big Endian. Tejas Belagod
09:27 Re: How to specify multiple OSDIRNAME suffixes for multilib (Multilib usage with MPX)? Ilya Enkovich
09:25 Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 PLT entry to support MPX Jan Beulich
09:17 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Peter Zijlstra
08:57 RE: How to specify multiple OSDIRNAME suffixes for multilib (Multilib usage with MPX)? Terry Guo
08:37 Re: How to specify multiple OSDIRNAME suffixes for multilib (Multilib usage with MPX)? Ilya Enkovich
08:28 Re: load reverse Andrew Haley
04:22 Re: load reverse sravan megan
02:32 RE: How to specify multiple OSDIRNAME suffixes for multilib (Multilib usage with MPX)? Terry Guo

August 11, 2013
22:41 gcc-4.9-20130811 is now available gccadmin
20:04 Steven Bosscher appointed RTL optimizers reviewer Gerald Pfeifer

August 10, 2013
23:05 Re: Toolchain Build Robot Jan-Benedict Glaw
22:39 gcc-4.7-20130810 is now available gccadmin
02:33 Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Jonathan Wakely

August 09, 2013
18:31 Re: [RFC] vector subscripts/BIT_FIELD_REF in Big Endian. Bill Schmidt
17:03 Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 PLT entry to support MPX H.J. Lu
16:59 Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Joe Buck
16:36 Re: conflict between scheduler and register allocator Vladimir Makarov
16:24 Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Joel Sherrill
16:06 Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Deng Hengyi
16:03 Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Joel Sherrill
15:15 Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Deng Hengyi
12:37 How to specify multiple OSDIRNAME suffixes for multilib (Multilib usage with MPX)? Ilya Enkovich
11:25 conflict between scheduler and register allocator shmeel gutl
07:08 Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 PLT entry to support MPX Jan Beulich

August 08, 2013
22:40 gcc-4.8-20130808 is now available gccadmin
16:07 Re: __ARM_arch_<x>__ Jonathan Wakely
16:03 __ARM_arch_<x>__ zhaobin xv
16:01 Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 PLT entry to support MPX H.J. Lu
15:35 Re: __ARM_ARCH_2__ Richard Earnshaw
11:59 load reverse sravan megan
08:30 Building Testing and Installing gcc-4.7.2 Ellis N. Thomas
07:20 __ARM_ARCH_2__ zhaobin xv
07:19 Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 PLT entry to support MPX Jan Beulich
06:16 cÐyÐÐa ÐocÑaÐkÐ pekÐamÑ ÐÐÐÐ ÐÑÑÐÐÐÐÐ
00:33 Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 PLT entry to support MPX H.J. Lu

August 07, 2013
23:22 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Mathieu Desnoyers
22:43 Re: Pointer arithmetic Hendrik Greving
20:40 Re: Pointer arithmetic Oleg Endo
16:42 ÐÐÑÐÑÐÐÐÐÐ ÑÐÐÐÐÐ Vertu ÐÐ ÐÑÐÑÐÐÑÐ ÑÐÐÐÐ ÐÐÐÐÐ
16:11 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
16:03 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Mathieu Desnoyers
15:02 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
13:27 Re: libstdc++ test case ext/headers.cc failed on arm-none-eabi Jonathan Wakely
13:11 Re: libstdc++ test case ext/headers.cc failed on arm-none-eabi David Edelsohn
10:23 libstdc++ test case ext/headers.cc failed on arm-none-eabi Bin.Cheng
05:06 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections OndÅej BÃlka
00:56 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
00:45 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
00:32 Re: Git mirror changes Jonathan Wakely

August 06, 2013
23:56 Re: Git mirror changes Jonathan Wakely
20:43 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
20:34 Toolchain Build Robot Jan-Benedict Glaw
20:33 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Mathieu Desnoyers
18:55 Re: i686 elf return values Gabriel Dos Reis
18:46 i686 elf return values Nathan Sidwell
17:58 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
17:49 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
16:30 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
16:27 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
16:20 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
16:15 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
15:37 Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Jonathan Wakely
15:31 Re: Help with C++11 memory model on zSeries Torvald Riegel
15:30 Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Deng Hengyi
15:26 Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Jonathan Wakely
14:47 i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found Deng Hengyi
14:19 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
10:52 Re: c++/linker problems maybe? George R Goffe
05:16 Re: c++/linker problems maybe? Marek Polacek
05:05 c++/linker problems maybe? George R Goffe
04:28 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
04:14 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Mathieu Desnoyers
03:03 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
02:26 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Jason Baron

August 05, 2013
22:08 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Mathieu Desnoyers
21:44 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
21:44 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
21:29 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Mathieu Desnoyers
20:35 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Richard Henderson
20:22 ÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÑÐÐÑÐÑÐ ÐÐÑÐÑÐÑÐÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÐÑ ÑÐÐÑ ÐÑÑÐÑÐÐÐ
20:06 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Jason Baron
20:02 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
19:58 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Jason Baron
19:57 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
19:56 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
19:54 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Mathieu Desnoyers
19:40 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Marek Polacek
19:39 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
19:30 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Xinliang David Li
19:25 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
19:16 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
19:09 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
19:05 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Andi Kleen
19:04 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
19:01 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
18:51 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
18:50 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
18:49 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
18:39 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
18:39 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
18:35 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
18:34 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
18:29 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
18:24 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
18:23 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
18:20 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
18:18 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
18:11 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
17:55 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
17:24 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
17:19 Re: all_ones_mask_p clarification Gabriel Dos Reis
17:15 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
17:12 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Linus Torvalds
17:02 Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections H. Peter Anvin
16:55 [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections Steven Rostedt
16:45 all_ones_mask_p clarification Mike Stump
14:03 Help with C++11 memory model on zSeries Richard Sandiford
10:47 [RFC] vector subscripts/BIT_FIELD_REF in Big Endian. Tejas Belagod
08:40 Re: Wrong code for i686 target with -O3 -flto Jan Hubicka

August 04, 2013
22:42 gcc-4.9-20130804 is now available gccadmin
06:43 Re: Wrong code for i686 target with -O3 -flto Uros Bizjak
00:34 Re: Wrong code for i686 target with -O3 -flto NightStrike

August 03, 2013
22:42 gcc-4.7-20130803 is now available gccadmin
22:41 Re: resurrecting automatic dependencies Gabriel Dos Reis
21:11 Re: resurrecting automatic dependencies Richard Henderson
20:36 Re: why cross out cout make result different? Jonathan Wakely
17:19 Press Inquiry: History of GCC (german Linux Magazine) Tim Schürmann
15:34 Re: why cross out cout make result different? eric lin
07:54 Re: why cross out cout make result different? Oleg Endo
01:25 why cross out cout make result different? eric lin

August 02, 2013
18:31 Re: AVR-gcc shift optimization Oleg Endo
17:14 Re: whether DIE of a "static const int" member has attribute "DW_AT_const_value" Richard Henderson
12:49 Re: [x86-64 psABI]: Extend x86-64 psABI to support AVX-512 Kirill Yukhin
01:23 AVR-gcc shift optimization Asm Twiddler

August 01, 2013
22:40 gcc-4.8-20130801 is now available gccadmin
21:34 P_a_c_c_Ð_Ð_k_Ð ÐÐÐÐÑÐÐ ÐÐÐÐÑÐÐ


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc