This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: David Starner <prosfilaes at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:44:16 +0100
- Subject: Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
- References: <CAMZ=zj40GLLXB0toTGhpJihm--eMYMd643SOVGcPUg+LpRuZ8g at mail dot gmail dot com> <51EF8D98 dot 3060005 at redhat dot com> <CAMZ=zj67PA=yYGnkCZmG3Yet45r5=f=HvWcu6p_v2VgNfo--4w at mail dot gmail dot com> <51EFB70C dot 3050309 at redhat dot com> <CAMZ=zj4ZyZSy_MVKsz53c6reWkCRu79n1jsYZ3kgYkwjL2PRjA at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 07/24/2013 01:26 PM, David Starner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I would just install GCC's build dependencies and build with the
>> defaults.
>
> I'm glad you have infinite hard-drive space. I rather wish fewer
> developers did, as well as those infinitely fast computers they seem
> to have; perhaps they would have more empathy with my day-to-day
> computing needs.
>
>> There is no resistance whatsoever to making it work with real systems
>> and real workloads.
>
> Yes, there is. Both in this thread, and on bugzilla, people with real
> systems, in my case a well-stocked development system, have said they
> started compiling gcc and after hours the compile has failed without
> even an explanation, and people have shrugged, and said what do you
> want us to do about it?
There should be a better diagnostic.
Andrew.