This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
On Nov 28, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28 November 2012 09:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 28 November 2012 07:36, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>> What you described is the 'transitional model' right? but I don't see
>>> any of those in the C++ standard working paper:
>>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3347.pdf
>>
>> It's far too early for anything to have been voted into the working
>> paper, that doesn't change the fact there's a WG21 study group,
>> chaired by Doug, working on modules. See
>> http://isocpp.org/std/the-committee
>
> Oh sorry, I didn't follow the link to realise that's Vandevoorde's
> most recent proposal. When you said "working paper" I thought you
> meant the current C++ draft, which is what people usually mean by "the
> C++ standard working paper". N3347 is just a proposal, it's not part
> of the standard and hasn't been approved or agreed on as being "the
> current state of modules". There are often competing or alternative
> proposals during development of a feature.
There is no document (yet) that proposes modules as implemented in Clang. We hope to have one for the Bristol meeting.
- Doug