This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Renaming Stage 1 and Stage 3

From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:20:56 -0400
Subject: Re: Renaming Stage 1 and Stage 3
References: <4EA8296F.2020300@redhat.com> <m3ty6pxotz.fsf@houston.quesejoda.com> <mcrbosxvvww.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1206102354370.7564@zbenl.fvgr> <CAFiYyc2AGbBtzhJTodneCt7i54wBUqC4cD0s8asJO4ziSYdy2Q@mail.gmail.com> <m3r4tmxhwl.fsf@seketeli.org>

On 06/11/2012 06:27 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:

Richard Guenther<richard.guenther@gmail.com> a Ãcrit:

Eh - why not give them names with an actual meaning? "Development Stage"
and "Stabilizing Stage"?  I realize those are rather long names, but you
can always put short forms in tables, like Dev Stage and Stab Stage.

Seconded, for what it's worth.

Indeed, that my first thought as well... make the name mean something.

Development and Stabilization work for me.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Renaming Stage 1 and Stage 3
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- Renaming Stage 1 and Stage 3
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Renaming Stage 1 and Stage 3
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Renaming Stage 1 and Stage 3
  - From: Dodji Seketeli

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]