This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Updated GCC vs Clang diagnostics


On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:30 AM, NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
> <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Shooting down a potentially user friendly feature to wait until some blue
>>> sky redesign is implemented means it might never be implemented.
>>
>> This is a mischaracterization and you know it.
>>
>> -- Gaby
>
> It is and it isn't. ?The guy willing to do the basic color stuff has
> no desire to do what you want. ?Is there someone else lined up to do
> it? ?If not, then forcing a wait on it effectively blocks the
> available developer.

No. When you submit a patch to GCC (whether it is diagnostics or not
is immaterial), you expect that it will get reviewed and recommendations
will be made about the appropriate way to get it done.  Just have a look
at gcc-patches.  There is no thing new here.  If the submitter
refused to follow the recommendations, it is unfair it is being shut down
or blocked.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]