This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:46:36 -0700
Subject: Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host
References: <201203160412.q2G4C6DV025456@greed.delorie.com> <mcrr4wtw4rt.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com> <201203160431.q2G4V6ZC025872@greed.delorie.com>

DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

>> My first try would be --with-build-sysroot.  Does that fail in some way?
>
> It's ignored without --with-sysroot, but if you use --with-sysroot,
> the cross-built native *also* expects to use a sysroot, which means
> binutils must also be built with a sysroot, even if its "/".

OK, but what's wrong --with-sysroot=/ ?

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- target_header_dir vs host-x-host
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]