Re: trouble emilinating redundant compares

[Paul S <pauls at dataworx dot com dot au>]

Thanks,

I was mistakenly only considering ports that defined 
TARGET_FIXED_CONDITION_CODE_REGS

Paul.

On 23/01/12 11:23, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 01/18/2012 08:16 AM, Paul S wrote:
>    
> > Thanks H-P,
> >
> > That worked first time !
> >
> > For a few days I had been searching the non cc0 ports for hints. Two
> > of the ports don't bother using the set CC side effect to avoid
> > compares and the others are obfuscated by the fact that they
> > (understandably) use custom CC modes and the reload conditions aren't
> > obvious - even when I inspected the .c file CCmode tests.
> >      
> Don't look at i386 -- it doesn't use compare-elim.c.
> Look at the mn10300 and rx ports instead.
>
>
> r~
>
>
>