This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
December 31, 2011
21:43 | Bogus gcc.c-torture/execute/20071018-1.c testcase? | Mark Kettenis |
09:44 | RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
00:41 | Re: RTL Conditional and Call | Matt Davis |
December 30, 2011
18:47 | Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | Basile Starynkevitch |
17:53 | Re: Lingering tbaa in anti_dependence? | Jakub Jelinek |
15:29 | Re: private member in union { union } | Jonathan Wakely |
15:26 | Re: Static code analysis follow ups | Richard Guenther |
15:25 | private member in union { union } | Jakub Staszak |
15:16 | Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p | Richard Guenther |
15:12 | Re: Lingering tbaa in anti_dependence? | Richard Guenther |
14:34 | Re: Static code analysis follow ups | Basile Starynkevitch |
14:17 | Static code analysis follow ups | sarah at hederstierna dot com |
13:51 | Re: RTL Conditional and Call | Alexander Monakov |
13:14 | RTL Conditional and Call | Matt Davis |
09:16 | Re: xlr/xlp __atomic builtins using ldadd and swap | Richard Sandiford |
04:16 | RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
03:10 | RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
02:44 | FW: | R A |
00:30 | Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | James Dennett |
December 29, 2011
December 28, 2011
23:25 | Re: a nift y feature for c prep rocessor | R A |
23:11 | FW: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
23:09 | RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
22:39 | Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | David Brown |
22:01 | Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | Jonathan Wakely |
21:06 | Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | Jonathan Wakely |
20:57 | RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
18:14 | return vs simple_return | Michael Eager |
16:53 | Re:Etrade:-Account ALERT 589b56ad69ee39fc | 96808bankofamericaalerts mail. |
10:00 | Re: FW: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | David Brown |
09:38 | RE: A case exposing code sink issue | Jiangning Liu |
06:59 | c preprocessor feature suggestion | R A |
06:48 | FW: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
December 27, 2011
09:10 | RE: A case exposing code sink issue | Jiangning Liu |
December 26, 2011
21:42 | NYC: Moving and other jobs from 19$/hour/man on van+19$/truck-no hidden fees,discounts for 7th and latest hours of jobtime or fix rate for whole jobs | admin |
December 25, 2011
02:07 | Re: gcc-4.7-20111224 is now available | Miles Bader |
December 24, 2011
23:04 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Gabriel Dos Reis |
22:43 | gcc-4.7-20111224 is now available | gccadmin |
15:10 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Miles Bader |
11:08 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Paolo Carlini |
11:05 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Paolo Carlini |
10:59 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Jonathan Wakely |
10:52 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Paolo Carlini |
02:04 | non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Miles Bader |
December 23, 2011
22:47 | gcc-4.6-20111223 is now available | gccadmin |
14:19 | Re: NSDMI bug? | Miles Bader |
12:40 | Re: NSDMI bug? | Jonathan Wakely |
09:07 | NSDMI bug? | Miles Bader |
07:43 | Re: Which Binutils should I use for performing daily regression test on trunk? | Hans-Peter Nilsson |
03:20 | Re: Which Binutils should I use for performing daily regression test on trunk? | Ye Joey |
December 22, 2011
22:48 | gcc-4.5-20111222 is now available | gccadmin |
17:44 | Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-12-06) | Joseph S. Myers |
17:13 | Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-12-06) | Gary Funck |
11:08 | Re: A case exposing code sink issue | Richard Guenther |
08:26 | RE: A case exposing code sink issue | Jiangning Liu |
December 21, 2011
19:00 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Ian Lance Taylor |
18:07 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Jonathan Wakely |
18:03 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Jonathan Wakely |
17:07 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Patrick Marlier |
16:43 | Re: Which Binutils should I use for performing daily regression test on trunk? | Ian Lance Taylor |
15:16 | Re: Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter | Martin Jambor |
14:11 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Aldy Hernandez |
03:26 | Which Binutils should I use for performing daily regression test on trunk? | Terry Guo |
02:01 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Jim Avera |
01:53 | Re: Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter | Matt Davis |
December 20, 2011
22:43 | gcc-4.4-20111220 is now available | gccadmin |
16:54 | Re: Misleading error if the type in catch() is ambiguous | Peter A. Felvegi |
14:28 | Re: Misleading error if the type in catch() is ambiguous | Jonathan Wakely |
14:21 | Re: Help with generating 'memset' for loop initialization | Richard Guenther |
13:31 | Misleading error if the type in catch() is ambiguous | Peter A. Felvegi |
13:23 | Help with generating 'memset' for loop initialization | Rohit Arul Raj |
13:22 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Jonathan Wakely |
12:47 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Segher Boessenkool |
00:42 | Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Jim Avera |
December 19, 2011
16:24 | NYC: Moving and other jobs from 19$ per man on van/truck/hour,discounts for 7th and latest hours of jobtime or fix rate for whole jobs | support |
12:05 | Re: Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter | Matt Davis |
09:43 | Re: Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter | Martin Jambor |
04:22 | Re: building unwind-sjlj.o with / without -fexceptions | Hans-Peter Nilsson |
December 18, 2011
02:57 | Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter | Matt Davis |
December 17, 2011
22:42 | gcc-4.7-20111217 is now available | gccadmin |
December 16, 2011
22:48 | gcc-4.6-20111216 is now available | gccadmin |
18:36 | RE: GCC Account | Iyer, Balaji V |
18:01 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Rainer Orth |
14:23 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Joseph S. Myers |
14:17 | Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals | Joseph S. Myers |
08:36 | RE: add and compare combination | BELBACHIR Selim |
06:16 | Re: How to change the search path for header files | Ian Lance Taylor |
December 15, 2011
23:54 | How to change the search path for header files | extraordinary |
22:48 | gcc-4.5-20111215 is now available | gccadmin |
20:48 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Patrick Marlier |
20:08 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Jack Howarth |
18:04 | Re: Long-term plan for C++98/C++11 incompatibility | Jeffrey Yasskin |
17:02 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Torvald Riegel |
15:51 | [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Patrick Marlier |
15:48 | OpenACC | Daniel Reynolds |
15:21 | [pph] Merge from trunk | Diego Novillo |
15:12 | add and compare combination | BELBACHIR Selim |
14:58 | Re: question on behavior of tree-ssa-ccp | Richard Guenther |
14:33 | Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals | Gerald Pfeifer |
14:02 | Re: question on behavior of tree-ssa-ccp | Amker.Cheng |
13:41 | question on behavior of tree-ssa-ccp | Amker.Cheng |
December 14, 2011
23:55 | Re: ICE in cp/semantics.c:cxx_eval_indirect_ref | Gabriel Dos Reis |
20:08 | Re: ICE in cp/semantics.c:cxx_eval_indirect_ref | Diego Novillo |
20:02 | Re: ICE in cp/semantics.c:cxx_eval_indirect_ref | Jason Merrill |
19:36 | ICE in cp/semantics.c:cxx_eval_indirect_ref | Diego Novillo |
18:39 | Re: GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems | Joel Sherrill |
16:58 | GNU Tools Cauldron 2012 - 2nd Call for Abstracts and Participation | Diego Novillo |
12:03 | RE: GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems | Henderson, Stuart |
10:55 | Re: a new write after approval maintainer | Kaz Kojima |
10:29 | Re: a new write after approval maintainer | Gerald Pfeifer |
06:08 | Re: GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems | Denis Chertykov |
02:24 | a new write after approval maintainer | Kaz Kojima |
01:34 | add link | Mike |
December 13, 2011
December 12, 2011
December 11, 2011
23:14 | Ad: Fix PR middle-end/45416, missing opt for (a&(1<<C))!=0 to (a>>C)&1 | Georg-Johann Lay |
22:44 | Re: warn about deprecated access declarations | Jonathan Wakely |
22:23 | warn about deprecated access declarations | Fabien Chêne |
14:58 | Re: Failure to bootstrap current gcc trunk on cygwin (20111207 snapshot): conflicting declarations in cygwin's /usr/include/sys/wait.h | Christian Joensson |
December 10, 2011
22:46 | gcc-4.7-20111210 is now available | gccadmin |
15:25 | HeyJustin | JB |
01:49 | Re: Obtaining the arguments to a function pointer | Matt Davis |
01:40 | Re: Obtaining the arguments to a function pointer | Ian Lance Taylor |
01:24 | Obtaining the arguments to a function pointer | Matt Davis |
December 09, 2011
22:43 | gcc-4.6-20111209 is now available | gccadmin |
21:45 | Various problems building on x86_64 OpenBSD | Kyle Markley |
17:36 | Re: dse2 remove wrong insn | Andrew Haley |
16:49 | RE: Bug in Tree to RTL expansion? | Bingfeng Mei |
16:11 | Re: dse2 remove wrong insn | Jeff Law |
16:08 | Re: GCC Account | Jeff Law |
15:32 | GCC Account | Iyer, Balaji V |
15:21 | Re: dse2 remove wrong insn | Georg-Johann Lay |
15:05 | dse2 remove wrong insn | BELBACHIR Selim |
14:36 | RE: Bug in Tree to RTL expansion? | Bingfeng Mei |
10:34 | Re: middle end generated builtin functions passing to backend problem | Feng LI |
December 08, 2011
December 07, 2011
December 06, 2011
December 05, 2011
21:53 | Re: Broken link | Jonathan Wakely |
21:44 | Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection | Jeff Law |
20:41 | Re: Creating a structure at compile time. | Ian Lance Taylor |
18:18 | Re: Dimensions of array parameters | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:10 | Re: libsupc++/exception cannot find bits/atomic_lockfree_defines.h | Diego Novillo |
13:51 | Re: Broken link | Jonathan Wakely |
12:53 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Richard Guenther |
11:18 | Broken link | Marco Antonio Gómez Martín |
09:10 | Re: Dimensions of array parameters | Ludovic Courtès |
08:50 | Re: Links to release criteria? | Richard Guenther |
December 04, 2011
19:46 | Re: Links to release criteria? | Joern Rennecke |
17:16 | Re: Links to release criteria? | Gerald Pfeifer |
13:33 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Richard Guenther |
03:46 | Re: Creating a structure at compile time. | Matt Davis |
December 03, 2011
22:47 | gcc-4.7-20111203 is now available | gccadmin |
18:56 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Richard Henderson |
14:30 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Richard Guenther |
12:16 | Is ada's "make install" parallel-safe? | Dave Korn |
02:59 | Re: Simplification of relational operations (was [patch for PR18942]) | Maxim Kuvyrkov |
00:54 | Re: libsupc++/exception cannot find bits/atomic_lockfree_defines.h | Andrew MacLeod |
00:00 | libsupc++/exception cannot find bits/atomic_lockfree_defines.h | Diego Novillo |
December 02, 2011
December 01, 2011
23:26 | Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline | Joseph S. Myers |
22:45 | gcc-4.5-20111201 is now available | gccadmin |
22:36 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Ian Lance Taylor |
21:41 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Georg-Johann Lay |
21:09 | Parallel build error | Richard Henderson |
20:32 | Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline | Eric Botcazou |
20:10 | Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline | Steven Bosscher |
18:42 | Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline | Joseph S. Myers |
17:26 | Re: C++ memory model... What to do with libatomic | Richard Henderson |
17:00 | Warning for functions called before declared inline | Steven Bosscher |
15:45 | Re: At which pass thing goes wrong for PR43491? | Richard Guenther |
10:12 | Re: At which pass thing goes wrong for PR43491? | Amker.Cheng |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]