This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.


On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> Reviewable patches as in what goes in gcc-patches? ?Or do you want
>>> something
>>> else?
>>
>> Reviewable branch merge patch(es). ?You can't expect everyone to
>> follow all development branches that may or may not end up being merged.
>
> Is what I posted not in a way that can be reviewed? ?Did you download the
> link, or are you just complaining because it's easier?


Index: gcc/c-opts.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-opts.c	(.../trunk)	(revision 0)
+++ gcc/c-opts.c	(.../branches/transactional-memory)	(revision 180773)
@@ -0,0 +1,1773 @@
+/* C/ObjC/C++ command line option handling.
+   Copyright (C) 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
+   Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   Contributed by Neil Booth.

re-generates gcc/c-opts.c which was moved to gcc/c-family.  I suppose
sth was screwed up during some trunk->branch merge.  Please review
the patches yourself and look for these issues and fix them.

Thanks,
Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]