gcc archive
date index for November, 2011

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 30, 2011
23:00 Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Ian Lance Taylor
22:02 Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Steven Bosscher
21:54 Re: Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin Tom Tromey
21:53 Re: Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin David Malcolm
21:52 Re: Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin Jeff Law
21:03 Re: Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin Diego Novillo
20:07 Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin David Malcolm
18:07 C++ memory model... What to do with libatomic Andrew MacLeod
17:56 Re: A new stack protector option? Han Shen(ææ)
17:08 Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Ian Lance Taylor
16:45 Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Ian Lance Taylor
08:47 Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
08:38 Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Georg-Johann Lay
07:41 Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Denis Chertykov
06:44 Re: A new stack protector option? Ye Joey

November 29, 2011
23:54 A new stack protector option? Han Shen(ææ)
22:56 Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Joseph S. Myers
22:44 gcc-4.4-20111129 is now available gccadmin
22:36 Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one David Brown
22:28 ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.7 David Malcolm
21:55 Bluna.tv Reel 2012 bluna . tv
21:53 Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Ian Lance Taylor
21:21 volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Georg-Johann Lay
18:52 Preserve labels for the life of Compliation Iyer, Balaji V
17:04 [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
15:45 Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Joseph S. Myers
14:55 Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Michael Matz
14:44 Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one David Brown
14:26 Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Ian Lance Taylor
14:04 Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Robert Dewar
13:30 Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Michael Matz
11:38 Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Nadezhda Ivanоvna Vyukova

November 28, 2011
17:49 Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Ian Lance Taylor
13:07 RE: A case exposing code sink issue Michael Matz
12:51 Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
05:00 Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Ian Lance Taylor
02:45 RE: A case exposing code sink issue Jiangning Liu

November 27, 2011
18:54 Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Eric Botcazou
18:14 Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
17:51 Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Ian Lance Taylor
10:55 Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay

November 26, 2011
22:44 gcc-4.7-20111126 is now available gccadmin
20:55 Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Steven Bosscher
17:54 Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
09:27 Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Wim Lewis
07:41 At which pass thing goes wrong for PR43491? Amker.Cheng
06:20 Re: Defining symvers without using asm() Ian Lance Taylor
05:10 error linking lto1 for target avr Sean D'Epagnier

November 25, 2011
22:43 gcc-4.6-20111125 is now available gccadmin
20:23 Defining symvers without using asm() Jan Engelhardt
15:23 RE: A case exposing code sink issue Michael Matz
06:50 Re: Auto-Vectorization, Polyhedral Model Umesh Bhatia

November 24, 2011
23:58 X32 project status update H.J. Lu
22:48 gcc-4.5-20111124 is now available gccadmin
07:52 RE: A case exposing code sink issue Jiangning Liu
06:57 RE: A case exposing code sink issue Jiangning Liu
06:17 RE: A case exposing code sink issue Jiangning Liu
04:15 Re: A case exposing code sink issue Andrew Pinski
04:05 A case exposing code sink issue Jiangning Liu

November 23, 2011
16:44 Jumatatea ta te asteapta Amandoi
11:16 Re: Yet another issue with gcc current trunk with ada on cygwin: s-tpoaal.adb:60:13: "Specific" is undefined (more references follow) Christian Joensson
11:13 Re: GCC 4.6 is inserting unnecessary MOVAPS instructions for SSE intrinsics Marc Glisse
09:47 Re: success building gcc-4.6.2 on x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0 Jonathan Wakely
08:45 Re: Yet another issue with gcc current trunk with ada on cygwin: s-tpoaal.adb:60:13: "Specific" is undefined (more references follow) Eric Botcazou
07:53 Re: Yet another issue with gcc current trunk with ada on cygwin: s-tpoaal.adb:60:13: "Specific" is undefined (more references follow) Christian Joensson
07:30 Re: Yet another issue with gcc current trunk with ada on cygwin: s-tpoaal.adb:60:13: "Specific" is undefined (more references follow) Eric Botcazou
06:39 Re: Yet another issue with gcc current trunk with ada on cygwin: s-tpoaal.adb:60:13: "Specific" is undefined (more references follow) Christian Joensson
03:45 GCC 4.6 is inserting unnecessary MOVAPS instructions for SSE intrinsics Leith Bade
03:06 success building gcc-4.6.2 on x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0 Alex J. Avriette

November 22, 2011
22:45 gcc-4.4-20111122 is now available gccadmin
20:31 Re: gcc register allocation error when reloading an asm Richard Henderson
20:11 RE: gcc register allocation error when reloading an asm Bodart, Mitch L
19:53 Re: Linking libgcc with xgcc fails in build of trunk Jonathan Wakely
19:34 Re: gcc register allocation error when reloading an asm Richard Henderson
19:02 Linking libgcc with xgcc fails in build of trunk Aran Clauson
18:55 gcc register allocation error when reloading an asm Bodart, Mitch L
15:45 [pph] Merge from trunk rev 180687. Fix for skipped line tables Diego Novillo
13:17 maddsidi4 detection BELBACHIR Selim
07:01 Re: Yet another issue with gcc current trunk with ada on cygwin: s-tpoaal.adb:60:13: "Specific" is undefined (more references follow) Eric Botcazou
04:50 Yet another issue with gcc current trunk with ada on cygwin: s-tpoaal.adb:60:13: "Specific" is undefined (more references follow) Christian Joensson

November 21, 2011
21:50 Re: Bootstrap fails in 32bit libjava on x86_64 Fedora 16 with undefined reference to `__cxa_call_unexpected' Richard Henderson
16:29 Re: Bootstrap fails in 32bit libjava on x86_64 Fedora 16 with undefined reference to `__cxa_call_unexpected' Jeff Law
14:16 Joern Rennecke appointed Epiphany maintainer David Edelsohn
14:05 Re: Bootstrap fails in 32bit libjava on x86_64 Fedora 16 with undefined reference to `__cxa_call_unexpected' Mark Wielaard
12:31 Eric Botcazou to join our Ada maintainer team Gerald Pfeifer
11:19 ./libgcc/libgcc2.c:32:23: fatal error: libgcc_tm.h: No such file or directory Georg-Johann Lay
10:48 Re: Bootstrap fails in 32bit libjava on x86_64 Fedora 16 with undefined reference to `__cxa_call_unexpected' Andrew Haley
09:35 Re: Profiling gcc itself Gary Funck
09:20 Re: libgcc: why emutls.c in LIB2ADDEH instead of LIB2ADD? Paolo Bonzini
08:51 Re: Issues with building gcc trunk with ada on cygwin Eric Botcazou
06:59 Re: Issues with building gcc trunk with ada on cygwin Christian Joensson
04:13 Re: Bootstrap fails in 32bit libjava on x86_64 Fedora 16 with undefined reference to `__cxa_call_unexpected' Jeff Law
02:02 Re: Profiling gcc itself Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:54 RE: Is VRP is too conservative to identify boolean value 0 and 1? Jiangning Liu
01:23 Re: Profiling gcc itself Jonathan Wakely
01:04 Re: Profiling gcc itself Diego Novillo
01:03 Re: Profiling gcc itself Diego Novillo
01:02 Re: Profiling gcc itself David Edelsohn
00:54 Re: libgcc: why emutls.c in LIB2ADDEH instead of LIB2ADD? Richard Henderson
00:50 Re: Profiling gcc itself Jeff Evarts

November 20, 2011
23:53 Bootstrap fails in 32bit libjava on x86_64 Fedora 16 with undefined reference to `__cxa_call_unexpected' Uros Bizjak
16:34 Re: Profiling gcc itself Tim Prince
16:10 Re: Profiling gcc itself Basile Starynkevitch
11:43 Profiling gcc itself Jeff Evarts
11:29 libgcc: why emutls.c in LIB2ADDEH instead of LIB2ADD? Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:08 Re: Issues with building gcc trunk with ada on cygwin Eric Botcazou
09:42 Issues with building gcc trunk with ada on cygwin Christian Joensson

November 19, 2011
22:44 gcc-4.7-20111119 is now available gccadmin
17:49 Re: new mirror site Gcc Gerald Pfeifer
13:54 Re: About TYPE_DECL, typedefs and TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT Dodji Seketeli

November 18, 2011
23:05 Re: Links to release criteria? Diego Novillo
22:47 gcc-4.6-20111118 is now available gccadmin
21:51 Re: ICE Paolo Carlini
21:42 more pointer mode madness DJ Delorie
21:06 ICE François Dumont
20:34 Re: ICE in int_mode_for_mode() David Edelsohn
20:22 ICE in int_mode_for_mode() David Miller
20:11 The Linux binutils 2.22.51.0.1 is released H.J. Lu
18:08 GNU Tools Cauldron 2012 - Call for Abstracts and Participation Diego Novillo
17:58 Re:You can find everything whatever you want at this place! sarahnling
15:54 Re: Links to release criteria? Gerald Pfeifer
13:55 Re: Stack allocation David Brown
13:49 Re: Stack allocation Mihai DonÈu
13:39 Re: Stack allocation Alexandru Juncu
11:33 About TYPE_DECL, typedefs and TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT Alberto Lozano Alelu
11:31 Re: Stack allocation David Brown
10:58 Re: installing cross compiler Jonathan Wakely
09:57 installing cross compiler esmaeil mirzaee
09:40 Re: a question about IVOPTS: find_interesting_uses_address Richard Guenther
09:27 Stack allocation Alexandru Juncu
05:24 ````````你````好``````` bgulmm49197
01:07 Re: a question about IVOPTS: find_interesting_uses_address Yuehai Du
00:59 Re: powerpc compare_and_swap fails Richard Henderson
00:34 Re: powerpc compare_and_swap fails David Edelsohn

November 17, 2011
22:42 gcc-4.5-20111117 is now available gccadmin
21:04 Re: powerpc compare_and_swap fails Richard Henderson
19:32 Re: Links to release criteria? Gerald Pfeifer
19:22 Re: Links to release criteria? Richard Guenther
19:22 Re: Links to release criteria? Diego Novillo
19:19 Re: Links to release criteria? Richard Guenther
18:27 Links to release criteria? Diego Novillo
16:43 Re: Transactional Memory documentation in extend.texi Torvald Riegel
16:22 Re: Transactional Memory documentation in extend.texi Andi Kleen
14:15 Transactional Memory documentation in extend.texi Torvald Riegel
10:38 powerpc compare_and_swap fails Alan Modra

November 16, 2011
22:49 Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Do not run simulate-thread on alpha*-*-linux* Uros Bizjak
22:26 Re: a question about IVOPTS: find_interesting_uses_address Richard Guenther
22:12 Re: When is the hardware related register is allocated? Joern Rennecke
21:47 Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Do not run simulate-thread on alpha*-*-linux* Richard Henderson
21:06 Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Do not run simulate-thread on alpha*-*-linux* Uros Bizjak
17:32 Re: A question about redudant load elimination Michael Matz
17:04 Re: A question about redudant load elimination Jeff Law
14:52 Re: Developing GCC Ian Lance Taylor
14:01 Re: Developing GCC Basile Starynkevitch
13:50 Re: A question about redudant load elimination Michael Matz
13:43 Re: When is the hardware related register is allocated? Feng LI
13:39 Developing GCC Rick C. Hodgin
11:34 Re: A question about redudant load elimination Eric Botcazou
11:31 Re: a question about IVOPTS: find_interesting_uses_address Eric Botcazou
11:18 Re: When is the hardware related register is allocated? Joern Rennecke
11:01 Re: A question about redudant load elimination Richard Guenther
10:59 Re: a question about IVOPTS: find_interesting_uses_address Richard Guenther

November 15, 2011
22:46 gcc-4.4-20111115 is now available gccadmin
22:43 Re: Autoconf 2.64 broken on FreeBSD 10.0 Andreas Tobler
22:38 Re: Autoconf 2.64 broken on FreeBSD 10.0 Andreas Tobler
22:34 Re: Autoconf 2.64 broken on FreeBSD 10.0 Gerald Pfeifer
22:32 Re: Autoconf 2.64 broken on FreeBSD 10.0 Peter O'Gorman
22:19 Re: Autoconf 2.64 broken on FreeBSD 10.0 Andreas Tobler
22:09 Re: Autoconf 2.64 broken on FreeBSD 10.0 Andreas Schwab
21:45 Re: Autoconf 2.64 broken on FreeBSD 10.0 Andreas Tobler
21:37 Autoconf 2.64 broken on FreeBSD 10.0 Gerald Pfeifer
17:28 Re: builtin gamma function Ian Lance Taylor
15:43 Re: builtin gamma function Andrew Haley
14:18 Re: builtin gamma function Ed Smith-Rowland
14:14 Re: Auto-Vectorization, Polyhedral Model Konrad Trifunovic
13:52 RE: builtin gamma function James Hirschorn
13:15 On-line igre Igre
13:15 On-line igre Igre
12:30 Re: Bugzilla shouldn't mangle patches Frédéric Buclin
12:26 Re: Bugzilla shouldn't mangle patches Jonathan Wakely
11:56 Re: Bugzilla shouldn't mangle patches Frédéric Buclin
11:54 Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-10-27), Stage 1 will end Nov 7th Michael Zolotukhin
09:50 Bugzilla shouldn't mangle patches Jonathan Wakely
09:46 Building cross gnat + minimal RTS BELBACHIR Selim
09:22 Re: Odd things when change gcc from 3.3 to 3.4 Jonathan Wakely
09:02 Re: Odd things when change gcc from 3.3 to 3.4 Mingjie Xing
08:38 Odd things when change gcc from 3.3 to 3.4 Mingjie Xing
07:06 Auto-Vectorization, Polyhedral Model steven su
06:57 Re: builtin gamma function Ian Lance Taylor
06:09 builtin gamma function James Hirschorn

November 14, 2011
22:07 Re: Troubleshooting with gcc 4.6 Ian Lance Taylor
21:48 Re: Troubleshooting with gcc 4.6 Matthias Klose
21:23 Re: Bugzilla components for target libraries Matthias Klose
19:16 Re: When is the hardware related register is allocated? Ian Lance Taylor
17:41 Re: When is the hardware related register is allocated? Feng LI
09:46 Re: bootstrap regression on sparc Rainer Orth
08:22 Re: A question about redudant load elimination Ye Joey
08:02 A question about redudant load elimination Jiangning Liu
07:00 Re: When is the hardware related register is allocated? Ian Lance Taylor
03:58 a question about IVOPTS: find_interesting_uses_address Yuehai Du

November 13, 2011
21:45 When is the hardware related register is allocated? Feng LI
21:41 Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Do not run simulate-thread on alpha*-*-linux* Richard Henderson
01:30 suggest more inhibit_libc for ia64-linux -- problems with exception handling when haven't yet built glibc. Jay K
00:33 Re: bootstrap regression on sparc David Miller

November 12, 2011
22:46 gcc-4.7-20111112 is now available gccadmin
22:37 Re: bootstrap regression on sparc Joel Sherrill
22:25 Re: bootstrap regression on sparc David Miller
22:24 Re: bootstrap regression on sparc David Miller
17:51 Re: bootstrap regression on sparc Dennis Clarke
17:38 Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Do not run simulate-thread on alpha*-*-linux* Uros Bizjak
15:01 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Gabriel Dos Reis
14:52 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Jonathan Wakely
14:34 Re: bootstrap regression on sparc Joel Sherrill
12:49 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Gabriel Dos Reis
12:26 Re: bootstrap regression on sparc Hans-Peter Nilsson
09:00 Re:I want you to rid of all your problems! sarahnling
08:57 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Theodore Papadopoulo
04:53 Re: bootstrap regression on sparc David Miller
03:33 Re: Delegating Constructors? Miles Bader
01:41 bootstrap regression on sparc David Miller

November 11, 2011
22:42 gcc-4.6-20111111 is now available gccadmin
22:23 Re: gcc vs. glibc bootstrapping of libgcc_eh.a Mike Frysinger
21:43 Re: gcc vs. glibc bootstrapping of libgcc_eh.a Ian Lance Taylor
21:31 Re: [PATCH v2 9/10] Tilera (and Linux asm-generic) support for glibc Joseph S. Myers
21:27 Re: gcc vs. glibc bootstrapping of libgcc_eh.a Linas Vepstas
20:44 Re: [PATCH v2 9/10] Tilera (and Linux asm-generic) support for glibc Andrew Pinski
20:41 Re: [PATCH v2 9/10] Tilera (and Linux asm-generic) support for glibc Chris Metcalf
20:17 Re: [PATCH v2 9/10] Tilera (and Linux asm-generic) support for glibc Andrew Pinski
20:13 Re: [PATCH v2 9/10] Tilera (and Linux asm-generic) support for glibc Chris Metcalf
19:58 Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Do not run simulate-thread on alpha*-*-linux* Dominique Dhumieres
19:17 Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Do not run simulate-thread on alpha*-*-linux* Uros Bizjak
17:51 Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Do not run simulate-thread on alpha*-*-linux* Dominique Dhumieres
16:21 Re: revision r181278 gives me a bootstrap/build error on cygwin for gcc trunk: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Christian Joensson
15:31 Continue strict-volatile-bitfields fixes Joey Ye
15:30 Re: revision r181278 gives me a bootstrap/build error on cygwin for gcc trunk: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Jason Merrill
13:12 Re: revision r181278 gives me a bootstrap/build error on cygwin for gcc trunk: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Dominique Dhumieres
12:13 Re: revision r181278 gives me a bootstrap/build error on cygwin for gcc trunk: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Paolo Carlini
12:02 revision r181278 gives me a bootstrap/build error on cygwin for gcc trunk: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Christian JÃnsson
07:59 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Joe Buck
06:04 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Gabriel Dos Reis
04:27 Re: Delegating Constructors? Jason Merrill

November 10, 2011
22:44 gcc-4.5-20111110 is now available gccadmin
22:29 Re: Lack of libstdc++ compatibility Gerald Pfeifer
18:35 Re: Bugzilla components for target libraries Ian Lance Taylor
17:58 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Jonathan Wakely
17:36 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Basile Starynkevitch
17:31 Selective Scheduling Reviews Jeff Law
17:30 Re: Bugzilla components for target libraries Joseph S. Myers
16:18 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Jonathan Wakely
16:17 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Jonathan Wakely
16:12 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Jonathan Wakely
16:08 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Basile Starynkevitch
16:02 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Basile Starynkevitch
15:22 Re: Bugzilla components for target libraries Torvald Riegel
15:06 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Dodji Seketeli
14:03 Re: Bugzilla components for target libraries Arnaud Charlet
14:03 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Joern Rennecke
13:49 Re: Bugzilla components for target libraries Richard Guenther
13:36 Re: Bugzilla components for target libraries Arnaud Charlet
13:22 Bugzilla components for target libraries Rainer Orth
12:55 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Jonathan Wakely
12:18 Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. David Brown
10:58 wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code. Basile Starynkevitch
09:03 [CFARM] new 64 processor POWER7 3.55 GHz 64 GB RAM made available by IBM at OSUOSL for the GCC Compile Farm Laurent GUERBY
02:50 Re: gcc vs. glibc bootstrapping of libgcc_eh.a Mike Frysinger

November 09, 2011
21:52 building trunk fails due to C++ Steve Kargl
19:11 Re: template class with default parameter in template parameter declaration Marc Glisse
18:50 Re: Troubleshooting with gcc 4.6 Ian Lance Taylor
18:46 Re: [GCC steering committee] RL78 port maintainership Jeff Law
18:36 Re: [GCC steering committee] RL78 port maintainership DJ Delorie
18:31 Re: [GCC steering committee] RL78 port maintainership Joel Sherrill
18:26 [GCC steering committee] RL78 port maintainership DJ Delorie
17:55 Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-11-08), Stage 1 is over, Stage 3 in effect immediately Joseph S. Myers
17:53 Re: gcc vs. glibc bootstrapping of libgcc_eh.a Chris Metcalf
17:51 Re: gcc vs. glibc bootstrapping of libgcc_eh.a Linas Vepstas
17:40 Re: gcc vs. glibc bootstrapping of libgcc_eh.a Joseph S. Myers
17:33 Troubleshooting with gcc 4.6 santi
17:29 gcc vs. glibc bootstrapping of libgcc_eh.a Linas Vepstas
16:08 Re: implementation of std::thread::hardware_concurrency() niXman
11:22 Re: transactional-memory branch has been merged into trunk FX
08:04 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Miles Bader
00:27 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Joseph S. Myers

November 08, 2011
23:17 Re: transactional-memory branch has been merged into trunk Jonathan Wakely
22:51 gcc-4.4-20111108 is now available gccadmin
22:22 Re: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Andreas Schwab
22:13 Re: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Andreas Schwab
22:01 Re: transactional-memory branch has been merged into trunk Andrew Pinski
20:57 Re: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Paolo Carlini
20:50 Re: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Jason Merrill
20:23 Re: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Paolo Carlini
20:14 Re: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Jason Merrill
20:08 Re: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Jonathan Wakely
19:54 Re: powerpc rs6000_explicit_options change help request Michael Meissner
19:30 Re: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Michael Meissner
19:29 Re: libgcc/static-object.mk weird error on powerpc-rtems Michael Meissner
19:15 Re: powerpc rs6000_explicit_options change help request David Edelsohn
19:09 Re: how to configure for libitm? Torvald Riegel
19:09 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:56 Re: template class with default parameter in template parameter declaration Andrew Pinski
18:54 Re: template class with default parameter in template parameter declaration Marc Glisse
18:44 template class with default parameter in template parameter declaration Ulrich Drepper
17:37 Re: gcc-trunk build error in OpenBSD on stage3 Ian Lance Taylor
17:30 gnatmake unhandled argument Joel Sherrill
17:20 Re: gcc-trunk build error in OpenBSD on stage3 niXman
16:14 Re: AIX library issues David Edelsohn
16:02 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Joseph S. Myers
15:55 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Joseph S. Myers
15:52 Re: libgcc/static-object.mk weird error on powerpc-rtems Dave Korn
14:56 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. David Brown
14:24 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:30 GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-11-08), Stage 1 is over, Stage 3 in effect immediately Jakub Jelinek
11:19 transactional-memory branch has been merged into trunk Aldy Hernandez
09:20 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. David Brown
08:32 Re: libstdc++ breaks bootstrap (at least on x86_64-darwin11, maybe more) Tobias Burnus
08:10 libstdc++ breaks bootstrap (at least on x86_64-darwin11, maybe more) FX
04:28 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Hans-Peter Nilsson
04:11 Re: powerpc rs6000_explicit_options change help request Ralf Corsepius
03:44 powerpc rs6000_explicit_options change help request Joel Sherrill
03:22 [trans-mem] merge from mainline at revision 181122 Aldy Hernandez

November 07, 2011
23:28 Re: transactional-memory status Aldy Hernandez
22:56 Re: transactional-memory status Richard Guenther
22:23 Re: gcc-trunk build error in OpenBSD on stage3 niXman
22:20 Re: failure notice niXman
21:48 Re: gcc-trunk build error in OpenBSD on stage3 Ian Lance Taylor
21:03 gcc-trunk build error in OpenBSD on stage3 niXman
20:58 transactional-memory status Aldy Hernandez
19:51 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
18:53 Re: performance decreased Tobias Burnus
18:33 performance decreased Francisco Llaryora
18:06 Re: bootstrap of 4.6.2 on Solaris i386, gone in 60 seconds Dennis Clarke
18:03 Re: bootstrap of 4.6.2 on Solaris i386, gone in 60 seconds joern dot rennecke at embecosm
16:55 Re: Delegating Constructors? Ville Voutilainen
13:43 new mirror site Gcc В.Тутубалин
11:41 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Dennis Clarke
11:39 Re: bootstrap of 4.6.2 on Solaris i386, gone in 60 seconds Dennis Clarke
08:19 Re: Bootstrap Failure Question Jeff Law
07:56 Re: Need to correct the function declaration. Jonathan Wakely
07:31 Re: Need to correct the function declaration. Jonathan Wakely
07:18 Re: bootstrap of 4.6.2 on Solaris i386, gone in 60 seconds Jonathan Wakely
07:09 Re: Need to correct the function declaration. Jonathan Wakely
06:03 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Ian Lance Taylor
03:08 Re: Need to correct the function declaration. niXman
03:06 Re: Need to correct the function declaration. niXman
03:02 Re: Need to correct the function declaration. James Dennett
02:55 Need to correct the function declaration. niXman
02:14 Re: Delegating Constructors? Miles Bader
02:03 Re: Delegating Constructors? Ville Voutilainen
01:59 Delegating Constructors? Miles Bader
01:41 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Dennis Clarke
01:08 bootstrap of 4.6.2 on Solaris i386, gone in 60 seconds Dennis Clarke

November 06, 2011
20:10 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Gabriel Dos Reis
17:42 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Joern Rennecke
17:21 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Jonathan Wakely
16:25 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Marc Glisse
16:10 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. David Brown
16:07 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Ed Smith-Rowland
15:42 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Jonathan Wakely
15:40 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Jonathan Wakely
15:17 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Joseph S. Myers
15:04 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. David Brown
06:21 cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" Ralf Corsepius
05:24 Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics Kirill Yukhin

November 05, 2011
22:51 gcc-4.7-20111105 is now available gccadmin
20:44 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Gabriel Dos Reis
19:30 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. David Brown
17:29 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. Ed Smith-Rowland
12:37 Re: [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. David Brown
10:50 Re: Shrink wrapping issues Jakub Jelinek
10:28 Re: Shrink wrapping issues Alan Modra
09:51 Shrink wrapping issues Jakub Jelinek
04:47 Re: predicate forward references (Was: Re: RFA: Add Epiphany port) Richard Henderson
04:01 predicate forward references (Was: Re: RFA: Add Epiphany port) Joern Rennecke
03:44 Re: --enable-werror-always fails function.o for any non-pic target Ian Lance Taylor
02:48 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently David Miller
01:18 Re: --enable-werror-always fails function.o for any non-pic target Andrew Pinski
01:18 Re: --enable-werror-always fails function.o for any non-pic target DJ Delorie
01:14 Re: --enable-werror-always fails function.o for any non-pic target Ian Lance Taylor
01:01 Re: --enable-werror-always fails function.o for any non-pic target DJ Delorie
00:58 Re: --enable-werror-always fails function.o for any non-pic target Ian Lance Taylor
00:52 --enable-werror-always fails function.o for any non-pic target DJ Delorie

November 04, 2011
22:47 gcc-4.6-20111104 is now available gccadmin
21:51 Failure to bootstrap trunk with --enable-threads=posix on cygwin since r180767 Christian Joensson
20:26 Re: sparc-rtems 4.6 vs 4.7 Eric Botcazou
20:21 Re: Dependent Labels Question Bernd Schmidt
20:16 RE: Bootstrap Failure Question Iyer, Balaji V
20:14 sparc-rtems 4.6 vs 4.7 Joel Sherrill
19:36 [C++11] Reclaiming fixed-point suffixes for user-defined literals. 3dw4rd
18:41 Re: Bootstrap Failure Question Jeff Law
18:34 Bootstrap Failure Question Iyer, Balaji V
17:33 libgcc/static-object.mk weird error on powerpc-rtems Joel Sherrill
14:38 Re: Dependent Labels Question Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:44 [GCC steering committee] Epiphany port maintainership Joern Rennecke
12:01 Re: libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Rainer Orth
06:43 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently David Miller

November 03, 2011
22:49 gcc-4.5-20111103 is now available gccadmin
20:51 Re: Dependent Labels Question Richard Henderson
20:51 how to configure for libitm? Jack Howarth
19:55 Dependent Labels Question Iyer, Balaji V
19:47 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Joseph S. Myers
17:11 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
17:07 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Michael Matz
16:56 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
16:55 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Michael Matz
16:44 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Eric Botcazou
16:38 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Michael Matz
16:27 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
16:25 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Jeff Law
16:20 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Richard Guenther
16:17 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
16:15 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Richard Guenther
16:10 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
15:50 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Michael Matz
15:36 # of unexpected failures 790 Dennis Clarke
15:35 Re: libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Joel Sherrill
15:32 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Dennis Clarke
15:04 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
14:53 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
14:45 Re: libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Rainer Orth
14:38 Re: libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Eric Botcazou
14:35 Re: libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Joel Sherrill
14:29 Re: libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Rainer Orth
14:27 Re: Revision 180821 breaks bootstrap Tristan Gingold
14:24 Re: Revision 180821 breaks bootstrap Richard Guenther
14:22 Re: Revision 180821 breaks bootstrap Richard Guenther
14:20 Revision 180821 breaks bootstrap Dominique Dhumieres
14:10 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Jakub Jelinek
14:09 Re: libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Rainer Orth
14:04 Re: libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Eric Botcazou
13:58 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently Joel Sherrill
13:56 [cxx-mem-model] permission to merge cxx-mem-model branch? Aldy Hernandez
13:50 Re: libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Joel Sherrill
13:06 Re: libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Rainer Orth
10:29 Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics Jakub Jelinek
09:37 Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics Kirill Yukhin
09:35 Non-deterministic failure in cactusADM using OpenMP Razya Ladelsky
08:23 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently Jakub Jelinek
03:41 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently David Miller
01:21 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently Joseph S. Myers
01:16 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently David Miller
01:12 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently David Miller
00:27 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently Joseph S. Myers
00:23 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently Joseph S. Myers

November 02, 2011
23:40 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently Andrew Pinski
23:28 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently David Miller
22:44 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently David Miller
22:31 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Jakub Jelinek
22:31 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently David Miller
21:34 libgcc sparc-rtems config on gcc head Joel Sherrill
21:29 Re: serious libgcc regression added recently Joel Sherrill
20:36 serious libgcc regression added recently David Miller
20:03 Re: approaches to carry-flag modelling in RTL Richard Henderson
19:55 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Michael Haubenwallner
18:29 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Dennis Clarke
18:21 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Ian Lance Taylor
18:15 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Rainer Orth
18:10 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Ian Lance Taylor
18:07 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Rainer Orth
17:42 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Michael Haubenwallner
17:11 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Jonathan Wakely
17:06 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
14:29 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Dennis Clarke
13:53 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Michael Haubenwallner
13:48 RE: Hey gcc sandeepkvtmk
11:41 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Jonathan Wakely
11:26 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Dennis Clarke
09:55 Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics Jakub Jelinek
09:10 Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics Kirill Yukhin
06:52 Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ? Michael Haubenwallner
06:02 Re: scalar vector shift expansion problem on 64-bit David Miller
05:19 Re: IVopts bug? Yuehai Du
02:47 printed versions of GCC Internals book? Alan Lehotsky

November 01, 2011
23:48 Re: Need help resolving PR target/50906 Alan Modra
22:43 gcc-4.4-20111101 is now available gccadmin
22:28 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
21:59 Re: approaches to carry-flag modelling in RTL Hans-Peter Nilsson
21:11 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Richard Guenther
19:58 _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics Jakub Jelinek
19:53 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
18:58 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Jeff Law
18:47 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Diego Novillo
18:44 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Aldy Hernandez
18:33 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Robert Dewar
18:06 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Diego Novillo
17:20 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Robert Dewar
17:00 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. David Edelsohn
16:09 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Diego Novillo
15:47 Re: implementation of std::thread::hardware_concurrency() Jonathan Wakely
15:36 Re: implementation of std::thread::hardware_concurrency() niXman
15:23 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Jeff Law
14:02 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Andrew Haley
13:53 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Torvald Riegel
13:51 Re: approaches to carry-flag modelling in RTL Paulo J. Matos
11:36 RE: SLP vectorizer on non-loop? Ira Rosen
11:25 RE: SLP vectorizer on non-loop? Bingfeng Mei
11:13 Re: SLP vectorizer on non-loop? Ira Rosen
10:42 SLP vectorizer on non-loop? Bingfeng Mei
10:07 Re: IVopts bug? Richard Guenther
09:50 Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline. Richard Guenther
09:37 Re: [PATCH 1/1] sparc leon: add -Aleon architecture to GAS Konrad Eisele
09:35 Re: [PATCH 1/1] sparc leon: add -Aleon architecture to GAS David Miller
09:31 Re: [PATCH 1/1] sparc leon: Use -Aleon assembler switch for -mcpu=leon arch Konrad Eisele
09:26 Re: [PATCH 1/1] sparc leon: add -Aleon architecture to GAS Konrad Eisele
08:49 Re: [PATCH 1/1] sparc leon: Use -Aleon assembler switch for -mcpu=leon arch David Miller
08:42 Re: [PATCH 1/1] sparc leon: add -Aleon architecture to GAS David Miller
08:28 [PATCH 1/1] sparc leon: Use -Aleon assembler switch for -mcpu=leon arch Konrad Eisele
08:28 [PATCH 1/1] sparc leon: add -Aleon architecture to GAS Konrad Eisele
08:28 Intro Konrad Eisele
08:21 Re: Adding official support into the main tree for SPARC Leon Konrad Eisele
07:42 IVopts bug? 杜越海
03:56 Re: C++11 no longer experimental Jason Merrill
02:43 Re: approaches to carry-flag modelling in RTL Hans-Peter Nilsson


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3