This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Suboptimal __restrict optimization?

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:22:41 -0700
Subject: Re: Suboptimal __restrict optimization?
References: <CAFkk2KTGL53aWgNiNQm8+Yt_6SK2nXjPDonpH4fT9Mp_PWoJTw@mail.gmail.com>

Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com> writes:

> Is there some reason why GCC couldn't generate this code for the first
> version of C::f()? Is this a failure of optimization, or am I missing
> something in how __restricted works?

It's a failure of optimization.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suboptimal __restrict optimization?
  - From: Ulf Magnusson

References:
- Suboptimal __restrict optimization?
  - From: Ulf Magnusson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]