This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
October 31, 2011
October 30, 2011
23:28 | # of unexpected failures 768 ? | Dennis Clarke |
19:25 | Re: C++11 no longer experimental | Gerald Pfeifer |
19:20 | Re: Target-libiberty being built -- gcc-4.6.1 & gcc-4.6.2 | Hans-Peter Nilsson |
18:27 | Re: Help: Register allocator sets up frame at low register pressure (PR 50775) | Denis Chertykov |
14:50 | Re: Target-libiberty being built -- gcc-4.6.1 & gcc-4.6.2 | Michael Eager |
14:04 | Re: C++11 no longer experimental | Jonathan Wakely |
14:00 | Re: C++11 no longer experimental | Oleg Endo |
13:48 | Re: C++11 no longer experimental | Jonathan Wakely |
13:15 | Re: C++11 no longer experimental | Gerald Pfeifer |
09:50 | Re: vector shift regression on sparc | Richard Guenther |
08:38 | Re: Why running the next command will jump back to the previous line position | ééä |
06:55 | Re: Target-libiberty being built -- gcc-4.6.1 & gcc-4.6.2 | Michael Eager |
04:39 | vector shift regression on sparc | David Miller |
03:45 | Re: Target-libiberty being built -- gcc-4.6.1 & gcc-4.6.2 | Ian Lance Taylor |
October 29, 2011
22:48 | gcc-4.7-20111029 is now available | gccadmin |
22:22 | Mercurial mirror | Simon Wright |
21:30 | Target-libiberty being built -- gcc-4.6.1 & gcc-4.6.2 | Michael Eager |
20:06 | Mercurial mirror | Simon Wright |
17:34 | Re: approaches to carry-flag modelling in RTL | Peter Bigot |
15:58 | Re: approaches to carry-flag modelling in RTL | Richard Henderson |
14:17 | Re: Why running the next command will jump back to the previous line position | asmwarrior |
12:41 | Re: approaches to carry-flag modelling in RTL | Peter Bigot |
October 28, 2011
October 27, 2011
October 26, 2011
October 25, 2011
October 24, 2011
October 23, 2011
21:21 | Re: Expanding instructions with condition codes inter-deps | Richard Henderson |
18:59 | Re: AIX library issues | David Edelsohn |
14:16 | Re: AIX library issues | Perry Smith |
13:50 | Re: [GCC Wiki] Update of "BuildInfrastructure" by Ma nuelLópezIbáñez | Jonathan Wakely |
13:48 | Re: [GCC Wiki] Update of "BuildInfrastructure" by Ma nuelLópezIbáñez | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
13:33 | Re: [GCC Wiki] Update of "BuildInfrastructure" by Man uelLÃpezIbÃÃez | Thomas Schwinge |
10:30 | Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc | Richard Guenther |
09:34 | Re: [4.6.1] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1433 | Richard Guenther |
October 22, 2011
22:59 | Re: Missing gstdint.h | Joseph S. Myers |
22:42 | gcc-4.7-20111022 is now available | gccadmin |
18:27 | Missing gstdint.h | Michael Eager |
14:21 | Re: gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp | asmwarrior |
13:18 | Re: GCC 4.6.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | Gerald Pfeifer |
12:30 | Re: [RFC] New git-only branch for Fission project | Gerald Pfeifer |
11:20 | Re: gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp | Kai Tietz |
05:21 | Re: gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp | xunxun |
05:13 | Re: gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp | xunxun |
01:31 | Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc | Basile Starynkevitch |
00:50 | RE: Expanding instructions with condition codes inter-deps | Paul_Koning |
00:13 | Re: Expanding instructions with condition codes inter-deps | Peter Bigot |
October 21, 2011
October 20, 2011
October 19, 2011
October 18, 2011
October 17, 2011
October 16, 2011
23:37 | Re: asm in inline function invalidating function attributes? | Andi Kleen |
18:52 | Re: asm in inline function invalidating function attributes? | Ulrich Drepper |
18:38 | Re: asm in inline function invalidating function attributes? | Jakub Jelinek |
14:30 | Re: asm in inline function invalidating function attributes? | Ulrich Drepper |
10:32 | Re: asm in inline function invalidating function attributes? | Richard Guenther |
10:29 | MELT plugin 0.9.1 rc1 available for GCC 4.6 | Basile Starynkevitch |
03:29 | Re: RFC: Add --plugin-gcc option to ar/nm | Andi Kleen |
October 15, 2011
22:45 | RFC: Add --plugin-gcc option to ar/nm | H.J. Lu |
22:42 | gcc-4.7-20111015 is now available | gccadmin |
21:52 | asm in inline function invalidating function attributes? | Ulrich Drepper |
17:12 | Re: The AST tree modification. Edited. | niXman |
08:58 | Re: ISO_IEC_14882-2011-5.1.2/10 - bug | Paolo Carlini |
06:08 | ISO_IEC_14882-2011-5.1.2/10 - bug | niXman |
October 14, 2011
22:45 | gcc-4.6-20111014 is now available | gccadmin |
20:39 | RE: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function | Iyer, Balaji V |
20:29 | Re: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function | Ian Lance Taylor |
18:31 | Re: [BUG?] GCC 4.5.2 produces deprecated ARM relocation | Ben Gamari |
17:38 | Re: [BUG?] GCC 4.5.2 produces deprecated ARM relocation | Richard Earnshaw |
17:34 | Re: Handling R_ARM_JUMP24 with inter-working | Richard Earnshaw |
16:40 | Handling R_ARM_JUMP24 with inter-working | Ben Gamari |
16:40 | [BUG?] GCC 4.5.2 produces deprecated ARM relocation | Ben Gamari |
13:59 | RE: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function | Iyer, Balaji V |
10:19 | Re: Vector alignment tracking | Richard Guenther |
06:59 | Re: VIS2 pattern review | Eric Botcazou |
06:06 | Re: **Help I love GCC | Liu |
04:40 | Re: **Help I love GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
04:38 | Re: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function | Ian Lance Taylor |
01:50 | Re: VIS2 pattern review | David Miller |
October 13, 2011
22:53 | gcc-4.5-20111013 is now available | gccadmin |
22:46 | Re: VIS2 pattern review | Eric Botcazou |
20:20 | Re: VIS2 pattern review | David Miller |
20:06 | Re: VIS2 pattern review | Richard Henderson |
19:56 | Re: VIS2 pattern review | David Miller |
19:02 | Re: VIS2 pattern review | Richard Henderson |
18:35 | Re: VIS2 pattern review | David Miller |
18:26 | Re: VIS2 pattern review | David Miller |
17:04 | Re: Vector alignment tracking | Jakub Jelinek |
16:58 | Re: Vector alignment tracking | Andi Kleen |
16:02 | Re: Vector alignment tracking | Artem Shinkarov |
15:55 | Re: Vector alignment tracking | Andi Kleen |
15:41 | Vector alignment tracking | Artem Shinkarov |
14:50 | Re: Register constrained variable issue | Richard Henderson |
12:29 | Fix gcc.dg/builtins-67.c on Solaris 8/9 | Eric Botcazou |
11:41 | **Help I love GCC | 花儿对我笑 |
07:26 | Register constrained variable issue | ZoltÃn KÃcsi |
00:49 | VIS2 pattern review | Richard Henderson |
October 12, 2011
October 11, 2011
22:44 | gcc-4.4-20111011 is now available | gccadmin |
20:43 | GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-10-11) | Joseph S. Myers |
14:17 | Re: make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice? | Paolo Carlini |
14:14 | Re: make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice? | Jason Merrill |
14:05 | Re: make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice? | Paolo Carlini |
13:57 | Re: make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice? | Jason Merrill |
13:09 | Re: make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice? | Andrew Haley |
12:21 | Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc | Dave Korn |
10:53 | make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice? | Paolo Carlini |
09:41 | Re: added_clobbers_hard_reg_p and FLAGS_REGNUM | Richard Sandiford |
02:58 | Combine Pass Behavior | Oleg Endo |
00:07 | Re: Long-term plan for C++98/C++11 incompatibility | Gabriel Dos Reis |
October 10, 2011
22:33 | Re: Long-term plan for C++98/C++11 incompatibility | Joe Buck |
15:58 | RE: Porting 64-bit target on 32-bit host | Bingfeng Mei |
15:55 | Re: Porting 64-bit target on 32-bit host | Huang Ping |
15:37 | Re: Porting 64-bit target on 32-bit host | Eric Botcazou |
14:57 | RE: Porting 64-bit target on 32-bit host | Joseph S. Myers |
14:22 | RE: Porting 64-bit target on 32-bit host | Bingfeng Mei |
10:29 | Porting 64-bit target on 32-bit host | Huang Ping |
09:01 | Re: Heapless C/C++ | Shiv Shankar Dayal |
08:45 | RE: Heapless C/C++ | David Paterson |
07:06 | Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass | Amker.Cheng |
05:08 | Re: mno-eabi option on powerpc-elf | Ian Lance Taylor |
01:34 | Re: ARM EABI ZCX Ada (4.6.1) almost working | Luke A. Guest |
October 09, 2011
20:49 | RE: compile a bounch of file | Iyer, Balaji V |
19:43 | ARM EABI ZCX Ada (4.6.1) almost working | Luke A. Guest |
14:15 | mno-eabi option on powerpc-elf | Rohit Arul Raj |
11:39 | Help required re ARM EABI ZCX Ada (4.6.1) | Luke A. Guest |
11:39 | Help required re ARM EABI ZCX Ada (4.6.1) | Luke A. Guest |
10:57 | Re: compile a bounch of file | Jonathan Wakely |
10:06 | compile a bounch of file | esmaeil mirzaee |
01:54 | Re: Heapless C/C++ | Shiv Shankar Dayal |
01:48 | Re: Heapless C/C++ | Gabriel Dos Reis |
01:41 | Re: Heapless C/C++, embedded systems requirements out of scope | Thierry Moreau |
01:32 | Re: Heapless C/C++ | Shiv Shankar Dayal |
01:29 | Re: Heapless C/C++ | Gabriel Dos Reis |
01:16 | Re: Heapless C/C++ | Shiv Shankar Dayal |
October 08, 2011
October 07, 2011
October 06, 2011
October 05, 2011
October 04, 2011
October 03, 2011
October 02, 2011
13:56 | Re: C++11 atomic library notes | Andrew MacLeod |
08:40 | Re: C++11 atomic library notes | Marc Glisse |
00:59 | Suboptimal __restrict optimization? | Ulf Magnusson |
October 01, 2011
23:12 | Re: C++11 atomic library notes | Andrew MacLeod |
22:45 | gcc-4.7-20111001 is now available | gccadmin |
08:53 | Re: PR 36778: Should we have -Wfatal-warnings | Paolo Carlini |
06:56 | Re: C++11 atomic library notes | Marc Glisse |
01:35 | Re: PR 36778: Should we have -Wfatal-warnings | Paul Brook |
01:01 | PR 36778: Should we have -Wfatal-warnings | Paolo Carlini |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]