This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at spamcop dot net>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocmatos at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:04:48 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h
- References: <4E283680.7040704@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107211428590.11368@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20110721174429.GB12907@synopsys.com> <4E28BA8E.6090400@gmail.com> <j0blg8$mgj$1@dough.gmane.org> <20110722112215.utk9zqjq0c0wss0o-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1108212125530.2761@gerinyyl.fvgr> <20110925081955.3x5kvx7rc4o88kc8-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Attached.
Thanks, Jörn!
! <p>"Library Issue" means that support may or may not be available depending
! on the C library used; for example, the GNU C library supports all C99
I suggest a full stop isntead of ";" before "for example" and to just
say "defined" without going into the how.
Joseph, how do you suggest to rephrase the note on activation?
Just -std=c99 as an option to GCC which then triggers the appropriate
#defines?
Gerald