gcc archive
date index for September, 2011

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2011
23:53 float "op-and-halve" David Miller
22:45 gcc-4.6-20110930 is now available gccadmin
21:32 C++11 atomic library notes Andrew MacLeod
13:01 Re: Question on cse_not_expected in explow.c:memory_address_addr_space() Georg-Johann Lay
10:09 Re: Question on cse_not_expected in explow.c:memory_address_addr_space() Paolo Bonzini
09:00 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Rainer Orth
06:04 Re: Go Garbage Collection Roots Ian Lance Taylor
04:44 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Amker.Cheng
02:51 Go Garbage Collection Roots Matt Davis
01:51 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Amker.Cheng

September 29, 2011
22:46 gcc-4.5-20110929 is now available gccadmin
18:38 Bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Art Haas
17:20 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Paulo J. Matos
16:06 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Jeff Law
15:49 RE: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Rahul Kharche
15:39 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Bernd Schmidt
15:38 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Jeff Law
15:37 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Jeff Law
15:33 Re: RFC: Collecting together binary file attributes into a single file. Joseph S. Myers
15:26 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Bernd Schmidt
14:44 RE: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Rahul Kharche
14:25 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Amker.Cheng
14:08 Re: RFC: Collecting together binary file attributes into a single file. Nick Clifton
14:00 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Paulo J. Matos
13:53 [ARM] Outstanding bugs in GCC 4.6 Sebastian Huber
11:40 Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Amker.Cheng
09:51 Re: RFC: Collecting together binary file attributes into a single file. Richard Earnshaw (home)
09:33 RFC: Collecting together binary file attributes into a single file. Nick Clifton
05:52 Re: [Patch,AVR]: Better log output with -mdeb Denis Chertykov

September 28, 2011
23:43 -fdebug-types-section unidentifiable anonymous struct (PR debug/49750) Jan Kratochvil
15:12 Re: [Patch,AVR]: Better log output with -mdeb Georg-Johann Lay
13:52 [Patch,AVR]: Better log output with -mdeb Georg-Johann Lay
12:14 Question on cse_not_expected in explow.c:memory_address_addr_space() Georg-Johann Lay
11:06 Re: GCC testting infrastructure issue Kirill Yukhin
10:49 Re: GCC testting infrastructure issue Richard Guenther
10:49 Re: A question about detecting array bounds for case Warray-bounds-3.c Dirk Müller
10:18 GCC testting infrastructure issue Kirill Yukhin
05:51 Re: stringification of PREFIX etc... Basile Starynkevitch

September 27, 2011
22:56 gcc-4.4-20110927 is now available gccadmin
21:56 Re: stringification of PREFIX etc... Joseph S. Myers
18:59 Re: ARRAY_RANGE_REF Richard Henderson
18:59 Re: ARRAY_RANGE_REF Andrew Pinski
18:45 ARRAY_RANGE_REF Iyer, Balaji V
15:12 Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Jeff Law
15:01 Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Richard Guenther
14:56 Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Jeff Law
13:44 Re: added_clobbers_hard_reg_p and FLAGS_REGNUM Paulo J. Matos
11:15 Ann: GCC MELT plugin 0.9 release (for gcc 4.6) Basile Starynkevitch
09:51 Re: Information on SCoP coverage by GRAPHITE Simone Pellegrini
08:19 missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass Amker.Cheng
07:30 Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Richard Guenther
05:26 RE: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Jiangning Liu
01:29 Re: misleading description in vec.h? Liang Wang

September 26, 2011
18:10 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Andrew MacLeod
17:35 Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Jeff Law
17:32 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? James Dennett
17:04 Re: opencl and gcc M Wahab
16:57 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Andrew MacLeod
16:27 Re: misleading description in vec.h? Ian Lance Taylor
16:26 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Ian Lance Taylor
16:23 Re: added_clobbers_hard_reg_p and FLAGS_REGNUM Ian Lance Taylor
16:18 Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors Andrew Haley
16:17 Re: stringification of PREFIX etc... Ian Lance Taylor
16:12 Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors Ian Lance Taylor
15:16 misleading description in vec.h? Liang Wang
14:39 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Richard Guenther
14:33 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Michael Matz
13:04 Information on SCoP coverage by GRAPHITE Simone Pellegrini
11:45 Re: opencl and gcc Basile Starynkevitch
11:05 Re: opencl and gcc Philip Pratt-Szeliga
11:01 Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Richard Guenther
10:54 opencl and gcc naveen yadav
10:04 added_clobbers_hard_reg_p and FLAGS_REGNUM Paulo J. Matos
09:51 Re: No pointer conversion warning for "bool" in C/C++ Jon Grant
09:35 Re: A question about detecting array bounds for case Warray-bounds-3.c Matthew Gretton-Dann
09:30 Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors Andrew Haley
09:13 Re: stringification of PREFIX etc... Robert Dewar
09:08 stringification of PREFIX etc... Basile Starynkevitch
09:03 Re: A question about detecting array bounds for case Warray-bounds-3.c Jonathan Wakely
08:58 Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors Jonathan Wakely
08:53 Re: No pointer conversion warning for "bool" in C/C++ Jonathan Wakely
08:34 Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors Jon Grant
08:32 Re: No pointer conversion warning for "bool" in C/C++ Jon Grant
07:41 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data David Brown
07:39 RE: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Jiangning Liu
07:14 RE: A question about detecting array bounds for case Warray-bounds-3.c Jiangning Liu
07:11 Re: No pointer conversion warning for "bool" in C/C++ Jonathan Wakely
04:29 Re: No pointer conversion warning for "bool" in C/C++ Ian Lance Taylor
00:40 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Miles Bader

September 25, 2011
23:45 Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h Joseph S. Myers
22:53 Re: Trying to find a gcc warning to detect different parameter names Jonathan Wakely
22:49 Trying to find a gcc warning to detect different parameter names Jon Grant
22:05 No pointer conversion warning for "bool" in C/C++ Jon Grant
22:05 Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h Gerald Pfeifer
16:36 Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h Joseph S. Myers
16:33 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data David Brown
16:06 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data David Brown
15:15 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Dave Korn
14:16 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Andreas Schwab
13:03 Re: gengtype installation in trunk? Basile Starynkevitch
13:00 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data David Brown
12:20 Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h Joern Rennecke
12:00 Re: gengtype installation in trunk? Romain Geissler

September 24, 2011
22:47 gcc-4.7-20110924 is now available gccadmin
21:32 Re: ld build-id crash on ARM linking gcc Daniel Drake
19:38 Re: ld build-id crash on ARM linking gcc Ian Lance Taylor
16:26 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data John Regehr
15:49 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data David Brown
15:24 Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors Jakub Jelinek
15:10 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data John Regehr
15:09 gengtype installation in trunk? Basile Starynkevitch
14:55 Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors Jonathan Wakely
14:40 Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors Jon Grant
12:46 Re: ld build-id crash on ARM linking gcc Daniel Drake
12:26 ld build-id crash on ARM linking gcc Daniel Drake
11:22 Re: Wrong documentation of TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_SUBSET_P Richard Guenther
09:24 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Richard Guenther

September 23, 2011
22:54 Re: Lawrence Gutsin
22:52 gcc-4.6-20110923 is now available gccadmin
22:51 Re: AIX libstdc++ missing symbols Paolo Carlini
22:23 AIX libstdc++ missing symbols David Edelsohn
21:35 Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] RFC: DWARF Extensions for Separate Debug Info Files ("Fission") John DelSignore
21:02 Re: RFC: DWARF Extensions for Separate Debug Info Files ("Fission") Jason Molenda
20:25 Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Richard Guenther
19:56 Re: Incorrect optimized (-O2) linked list code with 4.3.2 Richard Guenther
19:20 Re: misbehaviour with md5_process_bytes and maybe in optimization Ian Lance Taylor
18:17 Re: misbehaviour with md5_process_bytes and maybe in optimization Pierre Vittet
17:58 Re: RFC: DWARF Extensions for Separate Debug Info Files ("Fission") Cary Coutant
17:50 Re: RFC: DWARF Extensions for Separate Debug Info Files ("Fission") Cary Coutant
16:42 Wrong documentation of TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_SUBSET_P Bingfeng Mei
15:56 Re: passing arguments to gcc build in eclipse pankajsejwal
15:13 Re: misbehaviour with md5_process_bytes and maybe in optimization Ian Lance Taylor
14:32 misbehaviour with md5_process_bytes and maybe in optimization Pierre Vittet
14:12 Re: Use of FLAGS_REGNUM clashes with generates insn Paulo J. Matos
13:51 Re: RFC: DWARF Extensions for Separate Debug Info Files ("Fission") Jan Kratochvil
13:31 Re: Use of FLAGS_REGNUM clashes with generates insn amylaar
13:17 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Paulo J. Matos
13:11 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Diego Novillo
12:17 Re: Use of FLAGS_REGNUM clashes with generates insn Paulo J. Matos
11:51 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Paulo J. Matos
11:33 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Paulo J. Matos
08:57 Re: Question on _GLIBCXX_HOSTED macro libstdc++ and libsupc++ Amker.Cheng
08:22 Re: Question on _GLIBCXX_HOSTED macro libstdc++ and libsupc++ Jonathan Wakely
08:14 Question on _GLIBCXX_HOSTED macro libstdc++ and libsupc++ Amker.Cheng
07:21 Re: Use of FLAGS_REGNUM clashes with generates insn Joern Rennecke
02:21 Re: RFC: DWARF Extensions for Separate Debug Info Files ("Fission") Paul Pluzhnikov
01:35 Re: RFC: DWARF Extensions for Separate Debug Info Files ("Fission") Jason Molenda
00:22 RFC: DWARF Extensions for Separate Debug Info Files ("Fission") Cary Coutant
00:07 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Hans-Peter Nilsson

September 22, 2011
23:03 gcc-4.5-20110922 is now available gccadmin
21:15 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Richard Guenther
21:00 Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09) Gary Funck
20:07 Re: PowerPC shrink-wrap support 0 of 3 Richard Henderson
18:35 Use of FLAGS_REGNUM clashes with generates insn Paulo J. Matos
17:34 Re: I cannot disable GCC TLS support thoroughly. Ian Lance Taylor
14:47 Re: PowerPC shrink-wrap support 0 of 3 Bernd Schmidt
14:40 Re: PowerPC shrink-wrap support 0 of 3 Alan Modra
14:29 Re: [PLUGIN] Fix PLUGIN_FINISH_TYPE Romain Geissler
14:18 Re: [PLUGIN] Fix PLUGIN_FINISH_TYPE Diego Novillo
13:40 Re: [PLUGIN] Fix PLUGIN_FINISH_TYPE Dodji Seketeli
11:12 å Ms. White
10:05 I cannot disable GCC TLS support thoroughly. Terry Guo
08:53 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data David Brown
08:39 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data David Brown
02:19 A question about detecting array bounds for case Warray-bounds-3.c Jiangning Liu

September 21, 2011
20:22 [pph] Merge from trunk Diego Novillo
19:52 Re: C++11 no longer experimental Jonathan Wakely
18:51 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Georg-Johann Lay
18:34 Re: C++11 no longer experimental Jonathan Wakely
18:26 Re: C++11 no longer experimental Joe Buck
18:14 Re: new C++11 features in GCC 4.7 Jonathan Wakely
18:07 Re: C++11 no longer experimental Jonathan Wakely
18:01 Re: C++11 no longer experimental Jonathan Wakely
17:58 Re: C++11 no longer experimental James Dennett
17:53 new C++11 features in GCC 4.7 Nathan Ridge
17:51 C++11 no longer experimental Nathan Ridge
14:57 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Paulo J. Matos
14:25 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data David Brown
13:57 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Ian Lance Taylor
10:20 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data David Brown
08:22 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Paulo J. Matos
08:14 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Paulo J. Matos
07:07 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data David Brown
03:14 Re: [gimplefe] Ran into a internal compiler error Sandeep Soni
01:32 GNU MPFR 3.1.0 Release Candidate 2 Vincent Lefevre

September 20, 2011
23:25 [google] Merged google/integration -> google/main Diego Novillo
22:43 gcc-4.4-20110920 is now available gccadmin
17:18 Re: [gimplefe] Ran into a internal compiler error Diego Novillo
16:36 Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data Ian Lance Taylor
16:15 RE: [gimplefe] Ran into a internal compiler error Iyer, Balaji V
16:08 Volatile qualification on pointer and data Paulo J. Matos
07:56 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
03:32 [gimplefe] Ran into a internal compiler error Sandeep Soni

September 19, 2011
18:41 Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors Jonathan Wakely
18:00 cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors Jon Grant
11:58 RE: Derive more alias information from named address space Bingfeng Mei
11:56 Re: Derive more alias information from named address space Ulrich Weigand

September 18, 2011
02:44 CALL FOR PARTICIPATION: HelloGCC Workshop 2011 Mingjie Xing

September 17, 2011
23:46 GNU MPFR 3.1.0 Release Candidate Vincent Lefevre
22:46 gcc-4.7-20110917 is now available gccadmin

September 16, 2011
22:49 gcc-4.6-20110916 is now available gccadmin
20:31 Re: original tree for folded expressions Diego Novillo
20:26 Re: original tree for folded expressions Joachim Wieland
18:58 More int128 tests? Rohini Jayaram
17:38 Re: original tree for folded expressions Diego Novillo
16:11 Derive more alias information from named address space Bingfeng Mei
16:05 original tree for folded expressions Joachim Wieland
10:49 Re: passing arguments to gcc build in eclipse Andrew Haley
10:35 Re: IRA misses register range overlap Peter Bigot
10:30 passing arguments to gcc build in eclipse pankajsejwal
02:01 RE: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Jiangning Liu

September 15, 2011
22:49 gcc-4.5-20110915 is now available gccadmin
22:26 Re: IRA misses register range overlap Peter Bigot
21:10 Re: IRA misses register range overlap Vladimir Makarov
20:28 Re: Are there plans to maintain the CFG througout the compilation? Peter Garbett
19:07 Re: IRA misses register range overlap Peter Bigot
18:36 [google] Merged gcc-4_6-branch -> google/gcc-4_6 Diego Novillo
16:26 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
16:20 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Richard Henderson
16:14 Re: [google] Merge trunk into google/integration Ollie Wild
15:35 Re: IRA misses register range overlap Vladimir Makarov
15:16 IRA misses register range overlap Peter Bigot
14:26 RE: CCmode size Joern Rennecke
13:49 RE: CCmode size Paul_Koning
12:56 CCmode size Paulo J. Matos
10:36 Are there plans to maintain the CFG througout the compilation? Peter Garbett
07:51 RE: postreload problem using reload_inm and SECONDARY_RELOAD macros BELBACHIR Selim

September 14, 2011
20:30 [google] Merge trunk into google/integration Diego Novillo
20:11 Re: [trans-mem] merge from trunk @ 178608 Richard Henderson
20:01 [trans-mem] merge from trunk @ 178608 Aldy Hernandez
18:54 Re: IRA confused about killed registers Vladimir Makarov
16:14 RE: postreload problem using reload_inm and SECONDARY_RELOAD macros BELBACHIR Selim
13:41 Re: postreload problem using reload_inm and SECONDARY_RELOAD macros Ian Lance Taylor
13:09 postreload problem using reload_inm and SECONDARY_RELOAD macros BELBACHIR Selim
13:09 Re: gcc - Wednesday, September 14, 2011 Rashmi Sawardekar
09:38 Reloading going wrong. Bug in GCC? Mohamed Shafi
08:50 IRA confused about killed registers Paulo J. Matos
08:39 Re: [PLUGIN] Fix PLUGIN_FINISH_TYPE Romain Geissler

September 13, 2011
22:50 gcc-4.4-20110913 is now available gccadmin
19:51 Re: [Ann] MELT plugin 0.9 rc2 for GCC 4.6 Basile Starynkevitch
19:48 [Ann] MELT plugin 0.9 rc2 for GCC 4.6 Basile Starynkevitch
18:01 Re: Issue with delay slot scheduling? Jeff Law
16:16 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Andrew MacLeod
14:58 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Geert Bosch
14:46 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Eric Botcazou
12:09 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Andrew MacLeod
10:22 CFLAGS used in libgcc makefile? Amker.Cheng
08:01 Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09) Jan Hubicka
06:35 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
06:31 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Lawrence Crowl
06:20 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Lawrence Crowl
01:52 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Geert Bosch
00:39 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Andy Lutomirski
00:31 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Ken Raeburn

September 12, 2011
23:19 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Andrew MacLeod
20:54 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
18:40 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Geert Bosch
16:40 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Vladimir Makarov
15:53 Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09) Jeff Law
13:51 Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09) Aldy Hernandez
11:53 [Ann] MELT plugin 0.9 rc1 for GCC 4.6 Basile Starynkevitch
09:42 Re: An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using "-flto -fuse-linker-plugin" on Win7 mingw64 target Jonathan Wakely
09:02 Re: An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using "-flto -fuse-linker-plugin" on Win7 mingw64 target PcX
09:01 An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using "-flto -fuse-linker-plugin" on Win7 mingw64 target PcX
08:30 Votre site dans Google Votre Site
08:10 Incorrect optimized (-O2) linked list code with 4.3.2 pavan tc
07:07 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
07:03 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
05:00 Re: Adding functions at compile time Ian Lance Taylor
03:15 Draugs, noprovÄ dabÄgos ikrus jau drÄz Kacalova Regina
01:02 Jaukais, paÅammÄ kvalitatÄvos ikrus jau tÅlÄt Ivanova Maija

September 11, 2011
23:22 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Andrew MacLeod
19:44 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Jakub Jelinek
19:31 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Geert Bosch
19:12 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Jakub Jelinek
19:00 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Geert Bosch
18:23 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
15:38 Adding functions at compile time Matt Davis
14:13 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Andrew MacLeod
03:33 MÄÄais, uzÄd kvalitatÄvos ikrus te un tÅlÄt Krystal Knuth

September 10, 2011
22:44 gcc-4.7-20110910 is now available gccadmin
13:22 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Gabriel Dos Reis
06:18 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Jakub Jelinek
05:40 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
01:09 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Geert Bosch

September 09, 2011
23:30 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Lawrence Crowl
22:45 gcc-4.6-20110909 is now available gccadmin
17:46 Re: question on find_if_case_2 in ifcvt.c Jeff Law
16:50 Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09) Vladimir Makarov
14:36 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Jakub Jelinek
14:27 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
14:26 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Vladimir Makarov
14:23 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Andrew MacLeod
14:02 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Vladimir Makarov
13:56 Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09) Andrew MacLeod
08:18 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
08:17 Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Jakub Jelinek
08:07 should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? Paolo Bonzini
07:16 Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09) Richard Guenther
07:09 GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09) Jakub Jelinek
03:42 Re: [HELP] Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Xiangfu Liu
02:20 question on find_if_case_2 in ifcvt.c Amker.Cheng

September 08, 2011
22:48 gcc-4.5-20110908 is now available gccadmin
22:27 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Michael Hope
16:41 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Joseph S. Myers
16:39 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Joseph S. Myers
15:09 Re: Questions Regarding DWARF Michael Eager
14:03 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Richard Earnshaw
13:55 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Diego Novillo
13:41 Re: speed of simple loops on x86_64 using opencc vs gcc Richard Guenther
13:24 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Richard Earnshaw
13:21 Re: speed of simple loops on x86_64 using opencc vs gcc Richard Guenther
13:13 Re: Questions Regarding DWARF Andi Kleen
13:10 Re: speed of simple loops on x86_64 using opencc vs gcc Steve White
12:33 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Diego Novillo
12:30 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Richard Guenther
12:26 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Diego Novillo
12:20 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Richard Guenther
12:14 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Diego Novillo
11:49 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Richard Guenther
11:34 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Diego Novillo
11:16 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Richard Guenther
11:05 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Diego Novillo
09:38 Re: [HELP] Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Jonathan Wakely
09:22 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Duncan Sands
09:03 Re: speed of simple loops on x86_64 using opencc vs gcc Richard Guenther
09:01 Re: [HELP] Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Xiangfu Liu
08:47 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Jakub Jelinek
08:31 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Richard Guenther
08:23 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Richard Guenther
04:12 Re: [HELP] Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Joe Buck
03:08 [HELP] Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Xiangfu Liu
01:59 Questions Regarding DWARF Kevin Polulak

September 07, 2011
22:31 speed of simple loops on x86_64 using opencc vs gcc Steve White
19:57 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Joseph S. Myers
18:43 Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Andreas Jaeger
17:01 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Duncan Sands
16:59 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Vladimir Makarov
16:24 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Vladimir Makarov
15:55 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Xinliang David Li
15:29 Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Duncan Sands
15:28 RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures Diego Novillo
15:16 Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets Vladimir Makarov
14:25 [pph] Trunk merge rev 178517 Diego Novillo
08:11 Re: I am work with lm32 and want to help with the lm32 target in gcc Xiangfu Liu
07:11 Re: performance regression with trunk's gengtype on ARM? Mikael Pettersson
05:09 Re: Issue with delay slot scheduling? Mohamed Shafi
00:05 Re: Adding fstack-protector prologue to get_pc_thunk for targets with TARGET_PAD_SHORT_FUNCTION asharif tools

September 06, 2011
22:46 gcc-4.4-20110906 is now available gccadmin
22:30 Re: Is this correct behaviour? Ian Lance Taylor
18:17 Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW David Daney
17:56 Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW David Daney
15:54 RE: Is this correct behaviour? Bingfeng Mei
15:42 Re: Is this correct behaviour? Richard Guenther
15:32 Re: Issue with delay slot scheduling? Eric Botcazou
15:31 Is this correct behaviour? Bingfeng Mei
15:21 Re: Issue with delay slot scheduling? Jeff Law
14:46 Issue with delay slot scheduling? Mohamed Shafi
07:47 Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW Romain Geissler

September 05, 2011
17:47 Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW Jakub Jelinek
17:22 Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW Andrew Pinski
08:10 Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW Jakub Jelinek
07:51 Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW Richard Guenther
07:50 [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW Romain Geissler
03:09 Re: Fortran's DO CONCURRENT - make use of it middle-end-wise Andi Kleen
01:52 Re: Ping: viewvc: python: RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded Jie Zhang

September 04, 2011
19:08 Ping: viewvc: python: RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded Georg-Johann Lay
17:20 Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ Thomas Schwinge
09:06 Re: Fortran's DO CONCURRENT - make use of it middle-end-wise Richard Guenther
08:47 Fortran's DO CONCURRENT - make use of it middle-end-wise Tobias Burnus
08:00 Re: I am work with lm32 and want to help with the lm32 target in gcc Liu
04:44 Re: GCC online documentation Gerald Pfeifer

September 03, 2011
22:46 gcc-4.7-20110903 is now available gccadmin
19:11 Escorte Profesioniste Profesioniste

September 02, 2011
22:47 gcc-4.6-20110902 is now available gccadmin
10:02 RE: Is VRP is too conservative to identify boolean value 0 and 1? Jiangning Liu
09:07 Re: Is VRP is too conservative to identify boolean value 0 and 1? Richard Guenther
06:27 Re: Is VRP is too conservative to identify boolean value 0 and 1? Andrew Pinski
06:09 Is VRP is too conservative to identify boolean value 0 and 1? Jiangning Liu

September 01, 2011
22:52 Wanted gcov literate person for reviewer Joel Sherrill
22:44 gcc-4.5-20110901 is now available gccadmin
15:18 Re: role of dump_file notably for/in plugins? Pierre Vittet
06:59 Re: I am work with lm32 and want to help with the lm32 target in gcc Xiangfu Liu
03:32 Re: I am work with lm32 and want to help with the lm32 target in gcc Liu
03:04 I am work with lm32 and want to help with the lm32 target in gcc Xiangfu Liu
00:15 Re: Linker stumbles over non-grouped .text/.rodata for a C++ function Ian Lance Taylor


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3