This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
September 30, 2011
23:53 | float "op-and-halve" | David Miller |
22:45 | gcc-4.6-20110930 is now available | gccadmin |
21:32 | C++11 atomic library notes | Andrew MacLeod |
13:01 | Re: Question on cse_not_expected in explow.c:memory_address_addr_space() | Georg-Johann Lay |
10:09 | Re: Question on cse_not_expected in explow.c:memory_address_addr_space() | Paolo Bonzini |
09:00 | Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 | Rainer Orth |
06:04 | Re: Go Garbage Collection Roots | Ian Lance Taylor |
04:44 | Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass | Amker.Cheng |
02:51 | Go Garbage Collection Roots | Matt Davis |
01:51 | Re: missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass | Amker.Cheng |
September 29, 2011
September 28, 2011
23:43 | -fdebug-types-section unidentifiable anonymous struct (PR debug/49750) | Jan Kratochvil |
15:12 | Re: [Patch,AVR]: Better log output with -mdeb | Georg-Johann Lay |
13:52 | [Patch,AVR]: Better log output with -mdeb | Georg-Johann Lay |
12:14 | Question on cse_not_expected in explow.c:memory_address_addr_space() | Georg-Johann Lay |
11:06 | Re: GCC testting infrastructure issue | Kirill Yukhin |
10:49 | Re: GCC testting infrastructure issue | Richard Guenther |
10:49 | Re: A question about detecting array bounds for case Warray-bounds-3.c | Dirk Müller |
10:18 | GCC testting infrastructure issue | Kirill Yukhin |
05:51 | Re: stringification of PREFIX etc... | Basile Starynkevitch |
September 27, 2011
22:56 | gcc-4.4-20110927 is now available | gccadmin |
21:56 | Re: stringification of PREFIX etc... | Joseph S. Myers |
18:59 | Re: ARRAY_RANGE_REF | Richard Henderson |
18:59 | Re: ARRAY_RANGE_REF | Andrew Pinski |
18:45 | ARRAY_RANGE_REF | Iyer, Balaji V |
15:12 | Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance | Jeff Law |
15:01 | Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance | Richard Guenther |
14:56 | Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance | Jeff Law |
13:44 | Re: added_clobbers_hard_reg_p and FLAGS_REGNUM | Paulo J. Matos |
11:15 | Ann: GCC MELT plugin 0.9 release (for gcc 4.6) | Basile Starynkevitch |
09:51 | Re: Information on SCoP coverage by GRAPHITE | Simone Pellegrini |
08:19 | missing conditional propagation in cprop.c pass | Amker.Cheng |
07:30 | Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance | Richard Guenther |
05:26 | RE: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance | Jiangning Liu |
01:29 | Re: misleading description in vec.h? | Liang Wang |
September 26, 2011
September 25, 2011
23:45 | Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h | Joseph S. Myers |
22:53 | Re: Trying to find a gcc warning to detect different parameter names | Jonathan Wakely |
22:49 | Trying to find a gcc warning to detect different parameter names | Jon Grant |
22:05 | No pointer conversion warning for "bool" in C/C++ | Jon Grant |
22:05 | Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h | Gerald Pfeifer |
16:36 | Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h | Joseph S. Myers |
16:33 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | David Brown |
16:06 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | David Brown |
15:15 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | Dave Korn |
14:16 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | Andreas Schwab |
13:03 | Re: gengtype installation in trunk? | Basile Starynkevitch |
13:00 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | David Brown |
12:20 | Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h | Joern Rennecke |
12:00 | Re: gengtype installation in trunk? | Romain Geissler |
September 24, 2011
22:47 | gcc-4.7-20110924 is now available | gccadmin |
21:32 | Re: ld build-id crash on ARM linking gcc | Daniel Drake |
19:38 | Re: ld build-id crash on ARM linking gcc | Ian Lance Taylor |
16:26 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | John Regehr |
15:49 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | David Brown |
15:24 | Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors | Jakub Jelinek |
15:10 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | John Regehr |
15:09 | gengtype installation in trunk? | Basile Starynkevitch |
14:55 | Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors | Jonathan Wakely |
14:40 | Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors | Jon Grant |
12:46 | Re: ld build-id crash on ARM linking gcc | Daniel Drake |
12:26 | ld build-id crash on ARM linking gcc | Daniel Drake |
11:22 | Re: Wrong documentation of TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_SUBSET_P | Richard Guenther |
09:24 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Richard Guenther |
September 23, 2011
September 22, 2011
23:03 | gcc-4.5-20110922 is now available | gccadmin |
21:15 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | Richard Guenther |
21:00 | Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09) | Gary Funck |
20:07 | Re: PowerPC shrink-wrap support 0 of 3 | Richard Henderson |
18:35 | Use of FLAGS_REGNUM clashes with generates insn | Paulo J. Matos |
17:34 | Re: I cannot disable GCC TLS support thoroughly. | Ian Lance Taylor |
14:47 | Re: PowerPC shrink-wrap support 0 of 3 | Bernd Schmidt |
14:40 | Re: PowerPC shrink-wrap support 0 of 3 | Alan Modra |
14:29 | Re: [PLUGIN] Fix PLUGIN_FINISH_TYPE | Romain Geissler |
14:18 | Re: [PLUGIN] Fix PLUGIN_FINISH_TYPE | Diego Novillo |
13:40 | Re: [PLUGIN] Fix PLUGIN_FINISH_TYPE | Dodji Seketeli |
11:12 | å | Ms. White |
10:05 | I cannot disable GCC TLS support thoroughly. | Terry Guo |
08:53 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | David Brown |
08:39 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | David Brown |
02:19 | A question about detecting array bounds for case Warray-bounds-3.c | Jiangning Liu |
September 21, 2011
September 20, 2011
23:25 | [google] Merged google/integration -> google/main | Diego Novillo |
22:43 | gcc-4.4-20110920 is now available | gccadmin |
17:18 | Re: [gimplefe] Ran into a internal compiler error | Diego Novillo |
16:36 | Re: Volatile qualification on pointer and data | Ian Lance Taylor |
16:15 | RE: [gimplefe] Ran into a internal compiler error | Iyer, Balaji V |
16:08 | Volatile qualification on pointer and data | Paulo J. Matos |
07:56 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Paolo Bonzini |
03:32 | [gimplefe] Ran into a internal compiler error | Sandeep Soni |
September 19, 2011
18:41 | Re: cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors | Jonathan Wakely |
18:00 | cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors | Jon Grant |
11:58 | RE: Derive more alias information from named address space | Bingfeng Mei |
11:56 | Re: Derive more alias information from named address space | Ulrich Weigand |
September 18, 2011
02:44 | CALL FOR PARTICIPATION: HelloGCC Workshop 2011 | Mingjie Xing |
September 17, 2011
23:46 | GNU MPFR 3.1.0 Release Candidate | Vincent Lefevre |
22:46 | gcc-4.7-20110917 is now available | gccadmin |
September 16, 2011
22:49 | gcc-4.6-20110916 is now available | gccadmin |
20:31 | Re: original tree for folded expressions | Diego Novillo |
20:26 | Re: original tree for folded expressions | Joachim Wieland |
18:58 | More int128 tests? | Rohini Jayaram |
17:38 | Re: original tree for folded expressions | Diego Novillo |
16:11 | Derive more alias information from named address space | Bingfeng Mei |
16:05 | original tree for folded expressions | Joachim Wieland |
10:49 | Re: passing arguments to gcc build in eclipse | Andrew Haley |
10:35 | Re: IRA misses register range overlap | Peter Bigot |
10:30 | passing arguments to gcc build in eclipse | pankajsejwal |
02:01 | RE: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance | Jiangning Liu |
September 15, 2011
22:49 | gcc-4.5-20110915 is now available | gccadmin |
22:26 | Re: IRA misses register range overlap | Peter Bigot |
21:10 | Re: IRA misses register range overlap | Vladimir Makarov |
20:28 | Re: Are there plans to maintain the CFG througout the compilation? | Peter Garbett |
19:07 | Re: IRA misses register range overlap | Peter Bigot |
18:36 | [google] Merged gcc-4_6-branch -> google/gcc-4_6 | Diego Novillo |
16:26 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Paolo Bonzini |
16:20 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Richard Henderson |
16:14 | Re: [google] Merge trunk into google/integration | Ollie Wild |
15:35 | Re: IRA misses register range overlap | Vladimir Makarov |
15:16 | IRA misses register range overlap | Peter Bigot |
14:26 | RE: CCmode size | Joern Rennecke |
13:49 | RE: CCmode size | Paul_Koning |
12:56 | CCmode size | Paulo J. Matos |
10:36 | Are there plans to maintain the CFG througout the compilation? | Peter Garbett |
07:51 | RE: postreload problem using reload_inm and SECONDARY_RELOAD macros | BELBACHIR Selim |
September 14, 2011
20:30 | [google] Merge trunk into google/integration | Diego Novillo |
20:11 | Re: [trans-mem] merge from trunk @ 178608 | Richard Henderson |
20:01 | [trans-mem] merge from trunk @ 178608 | Aldy Hernandez |
18:54 | Re: IRA confused about killed registers | Vladimir Makarov |
16:14 | RE: postreload problem using reload_inm and SECONDARY_RELOAD macros | BELBACHIR Selim |
13:41 | Re: postreload problem using reload_inm and SECONDARY_RELOAD macros | Ian Lance Taylor |
13:09 | postreload problem using reload_inm and SECONDARY_RELOAD macros | BELBACHIR Selim |
13:09 | Re: gcc - Wednesday, September 14, 2011 | Rashmi Sawardekar |
09:38 | Reloading going wrong. Bug in GCC? | Mohamed Shafi |
08:50 | IRA confused about killed registers | Paulo J. Matos |
08:39 | Re: [PLUGIN] Fix PLUGIN_FINISH_TYPE | Romain Geissler |
September 13, 2011
September 12, 2011
September 11, 2011
23:22 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Andrew MacLeod |
19:44 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Jakub Jelinek |
19:31 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Geert Bosch |
19:12 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Jakub Jelinek |
19:00 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Geert Bosch |
18:23 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Paolo Bonzini |
15:38 | Adding functions at compile time | Matt Davis |
14:13 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Andrew MacLeod |
03:33 | MÄÄais, uzÄd kvalitatÄvos ikrus te un tÅlÄt | Krystal Knuth |
September 10, 2011
22:44 | gcc-4.7-20110910 is now available | gccadmin |
13:22 | Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets | Gabriel Dos Reis |
06:18 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Jakub Jelinek |
05:40 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Paolo Bonzini |
01:09 | Re: should sync builtins be full optimization barriers? | Geert Bosch |
September 09, 2011
September 08, 2011
September 07, 2011
September 06, 2011
22:46 | gcc-4.4-20110906 is now available | gccadmin |
22:30 | Re: Is this correct behaviour? | Ian Lance Taylor |
18:17 | Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW | David Daney |
17:56 | Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW | David Daney |
15:54 | RE: Is this correct behaviour? | Bingfeng Mei |
15:42 | Re: Is this correct behaviour? | Richard Guenther |
15:32 | Re: Issue with delay slot scheduling? | Eric Botcazou |
15:31 | Is this correct behaviour? | Bingfeng Mei |
15:21 | Re: Issue with delay slot scheduling? | Jeff Law |
14:46 | Issue with delay slot scheduling? | Mohamed Shafi |
07:47 | Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW | Romain Geissler |
September 05, 2011
17:47 | Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW | Jakub Jelinek |
17:22 | Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW | Andrew Pinski |
08:10 | Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW | Jakub Jelinek |
07:51 | Re: [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW | Richard Guenther |
07:50 | [PLUGIN] dlopen and RTLD_NOW | Romain Geissler |
03:09 | Re: Fortran's DO CONCURRENT - make use of it middle-end-wise | Andi Kleen |
01:52 | Re: Ping: viewvc: python: RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded | Jie Zhang |
September 04, 2011
19:08 | Ping: viewvc: python: RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded | Georg-Johann Lay |
17:20 | Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ | Thomas Schwinge |
09:06 | Re: Fortran's DO CONCURRENT - make use of it middle-end-wise | Richard Guenther |
08:47 | Fortran's DO CONCURRENT - make use of it middle-end-wise | Tobias Burnus |
08:00 | Re: I am work with lm32 and want to help with the lm32 target in gcc | Liu |
04:44 | Re: GCC online documentation | Gerald Pfeifer |
September 03, 2011
22:46 | gcc-4.7-20110903 is now available | gccadmin |
19:11 | Escorte Profesioniste | Profesioniste |
September 02, 2011
22:47 | gcc-4.6-20110902 is now available | gccadmin |
10:02 | RE: Is VRP is too conservative to identify boolean value 0 and 1? | Jiangning Liu |
09:07 | Re: Is VRP is too conservative to identify boolean value 0 and 1? | Richard Guenther |
06:27 | Re: Is VRP is too conservative to identify boolean value 0 and 1? | Andrew Pinski |
06:09 | Is VRP is too conservative to identify boolean value 0 and 1? | Jiangning Liu |
September 01, 2011
22:52 | Wanted gcov literate person for reviewer | Joel Sherrill |
22:44 | gcc-4.5-20110901 is now available | gccadmin |
15:18 | Re: role of dump_file notably for/in plugins? | Pierre Vittet |
06:59 | Re: I am work with lm32 and want to help with the lm32 target in gcc | Xiangfu Liu |
03:32 | Re: I am work with lm32 and want to help with the lm32 target in gcc | Liu |
03:04 | I am work with lm32 and want to help with the lm32 target in gcc | Xiangfu Liu |
00:15 | Re: Linker stumbles over non-grouped .text/.rodata for a C++ function | Ian Lance Taylor |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]