gcc archive
date index for August, 2011

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

August 31, 2011
22:12 Re: ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 Steve McIntyre
20:33 Re: Linker stumbles over non-grouped .text/.rodata for a C++ function Stephan Bergmann
20:08 Re: Linker stumbles over non-grouped .text/.rodata for a C++ function Ian Lance Taylor
19:43 Linker stumbles over non-grouped .text/.rodata for a C++ function Stephan Bergmann
14:47 Re: role of dump_file notably for/in plugins? David Malcolm
14:28 Re: role of dump_file notably for/in plugins? Richard Guenther
14:25 role of dump_file notably for/in plugins? Basile Starynkevitch

August 30, 2011
22:42 gcc-4.4-20110830 is now available gccadmin
20:57 Re: question about GCC Quad-Precision Math Library FX
15:28 Re: ARM Linux EABI: unwinding through a segfault handler Joseph S. Myers
09:15 Lodging Inquiry Mike dane
09:13 Lodging Inquiry Mike dane
09:11 Re: ARM Linux EABI: unwinding through a segfault handler Andrew Haley
04:37 Re: What command does dg-test generate? Ian Lance Taylor
02:24 What command does dg-test generate? Lawrence Crowl

August 29, 2011
17:14 Re: ARM Linux EABI: unwinding through a segfault handler Daniel Jacobowitz
15:51 Re: ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 Jeff Law
15:19 Re: ARM Linux EABI: unwinding through a segfault handler Ken Werner
07:30 Re: performance regression with trunk's gengtype on ARM? Mikael Pettersson
05:14 Re: performance regression with trunk's gengtype on ARM? Basile Starynkevitch
04:02 Re: ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 Jon Masters

August 28, 2011
21:54 Re: performance regression with trunk's gengtype on ARM? Michael Hope
20:58 performance regression with trunk's gengtype on ARM? Mikael Pettersson
08:30 Re: Inline Expansion Problem Richard Guenther

August 27, 2011
23:30 Re: Inline Expansion Problem Matt Davis
22:44 gcc-4.7-20110827 is now available gccadmin
13:43 re: Silly! X13YrdsToVictory
09:26 Re: Inline Expansion Problem Richard Guenther
08:07 Re: Inline Expansion Problem Matt Davis
07:28 Re: Inline Expansion Problem Richard Guenther
02:48 Inline Expansion Problem Matt Davis

August 26, 2011
22:43 gcc-4.6-20110826 is now available gccadmin
21:02 Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
15:45 Re: What goes into function_rodata_section Ian Lance Taylor
14:55 Re: What goes into function_rodata_section Georg-Johann Lay
14:41 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Georg-Johann Lay
14:28 Re: What goes into function_rodata_section Ian Lance Taylor
13:59 What goes into function_rodata_section Georg-Johann Lay
12:55 Re: linking time eroor with -fast-math -O0 Richard Guenther
12:52 linking time eroor with -fast-math -O0 Vladimir Yakovlev

August 25, 2011
22:43 gcc-4.5-20110825 is now available gccadmin
17:01 Re: ARM Linux EABI: unwinding through a segfault handler Andrew Haley
16:57 Re: ARM Linux EABI: unwinding through a segfault handler David Daney
12:26 ARM Linux EABI: unwinding through a segfault handler Andrew Haley

August 24, 2011
22:14 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Oleg Smolsky
21:57 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Xinliang David Li
21:26 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Oleg Smolsky
20:03 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Xinliang David Li
19:51 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Oleg Smolsky
16:26 Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 Bill Gatliff
13:59 [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
04:55 unconditional gen_rtx_MULT in expr.c DJ Delorie

August 23, 2011
22:47 gcc-4.4-20110823 is now available gccadmin
22:26 Re: ARM 3D support was Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 Gordan Bobic
21:00 Re: Flags and data mixing problem Richard Henderson
20:41 Re: Flags and data mixing problem Konstantin Vladimirov
20:12 in tree PPL/CLooG in combination with GMP/MPFR/MPC Ruben Van Boxem
18:56 Re: An unusual x86_64 code model Jed Davis
18:56 Re: Flags and data mixing problem Richard Henderson
18:38 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Xinliang David Li
18:37 Flags and data mixing problem Konstantin Vladimirov
18:02 ARM 3D support was Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 omalleys
17:47 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Oleg Smolsky
16:26 Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 Gordan Bobic
16:13 Re: ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 Steve McIntyre
01:37 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Andrew Pinski
01:34 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Oleg Smolsky
01:09 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Oleg Smolsky

August 22, 2011
23:23 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Peter Bigot
22:30 Re: [GSOC] Optimising GCC, conclusion Ian Lance Taylor
21:47 [GSOC] Optimising GCC, conclusion Dimitrios Apostolou
18:04 Re: Fwd: C6X fails to build in FSF mainline Bernd Schmidt
17:17 Re: Trunk LTO Bootstrap of Sun Aug 21 18:01:01 UTC 2011 (revision 177942) FAILED Marc Glisse
17:08 Re: Trunk LTO Bootstrap of Sun Aug 21 18:01:01 UTC 2011 (revision 177942) FAILED Toon Moene
15:53 Re: Just what are rtx costs? David Edelsohn
13:08 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Joern Rennecke
12:39 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Ulrich Weigand
12:23 Re: i370 port Ulrich Weigand
12:12 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Georg-Johann Lay
09:59 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Richard Guenther
08:20 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Richard Sandiford

August 21, 2011
23:48 Re: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ Joe Buck
19:27 Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h Gerald Pfeifer
18:20 Trunk LTO Bootstrap of Sun Aug 21 18:01:01 UTC 2011 (revision 177942) FAILED Toon Moene
17:03 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Georg-Johann Lay
16:43 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Georg-Johann Lay
12:09 Re: Critical behavioral change between g++-4.4/g++-4.5 and g++-4.6 ? Emmanuel Fleury
10:49 Re: Critical behavioral change between g++-4.4/g++-4.5 and g++-4.6 ? Marc Glisse
09:52 Critical behavioral change between g++-4.4/g++-4.5 and g++-4.6 ? Emmanuel Fleury

August 20, 2011
22:43 gcc-4.7-20110820 is now available gccadmin
14:55 Re: Converting SIGSEGV etc. signals to exceptions PaweÅ Sikora
14:43 Re: Converting SIGSEGV etc. signals to exceptions Ian Lance Taylor
14:21 Re: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ Ian Lance Taylor
12:51 Converting SIGSEGV etc. signals to exceptions sudhakar govindavajhala
12:15 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
10:09 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
07:44 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
05:20 Re: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
04:18 Re: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ Ian Lance Taylor

August 19, 2011
22:43 Re: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:43 gcc-4.6-20110819 is now available gccadmin
21:58 Re: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ H.J. Lu
21:47 RE: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ Marc Glisse
21:45 Re: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ Ian Lance Taylor
20:42 Re: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ H.J. Lu
20:35 RE: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ Paul_Koning
19:34 Re: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ H.J. Lu
19:25 RE: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ Joe Buck
16:36 Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++ H.J. Lu
14:17 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Richard Sandiford
12:25 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Richard Sandiford

August 18, 2011
22:46 gcc-4.5-20110818 is now available gccadmin
18:56 Re: Build report gcc 4.6.1 on Sparc Solaris 10 Marc Glisse
17:16 Re: Fwd: C6X fails to build in FSF mainline Richard Henderson
16:12 Re: Build report gcc 4.6.1 on Sparc Solaris 10 Eric Botcazou
15:16 Re: Fwd: C6X fails to build in FSF mainline Richard Henderson
14:38 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Ulrich Weigand
14:18 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
13:37 Re: An unusual x86_64 code model Michael Matz
13:36 [GSOC] code contribution + documentation Pierre Vittet
13:14 Re: i370 port Ulrich Weigand
13:08 Build report gcc 4.6.1 on Sparc Solaris 10 Wolfgang S. Kechel
12:15 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
10:39 Re: Lack of libstdc++ compatibility (was: Revision 176335) Jonathan Wakely
10:36 Re: Lack of libstdc++ compatibility Jonathan Wakely
10:19 Re: Lack of libstdc++ compatibility Paolo Carlini
09:42 Re: Lack of libstdc++ compatibility (was: Revision 176335) Richard Guenther
09:34 Lack of libstdc++ compatibility (was: Revision 176335) Gerald Pfeifer
09:14 [PATCH] for Re: New mirror Gerald Pfeifer
08:56 PATCH for Re: GCC 4.6.2 Status Report (2011-08-17) Gerald Pfeifer
08:14 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Richard Sandiford
08:10 Re: regrename and odd behaviour with early clobber operands Ramana Radhakrishnan
08:05 Re: Function Multiversioning Usability. Xinliang David Li
07:58 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Richard Sandiford
07:51 Re: Function Multiversioning Usability. Richard Guenther
01:46 Fwd: C6X fails to build in FSF mainline Andrew Pinski
00:55 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Hans-Peter Nilsson

August 17, 2011
23:20 Re: An unusual x86_64 code model Jed Davis
21:13 GCC 4.6.2 Status Report (2011-08-17) Joseph S. Myers
20:41 Re: PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu
20:35 Re: PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options Joseph S. Myers
20:27 Re: PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu
19:28 Re: PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options Joseph S. Myers
18:56 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Paolo Bonzini
17:44 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Georg-Johann Lay
17:33 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
17:29 Re: Just what are rtx costs? Georg-Johann Lay
17:22 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Xinliang David Li
16:38 Re: Function Multiversioning Usability. Xinliang David Li
15:35 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
15:12 Re: Function Multiversioning Usability. Richard Guenther
14:53 Re: Function Multiversioning Usability. Xinliang David Li
14:52 Just what are rtx costs? Richard Sandiford
07:29 Re: Function Multiversioning Usability. Richard Guenther
06:57 Re: clobber CC for arithmetic instructions Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:59 Re: clobber CC for arithmetic instructions Rohit Arul Raj

August 16, 2011
22:43 gcc-4.4-20110816 is now available gccadmin
21:24 Re: Function Multiversioning Usability. Xinliang David Li
21:13 Re: Announcing the Port of Intel(r) Cilk (TM) Plus into GCC Jason Merrill
21:06 Re: Function Multiversioning Usability. Xinliang David Li
20:38 Function Multiversioning Usability. Sriraman Tallam
17:32 Re: Defining constraint for registers tuple Kirill Yukhin
17:19 Re: define_split for specific split pass Kirill Yukhin
16:47 Re: define_split for specific split pass Andrew Pinski
15:25 Re: regrename and odd behaviour with early clobber operands Richard Sandiford
14:58 Re: Defining constraint for registers tuple Richard Henderson
13:48 Re: PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options Joseph S. Myers
13:32 define_split for specific split pass Ilya Enkovich
13:26 Re: i370 port Ulrich Weigand
13:09 Re: PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu
11:20 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
11:20 Re: Defining constraint for registers tuple Kirill Yukhin
09:37 Re: ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized allocates spaces more than necessary? Liang Wang
07:24 Re: ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized allocates spaces more than necessary? Andreas Schwab
06:40 regrename and odd behaviour with early clobber operands Ramana Radhakrishnan
05:52 Re: ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized allocates spaces more than necessary? Laurynas Biveinis
05:52 Re: ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized allocates spaces more than necessary? Laurynas Biveinis
00:39 Re: A question about sched_analyze_insn in sched-deps.c Ayal Zaks

August 15, 2011
23:26 Re: Announcing the Port of Intel(r) Cilk (TM) Plus into GCC H.J. Lu
20:31 Announcing the Port of Intel(r) Cilk (TM) Plus into GCC Iyer, Balaji V
17:23 Re: i370 port Ulrich Weigand
17:22 Re: ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized allocates spaces more than necessary? Andreas Schwab
16:45 Re: [PATCH] Remove "bogus" g++.dg/init/copy7.C testcase Mike Stump
15:26 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
14:32 Re: i370 port Ulrich Weigand
12:43 [PATCH] Remove "bogus" g++.dg/init/copy7.C testcase Richard Guenther
12:24 Re: New mirror Sergey Kutserey
12:20 Re: ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized allocates spaces more than necessary? Richard Guenther
12:17 ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized allocates spaces more than necessary? çä
08:40 Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance VÃclav Zeman
08:12 viewvc: python: RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded Georg-Johann Lay
06:29 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 Jan Beulich

August 13, 2011
22:47 gcc-4.7-20110813 is now available gccadmin
11:09 Re: [GSOC] Customizable warnings with a GCC plugin Pierre Vittet
08:34 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
00:18 Re: clobber CC for arithmetic instructions Hans-Peter Nilsson

August 12, 2011
23:53 Re: An unusual x86_64 code model Jed Davis
23:51 Re: clobber CC for arithmetic instructions Hans-Peter Nilsson
23:30 gcc-4.6-20110812 is now available gccadmin
22:02 Re: An unusual x86_64 code model Jed Davis
19:59 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 H.J. Lu
19:27 Re: [PATCH 2/2] document ISL requirement for GCC installation Sebastian Pop
17:53 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 H.J. Lu
16:12 Re: Move insn out of the way Jeff Law
16:00 Re: [GSOC] Customizable warnings with a GCC plugin Jonathan Wakely
15:52 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 H.J. Lu
15:06 Re: Move insn out of the way Paulo J. Matos
14:55 [GSOC] Customizable warnings with a GCC plugin Pierre Vittet
14:22 Re: Move insn out of the way Vladimir Makarov
14:03 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 H.J. Lu
13:58 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 Jan Beulich
13:22 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 H.J. Lu
13:16 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 Jan Beulich
12:10 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 H.J. Lu
10:21 Re: clobber CC for arithmetic instructions Richard Guenther
10:01 Re: Move insn out of the way Paulo J. Matos
09:48 Re: clobber CC for arithmetic instructions Rohit Arul Raj
07:59 Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Florian Merz
07:32 Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Richard Guenther
07:30 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 Jan Beulich
06:48 clobber CC for arithmetic instructions Rohit Arul Raj
04:37 Re: [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 H.J. Lu

August 11, 2011
22:49 gcc-4.5-20110811 is now available gccadmin
20:39 RE: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Joe Buck
20:16 Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Gabriel Dos Reis
20:14 Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Gabriel Dos Reis
18:58 Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Joseph S. Myers
18:30 Re: An unusual x86_64 code model Andi Kleen
17:51 Escorte Profesioniste Profesioniste
17:21 Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Florian Merz
17:15 Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Richard Guenther
17:13 Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Joe Buck
17:11 Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Richard Guenther
16:49 reload question Hari Sandanagobalane
16:27 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Xinliang David Li
16:05 Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Florian Merz
16:02 [pph] Merge from trunk Diego Novillo
15:48 Re: Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Richard Guenther
15:15 Fwd: Re: [LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang Florian Merz
14:27 Re: Move insn out of the way Vladimir Makarov
14:22 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
13:51 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Richard Earnshaw
12:22 Re: Move insn out of the way Paulo J. Matos
08:49 Re: Move insn out of the way Richard Guenther
08:12 Re: Move insn out of the way Paulo J. Matos
06:37 Re: A question about sched_analyze_insn in sched-deps.c Revital Eres

August 10, 2011
22:37 五工(WUGON)变频器第三代世界技术产品 中国五工(WUGON)变频
15:57 Re: A question about sched_analyze_insn in sched-deps.c Ian Lance Taylor
14:25 A question about sched_analyze_insn in sched-deps.c Revital Eres
14:14 Re: Move insn out of the way Paulo J. Matos
14:04 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Georg-Johann Lay
13:55 Re: Move insn out of the way Paulo J. Matos
13:51 Re: Move insn out of the way Richard Guenther
13:46 Re: Move insn out of the way Paulo J. Matos
11:42 Re: Move insn out of the way Richard Guenther
11:40 Re: Move insn out of the way Richard Guenther
11:20 Move insn out of the way Paulo J. Matos
10:39 Un nou stil de viata / A new life style. Hot Swingers
00:40 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Hans-Peter Nilsson

August 09, 2011
23:58 Re: An unusual x86_64 code model Andrew Pinski
23:35 RE: FDO and LTO on ARM Fu, Chao-Ying
23:26 An unusual x86_64 code model Jed Davis
22:41 gcc-4.4-20110809 is now available gccadmin
19:48 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:16 ARM summit at Plumbers 2011 Steve McIntyre
18:11 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
17:40 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Marc Glisse
17:24 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Ulrich Weigand
17:16 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Ulrich Weigand
16:55 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Earnshaw
15:40 Re: [RFC PATCH, i386]: Allow zero_extended addresses (+ problems with reload and offsetable address, "o" constraint) H.J. Lu
15:18 Re: [named address] rejects-valid: error: initializer element is not computable@load time Ulrich Weigand
14:22 Re: PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu
14:07 Re: PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options Joseph S. Myers
13:32 Re: PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu
13:21 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
13:04 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Jonathan Wakely
12:57 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
12:37 [pph] Merge from trunk rev 177573. Diego Novillo
11:19 Re: Question about SMS scheduling windows Richard Sandiford
07:41 Re: [RFC PATCH, i386]: Allow zero_extended addresses (+ problems with reload and offsetable address, "o" constraint) Uros Bizjak

August 08, 2011
20:36 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Jan Hubicka
20:03 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Xinliang David Li
19:40 Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ Romain Geissler
19:36 Re: Question about SMS scheduling windows Ayal Zaks
19:05 Re: [named address] rejects-valid: error: initializer element is not computable at load time Georg-Johann Lay
18:49 Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ Ian Lance Taylor
17:42 Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ Romain Geissler
17:14 Re: [RFC PATCH, i386]: Allow zero_extended addresses (+ problems with reload and offsetable address, "o" constraint) H.J. Lu
17:12 Re: [RFC PATCH, i386]: Allow zero_extended addresses (+ problems with reload and offsetable address, "o" constraint) Uros Bizjak
16:25 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Jonathan Wakely
15:30 Re: [RFC PATCH, i386]: Allow zero_extended addresses (+ problems with reload and offsetable address, "o" constraint) Ulrich Weigand
12:21 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
12:16 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
11:38 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Georg-Johann Lay
10:59 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Paolo Bonzini
10:43 New mirror Sergey Kutserey
09:30 Re: Question about SMS scheduling windows Richard Sandiford
09:26 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
08:06 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
02:18 Re: PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu

August 07, 2011
12:39 Re: [RFC PATCH, i386]: Allow zero_extended addresses (+ problems with reload and offsetable address, "o" constraint) Uros Bizjak
01:40 Re: __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ or does it? Jie Zhang
01:35 Re: __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ or does it? Jonathan Wakely
01:29 Re: __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ or does it? Jie Zhang

August 06, 2011
22:46 gcc-4.7-20110806 is now available gccadmin
21:40 __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ or does it? Christopher Huang-Leaver
16:31 Re: Building C++ with --enable-languages=c,fortran Toon Moene
16:05 PING: PATCH: Use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu
15:33 Re: autogen version testing in fixincludes/genfixes Marc Glisse
15:14 Re: Building C++ with --enable-languages=c,fortran Steve Kargl
15:00 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Paolo Bonzini
13:17 Re: Building C++ with --enable-languages=c,fortran Toon Moene
09:23 Re: Building C++ with --enable-languages=c,fortran Mikael Morin
02:09 Re: Building C++ with --enable-languages=c,fortran Ian Lance Taylor
01:56 Re: Building C++ with --enable-languages=c,fortran Steve Kargl
01:51 Re: Building C++ with --enable-languages=c,fortran Ian Lance Taylor
00:51 Please replace/augment buildstat entry Hin-Tak Leung

August 05, 2011
23:27 Re: Building C++ with --enable-languages=c,fortran Steve Kargl
22:52 Building C++ with --enable-languages=c,fortran Thomas Koenig
22:46 gcc-4.6-20110805 is now available gccadmin
22:25 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Jan Hubicka
21:51 The Linux binutils 2.21.53.0.2 is released H.J. Lu
21:34 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Xinliang David Li
21:08 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands DJ Delorie
21:01 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Ulrich Weigand
20:47 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands DJ Delorie
20:43 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Ulrich Weigand
19:49 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Jan Hubicka
18:51 [RFC PATCH, i386]: Allow zero_extended addresses (+ problems with reload and offsetable address, "o" constraint) Uros Bizjak
17:50 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Xinliang David Li
17:39 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Xinliang David Li
17:08 gcc-python-plugin finds its first bug in itself David Malcolm
14:40 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Jan Hubicka
14:29 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Ulrich Weigand
14:09 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Michael Matz
13:24 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Ulrich Weigand
12:47 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Georg-Johann Lay
10:19 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Ulrich Weigand
10:07 Re: [named address] rejects-valid: error: initializer element is not computable at load time Ulrich Weigand
07:32 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Richard Guenther
00:50 Re: RFC: PATCH: Require and use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu

August 04, 2011
23:44 Re: RFC: PATCH: Require and use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu
22:47 gcc-4.5-20110804 is now available gccadmin
22:46 Re: RFC: PATCH: Require and use int64 for x86 options Joseph S. Myers
22:09 Re: RFC: PATCH: Require and use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu
18:51 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Jan Hubicka
18:42 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Jan Hubicka
18:08 Re: RFC: PATCH: Require and use int64 for x86 options H.J. Lu
17:28 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Georg-Johann Lay
17:16 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Denis Chertykov
17:03 Re: [named address] rejects-valid: error: initializer element is not computable at load time Georg-Johann Lay
17:02 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Xinliang David Li
16:38 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
16:33 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Ulrich Weigand
16:27 Re: Question about SMS scheduling windows Ayal Zaks
16:26 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands DJ Delorie
16:20 Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Ulrich Weigand
16:10 Re: [named address] rejects-valid: error: initializer element is not computable at load time Ulrich Weigand
16:03 Re: [RFC] Remove -freorder-blocks-and-partition Taras Glek
15:16 Re: FDO and LTO on ARM Richard Guenther
14:46 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Andrew Haley
14:05 FDO and LTO on ARM Mike Hommey
13:43 [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands Georg-Johann Lay
13:39 Re: [RFC] Remove -freorder-blocks-and-partition Jan Hubicka
13:32 Re: [RFC] Remove -freorder-blocks-and-partition Jan Hubicka
13:04 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:26 Re: g++ 2.5.2 does not catch reference to local variable error. Jonathan Wakely
11:20 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
11:11 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Andrew Haley
10:39 Re: g++ 2.5.2 does not catch reference to local variable error. Miles Bader
10:32 Re: g++ 2.5.2 does not catch reference to local variable error. LIM Fung-Chai
09:54 Re: g++ 2.5.2 does not catch reference to local variable error. Jonathan Wakely
09:52 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
09:51 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Andrew Haley
09:44 [named address] rejects-valid: error: initializer element is not computable at load time Georg-Johann Lay
09:30 Re: g++ 2.5.2 does not catch reference to local variable error. Miles Bader
09:20 Re: g++ 2.5.2 does not catch reference to local variable error. Jonathan Wakely
09:03 Re: Question about SMS scheduling windows Richard Sandiford
07:29 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Andreas Schwab
02:30 g++ 2.5.2 does not catch reference to local variable error. LIM Fung-Chai
00:20 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Hans-Peter Nilsson

August 03, 2011
21:46 Re: [RFC] Remove -freorder-blocks-and-partition Xinliang David Li
21:06 Re: [RFC] Remove -freorder-blocks-and-partition Jan Hubicka
20:56 Re: [RFC] Remove -freorder-blocks-and-partition Jan Hubicka
20:50 Re: [RFC] Remove -freorder-blocks-and-partition Jan Hubicka
19:12 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Xinliang David Li
16:35 2011 GCC Summit. Andrew J. Hutton
15:05 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Henderson
14:55 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Georg-Johann Lay
14:02 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
13:27 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Michael Matz
10:04 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
09:51 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Georg-Johann Lay
09:12 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Ulrich Weigand
07:50 Re: gcc.gnu.org Bugzilla: Perl error Can't locate mro.pm in @INC Frédéric Buclin
04:59 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Miles Bader

August 02, 2011
22:45 gcc-4.4-20110802 is now available gccadmin
20:20 ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.6 David Malcolm
20:10 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
19:24 Re: Problem in bootstrapping trunk - error in stage 2 -mnolzcnt command line option. H.J. Lu
18:24 Problem in bootstrapping trunk - error in stage 2 -mnolzcnt command line option. Toon Moene
17:21 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Georg-Johann Lay
16:03 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Henderson
14:35 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Ian Lance Taylor
13:55 Re: Revision 176335 (removal of #include <unistd.h> in thr-posix.h) cause numerous compile failures Jonathan Wakely
13:42 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
13:23 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Ian Lance Taylor
13:16 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:14 Re: Revision 176335 (removal of #include <unistd.h> in thr-posix.h) cause numerous compile failures Jakub Jelinek
13:09 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
13:08 Revision 176335 (removal of #include <unistd.h> in thr-posix.h) cause numerous compile failures Markus Trippelsdorf
12:54 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:36 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Georg-Johann Lay
12:23 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
12:06 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Mikael Pettersson
10:55 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Michael Walle
10:11 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
10:02 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Georg-Johann Lay
09:47 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Guenther
09:27 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Richard Guenther
09:23 Re: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Richard Guenther
08:49 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Mikael Pettersson
06:47 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Georg-Johann Lay
06:37 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Hans-Peter Nilsson
06:29 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:48 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Xinliang David Li
04:46 RE: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size Jiangning Liu
03:17 Re: Line 0 Hack?? Gabriel Charette
02:37 A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Jiangning Liu

August 01, 2011
22:16 [x32] Allow R_X86_64_64 H.J. Lu
21:56 Re: Line 0 Hack?? Gabriel Charette
21:30 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Richard Henderson
21:14 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Michael Walle
20:51 Re: libgcc: strange optimization Georg-Johann Lay
20:30 libgcc: strange optimization Michael Walle
20:03 Re: IRA vs CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS, + 4.7 IRA regressions? Sandra Loosemore
20:01 Re: Do I need some Python stuff to build trunk as of 177065 ? Toon Moene
18:56 Re: Do I need some Python stuff to build trunk as of 177065 ? Toon Moene
18:46 Re: Do I need some Python stuff to build trunk as of 177065 ? Marc Glisse
18:44 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Oleg Smolsky
18:38 Do I need some Python stuff to build trunk as of 177065 ? Toon Moene
18:14 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Marc Glisse
18:04 Re: Performance degradation on g++ 4.6 Oleg Smolsky
15:00 Re: Re: patch: don't issue -Wreorder warnings when order doesn't matter Daniel Marjamäki
12:28 Re: Defining constraint for registers tuple Kirill Yukhin
10:31 Re: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size Jakub Jelinek
10:16 Re: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size Richard Earnshaw
10:15 RE: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size Jiangning Liu
10:05 Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ Marc Glisse
10:03 Re: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size Joseph S. Myers
09:59 Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ Richard Guenther
09:53 Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ Joseph S. Myers
09:14 Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ Richard Guenther
09:12 Re: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size Jakub Jelinek
08:41 Re: onlinedocs formated text too small to read Georg-Johann Lay
07:08 Re: Help with PPC Relocation options Rohit Arul Raj
06:42 Help with PPC Relocation options Rohit Arul Raj
03:44 RE: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size Jiangning Liu


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3