This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: A visualization of GCC's passes, as a subway map

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat dot com>, "Paulo J. Matos" <pocmatos at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:15:38 +0200
Subject: Re: A visualization of GCC's passes, as a subway map
References: <1310406999.23887.34257.camel@surprise> <4E1BF650.1010503@gnu.org> <ivh1g2$nbg$1@dough.gmane.org> <1310486854.23887.35650.camel@surprise> <4E1D6A21.3020005@gnu.org> <CAFiYyc3_Xt+NkmLBmx3cwkZ9syG6FCHqrBG6gh9ppbnTDwrOaQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/13/2011 12:54 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:

>  Yes, PROP_gimple_lcx needs to be added to PROP_trees.  I cannot approve the
>  patch, unfortunately.

Hm, why?  complex operations are lowered after a complex lowering pass
has executed.  they are still lowered on RTL, so I don't see why we need
to destroy them technically.

Because it's PROP_*gimple*_lcx. :)

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A visualization of GCC's passes, as a subway map
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- A visualization of GCC's passes, as a subway map
  - From: David Malcolm
- Re: A visualization of GCC's passes, as a subway map
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: A visualization of GCC's passes, as a subway map
  - From: Paulo J. Matos
- Re: A visualization of GCC's passes, as a subway map
  - From: David Malcolm
- Re: A visualization of GCC's passes, as a subway map
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: A visualization of GCC's passes, as a subway map
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]