This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?

From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Toon Moene <toon at moene dot org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:01:38 +0200
Subject: Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
References: <4E18B50E.2050402@moene.org> <mcroc10r0uo.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <1310424868.3000.108.camel@pc2.unassigned-domain> <201107120846.49211.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20110712065417.GA64529@adacore.com> <4E1BFB5B.30808@gnu.org>

> But apparently they already are (when building the compiler), otherwise

That's different: some parts of the run-time is used with a native compiler to
bootstrap GNAT.

The GNAT run-time is built separately using the target compiler (potentially
different from the native compiler), so bootstrapping and building the
run-time is done separately, using different compilers and different options.

Arno

References:
- C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Laurent GUERBY
- Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Arnaud Charlet
- Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]