This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Toon Moene <toon at moene dot org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:28:17 -0500
Subject: Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
References: <4E18B50E.2050402@moene.org> <mcr39ievj49.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <201107100930.54388.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <mcrliw4u5mx.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <20110711165302.GB64043@adacore.com>

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Arnaud Charlet <charlet@adacore.com> wrote:
>> When I configure with
>> ? ? --enable-build-with-cxx --enable-languages=c,c++,ada
>> I get the appended. ?The problem is that the Ada code is looking for C
>> symbol names but the names in the .o files are mangled for C++.
>
> Right, or rather than we want to use the C compiler to compile all those
> files (e.g. init.c, argv.c), not the C++ compiler.

Do you want a C compiler for that, or do you in fact just need an

   extern "C"

language specification for those symbols?  I would have thought the latter.

-- Gaby

References:
- C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]