This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: To Steering Committee: RFC for patch revert policy (PR48403, bootstrap broken on many targets)


On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 08:26 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>
>>> For i686-linux bootstraps it's hard to argue against it, but in general
>>> I find it easier to cope with the occasional broken tree than with
>>> getting patches reverted when you can't reproduce the failure.
>>
>> Maybe you find that easier, but auto-testers do not.
>
> The auto-testers serve the developers, not the other way round.

At least our ones were completely unaffected and appearantly
couldn't reproduce the bootstrap failure either.

Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]