This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code?

From: "McCall, Ronald SIK" <RMcCall at SIKORSKY dot COM>
To: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:25 -0400
Subject: RE: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code?
References: <21A301266F5A9F4C8347D252C108AE9D059981E1@UUSNWEG4.na.utcmail.com> <4D823F17.7040808@caviumnetworks.com> <21A301266F5A9F4C8347D252C108AE9D059981E4@UUSNWEG4.na.utcmail.com> <4D825234.6080704@caviumnetworks.com> <4D8252FB.7020505@redhat.com> <4D82617C.4020002@gmail.com>

> In particular, isn't it a known issue that 32-bit hosts and 64-bit hosts can
> generate different constant-loading sequences owing to the differing size of
> HOST_WIDE_INT?
>
> Was that 32-bit Solaris?
>
> cheers,
> DaveK

The system is 64-bit Solaris 9 but the native gcc is sparc-sun-solaris2.9 which I believe is 32-bit (sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9 is the 64-bit target if memory serves).

References:
- Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code?
  - From: McCall, Ronald SIK
- Re: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code?
  - From: David Daney
- Re: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code?
  - From: David Daney
- Re: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code?
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code?
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]