gcc archive
date index for March, 2011

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2011
23:01 gcc-4.5-20110331 is now available gccadmin
21:48 Re: Question about Temporary Outputs Ian Lance Taylor
21:30 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Dennis Clarke
21:12 Re: Question about Temporary Outputs Pranav Bhandarkar
21:07 Question about Temporary Outputs Iyer, Balaji V
16:00 Re: Use --format=pax for release? Ian Lance Taylor
15:39 Re: Use --format=pax for release? Joe Buck
13:45 Re: PING^2 [PATCH] Support for AMD64 targets running GNU/kFreeBSD Joseph S. Myers
12:32 Re: Supporting multiple pointer sizes in GCC Paulo J. Matos
12:09 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Joseph S. Myers
09:35 Re: PING^2 [PATCH] Support for AMD64 targets running GNU/kFreeBSD Robert Millan
08:31 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Rainer Orth
08:14 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Dennis Clarke
08:02 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Rainer Orth
07:46 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Paolo Bonzini
07:44 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Paolo Bonzini
07:20 Re: how can I split 1 mov insn into 2 sub_mov and 1 combine? Liu
07:07 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Dennis Clarke
07:03 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Jakub Jelinek
06:57 Re: how can I split 1 mov insn into 2 sub_mov and 1 combine? Ian Lance Taylor
06:45 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Ian Lance Taylor
06:38 Use --format=pax for release? Ian Lance Taylor
06:26 Re: how can I split 1 mov insn into 2 sub_mov and 1 combine? Liu
04:34 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Ryan Hill

March 30, 2011
20:40 Re: [C++-0X] User-defined literals Jason Merrill
17:29 On Cygwin build i try to use pex_win32 but do not work Bernd Roesch
16:42 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Richard Henderson
16:20 Re: Error in ira-color.c while bootstrap trunk Vladimir Makarov
15:54 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Joseph S. Myers
15:48 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Ian Lance Taylor
15:45 Re: how can I split 1 mov insn into 2 sub_mov and 1 combine? Ian Lance Taylor
15:34 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system DJ Delorie
15:19 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Bernd Roesch
15:16 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Joseph S. Myers
14:21 Re: Proposed solution for bug 44384, "builtin_object_size_ treatment of multidimensional arrays is unexpected" Mark Eklund
13:57 Error in ira-color.c while bootstrap trunk Revital Eres
13:37 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Tom Tromey
07:57 Re: Supporting multiple pointer sizes in GCC Claudiu Zissulescu
05:25 Re: how can I split 1 mov insn into 2 sub_mov and 1 combine? Liu

March 29, 2011
23:52 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Joseph S. Myers
23:48 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system DJ Delorie
23:45 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Joseph S. Myers
23:41 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Frank Ch. Eigler
23:33 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Ian Lance Taylor
23:29 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Joseph S. Myers
22:54 gcc-4.4-20110329 is now available gccadmin
22:50 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system Geoffrey Keating
22:28 Re: On the toplevel configure and build system DJ Delorie
21:52 On the toplevel configure and build system Joseph S. Myers
21:12 old software versions on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ Vincent Lefevre
21:01 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Richard Henderson
19:11 [google] Merged google/gcc-4_6 from 4.6.0 release Diego Novillo
18:36 Re: [C++-0X] User-defined literals, gsoc Levon Haykazyan
16:29 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released NightStrike
16:03 Re: GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES vs. libtool Paolo Bonzini
14:57 Re: Possible Bug Nathan Boley
14:46 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Dave Korn
14:40 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Rainer Orth
14:32 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Jakub Jelinek
14:24 Re: [C++-0X] User-defined literals, gsoc James Dennett
14:19 Re: GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES vs. libtool Ian Lance Taylor
14:17 Re: [C++-0X] User-defined literals, gsoc Ed Smith-Rowland
14:13 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Dave Korn
14:05 Re: [C++-0X] User-defined literals, gsoc Levon Haykazyan
13:30 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Guenther
12:54 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Dave Korn
12:50 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Dave Korn
12:45 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Sandiford
12:15 [CFARM] New Intel donated servers and hosting donation by IRILL Laurent GUERBY
11:33 Re: GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES vs. libtool Joseph S. Myers
07:51 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Bernd Roesch
06:12 Re: GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES vs. libtool Ralf Wildenhues
05:55 Re: GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES vs. libtool Ralf Wildenhues
05:39 GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES vs. libtool Ian Lance Taylor
00:14 [C++-0X] User-defined literals Ed Smith-Rowland

March 28, 2011
22:55 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Joe Buck
18:53 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released FX
17:37 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure! (gcc 4.6.x with -O3) Witold Baryluk
16:24 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions Ian Lance Taylor
16:02 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Kai Tietz
15:46 Re: GCC 4.6.0 Released Piotr Wyderski
15:13 Bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Art Haas
14:58 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jason Merrill
14:37 Re: Proposed solution for bug 44384, "builtin_object_size_ treatment of multidimensional arrays is unexpected" Richard Guenther
14:35 Re: Possible Bug Richard Guenther
14:01 [Fwd: GCC 4.6.0 Released] Dennis Clarke
13:54 Proposed solution for bug 44384, "builtin_object_size_ treatment of multidimensional arrays is unexpected" Mark Eklund
13:37 Re: Possible Bug Paolo Bonzini
12:27 Re: Possible Bug Michael Matz
12:14 RE: Supporting multiple pointer sizes in GCC Jayant R. Sonar
11:47 Re: Possible Bug Richard Guenther
11:36 Re: Possible Bug Paolo Bonzini
11:28 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions roy rosen
11:06 Re: Possible Bug Richard Guenther
10:42 Re: Possible Bug Paolo Bonzini
07:26 GCC 4.6.0 Released Jakub Jelinek
02:23 gcc vleihulu

March 27, 2011
19:49 gcc-4.3-20110327 is now available gccadmin
19:24 Re: GCC 4.6 Successful Build and Install tnut
18:37 Re: More links in release change list Jonathan Wakely
18:37 GCC 4.6 Successful Build and Install Guy M. Allard
16:59 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure! (gcc 4.6.x with -O3) Eric Botcazou
16:44 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure! (gcc 4.6.x with -O3) Andi Kleen
14:30 Bootstrap comparison failure! (gcc 4.6.x with -O3) Witold Baryluk
13:24 Re: Subscribe ? Gerald Pfeifer
11:39 Subscribe ? Josh Robinson
07:38 還有信用卡未付餘額嗎 點看看 新低利率方案簡單借款,輕鬆償還-請洽-0958-272-060陳先生Sat, 02 Apr 2011 01:14:16 -0400 3分鐘告知您可貸額度及最低利率!
04:28 Re: Possible Bug Ian Lance Taylor

March 26, 2011
22:56 gcc-4.7-20110326 is now available gccadmin
20:28 Re: A question on coding conventions Michael Matz
20:04 Possible Bug Nathan Boley
19:35 A question on coding conventions Levon Haykazyan
14:08 More links in release change list Jonathan Adamczewski
09:50 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
06:44 GCC 4.6.1 Status Report (2011-03-26) Jakub Jelinek
01:49 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Gabriel Dos Reis

March 25, 2011
22:54 gcc-4.6-20110325 is now available gccadmin
22:01 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
20:35 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Gabriel Dos Reis
19:51 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
18:51 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Gabriel Dos Reis
18:51 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Gabriel Dos Reis
18:07 Re: Supporting multiple pointer sizes in GCC DJ Delorie
18:03 Re: Using secondary reload to reload CONST_INT? Georg-Johann Lay
17:53 Re: Second GCC 4.6.0 release candidate is now available Nicola Pero
17:50 Re: Supporting multiple pointer sizes in GCC Paul Koning
17:39 Re: Second GCC 4.6.0 release candidate is now available Jakub Jelinek
17:37 Re: Supporting multiple pointer sizes in GCC DJ Delorie
17:28 Re: Second GCC 4.6.0 release candidate is now available Joe Buck
16:36 Re: Using secondary reload to reload CONST_INT? Richard Sandiford
15:47 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
15:17 Re: Second GCC 4.6.0 release candidate is now available Ramana Radhakrishnan
14:53 Sezon ÃrÃnleri, Teslimatta Ãdeme seÃeneÄi ile... Elit ic giyim
14:22 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
13:56 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
12:34 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Gabriel Dos Reis
12:33 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
12:31 Supporting multiple pointer sizes in GCC Jayant R. Sonar
12:27 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
12:17 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
12:01 Re: Serializing mixed gimple data from a plugin in LTO? Richard Guenther
11:53 Re: Serializing mixed gimple data from a plugin in LTO? Diego Novillo
11:51 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
11:43 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
11:35 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jason Merrill
11:07 Re: Using secondary reload to reload CONST_INT? Georg-Johann Lay
10:53 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Gabriel Dos Reis
10:52 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL James Dennett
10:27 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
10:13 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
10:07 Re: Serializing mixed gimple data from a plugin in LTO? Richard Guenther
07:37 Serializing mixed gimple data from a plugin in LTO? Basile Starynkevitch

March 24, 2011
22:58 gcc-4.5-20110324 is now available gccadmin
21:04 Re: Second GCC 4.6.0 release candidate is now available Michael Hope
19:50 Re: Complex vectorization Richard Henderson
17:38 mt-ospace usage in m32r and fr30 Paolo Bonzini
17:21 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions Ian Lance Taylor
15:46 Re: mov arguments are still the same Paulo J. Matos
14:47 Re: Complex vectorization Richard Guenther
13:50 Re: Complex vectorization Simon Chopin
12:59 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions roy rosen
12:53 gcno file question Joel Sherrill
11:55 Re: Complex vectorization Richard Guenther
11:42 Complex vectorization Simon Chopin
09:42 Modifying instruction flow during scheduling Frederic Riss
09:12 Re: Hints for backporting gcc 4.5 powerpc fix to gcc 4.4.3? Simon Baldwin
06:18 GSoC participation question Merinov Nikolay

March 23, 2011
20:02 Re: Pruning for torture tests? Joseph S. Myers
19:09 Re: Pruning for torture tests? Rainer Orth
18:53 Re: Pruning for torture tests? IainS
18:45 Re: Pruning for torture tests? Rainer Orth
18:37 Re: -Wconversion is very poor Jonathan Wakely
17:58 -Wconversion is very poor Lisp2D
17:18 Re: [pph] Adapting LTO streaming for front end AST saving Diego Novillo
16:56 Re: debugging Jan Kratochvil
16:51 Re: Target library disabling at toplevel Paolo Bonzini
16:49 Re: [pph] Adapting LTO streaming for front end AST saving Diego Novillo
16:39 Re: [pph] Adapting LTO streaming for front end AST saving Jan Hubicka
15:11 Re: [pph] Adapting LTO streaming for front end AST saving Diego Novillo
14:53 Re: [pph] Adapting LTO streaming for front end AST saving Richard Guenther
14:47 [pph] Adapting LTO streaming for front end AST saving Diego Novillo
14:41 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Sandiford
14:28 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Guenther
14:14 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Sandiford
13:14 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Guenther
13:01 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Sandiford
12:37 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Guenther
12:25 Re: Cross compiler build instructions - PowerPC Joseph S. Myers
12:18 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Sandiford
11:52 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Guenther
11:49 Re: Target library disabling at toplevel NightStrike
11:24 Re: Target library disabling at toplevel Richard Sandiford
10:38 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Sandiford
10:02 Re: Fw: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Ira Rosen
09:40 Re: coreutils fails to compile wih GCC 4.6.0-rc2 but compile fine with Jakub Jelinek
09:31 coreutils fails to compile wih GCC 4.6.0-rc2 but compile fine with tnut
09:23 Re: Using secondary reload to reload CONST_INT? Richard Sandiford
09:23 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Guenther
07:51 Re: debugging Jakub Jelinek
04:58 Cross compiler build instructions - PowerPC Rohit Arul Raj

March 22, 2011
23:28 gcc-4.4-20110322 is now available gccadmin
22:43 Re: Target library disabling at toplevel Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:29 Re: debugging Ian Lance Taylor
22:19 Re: debugging Andrew Pinski
22:16 debugging Mike Stump
22:07 Re: Target library disabling at toplevel Ian Lance Taylor
22:07 Re: Target library disabling at toplevel Joseph S. Myers
21:50 Re: Target library disabling at toplevel Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:51 Target library disabling at toplevel Joseph S. Myers
19:43 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Sandiford
18:42 Re: segmentation fault with fclose Jeremy Hall
17:10 Re: RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Guenther
16:52 RFC: Representing vector lane load/store operations Richard Sandiford
13:56 Re: Hints for backporting gcc 4.5 powerpc fix to gcc 4.4.3? David Edelsohn
13:25 Hints for backporting gcc 4.5 powerpc fix to gcc 4.4.3? Simon Baldwin
06:45 Re: Clarification on PowerPC64 Linux ABI Rohit Arul Raj
06:11 Re: Clarification on PowerPC64 Linux ABI Andrew Pinski
05:51 Clarification on PowerPC64 Linux ABI Rohit Arul Raj

March 21, 2011
23:26 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions Ian Lance Taylor
22:13 Second GCC 4.6.0 release candidate is now available Jakub Jelinek
20:53 Re: Executing already executed optimization passes again Niranjan Hasabnis
18:45 Re: Deprecating config-ml.in multilib selection options Richard Sandiford
18:33 Re: git mirror corrupted? Frank Ch. Eigler
17:21 Re: Using secondary reload to reload CONST_INT? Georg-Johann Lay
16:11 RE: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code? McCall, Ronald SIK
15:23 Re: Deprecating config-ml.in multilib selection options Andreas Schwab
14:42 Re: Deprecating config-ml.in multilib selection options Richard Earnshaw
14:37 Deprecating config-ml.in multilib selection options Joseph S. Myers
13:58 Re: Using secondary reload to reload CONST_INT? Denis Chertykov
11:24 Re: Using secondary reload to reload CONST_INT? Georg-Johann Lay
10:52 Re: X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
08:20 Re: X32 psABI status update Michael Matz
07:47 Re: Using secondary reload to reload CONST_INT? Denis Chertykov
06:55 Re: X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
05:53 Re: X32 psABI status update Mike Frysinger
05:35 Re: X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
05:09 Re: X32 psABI status update Mike Frysinger
04:50 Re: A problem of our Gcc mirror Harry Wei
03:47 Re: git mirror corrupted? H.J. Lu
00:10 Re: A problem of our Gcc mirror Gerald Pfeifer

March 20, 2011
23:01 Re: segmentation fault with fclose Jonathan Wakely
22:48 segmentation fault with fclose bd satish
19:48 gcc-4.3-20110320 is now available gccadmin
18:45 Re: Using secondary reload to reload CONST_INT? Andrew Pinski
17:04 Using secondary reload to reload CONST_INT? Georg-Johann Lay
14:59 Re: g++ 4.6 and suggested flags Jonathan Wakely
13:41 g++ 4.6 and suggested flags denis campredon
03:01 Re: A problem of our Gcc mirror Harry Wei

March 19, 2011
22:51 gcc-4.7-20110319 is now available gccadmin
20:52 Re: git mirror corrupted? Andreas Schwab
20:18 Re: A problem of our Gcc mirror Gerald Pfeifer
15:52 Re: [MELT] issue with the garbage collector Basile Starynkevitch
15:47 Re: git mirror corrupted? Frank Ch. Eigler
15:04 git mirror corrupted? Diego Novillo
05:37 Re: Enquiry on GSoC projects Jason Merrill
01:49 GNU MPFR 3.0.1 Release Candidate Vincent Lefevre
01:24 Re: Executing already executed optimization passes again Paul Koning
01:04 Executing already executed optimization passes again Niranjan Hasabnis
00:15 Re: Enquiry on GSoC projects Diego Novillo

March 18, 2011
23:56 Google Summer of Code 2011 - Call for Mentors Diego Novillo
23:01 gcc-4.6-20110318 is now available gccadmin
22:53 Enquiry on GSoC projects Levon Haykazyan
18:41 Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Diego Novillo
18:05 Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Andreas Schwab
16:31 Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Diego Novillo
16:27 Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Diego Novillo
16:01 Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Joseph S. Myers
15:56 Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Andreas Schwab
15:43 Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Diego Novillo
15:40 Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Paolo Carlini
15:36 Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Diego Novillo
15:30 Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Paolo Carlini
15:04 Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output Diego Novillo
14:50 Re: avr compilation Paulo J. Matos
14:20 Re: avr compilation Ian Lance Taylor
13:51 àààààà: ààààààààà : failure notice fiveissara
13:40 Re: avr compilation Paulo J. Matos
13:37 Re: avr compilation Paulo J. Matos
13:26 Re: avr compilation Georg-Johann Lay
12:42 RE: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code? McCall, Ronald SIK
12:11 Re: avr compilation David Brown
10:15 Re: avr compilation Paulo J. Matos
10:08 Re: avr compilation WANG.Jiong
08:48 avr compilation Paulo J. Matos
01:27 Re: âxref_tagâ lacks a public declaration Ian Lance Taylor

March 17, 2011
22:49 gcc-4.5-20110317 is now available gccadmin
22:29 [pph] Merged from trunk rev 171104 Diego Novillo
21:24 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
20:44 Re: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code? Joern Rennecke
20:13 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
20:10 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
20:00 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
19:41 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
19:40 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
19:34 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
19:31 Re: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code? Dave Korn
18:43 RE: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code? McCall, Ronald SIK
18:37 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
18:29 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
18:29 Re: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code? Jeff Law
18:26 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
18:26 Re: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code? David Daney
18:24 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
18:18 Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
18:09 [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
17:38 Re: X32 psABI status update Richard Henderson
17:04 Re: Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code? David Daney
17:00 Same cross-gcc toolchain on different hosts produces different target code? McCall, Ronald SIK
14:43 Re: X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
11:34 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions roy rosen
09:07 Re: âxref_tagâ lacks a public declaration Ludovic Courtès
06:11 Re: how can I split 1 mov insn into 2 sub_mov and 1 combine? WANG.Jiong
05:45 Re: X32 psABI status update Mike Frysinger
05:21 Re: X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
04:59 how can I split 1 mov insn into 2 sub_mov and 1 combine? Liu
02:57 Re: X32 psABI status update Mike Frysinger
02:51 Re: [HELP]: Name conflicting in dynamically loading shared libraries Ian Lance Taylor
02:32 [HELP]: Name conflicting in dynamically loading shared libraries Jovi Zhang
01:13 --enable-build-with-cxx and gcc 4.7 Jack Howarth

March 16, 2011
20:04 Re: fsf paperwork? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:19 mov arguments are still the same Paulo J. Matos
17:24 Re: âxref_tagâ lacks a public declaration Ian Lance Taylor
15:28 Re: âxref_tagâ lacks a public declaration Ludovic Courtès
15:17 Re: âxref_tagâ lacks a public declaration Ian Lance Taylor
14:54 Re: âxref_tagâ lacks a public declaration Ludovic Courtès
14:38 Re: âxref_tagâ lacks a public declaration Ian Lance Taylor
12:40 Re: X32 psABI status update Andreas Schwab
12:40 Re: X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
09:58 [MELT] issue with the garbage collector piervit
09:50 âxref_tagâ lacks a public declaration Ludovic Courtès
05:24 Re: X32 psABI status update Mike Frysinger
04:51 Re: X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
04:30 Re: X32 psABI status update Mike Frysinger
04:19 X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
04:17 Re: X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
02:07 Re: fsf paperwork? Richard Kenner
02:00 Re: fsf paperwork? Jack Howarth
01:56 Re: fsf paperwork? Dave Korn
01:53 Re: fsf paperwork? Dave Korn
00:54 Re: fsf paperwork? Jack Howarth
00:37 Re: fsf paperwork? Robert Dewar
00:34 Re: fsf paperwork? Ian Lance Taylor
00:11 Re: fsf paperwork? Jack Howarth
00:07 Re: fsf paperwork? Jack Howarth
00:05 Re: fsf paperwork? Robert Dewar
00:04 Re: fsf paperwork? Ian Lance Taylor

March 15, 2011
22:50 gcc-4.4-20110315 is now available gccadmin
20:25 Re: fsf paperwork? Florian Weimer
19:01 Re: fsf paperwork? Gregory Casamento
18:01 fsf paperwork? Jack Howarth
17:29 [pph] Merge from google/integration Diego Novillo

March 14, 2011
21:33 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
21:26 [google] Merged google/integration and google/main Diego Novillo
21:09 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Ian Lance Taylor
19:48 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
17:22 GCC 4.6.0 release candidate is now available Jakub Jelinek
17:21 GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-03-14) Jakub Jelinek
17:20 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
17:14 GCC 4.6.0 Status Report (2011-03-14) Jakub Jelinek
15:42 Re: Why IRA stores in frame, not in callee-saved reg? Jeff Law
15:09 gcc-4.7-20110314 is now available gccadmin
15:04 Re: is trunk in stage 4 (4.6) or in stage 1 (4.7) - file gcc/BASE-VER? Richard Guenther
15:01 is trunk in stage 4 (4.6) or in stage 1 (4.7) - file gcc/BASE-VER? Basile Starynkevitch
14:02 Re: Redhat branches at git mirror Jason Merrill

March 13, 2011
23:03 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
21:13 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
20:55 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
20:49 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
20:43 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
20:43 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Steven Bosscher
20:41 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
20:38 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Steven Bosscher
20:03 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
19:56 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
19:49 gcc-4.3-20110313 is now available gccadmin
19:48 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Chris Lattner
19:47 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Chris Lattner
19:45 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Chris Lattner
19:43 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Steven Bosscher
19:11 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
19:07 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jan Hubicka
19:05 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
18:59 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Chris Lattner
18:55 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Chris Lattner
18:54 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Ian Lance Taylor
18:35 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
18:26 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
18:19 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Chris Lattner
15:38 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
11:39 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jan Hubicka
07:52 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth
07:52 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Chris Lattner
07:35 Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Ian Lance Taylor
04:17 darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 Jack Howarth

March 12, 2011
22:50 gcc-4.6-20110312 is now available gccadmin

March 11, 2011
16:03 Re: Inline param docs up-to-date? Richard Guenther
16:00 Inline param docs up-to-date? Benjamin Redelings
15:17 Re: New blank line after 'all warnings being treated as errors' Richard Guenther
14:33 Re: New blank line after 'all warnings being treated as errors' Diego Novillo
12:54 Re: New blank line after 'all warnings being treated as errors' Richard Guenther
11:32 Redhat branches at git mirror Kirill A. Shutemov
03:41 New blank line after 'all warnings being treated as errors' Diego Novillo
03:31 Re: Liqin Chen now maintainer of SCORE port Liqin Chen

March 10, 2011
23:10 Re: pr45055 on non-scheduling targets... Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:52 gcc-4.5-20110310 is now available gccadmin
17:59 Re: Handling strictness in {predicates,constraints}.md [was: Re: Converting CRIS to constraints.md] Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:42 Re: Handling strictness in {predicates,constraints}.md [was: Re: Converting CRIS to constraints.md] Eric Botcazou
17:33 Re: Handling strictness in {predicates,constraints}.md [was: Re: Converting CRIS to constraints.md] Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:14 Re: RFC: target hook to reverse bitfield allocations DJ Delorie
16:55 Re: Handling strictness in {predicates,constraints}.md [was: Re: Converting CRIS to constraints.md] Paolo Bonzini
15:47 Handling strictness in {predicates,constraints}.md [was: Re: Converting CRIS to constraints.md] Nathan Froyd
15:07 Re: latent issues with stack_ties on ppc ? Olivier Hainque
13:31 Re: RFC: target hook to reverse bitfield allocations Michael Matz
13:06 ACCOUNT VERIFICATION Elavon-Inc.
04:25 Re: RFC: target hook to reverse bitfield allocations Joern Rennecke
03:06 Re: RFC: target hook to reverse bitfield allocations DJ Delorie
02:58 Re: RFC: target hook to reverse bitfield allocations DJ Delorie
02:05 Re: RFC: target hook to reverse bitfield allocations Paul Koning
01:52 Re: RFC: target hook to reverse bitfield allocations Ian Lance Taylor
01:34 Re: RFC: target hook to reverse bitfield allocations DJ Delorie
00:44 Re: RFC: target hook to reverse bitfield allocations Ian Lance Taylor
00:39 Re: pattern problem with register assignment Ian Lance Taylor

March 09, 2011
22:45 RFC: target hook to reverse bitfield allocations DJ Delorie
21:32 Re: pattern problem with register assignment Christian Grössler
20:48 Re: Using cc (question from avr) Paul Koning
20:39 Re: Using cc (question from avr) Georg-Johann Lay
17:11 Re: Why IRA stores in frame, not in callee-saved reg? Vladimir Makarov
16:48 Using cc (question from avr) Paulo J. Matos
16:07 Tutorial on Essential Abstractions in GCC Uday P. Khedker
15:14 Re: Why IRA stores in frame, not in callee-saved reg? Georg-Johann Lay
14:28 Re: Using GCC bugzilla for MELT specific bugs? Richard Guenther
14:18 Using GCC bugzilla for MELT specific bugs? Basile Starynkevitch
07:08 Re: gcc4.1.2 and 4.3.2 has different default behavior Ian Lance Taylor
06:15 Re: debug & trace printing from GCC plugins (& MELT extensions) Basile Starynkevitch
04:54 gcc4.1.2 and 4.3.2 has different default behavior Yixuan Huang

March 08, 2011
22:59 gcc-4.4-20110308 is now available gccadmin
21:36 Re: Why IRA stores in frame, not in callee-saved reg? Vladimir Makarov
21:08 Re: debug & trace printing from GCC plugins (& MELT extensions) Dave Korn
16:03 Re: Why IRA stores in frame, not in callee-saved reg? Jeff Law
12:04 Re: __builtin_clzll and uintmax_t Joern Rennecke
11:36 Re: Why IRA stores in frame, not in callee-saved reg? Georg-Johann Lay
09:35 Re: gengtype state & srcdir??? Laurynas Biveinis

March 07, 2011
23:44 The Linux binutils 2.21.51.0.7 is released H.J. Lu
21:33 Re: X32 psABI status update Mike Frysinger
18:45 [cxx-mem-model] new branch, new project Aldy Hernandez
18:32 Re: how to generate x86 "narrowing" divide instruction Ian Lance Taylor
18:12 Re: how to generate x86 "narrowing" divide instruction Uros Bizjak
17:10 Why IRA stores in frame, not in callee-saved reg? Georg-Johann Lay
16:10 gengtype state & srcdir??? Basile Starynkevitch
15:40 debug & trace printing from GCC plugins (& MELT extensions) Basile Starynkevitch
15:19 Re: Perhaps a mailing list for plugins (& other GCC extensions) is needed? Diego Novillo
15:17 Re: Perhaps a mailing list for plugins (& other GCC extensions) is needed? Richard Guenther
15:03 Perhaps a mailing list for plugins (& other GCC extensions) is needed? Basile Starynkevitch
10:52 GCC 4.6.0 Status Report (2011-03-07) Richard Guenther
09:59 how to generate x86 "narrowing" divide instruction Jay Foad
05:25 Re: gcc 4.5.2 configuration issues Ian Lance Taylor
03:29 RE: gcc 4.5.2 configuration issues Gururaj, Rao
00:37 Re: "White paper" about GCC front-end internals Asm warrior

March 06, 2011
21:30 "White paper" about GCC front-end internals Andi Hellmund
19:48 gcc-4.3-20110306 is now available gccadmin
18:15 Bug detecting AMD K6-2+ with -march=native ? Stroller
17:29 Re: X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
15:30 Re: -flto tests don't pick up libgloss code at link time H.J. Lu
14:52 Re: __builtin_clzll and uintmax_t Jakub Jelinek
14:52 Re: -flto tests don't pick up libgloss code at link time Anthony Green
14:10 Re: -flto tests don't pick up libgloss code at link time H.J. Lu
13:58 Re: -flto tests don't pick up libgloss code at link time Dave Korn
08:57 Re: __builtin_clzll and uintmax_t Marc Glisse
08:10 Re: RFC: [4.7] Adding CUMULATIVE_ARGS to targetm.calls.function_ok_for_sibcall? Paolo Bonzini
07:29 -flto tests don't pick up libgloss code at link time Anthony Green

March 05, 2011
22:49 gcc-4.6-20110305 is now available gccadmin
22:05 Re: __builtin_clzll and uintmax_t FX
21:05 __builtin_clzll and uintmax_t Marc Glisse
19:08 X32 psABI status update H.J. Lu
07:15 new mirror in Nicosia, Cyprus Grigory Rayskin

March 04, 2011
15:10 Re: GCC_FOR_TARGET settings being overridden by toplevel Makefile Diego Novillo
15:07 Re: GCC_FOR_TARGET settings being overridden by toplevel Makefile Paolo Bonzini
15:03 Re: GCC_FOR_TARGET settings being overridden by toplevel Makefile Diego Novillo
07:38 Re: GCC_FOR_TARGET settings being overridden by toplevel Makefile Paolo Bonzini
07:20 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Liu

March 03, 2011
22:56 gcc-4.5-20110303 is now available gccadmin
18:57 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Dave Korn
18:13 Re: RFC: [4.7] Adding CUMULATIVE_ARGS to targetm.calls.function_ok_for_sibcall? Georg-Johann Lay
17:57 Re: new libjava bootstrap failure Dave Korn
16:31 Re: RFC: [4.7] Adding CUMULATIVE_ARGS to targetm.calls.function_ok_for_sibcall? Joern Rennecke
16:27 Re: GCC_FOR_TARGET settings being overridden by toplevel Makefile Diego Novillo
13:52 RFC: [4.7] Adding CUMULATIVE_ARGS to targetm.calls.function_ok_for_sibcall? Georg-Johann Lay
09:12 Re: TYPE_UID(node) macro value Michael Matz
08:27 Re: GCC_FOR_TARGET settings being overridden by toplevel Makefile Paolo Bonzini
06:41 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Liu
03:09 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Ian Lance Taylor
02:48 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Liu
02:16 Re: gcc restores wrong stack pointer value? Richard Henderson
02:05 Re: gcc restores wrong stack pointer value? DJ Delorie
01:56 Re: gcc restores wrong stack pointer value? Richard Henderson
01:49 Re: gcc restores wrong stack pointer value? DJ Delorie
01:27 Re: gcc restores wrong stack pointer value? Richard Henderson

March 02, 2011
23:56 Re: gcc restores wrong stack pointer value? DJ Delorie
23:53 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Richard Henderson
23:44 Re: gcc restores wrong stack pointer value? Richard Henderson
21:38 Re: new libjava bootstrap failure Ralf Wildenhues
21:01 Re: GCC_FOR_TARGET settings being overridden by toplevel Makefile Ian Lance Taylor
20:59 Re: TYPE_UID(node) macro value Ian Lance Taylor
19:20 GCC_FOR_TARGET settings being overridden by toplevel Makefile Diego Novillo
18:54 Re: TYPE_UID(node) macro value Kyle Girard
18:32 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Ian Lance Taylor
17:13 Re: TYPE_UID(node) macro value Michael Matz
17:08 Re: new libjava bootstrap failure Jack Howarth
17:06 TYPE_UID(node) macro value Kyle Girard
15:48 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Nathan Froyd
15:15 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Ian Lance Taylor
14:58 Re: Add a Score gcc maintainer David Edelsohn
14:07 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Dave Korn
13:54 Re: Add a Score gcc maintainer Liqin Chen
13:09 Re: Add a Score gcc maintainer Richard Guenther
13:07 Add a Score gcc maintainer Qin wei
07:57 Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? Liu
06:16 Re: new libjava bootstrap failure Ralf Wildenhues
05:28 Re: new libjava bootstrap failure Dave Korn
05:10 Re: new libjava bootstrap failure Jack Howarth
04:59 Re: new libjava bootstrap failure Dave Korn
03:23 new libjava bootstrap failure Jack Howarth

March 01, 2011
23:20 Liqin Chen now maintainer of SCORE port Mark Mitchell
23:05 Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 Steve Ellcey
22:56 gcc-4.4-20110301 is now available gccadmin
21:45 Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 Ian Lance Taylor
20:23 [ARM] Cortex-M3 multiply costs Alexandre Pereira Nunes
17:34 Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 Steve Ellcey
15:58 Re: gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass? Denis Chertykov
15:27 Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again Andrew Stubbs
10:10 Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 Richard Guenther
04:13 Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again Guillem Jover
01:14 Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 Steve Ellcey
00:17 Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 Richard Henderson
00:13 Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again Steve Langasek


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3