This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Can You Put Comments Into GCC Compiler Options Files?

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:51:45 -0800
Subject: Re: Can You Put Comments Into GCC Compiler Options Files?
References: <mcrhbbv2anx.fsf@google.com> <xnlj16d43n.fsf@greed.delorie.com> <4D65D4A9.2060705@gmail.com> <201102240356.p1O3udp9027803@greed.delorie.com> <4D665979.40202@gmail.com> <201102241429.p1OETuNh016782@greed.delorie.com>

DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

>>   Couldn't GCC (and binutils) on djgpp set
>> _CRT0_FLAG_DISALLOW_RESPONSE_FILES so that GCC's routines get used
>> to expand the response files instead of the runtime's routines?
>
> I suppose it could.  I'm not sure how much confusion that would cause
> (probably little if any), but as long as djgpp users don't break if
> they *don't* use comments, I don't see the harm in it.

Is it really worth worrying about this?  Are comments in response files
really of much value?

Ian

References:
- Re: Can You Put Comments Into GCC Compiler Options Files?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Can You Put Comments Into GCC Compiler Options Files?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Can You Put Comments Into GCC Compiler Options Files?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Can You Put Comments Into GCC Compiler Options Files?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Can You Put Comments Into GCC Compiler Options Files?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Can You Put Comments Into GCC Compiler Options Files?
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]