Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions

[Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> In the past few days, something has regressed
>>>> on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures
>>>> and ~100 of those were LTO related.  David Korn's
>>>> patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 169504
>>>> has 2231 failures.
> Were you able to test whether or not the ira-costs.c patch was the cause
> of these problems?  It's been problematical elsewhere and it wouldn't
> take much more than a nudge to for me to pull it given its ability to
> uncover latent problems.
> 
>> This is for revision 169231.  So it looks like that caused
>> the failures.
OK.  I'm going to take a looksie.  As long as it isn't something I've
already fixed or some dumb bug elsewhere, the plan is to pull the
ira-costs patch and revisit it in stage1.


jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNUEv/AAoJEBRtltQi2kC7WPQH+QGJOYGd3xLGqj0tx7ObT2GZ
7xvwUc8xHdKhnp/ltLyl2mb4SUmnhD0OQ5UXEQPD6jtDJmS3Xh2RO/LnmD0vo9Nb
TwvPvgq4ilR67hY2SvDAaHqHnclV4BAfVjhIKdRM3AZxO+a+ufTGJtTm7VZ8AiHO
531EDvrr7KCKTZRQqj2zqZWo/bO/Z1RjbX0BNV0B641OwP5Ng5md1XnGaNSPI3wq
4oSLfhFcm4YFYlxOqrmtJkHZHHOADNmpRHIRUbg/qC8quLr48v56wk4Bmn60x3/B
w0ldVZJqGg5Y0tyvpAdgYAzsNI7cQledwRJyLC1wiQWs2JzIztaGN6VkIWxo/HU=
=iM9P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----