This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:51:50 -0600
- Subject: Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions
- References: <4D4967D5.8010302@oarcorp.com> <4D501070.7020103@redhat.com>
On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi,
In the past few days, something has regressed
on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures
and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's
patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 169504
has 2231 failures.
Were you able to test whether or not the ira-costs.c patch was the cause
of these problems? It's been problematical elsewhere and it wouldn't
take much more than a nudge to for me to pull it given its ability to
uncover latent problems.
This is for revision 169231. So it looks like that caused
the failures.
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 67735
# of unexpected failures 635
# of expected failures 227
# of unresolved testcases 50
# of unsupported tests 1233
jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNUBBwAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7A38H/0xhcKeVjAZm1R2XL/t0W99K
U21D+Rn+Un0NeO0KaVr8SrpZZ2Nfyfrt62TqvyCjK6UuvBPlu8NNK1C7GBcR1gZQ
yZHVt99hyYChpBosFnRm/kef0736E9CNLzd1IQBWXTv9X0RJPyR8NdIUEnYNG9st
hj2+xHDOUR4JFdWxaObZlzFcJkQOSfd1m0oe5uUHaCLG2XDhwvVGj6z7tBL22+XC
J00oDcMPV/5Hm4xGv8rJ+rOezS7wvn1ifjAfy2NkhKqH5nR+wr6Z4l0o2VYb04kv
LU8eNo5Z4bVSXHNXH/LPUXaBRbYxU1KyBp8Fx+oEyrh6P8PuaTb4IHK5Xi4MOlY=
=sQGQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research& Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985