This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 4.6 release date
On Monday 17 of January 2011 16:32:32 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> 2011/1/17 Pawel Sikora :
> >
> > will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account?
> > i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x features in my code base
> > with 4.5 and would be nice to have 4.6 with the same c++0x subset working.
>
> You can look at the priority field in bugzilla. If they have priority
> P1 then it means they should be fixed before 4.6 can be released e.g.
> PR 47067. If they aren't P1 (or there is no PR) then they won't block
> the release.
i think about these 3 regressions:
Bug 46552 - [4.6 Regression][C++0x] Internal compiler error on pointer to member variable with template.
Bug 47311 - [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502.
Bug 47317 - [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in fixed_type_or_null.
they have P3 prio but afaics the P1/P2 are used for serious regressions in released code.
c++0x implementation is still an experimental compiler feautre.
can we raise a prio for expreimental feature regression?