This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 4.6 release date

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Pawel Sikora <pluto at agmk dot net>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:32:32 +0000
Subject: Re: gcc 4.6 release date
References: <AANLkTikqzs5B2=ySopkm0GPGGyiVD59gadrbyJjgcLpS@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=Dvr2h9ivzA3uqptvPQe8KQJBJDYgbchfDW3MP@mail.gmail.com> <201101171204.15246.pluto@agmk.net>

2011/1/17 Pawel Sikora :
>
> will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account?
> i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x features in my code base
> with 4.5 and would be nice to have 4.6 with the same c++0x subset working.

You can look at the priority field in bugzilla. If they have priority
P1 then it means they should be fixed before 4.6 can be released e.g.
PR 47067. If they aren't P1 (or there is no PR) then they won't block
the release.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 4.6 release date
  - From: Pawel Sikora

References:
- gcc 4.6 release date
  - From: Mehmet Sinan Şahin
- Re: gcc 4.6 release date
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: gcc 4.6 release date
  - From: Pawel Sikora

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]