This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
October 31, 2010
October 30, 2010
October 29, 2010
October 28, 2010
October 27, 2010
19:54 | Re: Constant propagation and CSE | Frederic Riss |
19:26 | Re: Constant propagation and CSE | Jeff Law |
19:21 | Sorry for abrupt departure | Jeff Law |
18:16 | Re: Constant propagation and CSE | Frederic Riss |
18:06 | Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? | Nathan Froyd |
17:36 | Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? | Frédéric RISS |
17:30 | GCC 4.6.0 Status Report (2010-10-27) | Jakub Jelinek |
14:56 | Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead | Paolo Bonzini |
14:30 | Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead | Georg Lay |
11:38 | Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead | Paolo Bonzini |
11:35 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Dave Korn |
11:10 | gengtype installation (where, how)? | Basile Starynkevitch |
10:54 | Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead | Georg Lay |
08:44 | Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? | Jon Beniston |
06:48 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Joakim Tjernlund |
02:02 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Alan Modra |
October 26, 2010
October 25, 2010
October 24, 2010
21:15 | Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend | Paolo Bonzini |
19:49 | gcc-4.3-20101024 is now available | gccadmin |
19:11 | Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend | H.J. Lu |
15:15 | Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend | Dave Korn |
14:59 | Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend | Joseph S. Myers |
07:09 | Discussion about merging Go frontend | Ian Lance Taylor |
October 23, 2010
22:49 | gcc-4.6-20101023 is now available | gccadmin |
20:32 | Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead | Paolo Bonzini |
15:22 | Re: G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++ | Michael Eager |
07:11 | Re: G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++ | Ralf Wildenhues |
October 22, 2010
October 21, 2010
22:52 | gcc-4.5-20101021 is now available | gccadmin |
20:42 | Describing multi-register values in RTL | Frederic Riss |
19:38 | Re: __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ | Jonathan Wakely |
18:54 | Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead | Ian Lance Taylor |
18:22 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Michael Meissner |
18:18 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Gunther Nikl |
17:52 | __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ | Neal Becker |
14:49 | Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? | Nathan Froyd |
13:58 | Stadyum Derbi Özel Reklam Teklifi | Esra ALTAŞ |
12:14 | Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? | Frederic Riss |
10:21 | Re: GCC RTX generation question | Radu Hobincu |
09:06 | peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead | Georg Lay |
00:48 | Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC | Jie Zhang |
October 20, 2010
20:09 | Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC | Pat Haugen |
15:47 | Re: GCC RTX generation question | Ian Lance Taylor |
15:16 | Re: GCC RTX generation question | Radu Hobincu |
09:13 | Re: old aliasing bug: fixed? | Richard Guenther |
09:02 | Re: Hooks, macros and target configuration | Richard Guenther |
08:29 | Re: old aliasing bug: fixed? | Albert Cahalan |
October 19, 2010
October 18, 2010
October 17, 2010
23:40 | Re: some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code | Gerald Pfeifer |
21:36 | Re: some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code | Jonathan Wakely |
21:34 | Re: some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code | Jonathan Wakely |
21:17 | some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code | Basile Starynkevitch |
20:45 | please help on makefile bug in MELT (plugin, not branch) | Basile Starynkevitch |
19:50 | gcc-4.3-20101017 is now available | gccadmin |
19:33 | Re: LTO symtabs inconsistency | Dave Korn |
18:22 | Re: LTO symtabs inconsistency | Jan Hubicka |
16:44 | Re: Who owns config.rpath? | Gerald Pfeifer |
October 16, 2010
23:35 | Re: LTO symtabs inconsistency | Dave Korn |
23:06 | gcc-4.6-20101016 is now available | gccadmin |
22:15 | Re: [trunk] hard-reg-set.h not installed in plugins/include | Basile Starynkevitch |
21:29 | Re: [trunk] hard-reg-set.h not installed in plugins/include | Basile Starynkevitch |
21:15 | [trunk] hard-reg-set.h not installed in plugins/include | Basile Starynkevitch |
19:57 | LTO symtabs inconsistency | Dave Korn |
16:54 | Re: dropping gccbug | Joseph S. Myers |
13:55 | dropping gccbug | Andi Kleen |
11:58 | -isysroot option ignored for crosscompiler? | Uros Bizjak |
October 15, 2010
16:45 | rehearsal of GCC Summit tutorial "Easily coding a GCC extension with MELT" (at IRILL, Paris, France oct.20th 2010) | Basile Starynkevitch |
15:39 | Re: LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF | Dave Korn |
09:53 | Re: LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF | Dave Korn |
00:14 | Re: check_cxa_atexit_available | Mark Mitchell |
October 14, 2010
October 13, 2010
23:50 | Re: show size of stack needed by functions | Ian Lance Taylor |
23:09 | "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit | Luke A. Guest |
22:43 | Re: show size of stack needed by functions | Eric Botcazou |
22:22 | Re: show size of stack needed by functions | Richard Guenther |
22:18 | Re: Trouble doing bootstrap | Dave Korn |
22:16 | Re: show size of stack needed by functions | Sebastian |
22:15 | Re: show size of stack needed by functions | Richard Guenther |
21:55 | Re: show size of stack needed by functions | Joe Buck |
21:43 | Re: show size of stack needed by functions | Sebastian |
21:34 | Trouble doing bootstrap | Paul Koning |
20:23 | Re: show size of stack needed by functions | H.J. Lu |
20:15 | Re: show size of stack needed by functions | Ian Lance Taylor |
20:05 | show size of stack needed by functions | Sebastian |
07:13 | Re: GCSE problem on a gcc testsuite | Eric Botcazou |
04:29 | GCSE problem on a gcc testsuite | johnc |
October 12, 2010
22:51 | gcc-4.4-20101012 is now available | gccadmin |
22:38 | Re: *_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP macros | Ian Lance Taylor |
21:58 | Re: Bootstrap errors on i386-pc-solaris2.10 bisected | H.J. Lu |
21:47 | Bootstrap errors on i386-pc-solaris2.10 bisected | Art Haas |
20:06 | Dragonegg-2.8 released | Duncan Sands |
17:08 | Re: gcov for assembly | Holger Blasum |
16:14 | Gcc Summit - room share | James Lemke |
14:32 | Re: Insert new global declaration to Gimple | Hongtao |
14:11 | Insert new global declaration to Gimple | Hongtao |
13:18 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Joakim Tjernlund |
09:01 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Joakim Tjernlund |
05:47 | rgthydhgrfgh | gingerab68 |
October 11, 2010
20:06 | Re: Bootstrap failures on sparc/x86 solaris2.10 machines | Rainer Orth |
19:58 | Re: DECL_SOURCE_LINE of else | Ian Lance Taylor |
19:55 | Re: unsupported symbol binding (probably GOLD related) when building trunk? | Ian Lance Taylor |
19:08 | GNAT ARM EABI ZCX, possible stopper needs clarification | Luke A. Guest |
16:07 | Bootstrap failures on sparc/x86 solaris2.10 machines | Art Haas |
15:47 | DECL_SOURCE_LINE of else | Peter Jensen |
14:54 | Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? | Gary Funck |
14:23 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Joakim Tjernlund |
12:59 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Alan Modra |
09:33 | unsupported symbol binding (probably GOLD related) when building trunk? | Basile Starynkevitch |
06:26 | Re: gcov for assembly | ravi s |
00:04 | Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) | Basile Starynkevitch |
October 10, 2010
21:04 | Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) | Eric Botcazou |
20:18 | Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) | Matthias Klose |
19:58 | Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) | Kalle Olavi Niemitalo |
19:58 | Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) | Basile Starynkevitch |
19:52 | gcc-4.3-20101010 is now available | gccadmin |
19:25 | Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) | Marc Glisse |
18:07 | forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) | Basile Starynkevitch |
15:47 | Re: ICE with GCC-4.5.1-20100708 | Angelo Graziosi |
13:31 | Re: ICE with GCC-4.5.1-20100708 | NightStrike |
09:22 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Joakim Tjernlund |
09:10 | Re: MIPS64 GCC not building at r165246 | Richard Sandiford |
04:46 | MIPS64 GCC not building at r165246 | David Daney |
October 09, 2010
22:57 | gcc-4.6-20101009 is now available | gccadmin |
20:53 | Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? | Florian Weimer |
20:10 | Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
19:35 | Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? | Jakub Jelinek |
19:23 | Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
16:32 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Joakim Tjernlund |
03:22 | Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? | Geert Bosch |
01:40 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Dave Korn |
01:36 | Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? | Dave Korn |
00:42 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Richard Guenther |
October 08, 2010
October 07, 2010
October 06, 2010
23:55 | Re: constant string changed | Robert Dewar |
22:55 | Re: constant string changed | Matt Thomas |
22:02 | Re: constant string changed | Robert Dewar |
21:43 | Re: constant string changed | Richard Guenther |
21:34 | Re: constant string changed | Phung Nguyen |
20:33 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Matt Thomas |
15:04 | Re: constant string changed | Jakub Jelinek |
14:59 | constant string changed | Phung Nguyen |
13:52 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Ian Lance Taylor |
08:41 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Joakim Tjernlund |
08:15 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Gabriel Paubert |
07:56 | Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data | Joakim Tjernlund |
06:40 | LLVM 2.8 Release | Chris Lattner |
01:10 | contacte-me | Ho Chen Tung |
00:34 | Re: *_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP macros | DJ Delorie |
00:29 | Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup | H.J. Lu |
October 05, 2010
October 04, 2010
October 03, 2010
20:28 | Re: Problem in bootstrapping on mingw | NightStrike |
19:53 | gcc-4.3-20101003 is now available | gccadmin |
19:04 | Re: RFE: 'enable checking' as a GCC compilation switch? | Ian Lance Taylor |
18:34 | RFE: 'enable checking' as a GCC compilation switch? | Gary Funck |
13:04 | GCC 4.4.5 Released | Jakub Jelinek |
11:48 | Re: Who owns config.rpath? | Dave Korn |
11:24 | Re: Who owns config.rpath? | Ralf Wildenhues |
11:19 | Who owns config.rpath? | Dave Korn |
10:05 | Re: Problem in bootstrapping on mingw | FX |
09:23 | Re: Problem in bootstrapping on mingw | FX |
08:43 | Re: Problem in bootstrapping on mingw | Kai Tietz |
08:34 | Problem in bootstrapping on mingw | FX |
07:41 | Re: toplevel *again* out of sync | DJ Delorie |
October 02, 2010
23:03 | Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup | H.J. Lu |
22:53 | gcc-4.6-20101002 is now available | gccadmin |
20:01 | [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup | Richard Henderson |
17:50 | Re: Range-based for in c++98 | Rodrigo Rivas |
16:44 | Re: make recheck? | Diego Novillo |
15:55 | Re: make recheck? | Ralf Wildenhues |
15:47 | Re: make recheck? | NightStrike |
14:03 | Re: toplevel *again* out of sync | Paolo Bonzini |
12:40 | Re: toplevel *again* out of sync | Ralf Wildenhues |
09:55 | make recheck? | Ralf Wildenhues |
09:18 | Re: toplevel *again* out of sync | Ralf Wildenhues |
08:47 | toplevel *again* out of sync | Paolo Bonzini |
October 01, 2010
20:40 | Re: gcc-testresults submissions | Sean McGovern |
18:06 | Re: gcc-testresults submissions | Andreas Schwab |
18:02 | Re: gcc-testresults submissions | Richard Henderson |
17:59 | gcc-testresults submissions | Sean McGovern |
15:49 | Re: Range-based for in c++98 | Jason Merrill |
12:29 | GCC 4.4.5 Status Report (2010-10-01) | Jakub Jelinek |
09:11 | building gcc-4.3.5 for sh-elf --with-newlib --enable-language="c,c++" | Fabio Giovagnini |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]