gcc archive
date index for October, 2010

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

October 31, 2010
19:53 RE: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Weddington, Eric
19:47 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Gerald Pfeifer
19:46 gcc-4.3-20101031 is now available gccadmin
19:33 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Steven Bosscher
19:28 Re: dual result function & ABI (using extra register), e.g. for Go Ian Lance Taylor
19:13 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Ian Lance Taylor
19:10 Re: dual result function & ABI (using extra register), e.g. for Go Joern Rennecke
19:09 PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Ian Lance Taylor
18:59 dual result function & ABI (using extra register), e.g. for Go Basile Starynkevitch
18:57 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity H.J. Lu
18:47 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
18:42 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Ian Lance Taylor
18:40 Re: TARGET_VALID_POINTER_MODE unused? Ian Lance Taylor
18:39 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Florian Weimer
18:05 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
17:55 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
17:53 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
11:27 CASES'10 paper related to MILEPOST GCC Grigori Fursin

October 30, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.6-20101030 is now available gccadmin
22:28 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity H.J. Lu
21:37 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Frank Ch. Eigler
21:12 RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity H.J. Lu
18:37 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
18:24 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Richard Henderson
18:14 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
18:06 RE: A Framework for GCC Plug-ins Grigori Fursin
17:58 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Richard Henderson
16:26 [PATCH] Enable linker plugin for windows [was Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend] Dave Korn
15:57 Re: TARGET_VALID_POINTER_MODE unused? Paul Koning
15:05 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
10:21 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
07:57 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Paolo Bonzini
07:53 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
03:30 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend H.J. Lu
00:23 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Richard Henderson
00:15 Re: Help with reloading FP + offset addressing mode Joern Rennecke

October 29, 2010
23:39 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
23:20 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend H.J. Lu
23:15 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
22:40 Re: gcc's(4.4.3) math lib :power Paolo Carlini
22:35 gcc's(4.4.3) math lib :power eric lin
21:48 Re: TARGET_VALID_POINTER_MODE unused? Andrew Pinski
21:28 TARGET_VALID_POINTER_MODE unused? Paul Koning
19:52 Re: Preprocessor (cpp) separate binary Ian Lance Taylor
18:12 GCC Summit 2010 papers and presentations Diego Novillo
17:39 RE: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Jon Beniston
16:36 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
16:18 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
15:53 Re: Preprocessor (cpp) separate binary Basile Starynkevitch
15:46 Re: Preprocessor (cpp) separate binary Artem Shinkarov
15:21 Re: Preprocessor (cpp) separate binary Ian Lance Taylor
15:17 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
15:09 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
15:00 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
14:55 Re: g++ produces crazy code for STL container Ian Lance Taylor
14:50 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Mark Mitchell
14:34 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Jack Howarth
14:16 Preprocessor (cpp) separate binary Artem Shinkarov
14:03 Re: define_split Ian Lance Taylor
13:50 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
13:45 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
13:43 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
13:31 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Richard Guenther
13:19 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Jack Howarth
11:10 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend IainS
09:54 g++ produces crazy code for STL container Zeev Tarantov
08:32 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
06:58 Benchmarks for Pointer Analysis Swaroop Joshi
04:04 Re: Help with reloading FP + offset addressing mode Mohamed Shafi
03:35 Re: define_split roy rosen
02:53 Re: define_split Ian Lance Taylor
01:33 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
01:32 A Framework for GCC Plug-ins Justin Seyster
00:33 Re: simple for loop on g++ 4.4.3 Jonathan Wakely

October 28, 2010
23:41 simple for loop on g++ 4.4.3 eric lin
22:52 gcc-4.5-20101028 is now available gccadmin
22:38 Re: Fwd: NEW GCC build failure, HEAD@166030 on native Paolo Bonzini
22:35 Fwd: NEW GCC build failure, HEAD@166030 on native Andrew Pinski
18:57 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
15:09 Re: Is Ada 2005 Issue AI-0157 implemented correctly in GCC 4.6.0? Arnaud Charlet
14:24 Help with reloading FP + offset addressing mode Mohamed Shafi
13:58 Re: Is Ada 2005 Issue AI-0157 implemented correctly in GCC 4.6.0? John Marino
13:47 Re: Is Ada 2005 Issue AI-0157 implemented correctly in GCC 4.6.0? Robert Dewar
13:37 Is Ada 2005 Issue AI-0157 implemented correctly in GCC 4.6.0? John Marino
13:10 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
12:19 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
10:40 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
10:24 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
08:34 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
07:11 define_split roy rosen

October 27, 2010
19:54 Re: Constant propagation and CSE Frederic Riss
19:26 Re: Constant propagation and CSE Jeff Law
19:21 Sorry for abrupt departure Jeff Law
18:16 Re: Constant propagation and CSE Frederic Riss
18:06 Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Nathan Froyd
17:36 Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Frédéric RISS
17:30 GCC 4.6.0 Status Report (2010-10-27) Jakub Jelinek
14:56 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
14:30 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
11:38 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
11:35 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Dave Korn
11:10 gengtype installation (where, how)? Basile Starynkevitch
10:54 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
08:44 Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Jon Beniston
06:48 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
02:02 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Alan Modra

October 26, 2010
23:29 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Dave Korn
22:58 gcc-4.4-20101026 is now available gccadmin
22:37 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
19:31 Re: movmemm pattern Richard Guenther
18:06 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
17:55 Re: combiner Georg Lay
17:42 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
17:12 Re: movmemm pattern Paul Koning
17:03 Re: movmemm pattern Dave Korn
16:39 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Andi Kleen
16:16 Re: movmemm pattern Paul Koning
16:14 Re: Problem with equivalent memory handling Ian Lance Taylor
16:12 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions Ian Lance Taylor
16:05 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
15:58 Re: Describing multi-register values in RTL Jeff Law
15:51 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Mark Mitchell
15:25 Re: Problem with equivalent memory handling Jeff Law
15:23 Default initialization value... Bruce Korb
15:01 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions roy rosen
14:42 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Joseph S. Myers
14:31 Re: movmemm pattern Joseph S. Myers
14:28 Re: Constant propagation and CSE Jeff Law
13:36 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions roy rosen
13:31 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions Ian Lance Taylor
05:54 inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions roy rosen
02:41 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Mark Mitchell
02:39 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Frank Ch. Eigler
02:36 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Mark Mitchell
02:35 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Frank Ch. Eigler
02:22 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Mark Mitchell
01:44 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
01:05 Re: movmemm pattern Dave Korn
00:53 Re: movmemm pattern Paul Koning

October 25, 2010
22:49 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Mark Mitchell
22:38 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
19:52 Re: Is it possbile to hack I386 backend to make all function calls to be indirect function calling? Jan Hubicka
19:50 Re: REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P Ian Lance Taylor
19:45 Re: movmemm pattern Richard Guenther
19:33 Re: Is it possbile to hack I386 backend to make all function calls to be indirect function calling? Ian Lance Taylor
19:26 Re: combiner Ian Lance Taylor
19:16 Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new mirror Gerald Pfeifer
18:43 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Andi Kleen
18:35 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Andrew Pinski
18:15 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
18:06 Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Ian Lance Taylor
15:26 movmemm pattern Paul Koning
15:22 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Mark Mitchell
11:57 Re: Is it possbile to hack I386 backend to make all function calls to be indirect function calling? Andi Kleen
11:03 REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P Paul Koning
09:55 Re: Constant propagation and CSE Paolo Bonzini
09:53 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
09:53 Is it possbile to hack I386 backend to make all function calls to be indirect function calling? redriver jiang
09:35 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
08:46 Constant propagation and CSE Frederic Riss
08:32 combiner roy rosen
07:57 Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Frederic Riss
03:49 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
03:32 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Andrew Pinski
02:54 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
02:53 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor

October 24, 2010
21:15 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Paolo Bonzini
19:49 gcc-4.3-20101024 is now available gccadmin
19:11 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend H.J. Lu
15:15 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Dave Korn
14:59 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Joseph S. Myers
07:09 Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor

October 23, 2010
22:49 gcc-4.6-20101023 is now available gccadmin
20:32 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
15:22 Re: G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++ Michael Eager
07:11 Re: G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++ Ralf Wildenhues

October 22, 2010
22:35 Re: question on ssa representation of aggregates Amker.Cheng
20:44 Re: G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++ H.J. Lu
20:35 Re: G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++ Michael Eager
20:09 Re: G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++ Paolo Carlini
18:43 G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++ Michael Eager
18:28 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Ian Lance Taylor
18:21 Re: question on ssa representation of aggregates Ian Lance Taylor
18:17 Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Ian Lance Taylor
18:16 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.12 is released H.J. Lu
18:10 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Jie Zhang
17:51 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Pat Haugen
15:08 Re: Describing multi-register values in RTL Ian Lance Taylor
11:16 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
09:56 question on ssa representation of aggregates Amker.Cheng
07:45 Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Frederic Riss
05:22 Re: Describing multi-register values in RTL Frédéric RISS
04:26 Re: -mcmodel=large doesn't work to me Ian Lance Taylor
04:11 Re: Describing multi-register values in RTL Ian Lance Taylor
01:30 -mcmodel=large doesn't work to me Wei Li
01:27 Re: Describing multi-register values in RTL Paul Koning
00:15 Re: Describing multi-register values in RTL Ian Lance Taylor

October 21, 2010
22:52 gcc-4.5-20101021 is now available gccadmin
20:42 Describing multi-register values in RTL Frederic Riss
19:38 Re: __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ Jonathan Wakely
18:54 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Ian Lance Taylor
18:22 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Michael Meissner
18:18 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Gunther Nikl
17:52 __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ Neal Becker
14:49 Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Nathan Froyd
13:58 Stadyum Derbi Özel Reklam Teklifi Esra ALTAŞ
12:14 Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Frederic Riss
10:21 Re: GCC RTX generation question Radu Hobincu
09:06 peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
00:48 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Jie Zhang

October 20, 2010
20:09 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Pat Haugen
15:47 Re: GCC RTX generation question Ian Lance Taylor
15:16 Re: GCC RTX generation question Radu Hobincu
09:13 Re: old aliasing bug: fixed? Richard Guenther
09:02 Re: Hooks, macros and target configuration Richard Guenther
08:29 Re: old aliasing bug: fixed? Albert Cahalan

October 19, 2010
22:54 gcc-4.4-20101019 is now available gccadmin
22:03 Re: Plug-in Licensing Ian Lance Taylor
21:59 Re: how to initialize a pointer using data page mode Ian Lance Taylor
21:55 Hooks, macros and target configuration Joseph S. Myers
21:47 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Paul Brook
21:42 Re: Plug-in Licensing Justin Seyster
21:08 Re: *_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP macros DJ Delorie
21:00 Re: how to initialize a pointer using data page mode Phung Nguyen
20:49 Re: Plug-in Licensing Ian Lance Taylor
20:43 Re: Problem with equivalent memory handling Ian Lance Taylor
20:37 Re: GCC RTX generation question Ian Lance Taylor
20:19 Re: Plug-in Licensing Basile Starynkevitch
20:06 Plug-in Licensing Justin Seyster
19:25 Problem with equivalent memory handling Jeff Law
17:31 Re: 4-15% speed-up in std::sort special case - is it worth the effort? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:20 GCC RTX generation question Radu Hobincu
14:52 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Jie Zhang
14:30 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Maxim Kuvyrkov
14:16 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Andrey Belevantsev
13:57 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Jie Zhang
13:31 Re: Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Ian Lance Taylor
13:25 Re: atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc? Ian Lance Taylor
08:53 Re: secondary reload via 2 intermediary registers Alex Turjan
08:51 Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ? Frederic Riss
08:32 RE: atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc? Jay K
08:08 RE: atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc? Rick C. Hodgin
08:01 RE: atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc? Jay K
07:52 Re: atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc? Rick C. Hodgin
07:42 atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc? Jay K
04:43 Re: how to initialize a pointer using data page mode Ian Lance Taylor
01:03 Re: how to initialize a pointer using data page mode Phung Nguyen

October 18, 2010
22:39 Re: Constant initializers Richard Henderson
21:51 Re: Constant initializers Jonathan Wakely
21:04 Constant initializers Matt Fischer
17:45 Re: define_peepholes in mn10300 Paolo Bonzini
15:33 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Jeff Law
15:22 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC David Edelsohn
14:18 Re: -isysroot option ignored for crosscompiler? Kai Ruottu
13:27 Re: secondary reload via 2 intermediary registers Jeff Law
12:51 Re: define_peepholes in mn10300 Jeff Law
12:28 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Nathan Froyd
10:40 ralloc UNSPEC vs UNSPEC_VOLATILE Hariharan Sandanagobalane
07:41 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Andrey Belevantsev
07:31 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Jie Zhang
07:13 Re: Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Andrey Belevantsev
06:49 Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC Jie Zhang
06:14 Re: some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code Basile Starynkevitch
06:09 Re: GCSE problem on a gcc testsuite Eric Botcazou
03:10 Re: Laurynas Biveinis now gengtype reviewer Laurynas Biveinis
02:53 Re: GCSE problem on a gcc testsuite johnc
02:51 how to initialize a pointer using data page mode Phung Nguyen
00:21 Laurynas Biveinis now gengtype reviewer Mark Mitchell

October 17, 2010
23:40 Re: some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code Gerald Pfeifer
21:36 Re: some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code Jonathan Wakely
21:34 Re: some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code Jonathan Wakely
21:17 some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code Basile Starynkevitch
20:45 please help on makefile bug in MELT (plugin, not branch) Basile Starynkevitch
19:50 gcc-4.3-20101017 is now available gccadmin
19:33 Re: LTO symtabs inconsistency Dave Korn
18:22 Re: LTO symtabs inconsistency Jan Hubicka
16:44 Re: Who owns config.rpath? Gerald Pfeifer

October 16, 2010
23:35 Re: LTO symtabs inconsistency Dave Korn
23:06 gcc-4.6-20101016 is now available gccadmin
22:15 Re: [trunk] hard-reg-set.h not installed in plugins/include Basile Starynkevitch
21:29 Re: [trunk] hard-reg-set.h not installed in plugins/include Basile Starynkevitch
21:15 [trunk] hard-reg-set.h not installed in plugins/include Basile Starynkevitch
19:57 LTO symtabs inconsistency Dave Korn
16:54 Re: dropping gccbug Joseph S. Myers
13:55 dropping gccbug Andi Kleen
11:58 -isysroot option ignored for crosscompiler? Uros Bizjak

October 15, 2010
16:45 rehearsal of GCC Summit tutorial "Easily coding a GCC extension with MELT" (at IRILL, Paris, France oct.20th 2010) Basile Starynkevitch
15:39 Re: LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF Dave Korn
09:53 Re: LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF Dave Korn
00:14 Re: check_cxa_atexit_available Mark Mitchell

October 14, 2010
23:13 RE: show size of stack needed by functions Weddington, Eric
23:04 gcc-4.5-20101014 is now available gccadmin
22:59 Re: "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit Robert Dewar
20:39 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Joseph S. Myers
20:34 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Joe Buck
19:48 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
19:19 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Ralf Wildenhues
18:44 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
18:32 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Ralf Wildenhues
18:12 Re: LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF Ian Lance Taylor
16:56 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
16:54 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Paul Koning
15:49 Re: LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF Dave Korn
15:42 RE: Bootstrap errors on i386-pc-solaris2.10 bisected Arthur Haas
15:39 RE: Bootstrap failures on sparc/x86 solaris2.10 machines Arthur Haas
15:24 Re: LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF Richard Guenther
15:05 Re: LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF Dave Korn
14:57 Re: "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit Olivier Hainque
14:44 Re: LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF Richard Guenther
14:36 LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF Dave Korn
14:32 Options for dumping dependence checking results Hongtao
13:54 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
13:37 Re: "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit Luke A. Guest
08:19 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Jonathan Wakely
07:32 Re: "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit Duncan Sands
05:33 Re: show size of stack needed by functions Anthony Foiani
03:59 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Ralf Wildenhues
01:10 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
01:09 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Paul Koning
01:08 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
01:07 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Paul Koning
01:00 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Paul Koning

October 13, 2010
23:50 Re: show size of stack needed by functions Ian Lance Taylor
23:09 "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit Luke A. Guest
22:43 Re: show size of stack needed by functions Eric Botcazou
22:22 Re: show size of stack needed by functions Richard Guenther
22:18 Re: Trouble doing bootstrap Dave Korn
22:16 Re: show size of stack needed by functions Sebastian
22:15 Re: show size of stack needed by functions Richard Guenther
21:55 Re: show size of stack needed by functions Joe Buck
21:43 Re: show size of stack needed by functions Sebastian
21:34 Trouble doing bootstrap Paul Koning
20:23 Re: show size of stack needed by functions H.J. Lu
20:15 Re: show size of stack needed by functions Ian Lance Taylor
20:05 show size of stack needed by functions Sebastian
07:13 Re: GCSE problem on a gcc testsuite Eric Botcazou
04:29 GCSE problem on a gcc testsuite johnc

October 12, 2010
22:51 gcc-4.4-20101012 is now available gccadmin
22:38 Re: *_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP macros Ian Lance Taylor
21:58 Re: Bootstrap errors on i386-pc-solaris2.10 bisected H.J. Lu
21:47 Bootstrap errors on i386-pc-solaris2.10 bisected Art Haas
20:06 Dragonegg-2.8 released Duncan Sands
17:08 Re: gcov for assembly Holger Blasum
16:14 Gcc Summit - room share James Lemke
14:32 Re: Insert new global declaration to Gimple Hongtao
14:11 Insert new global declaration to Gimple Hongtao
13:18 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
09:01 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
05:47 rgthydhgrfgh gingerab68

October 11, 2010
20:06 Re: Bootstrap failures on sparc/x86 solaris2.10 machines Rainer Orth
19:58 Re: DECL_SOURCE_LINE of else Ian Lance Taylor
19:55 Re: unsupported symbol binding (probably GOLD related) when building trunk? Ian Lance Taylor
19:08 GNAT ARM EABI ZCX, possible stopper needs clarification Luke A. Guest
16:07 Bootstrap failures on sparc/x86 solaris2.10 machines Art Haas
15:47 DECL_SOURCE_LINE of else Peter Jensen
14:54 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Gary Funck
14:23 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
12:59 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Alan Modra
09:33 unsupported symbol binding (probably GOLD related) when building trunk? Basile Starynkevitch
06:26 Re: gcov for assembly ravi s
00:04 Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Basile Starynkevitch

October 10, 2010
21:04 Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Eric Botcazou
20:18 Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Matthias Klose
19:58 Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
19:58 Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Basile Starynkevitch
19:52 gcc-4.3-20101010 is now available gccadmin
19:25 Re: forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Marc Glisse
18:07 forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd) Basile Starynkevitch
15:47 Re: ICE with GCC-4.5.1-20100708 Angelo Graziosi
13:31 Re: ICE with GCC-4.5.1-20100708 NightStrike
09:22 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
09:10 Re: MIPS64 GCC not building at r165246 Richard Sandiford
04:46 MIPS64 GCC not building at r165246 David Daney

October 09, 2010
22:57 gcc-4.6-20101009 is now available gccadmin
20:53 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Florian Weimer
20:10 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:35 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Jakub Jelinek
19:23 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Manuel López-Ibáñez
16:32 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
03:22 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Geert Bosch
01:40 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Dave Korn
01:36 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Dave Korn
00:42 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Richard Guenther

October 08, 2010
22:19 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:51 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Ian Lance Taylor
21:14 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
21:09 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Richard Guenther
20:58 RE: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Hargett, Matt
20:39 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Gary Funck
20:23 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Ian Lance Taylor
19:05 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Gary Funck
18:38 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Basile Starynkevitch
18:11 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
18:04 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Jonathan Wakely
18:03 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Ian Lance Taylor
17:50 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Basile Starynkevitch
17:37 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Ian Lance Taylor
16:54 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
16:54 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Gary Funck
16:38 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Basile Starynkevitch
16:10 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Kai Tietz
16:06 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Jonathan Wakely
15:56 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
15:37 Re: RFE: 'enable checking' as a GCC compilation switch? Gary Funck
15:14 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Gary Funck
04:24 Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Ian Lance Taylor
04:12 GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes? Gary Funck

October 07, 2010
22:55 gcc-4.5-20101007 is now available gccadmin
21:06 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
19:27 Re: toplevel *again* out of sync Ralf Wildenhues
18:27 Re: rules for svn commit-ing a [gengtype] patch? Diego Novillo
18:25 Re: rules for svn commit-ing a [gengtype] patch? Basile Starynkevitch
18:21 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Michael Meissner
17:56 Re: rules for svn commit-ing a [gengtype] patch? Ian Lance Taylor
17:08 rules for svn commit-ing a [gengtype] patch? Basile Starynkevitch
15:28 Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new mirror James Miller
14:53 Re: Bootstrap broken on Cygwin, fix on the way. Dave Korn
14:53 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
14:18 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Richard Guenther
14:07 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
13:00 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Michael Meissner
03:38 Bootstrap broken on Cygwin, fix on the way. Dave Korn
01:55 Re: Regarding the GCC Binaries and Build status pages Gerald Pfeifer

October 06, 2010
23:55 Re: constant string changed Robert Dewar
22:55 Re: constant string changed Matt Thomas
22:02 Re: constant string changed Robert Dewar
21:43 Re: constant string changed Richard Guenther
21:34 Re: constant string changed Phung Nguyen
20:33 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Matt Thomas
15:04 Re: constant string changed Jakub Jelinek
14:59 constant string changed Phung Nguyen
13:52 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Ian Lance Taylor
08:41 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
08:15 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Gabriel Paubert
07:56 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
06:40 LLVM 2.8 Release Chris Lattner
01:10 contacte-me Ho Chen Tung
00:34 Re: *_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP macros DJ Delorie
00:29 Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup H.J. Lu

October 05, 2010
23:19 Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup H.J. Lu
23:00 gcc-4.4-20101005 is now available gccadmin
22:19 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Alan Modra
22:13 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Richard Henderson
22:10 Re: [RFC] Dealing with TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS Eric Botcazou
22:00 Re: [RFC] Dealing with TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS FX
21:41 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
21:12 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Richard Henderson
20:56 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
18:57 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Richard Henderson
15:57 Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup Richard Henderson
15:04 Re: Unable to build --enable-build-with-cxx --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gold Andreas Schwab
14:18 Re: Unable to build --enable-build-with-cxx --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gold Ian Lance Taylor
13:58 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
13:47 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Ian Lance Taylor
12:37 %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
12:07 Unable to build --enable-build-with-cxx --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gold Jerry Quinn
06:19 Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready Frédéric Buclin
05:33 Re: Problem in bootstrapping on mingw Ralf Wildenhues
04:53 Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready Florian Weimer

October 04, 2010
23:25 Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup H.J. Lu
22:44 Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup Paul Brook
21:36 Re: [RFC] Dealing with TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS FX
20:29 Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Jason Merrill
19:56 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Rodrigo Rivas
18:27 Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup Richard Henderson
18:24 Re: about function attributes for functions returning a pointer Ian Lance Taylor
18:17 Re: Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. 3dw4rd
18:15 Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup Richard Henderson
18:00 Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup Paul Brook
17:16 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Nicola Pero
16:11 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Jason Merrill
15:26 Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Jason Merrill
15:26 Re: Map tree to properties Basile Starynkevitch
15:00 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Rodrigo Rivas
14:47 Re: Map tree to properties Richard Guenther
14:43 Map tree to properties Hongtao
13:47 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Jason Merrill
12:01 Re: [RFC] Dealing with TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS Joseph S. Myers
10:27 Re: How to get attribute of callee Georg Lay
09:17 [RFC] Dealing with TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS FX
09:04 about function attributes for functions returning a pointer Uwe Kleine-König
08:45 RE: toplevel *again* out of sync Naveen H. S

October 03, 2010
20:28 Re: Problem in bootstrapping on mingw NightStrike
19:53 gcc-4.3-20101003 is now available gccadmin
19:04 Re: RFE: 'enable checking' as a GCC compilation switch? Ian Lance Taylor
18:34 RFE: 'enable checking' as a GCC compilation switch? Gary Funck
13:04 GCC 4.4.5 Released Jakub Jelinek
11:48 Re: Who owns config.rpath? Dave Korn
11:24 Re: Who owns config.rpath? Ralf Wildenhues
11:19 Who owns config.rpath? Dave Korn
10:05 Re: Problem in bootstrapping on mingw FX
09:23 Re: Problem in bootstrapping on mingw FX
08:43 Re: Problem in bootstrapping on mingw Kai Tietz
08:34 Problem in bootstrapping on mingw FX
07:41 Re: toplevel *again* out of sync DJ Delorie

October 02, 2010
23:03 Re: [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup H.J. Lu
22:53 gcc-4.6-20101002 is now available gccadmin
20:01 [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup Richard Henderson
17:50 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Rodrigo Rivas
16:44 Re: make recheck? Diego Novillo
15:55 Re: make recheck? Ralf Wildenhues
15:47 Re: make recheck? NightStrike
14:03 Re: toplevel *again* out of sync Paolo Bonzini
12:40 Re: toplevel *again* out of sync Ralf Wildenhues
09:55 make recheck? Ralf Wildenhues
09:18 Re: toplevel *again* out of sync Ralf Wildenhues
08:47 toplevel *again* out of sync Paolo Bonzini

October 01, 2010
20:40 Re: gcc-testresults submissions Sean McGovern
18:06 Re: gcc-testresults submissions Andreas Schwab
18:02 Re: gcc-testresults submissions Richard Henderson
17:59 gcc-testresults submissions Sean McGovern
15:49 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Jason Merrill
12:29 GCC 4.4.5 Status Report (2010-10-01) Jakub Jelinek
09:11 building gcc-4.3.5 for sh-elf --with-newlib --enable-language="c,c++" Fabio Giovagnini


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3