This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes


On 9/13/10 2:04 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Therefore, I see a clear benefit to clang->gcc, but I
do not see a clear benefit to gcc->llvm.
Suppose you have large Fortran applications, and want to accelerate parts of them on graphics processors.
Several of the OpenCL implementations use LLVM for runtime code generation, so one could compile the application to LTO, and let it go through some expensive stages of the GCC optimizer, and have LLVM bitcode staged for final translation to the GPU ISA.


In general, make the distinction between heavy ahead-of-time compilation and light just-in-time compilation along the lines of GCC and LLVM.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]