This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
September 30, 2010
23:00 | gcc-4.5-20100930 is now available | gccadmin |
17:12 | Re: secondary reload via 2 intermediary registers | Georg Lay |
12:37 | GCC 4.6.0 Status Report (2010-09-30) | Richard Guenther |
10:57 | Re: Report: using GCC plugin to implement ORM for C++ | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
10:35 | Report: using GCC plugin to implement ORM for C++ | Boris Kolpackov |
09:39 | Re: old aliasing bug: fixed? | Richard Guenther |
09:05 | secondary reload via 2 intermediary registers | Alex Turjan |
07:54 | old aliasing bug: fixed? | Albert Cahalan |
00:24 | Re: Handling NaNs in FP comparisons | Richard Henderson |
September 29, 2010
23:31 | Handling NaNs in FP comparisons | Michael Eager |
23:02 | Re: Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions | Jonathan Wakely |
22:53 | check_cxa_atexit_available | Richard Henderson |
21:47 | Re: Clarification on who can approve Objective-C/Objective-C++ parser patches | Nicola Pero |
17:40 | Re: Worse code generated by PRE | Xinliang David Li |
12:57 | RE: Worse code generated by PRE | Bingfeng Mei |
12:33 | Re: Worse code generated by PRE | Richard Guenther |
12:16 | Worse code generated by PRE | Bingfeng Mei |
11:10 | Re: Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
10:49 | Re: Bugzilla not whining [was Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT] | Dave Korn |
08:29 | Re: Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions | Andrew Haley |
07:07 | Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions | #SINHA SHARAD# |
September 28, 2010
September 27, 2010
September 26, 2010
19:53 | gcc-4.3-20100926 is now available | gccadmin |
18:52 | Re: Polyhedron Fortran benchmark - compiler comparison: Good results for GCC 4.6 | Steve Kargl |
14:47 | Polyhedron Fortran benchmark - compiler comparison: Good results for GCC 4.6 | Tobias Burnus |
14:37 | Re: Handle macros like TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS for non C-family frontends | Joseph S. Myers |
14:31 | Re: Handle macros like TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS for non C-family frontends | Steven Bosscher |
14:21 | Handle macros like TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS for non C-family frontends | FX |
12:19 | Re: -Os is weak... | Gerald Pfeifer |
04:32 | Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Jason Merrill |
02:02 | Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT | Ian Lance Taylor |
September 25, 2010
22:54 | gcc-4.6-20100925 is now available | gccadmin |
20:56 | Re: About DECL_UID | Diego Novillo |
20:52 | Re: About DECL_UID | Hongtao |
20:48 | Re: About DECL_UID | Diego Novillo |
20:40 | About DECL_UID | Hongtao |
19:34 | [Ada] SCIL file generation in the trunk | Florian Weimer |
15:30 | Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT | Jonathan Wakely |
15:20 | Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT | Frédéric Buclin |
15:10 | Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT | Jonathan Wakely |
15:03 | Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? | Jonathan Wakely |
14:43 | Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
14:28 | Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? | Steve Kargl |
13:20 | gcj fails to compile java | Jack Howarth |
08:46 | Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? | Jakub Jelinek |
05:45 | Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? | Steve Kargl |
September 24, 2010
22:46 | Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI | Luke A. Guest |
22:40 | Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI | Andrew Pinski |
22:37 | Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI | Luke A. Guest |
20:23 | GCC 4.4.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | Jakub Jelinek |
14:23 | Re: gengtype indentation issues | Ian Lance Taylor |
10:00 | Re: Choosing the best multiplication | Paulo J. Matos |
09:57 | Re: Choosing the best multiplication | Paulo J. Matos |
09:33 | Re: gengtype indentation issues | Paolo Bonzini |
09:30 | Re: gengtype indentation issues | Basile Starynkevitch |
08:51 | Re: gengtype indentation issues | Paolo Bonzini |
08:48 | Re: Choosing the best multiplication | Paolo Bonzini |
08:11 | Choosing the best multiplication | Paulo J. Matos |
07:56 | Re: Calculation of RTX Costs | Paulo J. Matos |
September 23, 2010
September 22, 2010
23:44 | Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Rodrigo Rivas |
22:06 | [PATCH] for Re: new mirror | Gerald Pfeifer |
20:18 | RE: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Hargett, Matt |
19:35 | Re: Where are the new GCC releases? | Jakub Jelinek |
19:15 | Re: Where are the new GCC releases? | Joe Buck |
19:02 | Re: Where are the new GCC releases? | Richard Guenther |
17:50 | Where are the new GCC releases? | Artem S. Tashkinov |
08:12 | Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Rodrigo Rivas |
02:41 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Ed Smith-Rowland |
02:39 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Ed Smith-Rowland |
September 21, 2010
September 20, 2010
23:23 | Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready | Frédéric Buclin |
23:18 | Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready | Jonathan Wakely |
23:07 | Re: Range-based for in c++98 | Rodrigo Rivas |
22:26 | RE: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Hargett, Matt |
22:01 | GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready | Frédéric Buclin |
19:02 | Re: Range-based for in c++98 | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
19:01 | Re: Range-based for in c++98 | Rodrigo Rivas |
18:22 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Jonathan Wakely |
18:20 | RE: Range-based for in c++98 | Rodrigo |
17:28 | RE: Range-based for in c++98 | Magnus Fromreide |
16:39 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | NightStrike |
16:22 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Rodrigo Rivas |
13:58 | [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Rodrigo Rivas |
08:39 | RE: Range-based for in c++98 | Rodrigo Rivas |
08:24 | Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new canadian mirror | Sergey Ivanov |
September 19, 2010
21:02 | , you may not | Deaguero Mostowy |
20:42 | [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new canadian mirror | Gerald Pfeifer |
19:49 | gcc-4.3-20100919 is now available | gccadmin |
19:06 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Ed Smith-Rowland |
18:37 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Rodrigo Rivas |
17:49 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Paolo Carlini |
10:21 | Re: Reverse mapping from decl uid | Richard Guenther |
09:13 | Re: bump Autoconf and Libtool versions? | Ralf Wildenhues |
09:11 | Re: bump Autoconf and Libtool versions? | Paolo Bonzini |
09:06 | bump Autoconf and Libtool versions? | Ralf Wildenhues |
September 18, 2010
22:56 | gcc-4.6-20100918 is now available | gccadmin |
20:32 | Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types | Jonathan Wakely |
19:26 | Reverse mapping from decl uid | Uday P. Khedker |
14:50 | Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types | H.J. Lu |
13:36 | Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types | H.J. Lu |
13:33 | Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types | Jonathan Wakely |
13:31 | RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types | Jonathan Wakely |
04:39 | Range-based for in c++98 | Magnus Fromreide |
September 17, 2010
06:25 | [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Ed Smith-Rowland |
September 16, 2010
22:50 | gcc-4.5-20100916 is now available | gccadmin |
22:15 | Re: About LTO merging symbol tables | Diego Novillo |
22:06 | About LTO merging symbol tables | Hongtao |
21:40 | Re: Bugzilla outage Friday, September 17, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:13 | Re: ICE with GCC-4.5.1-20100708 | JonY |
16:18 | Re: Mixed mode __complex__ arithmetic | Paolo Carlini |
15:26 | Re: Mixed mode __complex__ arithmetic | Joseph S. Myers |
14:18 | Re: -Os is weak... | Jakub Jelinek |
13:19 | new canadian mirror | Sergey Ivanov |
13:00 | Re: array of pointer to function support in GNU C | ZoltÃn KÃcsi |
12:10 | Mixed mode __complex__ arithmetic | Paolo Carlini |
12:03 | Re: -Os is weak... | Steven Bosscher |
08:55 | Re: -Os is weak... | Andi Kleen |
07:50 | Re: array of pointer to function support in GNU C | J Decker |
07:36 | Re: -Os is weak... | Yao Qi |
06:38 | Re: array of pointer to function support in GNU C | Sebastian Redl |
06:15 | array of pointer to function support in GNU C | ir_idjit |
September 15, 2010
September 14, 2010
September 13, 2010
September 12, 2010
September 11, 2010
September 10, 2010
September 09, 2010
September 08, 2010
21:30 | Re: Switch case ordering | Richard Henderson |
21:26 | Re: Switch case ordering | Paulo J. Matos |
20:55 | How to avoid auto-vectorization for this loop (rolls at most 3 times) | Fang, Changpeng |
14:47 | Re: Switch case ordering | Richard Henderson |
14:15 | Switch case ordering | Paulo J. Matos |
12:28 | RE: Function-specific optimization flags and inlining | Bingfeng Mei |
10:43 | RE: Function-specific optimization flags and inlining | Bingfeng Mei |
10:26 | Re: Function-specific optimization flags and inlining | Richard Guenther |
10:07 | Function-specific optimization flags and inlining | Bingfeng Mei |
09:49 | Help setting up open-source project for charity | dev1 |
00:23 | Re: How to write a SPEC function that gets all arguments passed? | Ian Lance Taylor |
September 07, 2010
September 06, 2010
September 05, 2010
22:18 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Tobias Burnus |
22:10 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Gerald Pfeifer |
19:47 | gcc-4.3-20100905 is now available | gccadmin |
18:40 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Mark Mitchell |
18:35 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | NightStrike |
18:29 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Mark Mitchell |
18:23 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | NightStrike |
18:03 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Mark Mitchell |
15:48 | DFP regression on FreeBSD | Gerald Pfeifer |
11:46 | Question about Doloop | Revital1 Eres |
04:23 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | NightStrike |
September 04, 2010
22:57 | gcc-4.6-20100904 is now available | gccadmin |
18:41 | Re: please revert r163815/r163816 | Jack Howarth |
18:41 | Re: C++-0x range for loop | Paolo Carlini |
18:31 | C++-0x range for loop | Ed Smith-Rowland |
16:50 | Re: Broken links on main gcc website. | Gerald Pfeifer |
15:22 | Re: please revert r163815/r163816 | H.J. Lu |
09:10 | Re: please revert r163815/r163816 | Paolo Bonzini |
03:54 | please revert r163815/r163816 | Jack Howarth |
September 03, 2010
16:40 | Re: darwin weirdness | Joseph S. Myers |
15:55 | darwin weirdness | Jack Howarth |
13:03 | Re: Internal compiler error, gimplify.c:505. File a report? | Diego Novillo |
13:00 | Internal compiler error, gimplify.c:505. File a report? | Anders Furuhed |
10:29 | RE: Clustering switch cases | Rahul Kharche |
08:10 | Re: How to get attribute of callee | Georg Lay |
02:56 | Re: How to get attribute of callee | Phung Nguyen |
September 02, 2010
23:00 | gcc-4.5-20100902 is now available | gccadmin |
18:07 | structures & param_structures in gengtype | Basile Starynkevitch |
15:15 | Re: How to get attribute of callee | Phung Nguyen |
14:15 | How to write a SPEC function that gets all arguments passed? | Georg Lay |
12:59 | Re: How to get attribute of callee | Jakub Jelinek |
12:49 | Re: How to get attribute of callee | Georg Lay |
12:18 | How to get attribute of callee | Phung Nguyen |
September 01, 2010
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]