gcc archive
date index for June, 2010

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2010
23:22 Re: Plug-ins on Windows Jan Hubicka
23:07 Re: Plug-ins on Windows Richard Henderson
22:39 Re: installing with minimal sudo Matthias Klose
22:25 Re: Plug-ins on Windows Dave Korn
22:24 Re: Plug-ins on Windows Joern Rennecke
22:19 Re: installing with minimal sudo Dave Korn
22:13 Re: installing with minimal sudo Joern Rennecke
22:06 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jan Hubicka
21:30 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Taras Glek
21:29 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Basile Starynkevitch
21:24 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Taras Glek
21:21 installing with minimal sudo Basile Starynkevitch
20:57 Re: Plug-ins on Windows Basile Starynkevitch
20:53 Re: The trunk is fronzen NOW for the mem-ref2 merge Richard Guenther
20:50 Re: The trunk is fronzen NOW for the mem-ref2 merge Paolo Carlini
20:38 Plug-ins on Windows Kyle Girard
19:59 The trunk is fronzen NOW for the mem-ref2 merge Richard Guenther
19:45 Re: About gimple_body in gimple.h Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:43 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
19:31 Re: About gimple_body in gimple.h Basile Starynkevitch
19:24 Re: Patch pinging David Edelsohn
19:16 Re: About gimple_body in gimple.h Manuel López-Ibáñez
18:02 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
17:57 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
17:44 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
17:42 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
17:32 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
17:14 Re: Patch pinging Frank Ch. Eigler
15:57 Re: call_value problem: var = func() !? Richard Henderson
15:51 Re: invalid insn generated Ian Lance Taylor
12:06 call_value problem: var = func() !? M. -Eqbal Maraqa
11:00 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Basile Starynkevitch
09:51 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Paolo Bonzini
08:02 Re: invalid insn generated roy rosen
05:05 Re: Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence Kevin Bowling
02:00 Re: Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence David Edelsohn
01:51 Re: Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence David Edelsohn

June 29, 2010
23:59 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
23:15 Re: Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence Andrew Pinski
23:07 Re: Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence Kevin Bowling
22:50 gcc-4.4-20100629 is now available gccadmin
22:45 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Jonathan Wakely
22:36 Re: Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence Steven Bosscher
22:35 Re: Patch pinging Jonathan Corbet
22:18 Re: Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence Kevin Bowling
20:18 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Joern Rennecke
18:30 Re: GCC Internals FE documentation Philip Herron
17:14 Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org Tom Tromey
17:13 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Basile Starynkevitch
17:09 Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org Tom Tromey
16:50 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Basile Starynkevitch
16:50 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Diego Novillo
16:47 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Andrew Pinski
16:39 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
16:38 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Basile Starynkevitch
15:06 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
14:49 Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org Brett Neumeier
14:39 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
14:30 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
14:29 Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org Brett Neumeier
14:09 Re: Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence David Edelsohn
14:02 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Ian Lance Taylor
12:01 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
11:49 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:35 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Larry Evans
11:29 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
11:27 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
11:24 Re: Patch pinging Richard Kenner
11:23 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
10:15 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:40 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Paolo Bonzini
09:39 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Richard Guenther
09:38 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Richard Guenther
09:32 Re: Generic return types in built-in functions (C frontend) Richard Guenther
08:34 Re: Patch pinging Jonathan Wakely
08:29 Re: Trunk frozen for mem-ref2 merge starting Wed, Jun 28th 20:00 UTC Richard Guenther
08:27 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Basile Starynkevitch
08:23 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? David Brown
07:59 Re: Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence Kevin Bowling
07:45 Re: Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence Andrew Haley
07:04 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Basile Starynkevitch
06:30 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Ian Lance Taylor
06:23 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
05:53 Power/PowerPC RIOS/RIOS2 obsolescence Kevin Bowling
05:38 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Basile Starynkevitch
04:40 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
02:16 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Tom Tromey
00:40 RE: gengtype needs for C++? Hargett, Matt

June 28, 2010
23:58 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Ian Lance Taylor
23:55 Re: Generic return types in built-in functions (C frontend) Ian Lance Taylor
23:53 Re: test-suite question, dg-final/scan-file on objects? Ian Lance Taylor
23:42 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Jonathan Wakely
23:39 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
23:21 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Basile Starynkevitch
23:08 Re: gengtype needs for C++? Ian Lance Taylor
22:59 Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO? Jan Hubicka
22:46 role of executable_checksum & LTO? Basile Starynkevitch
22:37 Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org Matthias Klose
22:35 Re: Patch pinging David Edelsohn
22:33 Re: Patch pinging Joseph S. Myers
21:56 Re: Patch pinging Gerald Pfeifer
21:43 Re: Patch pinging Richard Kenner
21:40 Re: Patch pinging Basile Starynkevitch
21:35 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:25 Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org David Daney
21:25 gengtype needs for C++? Basile Starynkevitch
21:25 Re: Patch pinging Tobias Burnus
21:00 Re: Patch pinging David Edelsohn
20:56 Re: Patch pinging Richard Kenner
20:53 Re: Patch pinging Basile Starynkevitch
20:11 Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org Brett Neumeier
20:02 Generic return types in built-in functions (C frontend) Artem Shinkarov
18:00 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
17:13 Re: Patch pinging David Edelsohn
16:29 Re: Trunk frozen for mem-ref2 merge starting Wed, Jun 28th 20:00 UTC Jack Howarth
14:23 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
14:11 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
14:08 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
13:48 Re: About gimple_body in gimple.h Diego Novillo
13:38 About gimple_body in gimple.h jeremie . salvucci
13:06 Re: Trunk frozen for mem-ref2 merge starting Wed, Jun 30th 20:00 UTC Richard Guenther
13:02 Re: Trunk frozen for mem-ref2 merge starting Wed, Jun 28th 20:00 UTC Arnaud Charlet
12:59 Trunk frozen for mem-ref2 merge starting Wed, Jun 28th 20:00 UTC Richard Guenther
11:39 Re: Patch pinging David Edelsohn
10:38 test-suite question, dg-final/scan-file on objects? IainS
08:51 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Richard Earnshaw
07:28 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Richard B. Kreckel
04:10 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
03:35 Re: Patch pinging David Edelsohn
03:19 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support Mark Mitchell
00:37 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Martin Guy
00:05 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jan Hubicka

June 27, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.3-20100627 is now available gccadmin
22:33 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jan Hubicka
22:33 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jan Hubicka
21:55 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jan Hubicka
21:18 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Richard B. Kreckel
20:35 Re: Bootstrap failure on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Eric Botcazou
19:46 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:33 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jan Hubicka
19:26 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jan Hubicka
18:45 Re: Patch pinging David Edelsohn
17:45 Bootstrap failure on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Steven Bosscher
12:51 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Gerald Pfeifer
09:55 Re: Patch pinging Richard Guenther
09:44 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:32 Re: Patch pinging Tobias Burnus
09:07 Re: Patch pinging Gerald Pfeifer

June 26, 2010
22:46 gcc-4.6-20100626 is now available gccadmin
20:30 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Richard B. Kreckel

June 25, 2010
23:43 Re: Very recent libstdc++ breakage: testsuite_shared.so cannot be built anymore Martin Jambor
21:56 Re: vector register allocation Ian Lance Taylor
21:47 RE: vector register allocation BLUE 3TOO
21:38 Re: vector register allocation Ian Lance Taylor
20:04 vector register allocation BLUE 3TOO
19:18 Re: Very recent libstdc++ breakage: testsuite_shared.so cannot be built anymore Paolo Carlini
18:49 Re: Very recent libstdc++ breakage: testsuite_shared.so cannot be built anymore H.J. Lu
18:40 Re: [x86]: Allow @GOTOFF in non-memory context? Richard Henderson
18:38 Re: Very recent libstdc++ breakage: testsuite_shared.so cannot be built anymore H.J. Lu
18:09 Re: [x86]: Allow @GOTOFF in non-memory context? Rainer Orth
17:48 Re: [x86]: Allow @GOTOFF in non-memory context? Richard Henderson
16:32 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jan Hubicka
16:30 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Joe Buck
14:51 Very recent libstdc++ breakage: testsuite_shared.so cannot be built anymore Paolo Carlini
13:45 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Alexander Monakov
13:21 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Richard Guenther
13:21 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jakub Jelinek
13:11 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jan Hubicka
11:02 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Richard Guenther
10:49 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Eric Botcazou
09:08 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Richard Guenther
08:57 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Richard Guenther
06:38 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Eric Botcazou
06:15 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Jonathan Adamczewski

June 24, 2010
22:50 gcc-4.5-20100624 is now available gccadmin
20:39 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Richard Guenther
20:29 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Eric Botcazou
20:14 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Benjamin Smedberg
19:07 Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Andrew Pinski
18:56 Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5 Taras Glek
15:59 Re: A question about mov pattern Peter Bergner
15:13 Re: patch: honor volatile bitfield types Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:57 Re: A question about mov pattern Jeff Law
10:47 Re: Generated files and patches Manuel López-Ibáñez
10:35 Generated files and patches Sebastian Huber
08:03 A question about mov pattern Revital1 Eres
04:47 Re: About stack protector Ian Lance Taylor
04:45 Re: Accessor macros for target-specific types / enum reg_class -> int changes Ian Lance Taylor
03:44 Re: About stack protector Geert Bosch
02:53 About stack protector Tomás Touceda
02:12 Re: reload question Joern Rennecke
02:06 Accessor macros for target-specific types / enum reg_class -> int changes Joern Rennecke

June 23, 2010
21:49 Re: question about if_marked construct Tom de Vries
21:43 Re: patch: honor volatile bitfield types Hans-Peter Nilsson
21:29 Re: PowerPC64, optimization too aggressive? Richard Henderson
18:45 Re: reload question Jeff Law
18:30 Re: reload question Alex Turjan
17:41 Re: question about if_marked construct Ian Lance Taylor
17:26 Re: reload question Jeff Law
17:22 reload question Alex Turjan
17:06 Re: question about if_marked construct Basile Starynkevitch
15:56 Re: question about if_marked construct Ian Lance Taylor
15:53 Re: patch: honor volatile bitfield types Daniel Jacobowitz
15:49 Re: question about if_marked construct Tom de Vries
15:34 Re: patch: honor volatile bitfield types DJ Delorie
14:50 Re: question about if_marked construct Ian Lance Taylor
14:45 Re: invalid insn generated Ian Lance Taylor
14:44 Re: invalid insn generated Ian Lance Taylor
13:04 PowerPC64, optimization too aggressive? Alan Modra
12:32 question about if_marked construct Tom de Vries
11:06 invalid insn generated roy rosen
09:51 [RFT] mem-ref2 branch ready to merge Richard Guenther
02:24 question on function change_loop in IRA Amker.Cheng
01:13 Re: patch: honor volatile bitfield types Hans-Peter Nilsson

June 22, 2010
22:47 gcc-4.4-20100622 is now available gccadmin
21:27 Re: Illegal schedule Jeff Law
19:55 Re: GCC RTL <-> LLVM SSA Basile Starynkevitch
19:43 Re: GCC RTL <-> LLVM SSA Jianzhou Zhao
19:18 Re: Illegal schedule Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:57 Re: GCC RTL <-> LLVM SSA Basile Starynkevitch
18:47 GCC RTL <-> LLVM SSA Jianzhou Zhao
17:27 Re: Help with reload Jeff Law
14:52 Help with reload Revital1 Eres
14:02 Re: Waiting for stdin while compiling GCC-trunk jeremie . salvucci
12:19 Re: what are exactly GCC core types? Joseph S. Myers
11:56 Waiting for stdin while compiling GCC-trunk jeremie . salvucci
09:52 Re: plugin-provided pragmas & Fortran or Ada? Eric Botcazou
09:43 Re: Gimple vs ternary operations? Bernd Schmidt
09:39 Re: Gimple vs ternary operations? Jakub Jelinek
09:34 Re: Gimple vs ternary operations? Richard Guenther
08:59 Re: Illegal schedule Alex Turjan
07:19 Re: plugin-provided pragmas & Fortran or Ada? Duncan Sands
07:18 Re: plugin-provided pragmas & Fortran or Ada? Tobias Burnus
07:13 Re: what are exactly GCC core types? Manuel López-Ibáñez
07:05 Re: plugin-provided pragmas & Fortran or Ada? Basile Starynkevitch
06:58 Re: plugin-provided pragmas & Fortran or Ada? Duncan Sands
06:28 Re: what are exactly GCC core types? Ian Lance Taylor
06:13 what are exactly GCC core types? Basile Starynkevitch
04:21 plugin-provided pragmas & Fortran or Ada? Basile Starynkevitch

June 21, 2010
22:44 Re: Introducing redundancy in combine? Sebastian Pop
22:21 Re: Introducing redundancy in combine? Jeff Law
22:13 Introducing redundancy in combine? Sebastian Pop
18:13 Illegal schedule Boris Boesler
16:41 Devre Çelik 15-30 Haziran Hafta'nın Fı rsat Ürünleri Devre Çelik
15:25 Gimple vs ternary operations? Bernd Schmidt
10:42 Improvement of General Vector Extensions Artem Shinkarov
10:00 Mutluluk Eğitimi - Mutsuzluğunuzu Yenin Hızlı Eğitim
05:57 RE: ARM FLOOR_MOD_EXPR? Jay K
03:02 Re: About the "info locals" command of gdb and python pretty printer asmwarrior
02:36 Re: Can GCC emit debug information to support debug uninitialized local variables asmwarrior
00:31 Re: ChangeLog licensing issues Mark Mitchell

June 20, 2010
22:52 gcc-4.3-20100620 is now available gccadmin
15:30 targethook argument names (Was: Re: ChangeLog licensing issues) Joern Rennecke
15:02 Re: ChangeLog licensing issues Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:43 Re: ChangeLog licensing issues Joseph S. Myers
14:37 Re: ChangeLog licensing issues Joern Rennecke
14:05 Re: ChangeLog licensing issues Joseph S. Myers
13:46 Re: ChangeLog licensing issues Joern Rennecke
12:55 Re: ChangeLog licensing issues Joseph S. Myers
07:02 ChangeLog licensing issues Joern Rennecke
06:58 Re: Can GCC emit debug information to support debug uninitialized local variables asmwarrior
06:18 Re: Can GCC emit debug information to support debug uninitialized local variables Ian Lance Taylor

June 19, 2010
22:44 gcc-4.6-20100619 is now available gccadmin
12:49 Re: GCC plugin support when using Ada Duncan Sands
10:17 Re: GCC plugin support when using Ada Richard Guenther
08:17 ARM FLOOR_MOD_EXPR? Jay K
07:22 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Ryan Hill
04:38 Can GCC emit debug information to support debug uninitialized local variables asmwarrior

June 18, 2010
22:31 Re: how to comply games for consoles Jonathan Wakely
21:50 how to comply games for consoles tajiya1
20:33 GCC plugin support when using Ada PeteGarbett
18:35 Re: strange use of function_invariant_p Bernd Schmidt
15:36 DWARF Version 4 Released Michael Eager
15:36 Re: DWARF Version 4 Released Michael Eager
10:38 Re: GCC porting questions Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:42 Re: strange use of function_invariant_p Joern Rennecke
09:30 Re: DWARF v4 .debug_line and .debug_frame formats Roland McGrath
08:56 Re: GCC porting questions Radu Hobincu
08:48 Re: DWARF v4 .debug_line and .debug_frame formats Jakub Jelinek
08:02 Re: strange use of function_invariant_p Bernd Schmidt
06:45 Re: data type 'struct loop' in MELT Basile Starynkevitch
06:38 strange use of function_invariant_p (Was: Re: Followup for reg_equiv_invariant patch: Fix PR39871) Joern Rennecke

June 17, 2010
22:56 gcc-4.5-20100617 is now available gccadmin
16:48 Re: GCC porting questions Ian Lance Taylor
14:57 Re: GCC porting questions Radu Hobincu
14:57 Re: Floating Point Representation in libgcc (is IEEE?) Paulo J. Matos
11:41 Re: RFC: ARM Cortex-A8 and floating point performance David Brown
09:54 Re: Question about polyhedral model and solver used in GRAPHITE Tobias Grosser
08:55 Re: RFC: ARM Cortex-A8 and floating point performance Siarhei Siamashka
08:41 Question about polyhedral model and solver used in GRAPHITE Simone Pellegrini
00:06 DWARF v4 .debug_line and .debug_frame formats Roland McGrath

June 16, 2010
22:32 DWARF Version 4 Released Michael Eager
15:22 Re: RFC: ARM Cortex-A8 and floating point performance Ramana Radhakrishnan
15:15 RE: [RFC] Cleaning up the pass manager Grigori Fursin
15:09 Re: RFC: ARM Cortex-A8 and floating point performance Andrew Pinski
13:04 Re: RFC: ARM Cortex-A8 and floating point performance Richard Guenther
12:53 RFC: ARM Cortex-A8 and floating point performance Siarhei Siamashka
08:12 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Paolo Bonzini
02:26 Re: Write permission but connection refused Dave Korn
01:09 Write permission but connection refused Douglas B Rupp

June 15, 2010
22:55 gcc-4.4-20100615 is now available gccadmin
18:17 Re: Floating Point Representation in libgcc (is IEEE?) Basile Starynkevitch
17:37 Re: [RFC] Cleaning up the pass manager Joern Rennecke
17:12 Re: [RFC] Cleaning up the pass manager Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:12 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
17:05 Re: subreg against register allocation? Ulrich Weigand
17:03 Re: [RFC] Cleaning up the pass manager Basile Starynkevitch
16:57 Re: typed gengtype & GCC plugins for both 4.5 & 4.6 - e.g. MELT Basile Starynkevitch
16:39 Re: [RFC] Cleaning up the pass manager Jan Hubicka
16:32 Re: [Patch,Fortran,Committed] Re: Incorrect format of copyright statement for Fortran manuals Tobias Burnus
14:08 Re: subreg against register allocation? Ian Lance Taylor
14:08 Re: subreg against register allocation? Ian Lance Taylor
13:13 Re: Floating Point Representation in libgcc (is IEEE?) Joern Rennecke
12:56 Re: typed gengtype & GCC plugins for both 4.5 & 4.6 - e.g. MELT Laurynas Biveinis
12:29 Floating Point Representation in libgcc (is IEEE?) Paulo J. Matos
12:26 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Michael Matz
12:17 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
12:15 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Paulo J. Matos
12:06 Re: Question about Machine Description Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:01 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
12:00 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Joern Rennecke
11:17 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Paulo J. Matos
11:14 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Paulo J. Matos
10:46 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Joern Rennecke
10:31 Re: typed gengtype & GCC plugins for both 4.5 & 4.6 - e.g. MELT Joern Rennecke
09:45 Re: typed gengtype & GCC plugins for both 4.5 & 4.6 - e.g. MELT Richard Guenther
09:43 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Joseph S. Myers
09:30 Re: Question about Machine Description Revital1 Eres
09:26 typed gengtype & GCC plugins for both 4.5 & 4.6 - e.g. MELT Basile Starynkevitch
09:07 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
09:02 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Paulo J. Matos
08:58 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Paulo J. Matos
08:41 Re: [RFC] Cleaning up the pass manager Richard Guenther
08:24 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Paulo J. Matos
08:17 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Paulo J. Matos
08:06 Re: [RFC] Cleaning up the pass manager Joern Rennecke
07:36 Re: [RFC] Cleaning up the pass manager Manuel López-Ibáñez
06:47 Re: subreg against register allocation? Joern Rennecke
04:32 Re: subreg against register allocation? Jeff Law
03:50 Re: subreg against register allocation? Amker.Cheng
02:57 Re: [RFC] Cleaning up the pass manager Joern Rennecke
02:03 [RFC] Cleaning up the pass manager Diego Novillo

June 14, 2010
23:08 Re: subreg against register allocation? Mark Mitchell
22:53 Re: subreg against register allocation? Ian Lance Taylor
22:08 Re: subreg against register allocation? Bernd Schmidt
22:06 Re: subreg against register allocation? Ian Lance Taylor
21:21 Re: Patch pinging Quentin Neill
21:12 Re: subreg against register allocation? Bernd Schmidt
19:56 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Joseph S. Myers
18:02 Re: GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Ian Lance Taylor
17:58 Re: subreg against register allocation? Ian Lance Taylor
17:51 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Ian Lance Taylor
17:29 GCC 4.3.4 is casting my QImode vars to SImode for libcall Paulo J. Matos
17:14 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Ian Lance Taylor
16:44 Re: using GCC to compile games 4 game consoles Andrew Pinski
16:09 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
16:06 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:37 Re: Broken trunk (160732) Joern Rennecke
13:26 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Jakub Jelinek
13:14 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Michael Matz
13:01 Broken trunk (160732) Bingfeng Mei
11:58 using GCC to compile games 4 game consoles tajiya1
11:51 using GCC to compile games 4 game consoles tajiya1
10:03 Re: [inliner] g++ -O[123] generates undefined symbol ÐÐÐÑÑÐÐ ÐÑÑÑÐÐÐÐ
09:38 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Richard Guenther
09:37 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Richard Guenther
09:35 subreg against register allocation? Amker.Cheng
09:29 Re: how to get instruction codes in gcc passes? Ilya K
09:27 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program David Brown
09:21 RE: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Bingfeng Mei
09:16 Re: how to get instruction codes in gcc passes? Ilya K
09:02 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Dave Korn
08:24 Balla Ingatlaniroda - önkiszol gáló ügyfélszolgálat Balla Ingatlan
07:27 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program David Brown
05:27 RE: Pseudo frame pointer register in assembly code Naveen H. S
05:05 Re: SH optimized software floating point routines Joern Rennecke
04:50 Re: [inliner] g++ -O[123] generates undefined symbol Ian Lance Taylor
04:43 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Ian Lance Taylor
01:15 Re: SH optimized software floating point routines Kaz Kojima
00:05 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program David Brown

June 13, 2010
23:31 Re: onlinedocs/libstdc++ appears stale Jonathan Wakely
23:24 Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3 Jonathan Wakely
23:24 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Joseph S. Myers
23:23 Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3 Jonathan Wakely
22:56 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Dave Korn
22:56 Re: onlinedocs/libstdc++ appears stale Gerald Pfeifer
22:51 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Dave Korn
22:49 gcc-4.3-20100613 is now available gccadmin
22:40 onlinedocs/libstdc++ apperas stale (was: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3) Gerald Pfeifer
22:23 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program David Brown
22:22 Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3 Gerald Pfeifer
22:20 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Joseph S. Myers
22:08 Re: how to get instruction codes in gcc passes? Dave Korn
21:54 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Dave Korn
20:26 Re: how to get instruction codes in gcc passes? Basile Starynkevitch
20:05 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows H.J. Lu
19:57 Re: how to get instruction codes in gcc passes? Ian Lance Taylor
19:56 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Ian Lance Taylor
19:50 [inliner] g++ -O[123] generates undefined symbol ÐÐÐÑÑÐÐ ÐÑÑÑÐÐÐÐ
16:28 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Chris Lattner
15:50 Re: how to get instruction codes in gcc passes? Ilya K
15:28 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Frank Ch. Eigler
15:18 Re: how to get instruction codes in gcc passes? Dave Korn
15:09 Fwd: gcc-4.5.0 Success Story with Freecell Solver Shlomi Fish
15:02 Re: how to get instruction codes in gcc passes? Ilya K
14:38 Re: how to get instruction codes in gcc passes? Richard Guenther
14:36 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Joern Rennecke
14:29 how to get instruction codes in gcc passes? Ilya K
13:27 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Andi Kleen
13:09 Re: [Patch,Fortran,Committed] Re: Incorrect format of copyright statement for Fortran manuals Gerald Pfeifer
12:35 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program David Brown
11:14 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Joern Rennecke
10:07 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Andi Kleen

June 12, 2010
22:45 gcc-4.6-20100612 is now available gccadmin
18:54 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Ian Lance Taylor
18:44 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Ian Lance Taylor
15:15 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows H.J. Lu
14:52 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Richard Guenther
14:30 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program David Brown
11:25 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:46 Re: [Tinycc-devel] Please support coo.h shinichiro . h
07:41 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Andi Kleen
05:06 Re: ld linking behaviour Ian Lance Taylor

June 11, 2010
23:36 ld linking behaviour Edward Peschko
23:28 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Richard Guenther
22:42 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Quentin Neill
20:30 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Ian Lance Taylor
20:07 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program H.J. Lu
19:50 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:41 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:21 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Jakub Jelinek
19:17 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows H.J. Lu
19:09 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Quentin Neill
18:59 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Paolo Bonzini
18:49 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Cary Coutant
17:31 Dump final -most gimp le (with s sa) using the plugin option‏‏ karthik duraisami
17:21 Re: Minor issue with recent code to twiddle costs of pseudos with invariant equivalents Jeff Law
17:10 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Joern Rennecke
16:48 Re: Minor issue with recent code to twiddle costs of pseudos with invariant equivalents Bernd Schmidt
16:46 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Ralf Wildenhues
16:37 Re: Minor issue with recent code to twiddle costs of pseudos with invariant equivalents Jeff Law
15:58 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Daniel Jacobowitz
15:17 Re: GCC porting questions Ian Lance Taylor
14:59 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Ian Lance Taylor
14:52 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Ian Lance Taylor
14:43 Re: GCC porting questions Radu Hobincu
14:06 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Jan Hubicka
14:01 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Dave Korn
13:41 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:26 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Jan Hubicka
13:22 RE: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Bingfeng Mei
13:17 RE: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Bingfeng Mei
13:14 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:13 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Richard Guenther
13:04 RE: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Bingfeng Mei
13:03 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Richard Guenther
13:01 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Dave Korn
13:00 Re: [Tinycc-devel] Please support coo.h yuanbin
12:59 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Richard Guenther
12:57 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:43 Re: Please support coo.h Paolo Bonzini
12:40 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Richard Guenther
12:36 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:23 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Richard Guenther
12:23 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:07 Re: Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Richard Guenther
12:05 Issue with LTO/-fwhole-program Bingfeng Mei
09:36 Re: hot/cold pointer annotation Andi Kleen
09:27 Re: hot/cold pointer annotation Richard Guenther
08:15 Re: Please support coo.h yuanbin
05:58 Re: Please support coo.h Ian Lance Taylor
05:55 Re: Please support coo.h Magnus Fromreide
02:48 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Quentin Neill
00:44 Re: Please support coo.h yuanbin

June 10, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.5-20100610 is now available gccadmin
22:40 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Daniel Jacobowitz
22:23 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows H.J. Lu
22:09 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Quentin Neill
21:54 Re: Please support coo.h Dave Korn
21:08 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows H.J. Lu
20:59 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Quentin Neill
20:44 Re: Minor issue with recent code to twiddle costs of pseudos with invariant equivalents Bernd Schmidt
20:38 Minor issue with recent code to twiddle costs of pseudos with invariant equivalents Jeff Law
20:26 hot/cold pointer annotation Andi Kleen
20:25 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Joern Rennecke
20:12 Re: Patch pinging Quentin Neill
20:03 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Jeff Law
19:52 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows H.J. Lu
18:24 Re: Patch pinging Gerald Pfeifer
18:06 Re: Scheduling x86 dispatch windows Quentin Neill
17:24 Re: Please support coo.h yuanbin
17:21 Re: GCC porting questions Ian Lance Taylor
17:21 Scheduling x86 dispatch windows reza yazdani
15:39 Re: Please support coo.h Wojciech Meyer
15:11 GCC porting questions Radu Hobincu
14:34 Re: a typo in ira-emit.c? Vladimir Makarov
14:13 Re: internal compiler error in elim_reg_cond Ian Lance Taylor
13:57 Re: internal compiler error in elim_reg_cond Boris Boesler
13:27 Re: internal compiler error in elim_reg_cond Ian Lance Taylor
13:21 Re: Please support coo.h Andreas Schwab
13:20 Re: Please support coo.h yuanbin
12:59 Re: Please support coo.h yuanbin
12:44 Re: No output files on 4.6/Cygwin Piotr Wyderski
12:38 Announce: GNU MPFR 3.0.0 is released Vincent Lefevre
12:01 complex arithmetics roy rosen
11:57 Re: Please support coo.h Paolo Bonzini
11:31 SH optimized software floating point routines Naveen H. S
09:33 RE: externally_visible and resoultion file Bingfeng Mei
08:58 Please support coo.h yuanbin
08:27 internal compiler error in elim_reg_cond Boris Boesler
08:15 alpha-dec-osf5.1 4.5 built/installed Jay K
07:06 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Paolo Bonzini
04:29 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Jeremy Kerr
02:54 Re: a typo in ira-emit.c? Amker.Cheng
02:29 Re: a typo in ira-emit.c? Vladimir N. Makarov
00:46 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Paolo Bonzini

June 09, 2010
22:28 Re: externally_visible and resoultion file Richard Guenther
21:12 Re: license & copyright patch to MELT for dual GPLv3+ & GFDL1.2+ Mark Mitchell
21:08 Re: license & copyright patch to MELT for dual GPLv3+ & GFDL1.2+ Basile Starynkevitch
21:05 Re: Patch pinging Martin Guy
21:01 Re: license & copyright patch to MELT for dual GPLv3+ & GFDL1.2+ Basile Starynkevitch
20:57 Re: license & copyright patch to MELT for dual GPLv3+ & GFDL1.2+ Mark Mitchell
20:46 Re: license & copyright patch to MELT for dual GPLv3+ & GFDL1.2+ Basile Starynkevitch
20:06 Re: Vector subscription, register storage class Joseph S. Myers
17:43 Re: externally_visible and resoultion file Cary Coutant
17:17 Re: No output files on 4.6/Cygwin Dave Korn
16:31 Re: No output files on 4.6/Cygwin Piotr Wyderski
15:52 Re: No output files on 4.6/Cygwin Dave Korn
15:50 Re: No output files on 4.6/Cygwin Dave Korn
13:53 Vector subscription, register storage class Artem Shinkarov
13:24 Re: No output files on 4.6/Cygwin Piotr Wyderski
13:00 Re: No output files on 4.6/Cygwin Wojciech Meyer
12:54 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Segher Boessenkool
12:35 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Segher Boessenkool
11:31 No output files on 4.6/Cygwin Piotr Wyderski
10:45 a typo in ira-emit.c? Amker.Cheng
08:30 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Jeremy Kerr
08:12 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Martin Jambor
08:04 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Jeremy Kerr
07:35 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Manuel López-Ibáñez
07:31 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Manuel López-Ibáñez
06:13 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Paolo Bonzini
01:40 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
00:52 Re: Patch pinging Chiheng Xu
00:21 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Jeremy Kerr

June 08, 2010
23:04 Re: Patch pinging Martin Guy
22:52 gcc-4.4-20100608 is now available gccadmin
22:41 Re: Patch pinging Dave Korn
21:06 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Segher Boessenkool
20:44 Re: Variadic functions Ian Lance Taylor
20:37 Re: Experimental Patchwork setup Ian Lance Taylor
20:33 Re: Pseudo frame pointer register in assembly code Ian Lance Taylor
19:32 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Bonzini
19:21 Re: Patch pinging Basile Starynkevitch
18:43 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
18:41 Re: Patch pinging Basile Starynkevitch
16:31 Re: Patch pinging Eric Botcazou
15:55 Re: Patch pinging Tobias Burnus
15:53 Variadic functions Jonas Bonn
15:50 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:42 Re: Patch pinging H.J. Lu
15:32 Re: Patch pinging David Edelsohn
15:27 Experimental Patchwork setup Segher Boessenkool
15:21 Re: Patch pinging Jeff Law
15:21 Successful build Maynard, William L. (GSFC-5540
15:16 Re: gc-improv code merged to mainline, trunk is still frozen Laurynas Biveinis
15:08 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
14:59 Re: plugin_is_GPL_compatible mangling Mark Mitchell
14:58 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
14:23 Re: externally_visible and resoultion file Richard Guenther
14:22 RE: externally_visible and resoultion file Bingfeng Mei
14:22 Re: gc-improv code merged to mainline, trunk is still frozen Joern Rennecke
14:17 Re: externally_visible and resoultion file Richard Guenther
14:15 RE: externally_visible and resoultion file Bingfeng Mei
14:05 Re: plugin_is_GPL_compatible mangling Basile Starynkevitch
13:48 plugin_is_GPL_compatible mangling Joern Rennecke
13:10 Re: externally_visible and resoultion file Richard Guenther
13:02 RE: externally_visible and resoultion file Bingfeng Mei
11:30 Re: Patch pinging Jonathan Wakely
11:30 Re: gc-improv code merged to mainline, trunk is still frozen Laurynas Biveinis
11:17 Pseudo frame pointer register in assembly code Naveen H. S
09:18 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:18 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:14 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
08:43 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Bonzini
07:54 Re: Patch pinging Eric Botcazou
07:42 Re: gc-improv code merged to mainline, trunk is still frozen Laurynas Biveinis
07:35 gc-improv code merged to mainline, trunk is still frozen Laurynas Biveinis
07:32 Re: Patch pinging Jonathan Wakely
05:44 Re: Patch pinging Chiheng Xu
04:43 Re: Patch pinging Basile Starynkevitch
01:13 Re: Patch pinging Ben White
00:35 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
00:20 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez

June 07, 2010
23:59 Re: Patch pinging Manuel López-Ibáñez
22:22 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
22:21 Re: pic+64bit+sun assembler+unwind-tables => illegal cross section subtraction Rainer Orth
21:43 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
21:40 Re: Patch pinging Andrew Pinski
21:23 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
21:22 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
21:16 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
21:16 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
21:05 Re: Patch pinging Jeff Law
20:33 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
20:33 Re: Patch pinging Joseph S. Myers
20:31 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
20:27 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
19:40 Re: Patch pinging Steven Bosscher
19:36 Re: Patch pinging Paolo Carlini
19:34 Re: Patch pinging Eric Botcazou
19:24 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
18:57 [Patch,Fortran,Committed] Re: Incorrect format of copyright statement for Fortran manuals Tobias Burnus
17:04 Re: Patch pinging Eric Botcazou
15:00 Re: GNU MPFR 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 Vincent Lefevre
14:51 GCC 4.6 secondary platform update Paolo Bonzini
14:48 Re: Patch pinging Ian Lance Taylor
14:26 gfortran requires input files for linking? Peter O'Gorman
14:17 Re: GNU MPFR 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 David Edelsohn
11:40 Re: Patch pinging Martin Guy
11:24 Re: Patch pinging NightStrike
11:13 Re: â??x--â?? would self-add before opration "-- " ï¼? Andi Hellmund
11:06 Reminder: trunk frozen starting late tonight for gc-improv merge Laurynas Biveinis
09:33 MPFR 3.0.0 RC2 and GCC build (was: GNU MPFR 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2) Vincent Lefevre
07:47 Re: âx--â would self-add before opration "--" ï pem
07:40 Re: âx--â would self-add before oprati on "--" ï Paolo Bonzini
07:37 âx--â would self-add before opration "--" ï pem
01:41 Re: Puzzle about macro MIPS_PROLOGUE_TEMP_REGNUM Amker.Cheng

June 06, 2010
23:47 Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3 Jonathan Wakely
23:36 Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3 Gerald Pfeifer
23:15 Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3 Jonathan Wakely
22:50 Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3 Jonathan Wakely
22:47 gcc-4.3-20100606 is now available gccadmin
21:54 Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3 Gerald Pfeifer
20:35 GNU MPFR 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 Vincent Lefevre
18:31 Re: libstdc++, generic locale configuration, and c++0x Jonathan Wakely
18:22 Re: libstdc++, generic locale configuration, and c++0x Paolo Carlini
18:02 Re: libstdc++, generic locale configuration, and c++0x Doug Semler
16:03 Re: libstdc++, generic locale configuration, and c++0x Paolo Carlini
15:58 Bootstrap failure on darwin with --enable-build-with-cxx Dominique Dhumieres
15:30 libstdc++, generic locale configuration, and c++0x Doug Semler
09:27 GNU Hackers Meeting, Den Haag 2010 Dodji Seketeli
05:43 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor

June 05, 2010
22:51 gcc-4.6-20100605 is now available gccadmin
21:27 Re: Vector indexing patch Joseph S. Myers
21:14 Re: Vector indexing patch Andrew Pinski
20:52 Re: Vector indexing patch Andrew Pinski
20:51 Re: Vector indexing patch Richard Guenther
20:49 Re: Vector indexing patch Andrew Pinski
18:15 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
17:40 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
15:29 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
15:01 Need help tracking down and fixing PR44364 (e500 FP register save bug) Moffett, Kyle D
13:17 Re: [doc PATCH] Obsolete support for POWER and POWER2 Gerald Pfeifer
13:02 [doc PATCH] Obsolete support for POWER and POWER2 Segher Boessenkool
12:24 Re: Poor internal documentation (was: dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Jonathan Wakely
11:02 Incorrect format of copyright statement for Fortran manuals Gerald Pfeifer
10:18 Re: Vector indexing patch Richard Guenther
10:10 Re: Vector indexing patch Richard Guenther
06:58 Re: Puzzle about macro MIPS_PROLOGUE_TEMP_REGNUM Richard Sandiford
03:53 Re: Poor internal documentation (was: dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Philipp Thomas
02:36 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
00:58 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
00:56 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jeff Law
00:48 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell

June 04, 2010
23:10 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jonathan Wakely
21:39 Re: Vector indexing patch Andrew Pinski
21:09 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
21:07 RE: Bootstrap failed for i386-pc-solaris2.10 and sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Arthur Haas
20:55 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
20:32 Re: Vector indexing patch Joseph S. Myers
20:15 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Joseph S. Myers
20:06 Re: Vector indexing patch Richard Guenther
20:02 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Joseph S. Myers
19:58 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Joseph S. Myers
19:53 RE: Using C++ in GCC is OK Joseph S. Myers
19:42 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Joseph S. Myers
19:34 Re: Time to create wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.6? Joseph S. Myers
19:33 Re: Auto-generated cross-references can be distributed under the GPL Joseph S. Myers
19:27 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Joseph S. Myers
17:29 Re: Bootstrap failed for i386-pc-solaris2.10 and sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Nathan Froyd
17:04 Auto-generated cross-references can be distributed under the GPL Mark Mitchell
16:38 Re: Vector indexing patch Joseph S. Myers
16:15 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Joseph S. Myers
15:32 Re: Bootstrap failed for i386-pc-solaris2.10 and sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Ian Lance Taylor
15:27 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Kai Tietz
15:17 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Diego Novillo
15:04 Re: Bootstrap failed for i386-pc-solaris2.10 and sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Nathan Froyd
14:45 Re: Bootstrap failed for i386-pc-solaris2.10 and sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Ian Lance Taylor
14:42 Re: Puzzle about macro MIPS_PROLOGUE_TEMP_REGNUM Ian Lance Taylor
14:20 Re: Bootstrap failed for i386-pc-solaris2.10 and sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Nathan Froyd
13:44 Bootstrap failed for i386-pc-solaris2.10 and sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Art Haas
12:59 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Larry Evans
11:44 Re: [x86]: Allow @GOTOFF in non-memory context? Rainer Orth
09:56 Puzzle about macro MIPS_PROLOGUE_TEMP_REGNUM Amker.Cheng
08:24 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Andrew Haley
00:35 Votre Maison Bonjour

June 03, 2010
23:34 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Sebastian Pop
22:50 gcc-4.5-20100603 is now available gccadmin
22:46 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jonathan Wakely
22:04 RE: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Vakatov, Denis (NIH/NLM/NCBI)
20:49 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
20:47 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
20:38 RE: Using C++ in GCC is OK Hargett, Matt
20:28 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
19:41 Re: [x86]: Allow @GOTOFF in non-memory context? Uros Bizjak
19:40 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Steinar Bang
19:36 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Steinar Bang
18:10 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Basile Starynkevitch
18:05 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
17:42 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Andrew Haley
17:35 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Toon Moene
15:12 Re: Time to create wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.6? Michael Meissner
13:31 Re: Time to create wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.6? Gerald Pfeifer
12:28 Re: [x86]: Allow @GOTOFF in non-memory context? Kai Tietz
12:25 [x86]: Allow @GOTOFF in non-memory context? Uros Bizjak
11:16 Re: Target macros vs. target hooks - policy/goal is hooks, isn't it? Richard Guenther
11:14 Re: Target macros vs. target hooks - policy/goal is hooks, isn't it? Ira Rosen
11:09 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
11:00 Re: Target macros vs. target hooks - policy/goal is hooks, isn't it? Richard Guenther
10:52 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
10:49 Re: Time to create wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.6? Richard Guenther
08:49 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Steven Bosscher
08:34 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Paolo Bonzini
08:24 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Andrew Haley
07:01 Re: Target macros vs. target hooks - policy/goal is hooks, isn't it? Ira Rosen
06:44 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK åææ
06:11 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
05:47 Re: gc-improv merge plan (will need trunk freeze) Laurynas Biveinis
05:36 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh

June 02, 2010
23:49 Time to create wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.6? Michael Meissner
23:44 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK DJ Delorie
22:15 Re: question about GCC Jonathan Wakely
21:48 RE: Using C++ in GCC is OK Hargett, Matt
21:42 question about GCC manal habib
20:54 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Eric Blake
20:20 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK DJ Delorie
19:17 Re: Patch pinging Diego Novillo
19:00 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Joern Rennecke
18:09 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jakub Jelinek
18:09 Patch pinging NightStrike
17:52 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Earnshaw
17:51 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Kenner
17:50 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jakub Jelinek
17:48 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
17:47 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Mark Mitchell
17:22 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Earnshaw
17:17 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Earnshaw
16:26 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Dave Korn
16:23 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
16:14 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Dave Korn
16:03 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Tom Tromey
15:13 Re: Target macros vs. target hooks - policy/goal is hooks, isn't it? Steven Bosscher
15:12 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
14:57 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
14:55 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
14:45 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
14:40 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jonathan Wakely
14:36 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jonathan Wakely
14:33 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK EmÃlio Wuerges
14:23 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
14:14 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Mark Mitchell
14:08 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Paolo Bonzini
14:07 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Mark Mitchell
14:05 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Paolo Bonzini
14:01 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Richard Kenner
13:56 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Mark Mitchell
13:54 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
13:52 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
13:28 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
13:08 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
13:08 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
13:04 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
13:02 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
12:59 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Earnshaw
12:55 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
12:50 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
12:46 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Michael Matz
12:44 Re: Bug in C FE or difference between C & C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
12:34 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Michael Matz
12:08 Re: gc-improv merge plan (will need trunk freeze) Richard Guenther
12:01 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Paolo Bonzini
11:51 Re: gc-improv merge plan (will need trunk freeze) David Edelsohn
10:48 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Matthias Klose
10:29 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Dave Korn
10:22 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Dave Korn
10:14 Re: Bug in C FE or difference between C & C++ Richard Guenther
10:00 Bug in C FE or difference between C & C++ Bingfeng Mei
09:42 RE: Using C++ in GCC is OK Bingfeng Mei
09:36 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
09:34 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Eric Botcazou
09:19 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
09:17 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
09:12 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
08:59 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Richard Guenther
08:04 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jakub Jelinek
07:44 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Paolo Bonzini
06:47 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Laurynas Biveinis
06:41 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
06:32 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Laurynas Biveinis
06:29 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Laurynas Biveinis
06:23 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
06:07 gc-improv merge plan (will need trunk freeze) Laurynas Biveinis
05:27 Re: Tree Browser Eric Fisher
05:14 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK åææ
04:44 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Basile Starynkevitch
04:43 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Basile Starynkevitch
03:52 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK åææ
02:23 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Geert Bosch
01:55 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK åææ
01:48 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
01:44 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
01:42 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
01:41 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
01:30 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Kenner
01:09 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
01:04 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK DJ Delorie
00:52 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Joern Rennecke
00:50 Re: C++ vs Cpp v Cxx Gabriel Dos Reis
00:49 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
00:47 C++ vs Cpp v Cxx DJ Delorie
00:44 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jeff Law
00:44 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
00:41 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
00:41 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue DJ Delorie
00:38 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK DJ Delorie
00:37 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
00:19 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Mark Mitchell
00:10 Re: GFDL/GPL Issue Joern Rennecke
00:10 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK DJ Delorie
00:05 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK DJ Delorie
00:03 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK DJ Delorie
00:00 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Bernd Schmidt

June 01, 2010
23:43 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
23:40 Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/44013] VTA produces wrong code Alexandre Oliva
23:39 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
23:32 GFDL/GPL Issue Mark Mitchell
23:30 Re: merging the maverick FPU patches Martin Guy
23:29 RE: Using C++ in GCC is OK Hargett, Matt
23:09 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK DJ Delorie
22:59 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Dave Korn
22:51 gcc-4.4-20100601 is now available gccadmin
22:49 RE: Using C++ in GCC is OK Hargett, Matt
22:31 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jonathan Wakely
21:41 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK DJ Delorie
21:13 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
21:04 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ DJ Delorie
20:55 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Eric Blake
20:54 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK DJ Delorie
20:21 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Eric Blake
20:06 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Ralf Wildenhues
19:22 Vector indexing patch Artem Shinkarov
19:16 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Ralf Wildenhues
19:11 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Joern Rennecke
18:54 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Ralf Wildenhues
18:37 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Toon Moene
18:25 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
18:02 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Diego Novillo
18:01 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Toon Moene
17:52 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Basile Starynkevitch
17:34 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
17:26 Re: Include files search order of cross build gcc Ian Lance Taylor
16:58 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
16:55 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Vladimir Makarov
16:49 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
16:38 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
16:27 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Rich Wallick
16:07 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Richard Guenther
15:45 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
15:16 Include files search order of cross build gcc Dongsheng Song
14:57 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
14:57 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
14:49 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
14:22 Reverted bogus commit in rev 160105 Diego Novillo
14:16 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Brian Makin
14:12 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
11:52 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Richard Guenther
10:00 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Richard Guenther
09:43 Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/44013] VTA produces wrong code Hariharan
09:32 Re: Loops no longer vectorized Dominique Dhumieres
09:16 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Bernd Roesch
08:31 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Paolo Bonzini
08:24 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Steven Bosscher
08:22 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Duncan Sands
08:13 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK VÃclav Haisman
08:07 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Paolo Bonzini
06:11 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Ian Lance Taylor
04:53 Re: GCC documentation in .info Ian Lance Taylor
04:41 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Ian Lance Taylor
04:38 Re: possible license issue (documentation generated from source) in MELT branch of GCC Basile Starynkevitch
03:36 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Mark Mitchell
03:10 Re: How to find out register information at the beginning of a basic block? Vladimir N. Makarov
02:12 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Geert Bosch
00:42 Question on REG_EQUAL documentation Jie Zhang
00:17 Re: How to find out register information at the beginning of a basic block? H.J. Lu


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3