This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libgcc2

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: EggenmÃller Bernd <egge-b at gmx dot de>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 08:50:07 -0700
Subject: Re: libgcc2
References: <1273493360.28372.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org> <4BEA9B3E.6020306@gmx.de> <mcreihhi7dy.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <4BEAAD7B.7020009@gmx.de> <mcr8w7pmbtb.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <4BEC1EE3.80002@gmx.de>

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:46 AM, EggenmÃller Bernd <egge-b@gmx.de> wrote:
> Is there any implementation with less registers like this.

libgcc2 is written in C; so if it fails to compile you need to fix up
your backend.  There might need some middle-end fixes too with this
small number of registers used.  You might just want to disable double
register sized integer types to fix this in the end.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libgcc2
  - From: EggenmÃller Bernd
- Re: libgcc2
  - From: EggenmÃller Bernd

References:
- libgcc2
  - From: Eggenmüller Bernd
- Re: libgcc2
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: libgcc2
  - From: EggenmÃller Bernd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]