gcc archive
date index for May, 2010

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 31, 2010
23:44 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
23:27 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Larry Evans
23:25 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Steven Bosscher
23:12 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Joel Sherrill
22:39 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Joern Rennecke
22:24 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Joern Rennecke
21:37 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Thomas Neumann
21:15 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Mark Mitchell
21:12 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
20:51 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Thomas Neumann
20:46 Re: possible license issue (documentation generated from source) in MELT branch of GCC Basile Starynkevitch
20:16 Re: How to find out register information at the beginning of a basic block? Vladimir Makarov
19:50 Re: How to find out register information at the beginning of a basic block? H.J. Lu
19:41 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Basile Starynkevitch
19:38 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Toon Moene
19:38 Re: possible license issue (documentation generated from source) in MELT branch of GCC Mark Mitchell
19:37 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:35 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Diego Novillo
19:34 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Mark Mitchell
19:31 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Basile Starynkevitch
19:30 Re: How to find out register information at the beginning of a basic block? Vladimir Makarov
19:29 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:16 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Tobias Burnus
19:00 How to find out register information at the beginning of a basic block? H.J. Lu
18:51 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Mark Mitchell
18:48 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
18:46 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
18:26 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Mark Mitchell
18:24 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Michael Witten
18:21 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Michael Witten
18:13 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Andi Kleen
17:54 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Vladimir Makarov
17:44 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
17:42 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
17:32 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Vladimir Makarov
17:31 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
17:22 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
17:19 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jakub Jelinek
17:11 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
17:06 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:02 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
16:54 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jakub Jelinek
16:54 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Diego Novillo
16:52 Re: possible license issue (documentation generated from source) in MELT branch of GCC Robert Dewar
16:50 Re: [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:44 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
16:39 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Eric Botcazou
16:39 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
16:37 Re: possible license issue (documentation generated from source) in MELT branch of GCC Basile Starynkevitch
16:26 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Basile Starynkevitch
16:22 [RFC] Switching implementation language to C++ Diego Novillo
16:17 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Jakub Jelinek
16:00 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
15:59 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Vladimir Makarov
15:56 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Diego Novillo
15:54 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Diego Novillo
15:53 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
15:53 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Diego Novillo
15:53 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
15:48 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
15:46 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Frank Ch. Eigler
15:40 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell
15:35 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
15:30 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK David Fang
15:15 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
15:10 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
15:09 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Steven Bosscher
15:04 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
14:58 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
12:23 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
12:14 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Michael Veksler
11:10 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
10:59 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
10:57 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Richard Guenther
10:49 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK åææ
10:41 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
10:30 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK åææ
10:29 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK åææ
10:24 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Andreas Schwab
10:06 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Eric Botcazou
09:54 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Andrew Pinski
09:53 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Paolo Bonzini
09:48 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Eric Botcazou
09:17 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Andreas Schwab
09:11 Code Instrumentation Wolfgang
08:42 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Basile Starynkevitch
08:19 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Basile Starynkevitch
06:51 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Eric Botcazou
06:39 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Gabriel Dos Reis
05:29 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Basile Starynkevitch
02:29 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Arnaud Lacombe
02:04 Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK Robert Dewar
00:26 Using C++ in GCC is OK Mark Mitchell

May 30, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.3-20100530 is now available gccadmin
18:17 Problem with DTYPE ABI regarding long double vs. __float128 FX
16:57 GCC 4.3.5 Released Richard Guenther
11:56 GCC documentation in .info christophe . jarry
07:07 Re: Loops no longer vectorized Ira Rosen
06:08 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Gabriel Dos Reis
06:01 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Basile Starynkevitch
05:40 Re: possible license issue (documentation generated from source) in MELT branch of GCC Joe Buck
00:10 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Gerald Pfeifer

May 29, 2010
23:03 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Robert Dewar
22:48 gcc-4.6-20100529 is now available gccadmin
22:33 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Basile Starynkevitch
21:48 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Gabriel Dos Reis
19:19 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Basile Starynkevitch
17:14 Re: possible license issue (documentation generated from source) in MELT branch of GCC Basile Starynkevitch
16:46 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Robert Dewar
15:59 Unused variables and functions and missing const decls in cc1 binary Jan Hubicka
15:54 Re: How to make IRA not to move an instruction Andrew Pinski
15:26 Re: How to make IRA not to move an instruction H.J. Lu
14:45 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Basile Starynkevitch
14:33 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Magnus Granberg
13:59 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Marc Espie
13:58 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Basile Starynkevitch
13:50 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Richard Kenner
13:49 Re: trampolines handling, important copyright question Steven Bosscher
13:45 trampolines handling, important copyright question Marc Espie
11:34 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Dave Korn
10:56 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Richard Guenther
10:55 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Richard Guenther
09:17 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Andreas Schwab
08:40 possible license issue (documentation generated from source) in MELT branch of GCC Basile Starynkevitch
04:08 Re: How to make IRA not to move an instruction Vladimir N. Makarov
01:07 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Dave Korn
01:07 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Dave Korn
00:17 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Ian Lance Taylor
00:14 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Ian Lance Taylor

May 28, 2010
23:48 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Dave Korn
23:40 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Dave Korn
22:37 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Ian Lance Taylor
22:19 Re: How to make IRA not to move an instruction H.J. Lu
22:16 RE: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Vakatov, Denis (NIH/NLM/NCBI)
22:03 Re: How to make IRA not to move an instruction Jeff Law
21:53 Re: optimizing a DSO Ian Lance Taylor
21:40 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Richard Guenther
21:25 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Ian Lance Taylor
19:16 RE: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Vakatov, Denis (NIH/NLM/NCBI)
18:55 Re: optimizing a DSO Tim Prince
18:33 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Ian Lance Taylor
18:24 RE: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Vakatov, Denis (NIH/NLM/NCBI)
18:14 Re: optimizing a DSO Ian Lance Taylor
17:10 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Paolo Bonzini
16:38 How to make IRA not to move an instruction H.J. Lu
16:13 RE: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Vakatov, Denis (NIH/NLM/NCBI)
15:36 Re: optimizing a DSO Quentin Neill
13:37 Re: Target macros vs. target hooks - policy/goal is hooks, isn't it? Paolo Bonzini
13:12 Re: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Paolo Bonzini
12:52 Loops no longer vectorized Dominique Dhumieres
11:44 Re: GCC wiki page on gengtype improvements Basile Starynkevitch
10:29 GCC wiki page on gengtype improvements Laurynas Biveinis
07:46 Re: loading output of -fdump-tree-original-raw Steven Bosscher
04:37 Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCB
04:28 Re: loading output of -fdump-tree-original-raw Andrew Pinski
04:14 Re: [doc PATCH] Obsolete support for POWER and POWER2 Segher Boessenkool
04:10 Re: loading output of -fdump-tree-original-raw Marcus G. Daniels
03:40 Re: loading output of -fdump-tree-original-raw Andrew Pinski
03:21 loading output of -fdump-tree-original-raw Marcus G. Daniels
02:51 Re: [doc PATCH] Obsolete support for POWER and POWER2 David Edelsohn
01:17 [doc PATCH] Obsolete support for POWER and POWER2 Segher Boessenkool
00:32 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Ian Lance Taylor

May 27, 2010
22:51 gcc-4.5-20100527 is now available gccadmin
22:39 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joern Rennecke
22:03 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Russ Allbery
19:58 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.9 is released H.J. Lu
18:47 Re: GCC RM Q&A, C++ in GCC Joseph S. Myers
18:36 GCC RM Q&A, C++ in GCC Mark Mitchell
17:20 Re: Melt-building problem Basile Starynkevitch
16:23 Re: stack slot reuse Xinliang David Li
16:12 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Alfred M. Szmidt
15:45 Re: gcc compilation broken with --enable-checking=release Jan Hubicka
15:28 Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Art Haas
15:05 Re: What are PLUGINCC & PLUGINCFLAGS in gcc/Makefile.in? Eric Botcazou
14:37 gcc compilation broken with --enable-checking=release Martin Reinecke
11:51 Re: [patch] Remove TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_KEYWORDS target macro Ulrich Weigand
11:46 Re: GCC4.3.4 downside against GCC3.4.4 on mips? Richard Guenther
11:44 Re: 32-bit immediate Georg Lay
11:43 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joseph S. Myers
11:37 Re: GCC4.3.4 downside against GCC3.4.4 on mips? Paolo Bonzini
10:49 Re: stack slot reuse Martin Jambor
10:33 Re: GCC4.3.4 downside against GCC3.4.4 on mips? Amker.Cheng
09:38 Re: stack slot reuse Richard Guenther
09:14 32-bit immediate Eggenmüller Bernd
08:41 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
08:38 Re: Melt-building problem Basile Starynkevitch
08:29 What are PLUGINCC & PLUGINCFLAGS in gcc/Makefile.in? Basile Starynkevitch
08:14 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Paolo Bonzini
08:12 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Paolo Bonzini
08:10 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
08:04 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Paolo Bonzini
08:04 Re: externally_visible and resoultion file Jan Hubicka
08:02 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joern Rennecke
07:49 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Paolo Bonzini
07:25 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
06:26 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
05:39 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Paolo Bonzini
05:16 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Paolo Bonzini
05:10 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Basile Starynkevitch
04:58 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
04:19 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Russ Allbery
00:01 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Ian Lance Taylor

May 26, 2010
23:12 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
23:12 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:54 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Alfred M. Szmidt
21:51 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Mark Mitchell
21:42 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Steven Bosscher
21:42 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Mark Mitchell
21:37 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joseph S. Myers
21:28 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joern Rennecke
21:26 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joseph S. Myers
21:22 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Mark Mitchell
21:15 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joern Rennecke
21:07 Re: RFH: gen_rtx_MEM / gen_rtx_CONST in ada front-end code Eric Botcazou
21:06 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Matthias Klose
20:31 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Mark Mitchell
19:16 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Basile Starynkevitch
18:49 Re: [patch] Remove TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_KEYWORDS target macro Michael Meissner
18:42 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joern Rennecke
18:27 Re: [patch] Remove TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_KEYWORDS target macro Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Mark Mitchell
18:12 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Richard Kenner
18:10 [patch] Remove TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_KEYWORDS target macro Ulrich Weigand
18:09 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Mark Mitchell
18:03 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Basile Starynkevitch
17:44 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Basile Starynkevitch
17:32 Re: Target macros vs. target hooks - policy/goal is hooks, isn't it? Michael Meissner
17:16 Re: Target macros vs. target hooks - policy/goal is hooks, isn't it? Mark Mitchell
17:03 Re: stack slot reuse Easwaran Raman
17:03 Re: Target macros vs. target hooks - policy/goal is hooks, isn't it? Ulrich Weigand
16:19 Re: Ada LTO failures (2x) Richard Guenther
16:11 Re: Ada LTO failures (2x) Eric Botcazou
16:08 Re: externally_visible and resoultion file Richard Guenther
16:05 Re: stack slot reuse Richard Guenther
16:03 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joern Rennecke
16:03 Re: Ada LTO failures (2x) Richard Guenther
15:56 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Mark Mitchell
15:53 externally_visible and resoultion file Bingfeng Mei
15:42 Re: stack slot reuse Xinliang David Li
15:41 Re: Ada LTO failures (2x) Eric Botcazou
15:36 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Frank Ch. Eigler
15:09 Re: Performance optimizations for Intel Core 2 and Core i7 processors Maxim Kuvyrkov
14:40 Re: vectorization issue Richard Guenther
14:27 vectorization issue roy rosen
13:43 Re: i370 port - status Paul Edwards
13:03 Re: Ada LTO failures (2x) Rainer Orth
12:40 Re: Melt-building problem Basile Starynkevitch
12:35 Ada LTO failures (2x) Steven Bosscher
11:05 RFH: gen_rtx_MEM / gen_rtx_CONST in ada front-end code Steven Bosscher
10:57 Re: Melt-building problem Basile Starynkevitch
10:27 Target macros vs. target hooks - policy/goal is hooks, isn't it? Steven Bosscher
09:58 Re: stack slot reuse Richard Guenther
09:37 Re: Melt-building problem Wolfgang
08:48 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Andreas Schwab
08:04 Re: Testing GCC on Cygwin made substantially easier [was Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc?] Laurynas Biveinis
07:30 Re: [PATCH, committed] Re: toplevel out of sync Paolo Bonzini
07:25 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joern Rennecke
06:25 Re: [PATCH, committed] Re: toplevel out of sync Ralf Wildenhues
05:56 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Basile Starynkevitch
05:16 [PATCH, committed] Re: toplevel out of sync Dave Korn
04:49 Re: toplevel out of sync Dave Korn
04:39 Re: toplevel out of sync Dave Korn
04:35 Re: toplevel out of sync Dave Korn
04:19 Re: toplevel out of sync NightStrike
00:53 RM Q&A Session on irc.oftc.net Mark Mitchell
00:44 GFDL/GPL issues Mark Mitchell

May 25, 2010
23:27 Re: unrecognizable insn ICE in latticemico32 (lm32-elf) when building Linux kernel Ian Lance Taylor
22:50 gcc-4.4-20100525 is now available gccadmin
21:03 Re: unrecognizable insn ICE in latticemico32 (lm32-elf) when building Linux kernel Philip Pemberton
20:41 Re: toplevel out of sync DJ Delorie
20:38 Re: toplevel out of sync DJ Delorie
20:02 Re: stack slot reuse Easwaran Raman
17:43 Re: toplevel out of sync Ralf Wildenhues
17:39 Re: toplevel out of sync Ralf Wildenhues
17:10 Re: toplevel out of sync Paolo Bonzini
17:09 Re: toplevel out of sync Ralf Wildenhues
16:10 toplevel out of sync Paolo Bonzini
15:32 Trouble with MDs: "const" RTL object stops recognition of RTL expressions by insn patterns Sergio Ruocco
15:32 Re: Melt-building problem Basile Starynkevitch
15:19 Re: Melt-building problem Basile Starynkevitch
15:09 Re: Melt-building problem Wolfgang
15:07 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Paolo Bonzini
15:00 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Andreas Schwab
14:54 Re: Melt-building problem Basile Starynkevitch
14:44 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
14:28 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Ralf Wildenhues
14:26 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Mark Mitchell
14:23 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
14:20 Re: Melt-building problem Basile Starynkevitch
13:05 Re: Help with expanding compare Paolo Bonzini
13:02 Re: Help with expanding compare Revital1 Eres
12:57 Re: Help with expanding compare Paolo Bonzini
12:35 Re: GCC4.3.4 downside against GCC3.4.4 on mips? VÃclav Haisman
12:33 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
12:25 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Joseph S. Myers
10:13 Help with expanding compare Revital1 Eres
10:03 Melt-building problem Wolfgang
09:13 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Andreas Schwab
08:57 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: FAQ conflict Gerald Pfeifer
08:53 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Dave Korn
08:44 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
08:28 GCC4.3.4 downside against GCC3.4.4 on mips? Amker.Cheng
07:57 Re: Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Paolo Bonzini
07:55 Help needed: banishing RTL from the front ends Steven Bosscher
05:29 RFC 2821 violation by GCC Bugzilla Andrew Church
05:18 Re: A question about _udivdi3.o in libgcc.a on Loongson platform Ling Kun
05:11 Re: A question about _udivdi3.o in libgcc.a on Loongson platform Ian Lance Taylor
05:07 Re: unrecognizable insn ICE in latticemico32 (lm32-elf) when building Linux kernel Ian Lance Taylor
02:40 A question about _udivdi3.o in libgcc.a on Loongson platform Ling Kun
01:20 unrecognizable insn ICE in latticemico32 (lm32-elf) when building Linux kernel Philip Pemberton

May 24, 2010
23:22 Sterling Augustine appointed Xtensa port maintainer David Edelsohn
22:59 Re: Where does the time go? Joseph S. Myers
22:51 Re: Where does the time go? Mark Mitchell
21:07 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support Martin Guy
20:10 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Gerald Pfeifer
19:22 Re: Where does the time go? Steven Bosscher
18:55 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new mirror Gerald Pfeifer
18:44 Re: Build error with USE_MD_CONSTRAINTS vs. CONST_OK_FOR_CONSTRAINT_P Ian Lance Taylor
18:00 new mirror James Miller
17:00 Re: [RFC] Quad-float support for gfortran Joseph S. Myers
16:56 Build error with USE_MD_CONSTRAINTS vs. CONST_OK_FOR_CONSTRAINT_P Jeff Kuskin
16:20 Re: Where does the time go? Mark Mitchell
15:30 Re: delay branch bug? Hariharan Sandanagobalane
14:33 Re: delay branch bug? Eric Botcazou
14:25 Re: delay branch bug? Jakub Jelinek
14:14 Re: delay branch bug? Jeff Law
13:49 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support Mark Mitchell
13:09 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Richard Kenner
12:54 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support Richard Earnshaw
12:51 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Richard Earnshaw
11:50 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support Joseph S. Myers
11:46 delay branch bug? Hariharan
11:43 Re: gfortran windows builds script Richard Guenther
11:41 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Richard Guenther
11:41 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support Joel Sherrill
11:38 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Joseph S. Myers
11:33 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Joseph S. Myers
11:06 GNU MPFR 3.0.0 Release Candidate Vincent Lefevre
10:50 Re: [RFC] Quad-float support for gfortran Dennis Wassel
10:49 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Richard Earnshaw
10:42 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Steven Bosscher
08:26 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Richard Earnshaw
08:23 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Richard Earnshaw
06:25 Re: gfortran windows builds script FX
02:53 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Steve Kargl
02:01 [RFC] Quad-float support for gfortran FX

May 23, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.3-20100523 is now available gccadmin
21:24 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support Mark Mitchell
21:15 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Steven Bosscher
20:26 Re: Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Mark Mitchell
19:45 Re: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22) Richard Guenther
19:09 Re: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22) Gerald Pfeifer
15:16 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Kai Wang
13:36 Re: Where does the time go? Joseph S. Myers
10:16 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Gerald Pfeifer
04:11 Deprecating ARM FPA support (was: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target) Martin Guy

May 22, 2010
22:48 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Gerald Pfeifer
22:47 gcc-4.6-20100522 is now available gccadmin
22:15 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Steve Kargl
21:52 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Gerald Pfeifer
21:15 C++ ABI change for std::bad_array_new_length Florian Weimer
21:07 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Richard Guenther
20:57 GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22) Richard Guenther
20:29 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Steve Kargl

May 21, 2010
20:43 Re: stack slot reuse Richard Guenther
20:29 Re: stack slot reuse Xinliang David Li
19:44 Re: Where does the time go? Diego Novillo
17:35 Re: stack slot reuse Richard Guenther
17:30 stack slot reuse Xinliang David Li
17:07 Re: Fw: quesitons about gcc 4.4.1 Ian Lance Taylor
17:06 Re: Performance optimizations for Intel Core 2 and Core i7 processors Vladimir N. Makarov
16:44 Re: Where does the time go? Richard Guenther
16:13 Re: Where does the time go? Xinliang David Li
16:08 Fw: quesitons about gcc 4.4.1 lin li
15:49 Re: Proposal: remove the Obj-C++ front end IainS
15:06 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage Nathan Froyd
13:26 Re: Where does the time go? Jan Hubicka
10:56 Re: Where does the time go? Richard Guenther
10:54 Re: Where does the time go? Jan Hubicka
09:25 v2: plugin to warn about surplus includes Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
09:24 Re: Where does the time go? Richard Guenther
09:23 Re: [PATCH, RFC] plugin to warn about surplus includes Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
09:12 Re: Proposal: remove the Obj-C++ front end Richard Guenther
08:58 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Richard Guenther
08:04 RE: Updating multilib support after a compiler is built Jon Beniston
03:59 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage Mark Mitchell
02:44 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage David Edelsohn
01:35 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage Alan Modra
00:47 Re: Performance optimizations for Intel Core 2 and Core i7 processors Alexander Strange
00:43 Re: Code compilation with GCC and GFORTRAN Ian Lance Taylor

May 20, 2010
22:53 gcc-4.5-20100520 is now available gccadmin
22:49 Re: Code compilation with GCC and GFORTRAN Muhammad Akbar
22:34 Code compilation with GCC and GFORTRAN muhammad.k.akbar
21:28 Re: Where does the time go? Bradley Lucier
21:21 Re: Where does the time go? Xinliang David Li
21:18 Re: Where does the time go? Steven Bosscher
21:14 Re: Where does the time go? Steven Bosscher
21:14 Re: Where does the time go? Xinliang David Li
21:09 Re: Where does the time go? Ian Lance Taylor
20:54 Re: Where does the time go? Duncan Sands
20:42 Re: Where does the time go? Eric Botcazou
20:36 Re: Where does the time go? Steven Bosscher
20:35 Re: Where does the time go? Eric Botcazou
20:26 Re: Proposal: remove the Obj-C++ front end Steven Bosscher
20:21 Re: Proposal: remove the Obj-C++ front end Steven Bosscher
20:20 Re: Proposal: remove the Obj-C++ front end Basile Starynkevitch
19:57 Re: Where does the time go? Toon Moene
19:55 Re: Proposal: remove the Obj-C++ front end IainS
19:36 Re: Where does the time go? Joseph S. Myers
19:16 Re: Where does the time go? Vladimir Makarov
19:02 Proposal: remove the Obj-C++ front end Steven Bosscher
18:43 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Peter Dimov
18:26 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Paolo Carlini
18:13 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Jason Merrill
17:31 Re: Workaround for error: ??? cannot appear in a constant-expression Ian Lance Taylor
17:26 Re: gcc 3.2 compile issue when initialize value Ian Lance Taylor
17:20 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Kai Wang
16:40 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage Mark Mitchell
16:26 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage Joel Sherrill
16:21 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage Mark Mitchell
15:55 Where does the time go? Steven Bosscher
14:20 Workaround for error: ??? cannot appear in a constant-expression Jan Tusch
14:05 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Andrew Pinski
12:44 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Peter Dimov
12:24 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Paolo Carlini
12:19 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Peter Dimov
12:17 Re: Performance optimizations for Intel Core 2 and Core i7 processors Maxim Kuvyrkov
12:05 Re: Performance optimizations for Intel Core 2 and Core i7 processors Steven Bosscher
11:59 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Paolo Carlini
11:55 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Paolo Carlini
11:49 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Peter Dimov
11:16 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Paolo Carlini
11:10 Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Paolo Carlini
10:35 gcc 3.2 compile issue when initialize value Yixuan Huang
10:08 [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x Paolo Carlini
03:57 Re: Question about rtx format for insn, call_insn and junp_insn kito
02:52 Re: Question about rtx format for insn, call_insn and junp_insn Ian Lance Taylor

May 19, 2010
23:13 Re: [PATCH, RFC] plugin to warn about surplus includes Tom Tromey
18:43 Question about rtx format for insn, call_insn and junp_insn kito
16:28 Re: g++ generates code for constructors and destructors several times Andrew Pinski
16:17 g++ generates code for constructors and destructors several times Lénaïc Huard
15:34 Haber Paketi Reklam Teklifi Hasan KARA
15:33 RE: ICE in LTO. Bingfeng Mei
15:12 Re: ICE in LTO. Richard Guenther
14:12 ICE in LTO. Bingfeng Mei
14:05 Re: RM Q&A Session on May 27th Mark Mitchell
13:10 Re: RM Q&A Session on May 27th Joseph S. Myers
05:37 prerequisites page Todd Rinaldo
03:47 Re: RM Q&A Session on May 27th Mark Mitchell
03:40 Re: RM Q&A Session on May 27th NightStrike
03:36 RM Q&A Session on May 27th Mark Mitchell
00:19 Re: useless stores generated when returning a struct -- bug? Joshua Haberman
00:12 Re: disallow movm in a register class Ian Lance Taylor
00:09 Re: useless stores generated when returning a struct -- bug? Ian Lance Taylor

May 18, 2010
23:53 Re: [PATCH, RFC] plugin to warn about surplus includes Joel Sherrill
22:54 gcc-4.4-20100518 is now available gccadmin
22:53 Re: [PATCH, RFC] plugin to warn about surplus includes Steven Bosscher
20:56 [PATCH, RFC] plugin to warn about surplus includes Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
19:36 disallow movm in a register class Eggenmüller Bernd
18:54 Re: Updating multilib support after a compiler is built Joseph S. Myers
18:18 Re: gcc help Joel Sherrill
18:11 gcc help packet
18:06 useless stores generated when returning a struct -- bug? Joshua Haberman
17:49 Re: Updating multilib support after a compiler is built Ian Lance Taylor
17:41 Re: Updating multilib support after a compiler is built Basile Starynkevitch
17:30 Updating multilib support after a compiler is built Jon Beniston
15:24 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Sandeep Soni
15:04 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Diego Novillo
14:52 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Andrew Haley
14:47 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Steven Bosscher
14:46 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Dave Korn
14:42 Re: unrecognizable insn after adding clobbers Dave Korn
14:32 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Richard Guenther
14:30 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Basile Starynkevitch
14:24 Re: unrecognizable insn after adding clobbers Paulo J. Matos
14:18 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Steven Bosscher
14:13 Re: Does `-fwhole-program' make sense when compiling shared libraries? Jan Hubicka
14:09 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Diego Novillo
14:06 Re: unrecognizable insn after adding clobbers Dave Korn
14:00 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Michael Matz
13:58 Re: Does `-fwhole-program' make sense when compiling shared libraries? Dave Korn
13:18 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Diego Novillo
12:01 unrecognizable insn after adding clobbers Paulo J. Matos
08:39 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Andrew Haley
03:25 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Sandeep Soni

May 17, 2010
21:33 Re: Does `-fwhole-program' make sense when compiling shared libraries? Jan Hubicka
21:04 Re: Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Andrew Haley
20:22 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Ian Lance Taylor
20:21 Design Considerations of GIMPLE Front End Sandeep Soni
18:33 Re: libgcc2 Ian Lance Taylor
18:24 Re: Does `-fwhole-program' make sense when compiling shared libraries? Joe Buck
17:57 Re: Does `-fwhole-program' make sense when compiling shared libraries? Toon Moene
17:49 Does `-fwhole-program' make sense when compiling shared libraries? Dave Korn
17:28 Re: Adding "soft-fp" support to a new target David Edelsohn
16:36 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Andrew MacLeod
16:23 Re: libgcc2 EggenmÃller Bernd
14:55 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Michael Matz
14:42 Re: FW: [Bug c/44166] New: -fvisibility=protected doesn't work? Dave Korn
14:24 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Michael Matz
14:09 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Andrew MacLeod
14:05 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Ian Lance Taylor
13:56 Re: lto and compile flag associations Richard Guenther
13:50 Re: lto and compile flag associations Diego Novillo
13:49 Re: lto and compile flag associations Diego Novillo
13:48 Re: lto and compile flag associations Jack Howarth
13:47 FW: [Bug c/44166] New: -fvisibility=protected doesn't work? Jay K
13:34 Re: lto and compile flag associations Richard Guenther
13:21 Re: lto and compile flag associations Jack Howarth
13:12 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Michael Matz
13:09 RE: Adding "soft-fp" support to a new target Rathish C
12:50 Re: lto and compile flag associations Richard Guenther
12:46 Re: lto and compile flag associations Diego Novillo
12:39 Re: lto and compile flag associations Richard Guenther
12:28 Re: lto and compile flag associations Diego Novillo
11:49 Re: build flags/options mike
11:46 Re: build flags/options Richard Guenther
11:44 build flags/options mike
09:51 Re: lto and compile flag associations Richard Guenther
06:45 Performance optimizations for Intel Core 2 and Core i7 processors Maxim Kuvyrkov
03:18 lto and compile flag associations Jack Howarth

May 16, 2010
23:58 Re: Clobbering two registers Paulo J. Matos
22:49 gcc-4.3-20100516 is now available gccadmin

May 15, 2010
22:50 gcc-4.6-20100515 is now available gccadmin
09:47 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Toon Moene
09:08 Re: arm-elf float-abi defaults... Richard Earnshaw
05:51 Re: data type 'struct loop' in MELT Basile Starynkevitch
01:02 Re: arm-elf float-abi defaults... Joseph S. Myers

May 14, 2010
22:33 Re: GIMPLE types merging in LTO compiler Jan Hubicka
20:51 Re: arm-elf float-abi defaults... DJ Delorie
20:39 Re: arm-elf float-abi defaults... Mark Mitchell
20:34 Re: arm-elf float-abi defaults... DJ Delorie
20:29 Re: arm-elf float-abi defaults... Mark Mitchell
20:26 data type 'struct loop' in MELT Michael Raitza
20:21 Re: arm-elf float-abi defaults... DJ Delorie
20:21 Re: GIMPLE types merging in LTO compiler Richard Guenther
19:36 Re: GIMPLE types merging in LTO compiler Eric Botcazou
19:18 Re: GCC seem output error messages in UTF8.Dev-cpp cant show it.Can this change in target declaration ? Jonathan Wakely
17:26 Re: arm-elf float-abi defaults... Mark Mitchell
17:22 Re: arm-elf float-abi defaults... DJ Delorie
16:31 GCC 4.3.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Guenther
13:40 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Richard Guenther
13:34 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Toon Moene
13:11 Re: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-14) Richard Guenther
13:10 Re: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-14) Steven Bosscher
13:04 GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-14) Richard Guenther
12:06 GCC seem output error messages in UTF8.Dev-cpp cant show it.Can this change in target declaration ? Bernd Roesch
11:52 Re: Tree Browser Diego Novillo
11:50 Re: GIMPLE types merging in LTO compiler Richard Guenther
11:43 Re: Machine description question Hariharan Sandanagobalane
11:35 RE: Machine description question Bingfeng Mei
11:27 GIMPLE types merging in LTO compiler Eric Botcazou
11:25 Re: Machine description question Hariharan Sandanagobalane
11:19 Re: Tree Browser Richard Guenther

May 13, 2010
23:06 FAQ conflict Todd Rinaldo
22:56 gcc-4.5-20100513 is now available gccadmin
21:45 Re: Tree Browser Diego Novillo
21:29 Re: [RFC] Introduce -Ofast Diego Novillo
21:20 Re: CLI-FE merge 4.3 to 4.5 Diego Novillo
20:00 Re: mips secondary reload question Richard Sandiford
19:12 Re: arm-elf float-abi defaults... Mark Mitchell
16:12 Re: libgcc2 EggenmÃller Bernd
15:50 Re: libgcc2 Andrew Pinski
15:46 Re: libgcc2 EggenmÃller Bernd
14:21 Re: Adding "soft-fp" support to a new target David Edelsohn
12:20 RE: Machine description question Bingfeng Mei
11:11 Adding "soft-fp" support to a new target Rathish C
09:17 Re: Machine description question Hariharan Sandanagobalane
02:28 mips secondary reload question Amker.Cheng

May 12, 2010
20:12 Re: Different flags for building plugins and gcc. IainS
20:01 Re: Different flags for building plugins and gcc. Ian Lance Taylor
19:53 PING -- MicroBlaze target support patches Michael Eager
19:44 Different flags for building plugins and gcc. IainS
17:47 Re: Clobbering two registers Ian Lance Taylor
16:39 Re: Coverage of backend rules Paulo J. Matos
16:20 RE: Machine description question Bingfeng Mei
16:17 Clobbering two registers Paulo J. Matos
15:39 Re: Machine description question Hariharan Sandanagobalane
14:30 Re: Draft SH uClinux FDPIC ABI Joseph S. Myers
13:52 Freescale hc11/12 port extension to s12x / xgate James Murray
13:20 Re: libgcc2 Ian Lance Taylor
13:10 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Andrew MacLeod
12:12 libgcc2 Eggenmüller Bernd
11:59 RE: Machine description question Bingfeng Mei
11:56 Re: Build Error mike
10:17 Machine description question Hariharan
05:21 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Miles Bader

May 11, 2010
22:47 gcc-4.4-20100511 is now available gccadmin
21:40 arm-elf float-abi defaults... DJ Delorie
21:10 Re: Building GCC & CFLAGS settings Steve Ellcey
20:47 Re: [sysadmin@gnu.org: [gnu.org #572859] [gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org: ezmlm warning]] Joe Buck
20:12 [sysadmin@gnu.org: [gnu.org #572859] [gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org: ezmlm warning]] Alfred M. Szmidt
19:01 Re: A branch for 256bit vectorizer Jason Merrill
18:28 Re: A branch for 256bit vectorizer H.J. Lu
16:48 Re: A branch for 256bit vectorizer Andreas Schwab
16:41 Re: A branch for 256bit vectorizer Jason Merrill
15:21 Re: A branch for 256bit vectorizer H.J. Lu
14:49 Re: A branch for 256bit vectorizer Jason Merrill
14:30 A branch for 256bit vectorizer H.J. Lu
14:29 Re: rep prefix doesn't work with Solaris 2.9 Sun assembler Richard Kenner
14:28 Re: Coverage of backend rules Ian Lance Taylor
14:25 Re: optimizing a DSO Marc Glisse
14:25 Re: Build Error Sandeep Soni
14:23 Re: rep prefix doesn't work with Solaris 2.9 Sun assembler Ian Lance Taylor
13:59 Re: C/C++ AST Basile Starynkevitch
13:52 Re: optimizing a DSO Ian Lance Taylor
13:00 Re: Build Error Diego Novillo
12:49 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Andrew MacLeod
12:35 Coverage of backend rules Paulo J. Matos
11:57 Re: A question regarding bundling and NOPs insertion for VLIW architecture Alexander Monakov
11:39 Re: optimizing a DSO Marc Glisse
11:08 RE: rep prefix doesn't work with Solaris 2.9 Sun assembler Jay K
10:52 A question regarding bundling and NOPs insertion for VLIW architecture Revital1 Eres
09:34 C/C++ AST wolfgang8080
08:37 Re: rep prefix doesn't work with Solaris 2.9 Sun assembler Eric Botcazou
08:20 rep prefix doesn't work with Solaris 2.9 Sun assembler Jay K
06:41 Re: optimizing a DSO Jakub Jelinek
06:20 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Miles Bader
03:42 Is it safe to use $t0 when handling call clobbered registers (on MIPS) Amker.Cheng
03:36 Re: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target Mark Mitchell
02:44 Re: a peculiar fpload problem on an inferior processor Amker.Cheng
00:18 Re: -disable-fixincludes doesn't quite work, minor Ian Lance Taylor
00:16 Re: optimizing a DSO Ian Lance Taylor

May 10, 2010
22:45 RE: -disable-fixincludes doesn't quite work, minor Jay K
19:43 Re: alias of hidden function Jack Howarth
18:50 optimizing a DSO Vivek Verma
18:11 Re: profile mode output analysis (call stacks to source code mapping) Silvius Rus
17:23 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Andrew MacLeod
16:50 Re: -disable-fixincludes doesn't quite work, minor Ian Lance Taylor
16:00 Re: alias of hidden function Dave Korn
15:56 Re: alias of hidden function Dave Korn
15:19 Re: alias of hidden function Jack Howarth
14:58 Re: alias of hidden function Dave Korn
14:32 CLI-FE merge 4.3 to 4.5 Kevin Williams
13:30 alias of hidden function Jack Howarth
11:56 32 Bit Backend with 3 Registers Eggenmüller Bernd
09:12 RE: pic+64bit+sun assembler+unwind-tables => illegal cross section subtraction Marc Glisse
07:50 Re: Compile times for gcc with ppl/cloog backened? ajmcello
07:42 RE: pic+64bit+sun assembler+unwind-tables => illegal cross section subtraction Jay K
07:23 -disable-fixincludes doesn't quite work, minor Jay K
04:43 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
04:40 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Ian Lance Taylor
03:17 RE: pic+64bit+sun assembler+unwind-tables => illegal cross section subtraction Jay K
01:02 RE: pic+64bit+sun assembler+unwind-tables => illegal cross section subtraction Jay K
00:48 Re: pic+64bit+sun assembler+unwind-tables => illegal cross section subtraction Andrew Pinski
00:42 pic+64bit+sun assembler+unwind-tables => illegal cross section subtraction Jay K

May 09, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.3-20100509 is now available gccadmin
19:54 Re: Broken GCC mirror sites Gerald Pfeifer
15:36 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
10:22 Re: Compile times for gcc with ppl/cloog backened? Richard Guenther
07:34 Re: Compile times for gcc with ppl/cloog backened? Tobias Grosser
03:09 Compile times for gcc with ppl/cloog backened? ajmcello

May 08, 2010
22:51 gcc-4.6-20100508 is now available gccadmin
20:18 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Albert Cohen
14:38 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Jean-Marc Bourguet
09:36 Re: What is the best way to resolve ARM alignment issues for large modules? Mikael Pettersson
09:16 Re: What is the best way to resolve ARM alignment issues for large modules? Martin Guy
07:12 Re: builtin ffs vs. renamed ffs (vms-crtl.h) Andrew Pinski
06:52 Re: a peculiar fpload problem on an inferior processor Amker.Cheng
06:29 vmsdbgout.c int-to-enum cast and #define globalref Jay K
06:20 builtin ffs vs. renamed ffs (vms-crtl.h) Jay K
03:45 ANNOUNCEMENT : Workshop on Essential Abstractions in GCC, 2010. Prashant Rawat

May 07, 2010
22:41 What is the best way to resolve ARM alignment issues for large modules? Shaun Pinney
21:16 Re: where are caller-save addresses legitimized? Jeff Law
20:54 Re: where are caller-save addresses legitimized? Greg McGary
14:39 [Fwd: Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc] Andrew MacLeod
14:26 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Ian Lance Taylor
14:09 profile mode output analysis (call stacks to source code mapping) Karel Gardas
13:59 Re: [RFC] Introduce -Ofast Mark Mitchell
13:55 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Mark Mitchell
13:45 Re: a peculiar fpload problem on an inferior processor Dave Korn
13:27 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Andrew MacLeod
11:04 Re: a peculiar fpload problem on an inferior processor Amker.Cheng
09:20 generating MELT documentation from MELT sources. Basile Starynkevitch
09:15 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Richard Guenther
03:46 Re: [RFC] Introduce -Ofast Dave Korn

May 06, 2010
22:56 gcc-4.5-20100506 is now available gccadmin
22:32 Re: Broken GCC mirror sites Krzysztof Åelechowski
22:04 [Fwd: Cron <bernie@bombadil> nice ionice -n6 /home/bernie/bin/git-update-toolchain.sh] Bernie Innocenti
22:02 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Andrew MacLeod
20:40 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Ian Lance Taylor
20:36 Re: role of "register" C keyword? Daniel Jacobowitz
20:33 Re: role of "register" C keyword? Jakub Jelinek
20:26 Re: [RFC] Introduce -Ofast Ian Lance Taylor
20:23 Re: Broken GCC mirror sites Holger Weiß
20:22 Re: role of "register" C keyword? Ian Lance Taylor
20:19 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
20:14 Re: Broken GCC mirror sites Eberhard Moenkeberg
20:00 Broken GCC mirror sites Krzysztof Åelechowski
19:20 Re: role of "register" C keyword? Toon Moene
18:35 Re: role of "register" C keyword? Jonathan Wakely
16:44 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
16:23 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Andrew MacLeod
16:12 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Andrew MacLeod
16:11 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Richard Guenther
15:54 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Joseph S. Myers
15:51 Re: C++0x Memory model and gcc Richard Guenther
15:43 C++0x Memory model and gcc Andrew MacLeod
15:22 Re: [RFC] Introduce -Ofast Tobias Burnus
14:24 [RFC] Introduce -Ofast Richard Guenther
12:16 role of "register" C keyword? Basile Starynkevitch
11:51 Re: Build report for gcc-4.5.0 - i686-pc-cygwin m68k-unknown-elf Joel Sherrill
10:31 Re: a peculiar fpload problem on an inferior processor Dave Korn
09:57 Re: scheduling on VLIW architecture Steven Bosscher
09:47 scheduling on VLIW architecture roy rosen
09:47 Build report for gcc-4.5.0 - i686-pc-cygwin m68k-unknown-elf Alexandr Yeremenko
09:08 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
09:00 a peculiar fpload problem on an inferior processor Amker.Cheng
08:25 Re: Building GCC & CFLAGS settings Andreas Schwab
07:45 gcc/resource.h conflicts with sysroot/usr/include/resource.h (alpha-dec-vms) Jay K
04:27 Re: where are caller-save addresses legitimized? Jeff Law
03:35 Re: where are caller-save addresses legitimized? Greg McGary
03:21 Re: where are caller-save addresses legitimized? Jeff Law

May 05, 2010
23:50 Re: Building GCC & CFLAGS settings Steve Ellcey
23:45 where are caller-save addresses legitimized? Greg McGary
23:17 Re: Building GCC & CFLAGS settings Dave Korn
19:51 Re: Building GCC & CFLAGS settings H.J. Lu
19:41 Re: Building GCC & CFLAGS settings Basile Starynkevitch
17:42 Re: Building GCC & CFLAGS settings H.J. Lu
17:29 Re: more .o vs. .obj targeting VMS Ralf Wildenhues
17:18 Building GCC & CFLAGS settings Steve Ellcey
16:34 Adding function calls before and after a CALL_EXPR Saleel Kudchadker
16:11 more .o vs. .obj targeting VMS Jay K
12:48 RE: gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion Jay K
10:13 RE: gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion Jay K
10:12 RE: gcc4.5.0/libiberty/pex-common.h missing pid_t on vms Jay K

May 04, 2010
22:49 gcc-4.4-20100504 is now available gccadmin
20:51 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:12 Tree Browser Wolfgang kaifler
18:04 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
16:40 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
16:05 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
15:49 Re: peephole optimizations Jeff Law
15:04 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
14:29 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
12:01 RE: branch probabilities on multiway branches Rahul Kharche
11:53 Re: -pthread Joseph S. Myers
10:23 Re: -pthread Alexey Salmin
07:55 Re: -pthread Eric Botcazou
07:39 Re: -pthread Ian Lance Taylor
07:37 Re: peephole optimizations Ian Lance Taylor
07:18 Re: peephole optimizations roy rosen
07:13 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Theodore Papadopoulo
06:21 -pthread Magnus Fromreide
05:31 Re: split lui_movf pattern on mips? Amker.Cheng
03:16 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor

May 03, 2010
21:23 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
20:41 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
20:22 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
20:19 Re: anonymous struct Pedro Pedruzzi
20:16 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
20:11 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
20:06 Re: peephole optimizations Ian Lance Taylor
20:03 Re: gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion Ian Lance Taylor
20:02 Re: gcc4.5.0/libiberty/pex-common.h missing pid_t on vms Ian Lance Taylor
20:00 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
19:37 Re: anonymous struct Michael Witten
19:20 Re: anonymous struct wuyin
16:53 [Fwd: Re: Parallelized loads and widening mults cont:ed (was: Re: GCC porting tutorials)] Jonas Paulsson
13:11 Re: static linking of pthread crashes with segfault Jonathan Wakely
12:46 peephole optimizations roy rosen
12:43 Re: compile problems with gcc 4.5.0 Jonathan Wakely
12:15 Re: Plan for gc-improv merge Laurynas Biveinis
11:58 internal compiler error compiling gmp/get_d/gmpn_get_d for alpha-dec-vms Jay K
11:54 RE: gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion Jay K
11:29 gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion Jay K
11:05 gcc4.5.0/libiberty/pex-common.h missing pid_t on vms Jay K
10:46 gcc-4.5.0 internal compiler error on alpha-dec-vms compiling libiberty/regex.c without -mbwx Jay K
10:44 Re: gcc 4.5.0 stddef.h clobbers __size_t with #define, breaks VMS (code already avoids similar on FreeBSD) Tristan Gingold
10:42 Re: gcc 4.5.0 vms-gcc_shell_handler.c needs #define __NEW_STARLET Tristan Gingold
10:33 gcc 4.5.0 stddef.h clobbers __size_t with #define, breaks VMS (code already avoids similar on FreeBSD) Jay K
10:22 Re: Question about Machine Description yazdanbakhsh
10:02 gcc 4.5.0 vms-gcc_shell_handler.c needs #define __NEW_STARLET Jay K
09:43 compile problems with gcc 4.5.0 Klaus Rudolph
09:38 static linking of pthread crashes with segfault Klaus Rudolph
09:23 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Richard Guenther
04:57 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
03:47 anonymous struct wuyin

May 02, 2010
22:49 gcc-4.3-20100502 is now available gccadmin
21:59 Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Dave Korn
21:38 LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD) Gerald Pfeifer
19:22 Re: GCC 4.4.4 Released Dennis Clarke
19:12 Re: GCC 4.4.4 Released Jakub Jelinek
17:52 Re: cpplib utf8, status? Joseph S. Myers
17:41 Re: GCC 4.4.4 Released Dennis Clarke
17:00 Re: cpplib utf8, status? Gerald Pfeifer
16:18 GCC 4.4.4 Released Jakub Jelinek
15:32 Re: Function definition within function Nicholas Sherlock
14:38 Re: Function definition within function Robert Dewar
14:34 Function definition within function renato . astorino
13:46 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
07:04 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li

May 01, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.6-20100501 is now available gccadmin
17:23 Re: split lui_movf pattern on mips? Richard Sandiford
10:14 Re: The usage of the "clobber "match_scratch"" redriver jiang
09:36 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
07:02 Re: gcc.3.4.6 vs. gcc-4.3.2 re: pseudo instructions & bus error Ian Lance Taylor
00:59 gcc.3.4.6 vs. gcc-4.3.2 re: pseudo instructions & bus error SHANE MILLER, BLOOMBERG/ 731 L
00:07 Re: memcpy(p,p,len) Joe Buck


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3