This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: may_be_unaligned_p bug?

> Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c	(revision 158148)
> +++ tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c	(working copy)
> @@ -1546,6 +1546,9 @@ may_be_unaligned_p (tree ref, tree step)
>
>  	  || bitpos % BITS_PER_UNIT != 0)
>
>  	return true;
>
> +      if (toffset && !constant_multiple_of (toffset, al, &mul))
> +	return true;
> +
>        if (!constant_multiple_of (step, al, &mul))
>  	return true;
>      }

constant_multiple_of is too restrictive though, something like:

Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
===================================================================
--- tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c	(revision 158148)
+++ tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c	(working copy)
@@ -1537,16 +1537,18 @@ may_be_unaligned_p (tree ref, tree step)
 
   if (mode != BLKmode)
     {
-      double_int mul;
-      tree al = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (step),
-			       GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode) / BITS_PER_UNIT);
+      unsigned mode_align = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode);
 
-      if (base_align < GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode)
-	  || bitpos % GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode) != 0
-	  || bitpos % BITS_PER_UNIT != 0)
+      if (base_align < mode_align
+	  || (bitpos % mode_align) != 0
+	  || (bitpos % BITS_PER_UNIT) != 0)
 	return true;
 
-      if (!constant_multiple_of (step, al, &mul))
+      if (toffset
+	  && (highest_pow2_factor (toffset) * BITS_PER_UNIT) < mode_align)
+	return true;
+
+      if ((highest_pow2_factor (step) * BITS_PER_UNIT) < mode_align)
 	return true;
     }
 
-- 
Eric Botcazou
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]