This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: how to "parse" gcc -v output
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> How would g++ know that part of the objects were from Fortran sources?
By looking for undefined symbols matching patterns for symbols from
libgfortran.
> Maybe from a different (non-GCC) Fortran compiler, that needs a
> different set of libraries at link time? I don't see how this
I don't see how querying GCC is ever going to help with this case.
> Also, in order to actually be able to run programs, libtool needs to
> also be able to ask for paths missing in the run paths, so they can be
> added to the program *if the user so desires* and if they are not in the
> default run path.
(That is not a case mentioned in your original message so was not covered
by my previous reply.)
The interface -print-search-dirs already exists; you can use it along with
the multilib options to the compiler to get the list of directories it
searches for the selected multilib. That's better than parsing the
commands by which the compiler runs the linker. Both will involve a long
list of paths, most of which are not relevant and involve ../ parts you'll
want to resolve before embedding.
Embedding runpaths seems like a case for an ld option or options to
specify which directories (in which shared libraries are found) do or do
not get paths embedded and how those paths are remapped if they are
embedded.
I think extracting compiler/linker *internal commands* and trying to
process or adapt them is inherently fragile and liable to break whenever
new compiler/linker options (internal or otherwise) are added. If
possible the aim should be to work out user-friendly interfaces for direct
GCC users and have libtool use the same interfaces while expecting how
they are implemented to change over time. Interfaces by which GCC does
things (e.g. link a shared library for the multilib implied by the given
options) seem safer than interfaces where it gives information (if you ask
it for directories and lists of libraries, you might then find that
interface inadequate for handling per-library choice of static or shared
libraries, for example). Linking is a complicated iterative process that
can involve collect2 rerunning the compiler, making it hard for the driver
ever to give an answer about how something would be linked and be sure
that it would still be valid when libtool makes some unspecified change to
the link process (and if it isn't making such a change, it could just let
the driver do the linking instead of asking it questions).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com